West Chester Stormwater Assessment Fee Planning Process Ernie B. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

West Chester Stormwater Assessment Fee Planning Process

Ernie B. McNeely, Borough Manager

Who we are?

• West Chester Borough – celebrated a bicentennial in 1999.
• Population 18,461 according to the 2010 Census – that

counts about 3500 West Chester University students in on campus dorms but misses about 4000 students living in

• ff-campus apartments.
• Host to West Chester University, Chester County Hospital

(partial) and the county seat for Chester County – 34% tax exempt.

• West Chester University 14,000 students part of State

System of Higher Education.

• Out of over 6700 housing units - 63% are rental.
• The Borough is 1.8 sq. miles so density of over 10,000

persons per square mile and mostly fully developed so very little room for new development unless it is redevelopment – not growing new tax base.

• Home Rule community since 1994.

How we began?

• West Chester participates as a member in the National

League of Cities (NLC), Pennsylvania Municipal League (PML) & the International City-County Management Association (ICMA). Through those organizations we learned about stormwater utilities in other states funding stormwater needs. Began discussing the possibility in West Chester as early as 2009.

• Citizens Financial Advisory Committee in 2011 was made

aware of the device and in their report recommended Council consider the stormwater fee as a means of financing existing and needed stormwater services.

• It became increasingly evident with MS4 permit

requirements and TMDL standards issued for Goose Creek (part of Chester Creek) that regulatory requirements for stormwater management were becoming ever more stringent and costly.

• Several stormsewer collapses combined with an aggressive

effort to televise existing stormsewers (old brick storms) produced evidence that we needed to do far more infrastructure repair and replacement than we had been doing or what the budget could finance.

How we began….continued

• Began watching the stormwater assessment

adoption process in Philadelphia, Mt. Lebanon Twp., Meadville City and Radnor Twp.

• We realized that funding stormwater activities,

growing regulatory requirements and long

• verdue capital infrastructure renewal needs

with large real estate tax increases would be patently unfair since only 66% of our property pays real estate tax, the real estate tax burden bears no relationship to ability to pay and heavily impacts those on fixed incomes. A stormwater fee is designed to be fair and reflect (using impervious surface) the amount

• f stormwater a property is contributing to the

stormwater that must be managed.

• Verified legal right to enact a stormwater

assessment fee as a Home Rule community.

The Process- Consultant Proposals submitted February 6, 2013

• Purpose of the feasibility study is to review West Chester

Borough’s existing storm water management program, to make recommendations for future directions and changes, and to assess the feasibility of funding the program with a storm water assessment / utility user fee.

• What is the Borough currently doing in terms of storm water

management?

• What are the storm water related problems, issues, needs,

resources, and opportunities currently faced by the Borough?

• What storm water program priorities including new regulatory

requirements should guide the Borough in the next five to ten years?

• What specific program improvements should be made and

what will be the costs?

• What is (are) the best way(s) to pay for these program

improvements?

• How should the funding method(s) be implemented?

The Process…..continued

• Stakeholder and public participation in the feasibility study required.
• Basic elements of a storm water management program, which must be

addressed by the Program Development Task, include both operational and financial functions. Operations and Maintenance Regulation and Enforcement Engineering and Planning Capital Construction Administration and Finance Regulatory Compliance Billing and Collections

• Identification of the steps required to implement a storm water

assessment utility fee based on the plan prepared during the process.

• Consultants required to possess and clearly identify their experience with

guiding other municipalities through the design and implementation process for development of a storm water management assessment fee/utility.

• Consultants provide phased approach with pricing for each phase of the

development process. Authorization required to proceed from each phase to the next.

• Project to take from 9 months to a year to complete.

RFP Results

Firm Total Project

Raftelis Financial Consultants Inc. $140,000 Meliora Design LLC./Brandywine Conservancy/ $ 97,800 Municipal & Financial Services Group CH2M Hill Inc. $204,710 AMEC Environ. & Infrastructure Inc./Gilmore Assoc. $214,729 Contract was awarded to CH2M Hill Inc. in March 2013.

The Experience

• An advisory committee was formed including

stakeholders representing residents, business, West Chester University, Chester County Hospital, Chester County Government, churches, Borough Council, Borough staff and rental property owners.

• Three Advisory Committee Meetings each 3 hours in

length have been held to date.

• Much time is spent initially bringing an Advisory

Committee up to speed on the language of stormwater; ie. NPDES, MS4 Permits, impervious coverage, retention/detention systems and the interplay of regulatory bodies.

• The task of identifying past and current stormwater

services and capital investment is fairly straightforward while settling on needed future services and capital needs is more subjective and open for disagreement.

The Experience…..continued

• Identifying a service level to fund with the

stormwater assessment fee becomes even more difficult once service levels have been translated into proposed rates.

• Discussions on rate setting tend to gravitate

to how to create a rate schedule that is both fair and not too complex to administer along with how to keep the rate as low as possible.

• One more advisory committee meeting is

scheduled before a public presentation to Borough Council will be held.

• Unable to predict the outcome of either the

Advisory Committee decisions or the eventual Borough Council action on the recommendations.