Well Child Tamariki Ora Review WCTO Symposium May 2019 E rima ng - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

well child tamariki ora review
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Well Child Tamariki Ora Review WCTO Symposium May 2019 E rima ng - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Well Child Tamariki Ora Review WCTO Symposium May 2019 E rima ng pou o Well Child Tamariki Ora Review Ways of working Poutokomanawa: Whakatauki Achieving equity Co- lead (Mori MoH/DHB) Healthy futures Pae ora WCTO Review Purpose


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Well Child Tamariki Ora Review

WCTO Symposium May 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

E rima ngā pou o Well Child Tamariki Ora Review

Poutokomanawa: Whakatauki Healthy futures – Pae ora Achieving equity Co-lead (Māori –MoH/DHB) Ways of working

slide-3
SLIDE 3

WCTO Review Purpose

To review and redesign a WCTO programme that:

  • Contributes to improved and equitable outcomes for tamariki and

whānau

  • Supports tamariki and whānau at important points across the lifecourse
  • Delivers an accessible and integrated whānau-centred service offering

to support tamariki and their whānau

  • Has the right supports to delivery a high quality and sustainable

programme

slide-4
SLIDE 4

WCTO Review Rationale

1. Inequity in coverage and outcomes 2. Poor knowledge of what whanau want 3. Population and demographic changes 4. Evidence and Government direction 5. Opportunities for integration 6. Quality and sustainability concerns 7. Inadequate data and insights

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Coverage/access of new babies

12% 14% 9% 11% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Māori Pacific Non-Māori/Pacific Quintile 5

Percentage of babies not receiving any contacts 20 17/ 18

57% 64% 72% 63% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Māori Pacific Non-Māori/Pacific Quintile 5

Percentage of babies referred from m aternity to WCTO by 28 days 20 17/ 18

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Timeliness and Completeness of Core Contacts

76% 77% 84% 78% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Māori Pacific Non-Māori/Pacific Quintile 5

Percentage of babies that receive WCTO Core 1 by 50 days 20 17/ 18

66% 63% 80% 68% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% Māori Pacific Non-Māori/Pacific Quintile 5

Percentage of infants that receive all core contacts in the first year of life 20 17/ 18

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Overview of Review

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Review planning Early Analysis Forming options Implementation planning Formative engagement Ongoing engagement

slide-8
SLIDE 8

WCTO Review Questions

  • What outcomes should a WCTO programme contribute to for tamariki

and whānau?

  • What services should be delivered within the WCTO programme to

support tamariki and whānau across the lifecourse?

  • How should the WCTO service offering be delivered to best support

tamariki and whānau?

  • What are the critical enablers to deliver a high quality and sustainable

WCTO programme?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

1.What services and support should a WCTO programme offer tamariki and whānau?

ON GOING ENGAGEMENT HAVE YOUR SAY

slide-10
SLIDE 10

1.What services and support should a WCTO programme offer tamariki and whānau?

What we know or have heard about the current programme: Universal Core contacts – timing and number Universal Core contacts – content including screening tools Universal Core contacts – need for the application of screening/surveillance consideration to design Mismatch between current programme design and services wanted by parents and whanau Mismatch between current programme design and evidence and/or government direction Additional contacts/services – allocation, intensity, timing and content Shift in focus of schedule and scope to deliver brief interventions (Content) Parenting Education and Support elements not clearly defined Lack of alignment between service offering across service providers and other agencies Availability of referred services

slide-11
SLIDE 11

What do you need to deliver a high quality WCTO service?

2.What do you need to deliver a high quality Well Child Tamariki Ora Service? (Enabled)

What we know or have heard about the current programme: Funding Pressures, inequity, no agreed formula, mismatch to requirements Contracting Siloed, Outputs vs outcomes, short terms, mixed model across providers, lack integration Workforce Isolated, inequity in access to professional development, issues with qualifications, lack integration Quality Improvement Minimal investment in quality improvement, no agreed quality standards for providers/services, lack of consumer and/or workforce insights Information and Monitoring No national information system, lack of quality data available to support programme delivery and monitoring, lack of data sharing Coordination and Management Coordination, follow up, recall etc done within individual services and/or providers, not across programme as a whole, in ability to monitor coverage, programme lacks essential infrastructure

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What do you need to deliver a high quality WCTO service?

  • 3. How should services and support be offered to tamariki and whānau?

What we know or have heard about the current programme: Not proportionate enough Too one-size fits all Inequality and Inequity in access Mismatch between current programme design and services wanted by parents and whanau – integrated/whanau centred Mismatch between current programme design and evidence and/or government direction Lack of specific cultural services such as kaupapa Maori and need to improve cultural responsiveness of mainstream services More diversity in delivery modes and settings Lack of alignment between service offering across service providers and other agencies Service models, hours and settings need to match with parent and whanau need Focus needs to be on relationship building, whanau centred, integration Service handovers not managed well Diversity in workforce needed (multidisciplinary and culturally)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What do you need to deliver a high quality WCTO service?

4.What outcomes should a WCTO programme contribute to for tamariki and whānau?

What we know or have heard about the current programme: Programme Scope (ages and stages and health vs social) Programme tries to do all (screening, education and support ) Inequity in current outcomes Clarity on programme outcomes needed Mismatch between current programme design and outcomes wanted by parents and whanau Mismatch between current programme design and evidence and/or government direction Lack of alignment between outcomes across agencies

slide-14
SLIDE 14

What do you need to deliver a high quality WCTO service?

4.

Updates and Contacts

Well Child Tamariki Ora review will be featured in Kotahi te Tīma, the Ministry’s monthly stakeholder update. Subscribe to Kotahi te Tīma

  • n the Ministry of Health Website

wcto@health.govt.nz