Welcome to the Mississauga Halton LHIN Governance to Governance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

welcome to the mississauga halton lhin
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Welcome to the Mississauga Halton LHIN Governance to Governance - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Welcome to the Mississauga Halton LHIN Governance to Governance Session: Health Links October 3, 2013 Please enjoy something to eat and introduce yourselves to others seated at your table. The session will begin at 6 P.M. Mississauga Halton


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Welcome to the Mississauga Halton LHIN

Governance to Governance Session: Health Links

October 3, 2013

Please enjoy something to eat and introduce yourselves to others seated at your table. The session will begin at 6 P.M.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Mississauga Halton LHIN

Governance to Governance Session

October 3, 2013

Guest Speaker:

Helen Angus, Associate Deputy Minister Transformation Secretariat, MOHLTC

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Agenda

3

Agenda Item Lead Time Welcome Graeme Goebelle Chair, MH LHIN Board of Directors 2 minutes Introduction of Guest Speaker Bill MacLeod CEO, Mississauga Halton LHIN 3 minutes Provincial Overview of Health Links Helen Angus Associate Deputy Minister, Transformation Secretariat Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care 20 minutes Local Approach and Development Liane Fernandes Senior Director Health System Development & Community Engagement, MH LHIN 15 minutes Our Health Links, Our Opportunity – Facilitated Discussion (including Break) Carie Gall and Susan Swartzack Senior Leads, Health System Development, MH LHIN 55 minutes Report from Community Governance Consultation Group Jeannie Collins-Ardern Co-Chair, CGCG Chair, Links2Care 20 minutes Closing Remarks Graeme Goebelle Chair, MH LHIN Board of Directors 5 minutes

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Welcome

Graeme Goebelle Chair Board of Directors Mississauga Halton LHIN

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Introduction of Helen Angus Associate Deputy Minister Transformation Secretariat Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

Bill MacLeod CEO Mississauga Halton LHIN

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Health System Transformation

Mississauga Halton LHIN: Governance to Governance October 3, 2013

slide-7
SLIDE 7

$Billions

The Fiscal challenge

Health care spending since 2003

20 25 30 35 40 45 50 03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15

A C T U A L P R O J E C T E D

2

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Current State

 Too many people relying on Emergency Rooms

instead of receiving the right care in the community

 Too many people are having trouble navigating

the system

 Too many ALC patients  Too many people being readmitted to hospital

within days of leaving hospital

3 3 3

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Our Vision

 To make Ontario the healthiest

place in North America to grow up and grow old

 A system focused on wellness  Faster access to family health

care that serves as the hub of their health care system

 Better integration and

accountability

4

slide-10
SLIDE 10

5

Leadership from theSector Enabling Environment

(Government)

Transforming System (Together)

What does it mean for the patient?  Better experience  Improved outcomes  Healthier lifestyles What does it mean for the system?  Fiscally sound system  Better quality of care

  • Health care is overflowing with opportunities for reform
  • Providers and organizations in the system are ready for change and eager to

contribute

The Opportunity

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Transforming the System

Health System Redesign allows for more flexible models of health care delivery which promote access and quality but also allows for services to be provided in a fiscally sustainable manner.

6

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Health System Funding Reform (HSFR):  Promotes quality, value and efficiency  Better reflects needs of the community  Promotes more equitable allocation of health care dollars  Optimizes health care investments  Adopts and learns from approaches used in other jurisdictions

Health System Funding Reform is a Key Component of Improving the System

7

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What are the Components of HSFR?

Quality-Based Procedures (QBP)

 (Price x Volume) + Quality -

evidence based clinical pathways ensure quality standards

 Opportunity for process

improvements, clinical re- design, improved outcomes, and enhanced experience

Hip Knee Chronic Kidney Disease Cataract

Health Based Allocation Model (HBAM)

 Inform funding allocations to health service providers  Management tool to assist with health system service

planning

8

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Specialized Clinics: ♦ Building on successful community clinics (e.g. Kensington Eye Institute), the Ministry will shift certain procedures (cataracts, colonoscopy, dialysis) into the most appropriate setting to get the best results for patients by expanding community-based Specialty Clinics ♦ Leverage competitive pricing model and quality-based procedure alignment through Health System Funding Reform (HSFR) where funding is based on the services provided through patient-centered care Community Services: Creation of Birth Centres ♦ Providing women with more choice

  • n where to have their babies

through two new midwife-led birth centres Care transition for Seniors: ♦ Helping seniors transition home sooner from the hospital while also providing higher levels of care to long-term care residents with complex needs ♦ Repositioning some Long Term Care capacity as short stay centres to manage complex care conditions in the short term before resuming home care

Better Use of Delivery Channels

9 9

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Making Community Health Links Happen

10

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Health Links: Partnering Around Patients

11

Model

  • f Care
  • New model of care at the clinical level, to improve patient outcomes, charging

providers with improving care coordination & integration at the patient level

Target Group

  • Initial focus on improving patient care and outcomes for people with complex

health conditions and seniors.

Initial Success

  • Regions are already exhibiting a high degree of collaboration; aim is to have

coverage across Ontario.

Role of LHIN’s

  • LHINs will continue to assist identifying Health Links, supporting their

development, and providing oversight for Health Links in their regions.

Looking Forward

  • Health Links will evolve to cover the entire province and expand beyond complex

patients.

Success

  • Greater coordination of care, improved outcomes, and better value for investment.
  • Individual care plans, improved access, improved satisfaction / experience.
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Initial Focus

  • High cost users are a small but diverse

group; typically have 2 key characteristics: – They receive treatment from multiple health care sectors; and/or – They have long lengths of stay in inpatient settings.

  • The average number of episodes & cost per

episode is similar for high cost and all users. However, high cost users access a larger number of health care sectors

  • Seniors represent the largest percentage of

patients/expenses & have the highest average cost per patient.

Proportion of Ontario Patients Proportion of Costs

  • Acute care, physician visits, & long-term care represent the largest percentage of expenses.

12

slide-18
SLIDE 18

13

37 Health Links

Population Coverage: 5,827,660

Total Number of High Users: 523,230

Over 650 Partners

  • The response to Health Links in year 1 has exceeded expectation
  • There is at least one Health Link in every LHIN and some LHINs have already

submitted proposals to ensure full coverage within their boundaries.

  • Future: 80+ Health Links, providing full coverage across the province

Health Links Today

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Care Coordination and Care Plans

  • Developing

common principles for coordinated care plans so all complex patients in Ontario have the same experience

  • Creating care plans

for complex patients through the expertise of an interprofessional health team Patient Engagement

  • Strong

involvement of patients, families and caregivers in all stages

  • Making the patient

a part of the development of his/her individual care plan

  • Incorporating

patient, caregiver and/or family perspectives into the coordinated care design process

Alignment of Initiatives and Resources

  • Making use of

existing resources to strengthen and align work

  • Working with

agencies and associations to strengthen

  • utreach and

champion the Health Links model

  • Funding to support

existing infrastructure and assets, and build

  • n existing

innovations EMR / IT

  • Leveraging

provincial assets for local solutions

  • Working with

electronic health providers to align current assets with Health Links needs

What Will Change Look Like?

14

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Increased collaboration among partners to

work together to identify new complex care patients, and provide support within the circle

  • f care
  • Of 37 Health Links, diversity in the leadership

and participation:

– 9 led by hospitals – 14 FHT led and 1 FHO led (primary care) – 6 CHCs – 3 CCACs – 4 Community Service Organizations

  • As Health Links develop, the cross-section of

providers will increase, providing many potential access points for users of the health care system

Bringing Partners to the Table

15

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Governance and Accountability in Health Links

  • Flexibility for health care providers

to work together based on needs of patients and communities

  • Health Links are accountable to

their LHINs

  • Leadership, governance and degree
  • f integration is flexible and based
  • n local requirements and

relationships

16

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Coordinated Care: the Heart of Health Links

Hospital Long-Term Care Homes Specialists Home Care Allied Health Professionals

Health Links

Primary Care Physicians Community Support Services Consistent Province Wide Principles Patient Engagement EMR/IT Mechanisms and Tools Others Coordinated Care

17

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Health Links Care Coordination Tool

  • Existing IT system being expanded to

assist Health Links in developing coordinated care plans

  • Tool will leverage existing assessment

records and add new functionality:

– Allow circle of care to store, modify, share coordinated care plans for patients – Include progress notes for patients – Provide access to organizational and circle of care providers

18

  • Working with the Ministry, the tool is currently being refined by members from

Health Links, LHINs, HQO, CCACs, CHCs, FHTs, and other providers

  • eHealth Liaison Branch plans to demonstrate the final product in five Health

Links in 2014

slide-24
SLIDE 24

19

Strong involvement of patients, families and caregivers in all stages Making the patient a part of the development of his/her individual care plan Incorporating patients, caregivers and/or families perspectives into the coordinated care design process

Patient Passport Guelph HLt Patient Family and Community Engagement Working Group SE Mississauga HLt Care Coordination Consultation South Georgian Bay HLt

Patient Engagement

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Early Success

  • Hamilton identified 322 frequent users of hospitals, 70 of which appear to be “chronic” high users
  • South Simcoe & Northern York Region identified 200 high users, 80% of them were over age 55

Patient Identification

  • Holding “case conferences” to discuss identified patients (e.g., Learning Circles in Hamilton, Living

Labs in Central West)

  • SE LHIN holding dialogues with providers to support participation and planning (in Quinte, over 55
  • rganizational representatives and 40 health and social service providers participating)

Provider Collaboration

  • North East Toronto created a patient advisory council
  • Guelph holding “what matters to me” interviews with over 300 patients
  • South Georgian Bay consulted more than 60 seniors in development of program

Patient Engagement

  • Developed draft templates for coordinated care plans (TC and Central LHIN)
  • Rural Kingston has created care plans for 25 of their patients, East Toronto has attached four

complex patient to a FHT, Hamilton creating care plans for their complex patients

  • Consulting on care planning pathways and processes (CW, SE, MH LHINs)

Care Planning

20

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Supporting & Enabling

Provincial Role

Alignment of Resources Indicators & Measurement IT Support Barrier Removal Leadership & Engagement Evaluation & Sharing Best Practices 21

  • The key is not about the province defining the “who” or the “how”.
  • The goal is for the province to define the “what” needs to be accomplished, to provide

the right supports, but allow local solutions to develop the “how” that can be expanded at scale

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Where We Are Going

  • Defining priorities
  • Starting with early

adopters

  • Working with partners
  • Fostering local

solutions

Creating & Building

  • What’s working and not
  • Collecting stories
  • Sharing best practices
  • Tailoring approach

Learning & Sharing

  • Coverage across

province

  • Seamless transitions

for patients

  • Strong provider

relationships across all sectors

Scaling Up & Sustaining

22

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Mississauga Halton Health Links

Governance to Governance Session Presentation

October 3, 2013 Liane Fernandes Senior Director, Health System Development & Community Engagement

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Objectives

  • To provide an overview and the status of Health Links planning

in the MH LHIN

  • To outline the strategic alignment of Health Links with MH LHIN

priorities

  • To get you excited about Health Links and promote discussion
  • n how Boards of Governors can influence the Health Link

agenda

7

slide-30
SLIDE 30

What is Health Links?

A new way of organizing health care services for people with the highest, most complex needs. Focus on improving connections among health providers across the continuum to coordinate care plans for these individuals. Help close the gaps that occur when a patient moves from one provider to another.

8

slide-31
SLIDE 31

9

The Goals of Health Links

The goals of Health Links are to: 1. Improve care delivery (e.g. appropriate system utilization, coordinated care) 2. Improve patient experience* 3. Deliver better value for money and reduce costs

*Focus initially is on high users of the health care system

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Multiple Conditions Frequent access at multiple entry points Sub-optimal, uncoordinated care Duplication of services

Less than positive patient experience

The Experience

  • f

High Users

10

slide-33
SLIDE 33

MH LHIN HEALTH LINKS PLANNING APPROACH

11

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Map of MH LHIN Health Links

12

Population based, integrated health care planning approach within local geographies with a focus on complex and at-risk individuals

1 2 4 3 5 6 7

slide-35
SLIDE 35

MH LHIN Health Links Engagement

  • Primary Care Engagement
  • Medical Rounds
  • Group Sessions
  • Office Calls
  • Community Think Tanks
  • Presentations/Meetings

13

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6

Initial Engagement Readiness Assessment Design and Business Case Health Link Kick Off Link Operations and Monitoring Health Link Evaluation

Health Link Implementation Planning Steps

(South) East Mississauga (early adopter) South Etobicoke Halton Hills South West Mississauga North West Mississauga Oakville Milton 14 14

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Health Links Provincial Indicators

(Joint accountability among partners)

1. Increase the number of complex patients and seniors with regular and timely access to a primary care provider 2. Ensure the development of coordinated care plans for all complex patients 3. Ensure primary care follow up within seven days of discharge from an acute care setting 4. Reduce avoidable ED visits for patients with conditions best managed elsewhere (CTAS IV and V) 5. Reduce admissions to hospitals 6. Reduce the time from primary care referral to specialist consultations 7. Reduce 30 day readmission to hospital 8. Reduce the time from referral to home care visits 9. Enhance the health system experience for patients with the greatest health needs

  • 10. Achieve an ALC rate of nine per cent
  • r less
  • 11. Reduce the average cost of delivering

health services to patients without compromising the quality of care

15

slide-38
SLIDE 38

STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT

16

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Mississauga Halton LHIN Vision

A seamless health system for our communities – promoting optimal health and delivering high quality care when and where needed.

In support of the provincial vision of ‘Making Ontario the healthiest place in North America to grow up and grow old’

17

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Mississauga Halton LHIN Priorities

18

slide-41
SLIDE 41

To improve patient experience To improve coordination of care To achieve better value for investment Targeting patients with complex needs (high users)

Milton Health Link Halton Hills Health Link Oakville Health Link North West Mississauga Health Link South West Mississauga Health Link (South) East Mississauga Health Link South Etobicoke Health Link

Accessible & Sustainable Health Care Optimal Health – Mental & Physical Family Health Care When You Need It Enhanced Community Capacity Enablers Shared Purpose MH LHIN Strategic Priorities Health Links Strategic Alignment High Quality Person-Centred Care

19

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Next Steps

  • Establish remaining Health Links by end of December
  • Identify Lead Partners and Collaborating Partners
  • Submit Readiness Assessments
  • Develop communication channels across the Health Links to

promote knowledge exchange, sharing and scalability

  • Evaluation Framework to help monitor and measure our

success, with a particular focus on primary care access

20

slide-43
SLIDE 43

We cannot solve the problems we face today by using the same kind

  • f thinking that created them.”
  • Albert Einstien

21

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Thank you

Liane Fernandes

Senior Director, Health System Development & Community Engagement Liane.Fernandes@lhins.on.ca

Carie Gall

Senior Lead, Health System Development – Halton Health Links Carie.Gall@lhins.on.ca

Susan Swartzack

Senior Lead, Health System Development – Mississauga & Etobicoke Health Links Susan.Swartzack@lhins.on.ca

22

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Facilitated Discussion

  • What are the barriers and challenges that prevent this person

from receiving optimal care & patient experience?

  • Consider your organization’s mandate:
  • How does this mandate align with the goals of Health Links?
  • What might need to change to support Health Links?
  • How do you as Governors or Executive Directors work together

to achieve the shared purpose of Health Links and improve the patient experience?

23

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Final Thoughts on Health Links

What will you do tomorrow to move Health Links from ideas into action?

24

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Community Governance Consultation Group

Jeannie Collins-Ardern Co-Chair Community Governance Consultation Group Chair, Links2Care

25

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Terms of Reference

  • Terms of Reference (available at Registration)

26

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Community Governance Survey Results

27

  • Survey sent to approximately 45 Community HSPs with 34

responses received.

  • Not all respondents answered all the questions and several did

not identify themselves or their organization.

  • The results were of great interest to the CGCG in terms of the

focus for the next year.

  • Following are some of the results
slide-50
SLIDE 50

Community Governance Survey Results

28

Answer Options Response Percent Response Count Represent community HSPs with the MH LHIN regarding G2G session development. 70.0% 21 Represent community HSPs with the MH LHIN regarding governance matters. 66.7% 20 Increase your HSP's profile within the MH LHIN. 63.3% 19 Distribute sample governance templates. 46.7% 14 Facilitate sharing among HSPs of resources and best practices for governance effectiveness. 46.7% 14 Provide HSPs with opportunities to participate in presentations and workshops. 43.3% 13 Provide a reference library (or web links) to governance literature. 40.0% 12 Provide governance training. 40.0% 12 Represent community HSPs with the MH LHIN regarding other matters aside from governance. 36.7% 11 Assist HSPs through accreditation by connecting them with similar accredited HSPs, sharing templates, etc. 36.7% 11 Other (Please provide details in the Comments box below.) 6.7% 2 5 30 30 4 Please indicate the roles that your organization would like the CGCG to fulfill. (Check all that apply.) Comments for Questions 4, 5. skipped question answered question

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Community Governance Survey Results

29

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Community Governance Survey Results

30

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Community Governance Survey Results

31

Answer Options Response Percent Response Count Yes, but we do not have sufficient budget for as much training as we should have. 60.0% 15 Yes, we use United Way training as well as other training courses and seminars. 40.0% 10 Yes, but due to budget constraints training is available only through coaching, not through courses or seminars. 28.0% 7 Yes, board members may take any governance training that they wish at the organization's expense, subject to a board-wide budgetary cap. 20.0% 5 No, we believe that there is enough free information on the web that board members can and should train themselves. 16.0% 4 No, we have neither the budget nor the resources for training the board (but ideally would subsidize training). 8.0% 2 Yes, but we only use United Way training because of cost considerations. 8.0% 2 No, we believe that board members should pay for their own training. 4.0% 1 No, all our board members have sufficient experience to not require governance training. 4.0% 1 Yes, but board members are required to pay at least a portion of the cost. 4.0% 1 5 25 25 9 Do your board members have the opportunity to receive subsidized governance training? (Check all that apply.) Comments skipped question answered question

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Community Governance Survey Results

32

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Community Governance Survey Results

33

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Community Governance Survey Results

34

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Community Governance Survey Results

35

Answer Options Response Percent Response Count Yes overall, but some board members do not have sufficient knowledge through training and/or experience. 56.0% 14 No overall, despite some of our board members having sufficient knowledge through training and/or experience. 36.0% 9 Yes, all board members have sufficient knowledge through training and/or experience. 8.0% 2 No, none of our board members have sufficient knowledge through training and/or experience. 0.0% I don't know (please explain in the Comments box below.) 0.0% 2 25 25 9 Comments for Questions 21, 22, 23. skipped question answered question Do you believe that your board has sufficient risk management knowledge?

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Community Governance Survey Results

36

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Community Governance Survey Results

37 Answer Options Response Percent Response Count Sustainable funding for program delivery 64.0% 16 Chief Executive Officer / Executive Director succession 56.0% 14 Board recruitment 44.0% 11 Staff and volunteer safety 40.0% 10 Organization's reputation 36.0% 9 Risks associated with emergency/crisis services 24.0% 6 Compliance with M-SAA / H-SAA 16.0% 4 Client safety 16.0% 4 Directors' liability 12.0% 3 Staff pension sustainability 12.0% 3 Other (please specify in the Comments box below.) 0.0% 25 25 9 Please identify up to 3 risks that are most important to your board. skipped question answered question

* From a selected list of risks provided.

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Community Governance Survey Results

38

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Community Governance Survey Results

39

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Community Governance Survey Results

40

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Community Governance Survey Results

41

Response Percent Response Count 24.0% 6 44.0% 11 48.0% 12 12.0% 3 12.0% 3 16.0% 4 24.0% 6 4.0% 1 9 25 25 9 Yes, we can share by coaching. Comments Yes, regarding the quantity of services provided. No, we prefer not to share our service metrics or tools skipped question Yes, we can share by providing samples of metrics, I don't know. Answer Options No, we do not have good service metrics or tools to answered question Yes, regarding the quality of services provided. Maybe (please give specifics in the Comments box Does your organization have any unique service metrics or tools that you would be willing to share with others? (Check all that apply.)

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Community Governance Survey Results

Question: Please indicate how your organization would prefer to interact with the CGCG.

  • The majority selected “email response to and from a

CGCG related MH LHIN staff.

  • We have set up an email account:

GovernanceGroup@lhins.on.ca

42

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Community Governance Consultation Group

Questions?

E-mail: GovernanceGroup@lhins.on.ca

43

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Thank you for attending tonight’s session

You can find a copy of this presentation at: www.mississaugahaltonlhin.on.ca For Health Service Providers Governance to Governance

44