Welcome Program begins at 1:45 PM
Symposium Organizers Juan Sean Matute Calvin
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION • • • • Brian Taylor Professor of Urban Planning Director, Ralph & Goldy Lewis Center for Regional Policy Studies Director, Institute of Transportation Studies UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION A Unique Enterprise ▪ Created by LeRoy Graymer (UCLA Extension Public Policy Program) and Professor Martin Wachs (UCLA Department of Urban Planning) ▪ Pre-cursor event in 1989 ▪ Annual Land Use – Transportation – Environment Symposium since 1991 ▪ An explicitly collaborative endeavor
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION A Unique Enterprise
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION A Unique Enterprise ▪ Supported by 50+ organizations since 1991 o Federal o State o Local o Non-Profits o Research Institutions o Advocacy/Outreach Organizations
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION A Unique Enterprise ▪ Supported by 50+ organizations since 1991 o Federal o State o Local o Non-Profits o Research Institutions o Advocacy/Outreach Organizations ▪ Intellectual, Logistical, and Financial Support o Steering Committee o Sponsoring Organizations
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION A Unique Experience ▪ First , topics and presentations planned as an integrated whole ▪ Then , presenters are recruited ▪ Each session designed to build on the previous ▪ Few breakout sessions; for the most part, the group works through the topics together ▪ Lots of audience participation ▪ Time included for extracurricular communication/networking
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION A Unique Mix of Participants
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION A Unique Mix of Participants ▪ Participants nominated by Steering Committee o Elected officials o Private sector leaders o Government analysts o Non-profit leaders o Researchers o Students
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION A Unique Mix of Participants ▪ Participants nominated by Steering Committee o Elected officials o Private sector leaders o Government analysts o Non-profit leaders o Researchers o Students ▪ 2 ½ days of o Discussion o Presentations o Networking
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION Goal of the symposium
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION Goal of the symposium ▪ Foster two-way communication in a tradition of civility
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION Goal of the symposium ▪ Foster two-way communication in a tradition of civility ▪ Speakers and Participants o A mix of researchers and practitioners ■ Though typically more of the latter o Heterogeneous mix of participants ■ Across many dimensions o Many of the best and brightest from California and the world
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION The early 1990s ( Strategizing ) ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION The late 1990s ( Thinking big ) ▪ ▪ ▪ ▪
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION The early 2000s ( Grow, Grow, Grow... ) ▪ Planning for Growth (2000) ▪ Reinventing Transit (2001) ▪ Tackling Traffic Congestion (2002) ▪ Finance: The Critical Link (2003) ▪ Moving Goods (2004)
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION The late 2000s ( Coping with problems of growth, then decline ) ▪ Healthy Regions, Healthy People (2005) ▪ Global Energy and Climate Change (2006) ▪ Planning for Demographic, Employment, Housing, and Resources Growth and Change (2007) ▪ The Future of Cities and Travel (2008) ▪ Economic Crisis as Opportunity for Reform (2009)
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION The early 2010s ( The future is now ) ▪ Infrastructure Investment for Sustainable Growth (2010) ▪ Energy Policy (2011) ▪ Financing the Future (2012) ▪ Smart Technologies: Smart Policies (2013) ▪ Resilient Cities and Regions (2014)
This Year
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION …
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION California Department of Transportation University of California Transportation Center
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION Southern California Association of Governments University of California Center on Economic Competitiveness in Transportation
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION Metropolitan Transportation Commission
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION 2015 Arrowhead Steering Committee Members Please stand to be acknowledged
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION Elected Officials in Attendance Please stand to be acknowledged
THE TRANSPORTATION ∙ LAND USE ∙ ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION Who’s Who ● Madeline Brozen ○ Lewis Center/ITS Associate Director for External Engagement ● Esther Clark ○ Lewis Center Operations Manager ● Sean Calvin ○ 2015 Symposium Co-Organizer ● Oliver Chien ○ Technology Manager ● Student Assistants ○ Here to help
Lead symposium organizer and opening presenter: Juan Matute
Logistics ▪ Your program book Theme Guidance ▪ Document Attendee Directory ▪ Evaluation forms ▪ (check your email Tuesday at 11: 30AM for online versions) ▪ Room Check-in 5:30 to 6:30 pm in lobby ▪ ▪ Reception Monday 5:30 to 6:30 PM ▪ ▪ Attendee video interviews
all program sessions all meals Monday 5:30 reception
The conversation continues during shared meals
Recreation & relaxation
Panels at a Glance 2 or 3 presentations; each 15 to 20 minutes in length 20 to 40 minutes of questions and answers, facilitated by a moderator
An open discussion in a retreat environment #NoHashtag please use discretion on social media
Our Charge from the Symposium Steering Committee Focus the 2015 Arrowhead Symposium on the idea that cities and planners are facing an unprecedented pace of change
So Much Change... Innovative mobility services are changing transportation options quicker ● than ever before ● A growing gap between the private and public sector ’s ability to leverage data and technology to accomplish an organizational mission Residents of urban centers demand new services and new tech-enabled ● pathways to access existing services New regional plans focusing infill growth at the center of regions ● Accelerating climate change impacts ● ● The implementation tools of planning are shifting toward management and policy from infrastructure provision Big data and the pace of information flows creates new analysis ● opportunities but also necessitates continuous or frequent data collection Expanding attention to the connection between public health and urban ● planning Finance and future revenue expectations : progression from an impending ● challenge to the new normal
Making sense of change ...by focusing on the practice of planning
Make no Fragile Plans Fragile plans break down over time. These plans don’t anticipate how technology could change travel and urban life. Fragile plans extrapolate a continuation of past trends rather than a projection of future changes. Over time, a fragile plan’s guidance becomes less useful and it is retired to the shelf. “If your plan takes 10 years, it will be obsolete after a few months, or weeks. “ Peter Hinssen, Co-Founder of Across Group, 2012
Agile Plans Agile plans consider many future scenarios, including those that differ substantially from historic trends. Agile plans are resilient and adaptive. An agile plan continues to guide a planning organization’s learning over time, building in decision points for future actions. “Why build a deep plan if it doesn’t present the correct solution? Agility provides a framework to get real insight more quickly. Watch how people use the plan, take the findings back to the drawing table, iterate, and then do the same thing again and again, until slowly, over time, the plan begins to take shape.” - Simon LaPointe, Founder of 3Pikas, 2014
What do we mean by Agile Planning?
Civic Innovation
Civic Innovation “A tension exists between “putting out fires” and managing day-to-day responsibilities and finding the time and space needed to think, plan, and launch new solutions. There are few incentives within bureaucracies to experiment and try new things—but there are plenty of motivations to maintain the status quo or settle for incremental change. “ - Bloomberg Philanthropies Motivation for establishing the I-Teams program
Open Data
Recommend
More recommend
