Welcome! Kevin Scully NCARB Jason Baker PE, LEED AP Principal, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

SLIDE 1

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

SMARTool:

A Case Study Design Collaborative

SLIDE 2

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Welcome! Kevin Scully NCARB

Principal, Registered Architect Design Collaborative

Jason Baker PE, LEED AP

Principal, Mechanical Engineer Design Collaborative

SLIDE 3

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

ASSESSMENTS ·WHY do you need an assessment? ·WHAT are you trying to accomplish? ·HOW do you accomplish it? ·HOW our SMARTool can help. Agenda

SLIDE 4

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

·Understand Condition ·Understand Cost Why

SLIDE 5

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

·Develop a strategy/schedule to address issues ·Develop a budget ·Build a case for support from Administration/Board What

SLIDE 6

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

How Campus Assessment Detailed Assessment

• Provides an overview, not small details
• Develops a broad picture
• Used to develop support and strategy
• Provides in depth information on systems
• Usually focused on a single project
• r building
• Used to solve/fjx the problem

SLIDE 7

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Campus Overview Assessment

Design Collaborative

SLIDE 8

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Campus Assessment Systems/Components Evaluated

Primary Systems

• 1. Foundation & Substructure
• 2. Structural System
• 3. Exterior Wall Systems
• 4. Roof System

Secondary Systems

• 5. Ceiling System
• 6. Floor Covering System

7 . Interior Wall & Partition Systems

• 8. Specialties

Service Systems

• 9. Heating, Ventilating & Cooling
• 10. Plumbing System

1

• 1. Sprinkler System
• 12. Electrical Service
• 13. Electrical Devices
• 14. Conveying Systems
• 15. Other Systems
• 16. Safety Standards

SLIDE 9

Building Alpha

Primary Structure - Foundation System

A. 1) Material: Concrete  Masonry Steel Wood Other 2) Type: Spread  Mat B. System Evaluation S A B C U 1) Cracked Walls  2) Settlement  3) Deterioration  4) Design Load 5) Exposed Finish C. D. (S) Satisfactory 1.0 (A) Remodeling A - Requires Restoration, Cost not More than 25% of Total Replacement 0.8 (± 0.1) (B) 0.5 (± 0.1) (C) Remodeling C - Requires Major Remodeling, Cost Greater than 50% of Total Replacement 0.2(± 0.1) (U) Unsatisfactory - System is Totally Unsatisfactory and Cannot be Remodeled - Demolish 0.0 E. 0.95 System Type Pile/Caisson Comments Component Value Rating: Condition Value Multiplier There are several diagonal cracks that indicate settlement has occurred in the foundation walls. These are fairly minor and can be tuck pointed. Numerical Evaluation (circle one) stair rails non-compliant Remodeling B - Requires Major Modernization, Cost Between 25 and 50% of Total Replacement Comments: While significant vertical cracks appear in the brick veneer, most of the cracks do not appear to be caused by significant settlement or deterioration occurring in the foundation wall system. The design loads are unknown.

Campus Assessment Example

SLIDE 10

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Campus Assessment Value Rating

Primary Systems

• 1. Foundation & Substructure
• 2. Structural System
• 3. Exterior Wall Systems
• 4. Roof System

Secondary Systems

• 5. Ceiling System
• 6. Floor Covering System

7 . Interior Wall & Partition Systems

• 8. Specialties

Score .95 .92 .76 .51 .67 .42 .78 .83 Score .37 .41 .87 .38 .86 .91 N/A .73 Service Systems

• 9. Heating, Ventilating & Cooling
• 10. Plumbing System

1

• 1. Sprinkler System
• 12. Electrical Service
• 13. Electrical Devices
• 14. Conveying Systems
• 15. Other Systems
• 16. Safety Standards

SLIDE 11

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Campus Assessment Percentage

Primary Systems

• 1. Foundation & Substructure
• 2. Structural System
• 3. Exterior Wall Systems
• 4. Roof System

Secondary Systems

• 5. Ceiling System
• 6. Floor Covering System

7 . Interior Wall & Partition Systems

• 8. Specialties

Percentage 7% 10% 23% 8% 2% 3% 12% 0.3% Percentage 16% 4% 1.7% 2% 9% 1.5% N/A 0.5% Service Systems

• 9. Heating, Ventilating & Cooling
• 10. Plumbing System

1

• 1. Sprinkler System
• 12. Electrical Service
• 13. Electrical Devices
• 14. Conveying Systems
• 15. Other Systems
• 16. Safety Standards

SLIDE 12

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Campus Assessment Value

Primary Systems

• 1. Foundation & Substructure
• 2. Structural System
• 3. Exterior Wall Systems
• 4. Roof System

Secondary Systems

• 5. Ceiling System
• 6. Floor Covering System

7 . Interior Wall & Partition Systems

• 8. Specialties

Formula: 10,000,000(building cost) x .95 (value rating) = 9,500,000 x .07 (percentage) = $665,000 Value $665,000 $920,000 $1,748,000 $408,000 $134,000 $126,000 $936,000 $249,000 Value $592,000 $164,000 $147 ,900 $76,000 $774,000 $136,500 N/A $36,500 Service Systems

• 9. Heating, Ventilating & Cooling
• 10. Plumbing System

1

• 1. Sprinkler System
• 12. Electrical Service
• 13. Electrical Devices
• 14. Conveying Systems
• 15. Other Systems
• 16. Safety Standards

Based off a $10,000,000 building Building value based on deferred maintenance: $7 ,1 12,900

SLIDE 13

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Detailed Assessment

Design Collaborative

SLIDE 14

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Detailed Assessment Systems/Components Evaluated

1. Building Site 1.1 Entrance Accessibility 1.2 Parking & Accessibility 1.3 Landscaping Features 1.4 Service Entrances 2. Building Structure 2.1 Foundation Walls 2.2 Perimeter Load-Bearing Walls 2.3 Columns & Beams 2.4 Intermediate Floor Systems 2.5 Roof Framing Systems 2.6 Misc. Structural Components 3. Building Envelope 3.1 Exterior Wall Materials & Systems 3.2 Windows & Doors 3.3 Roof Systems 4. Building Interiors & Finishes 4.1 Ceiling System Types & Finishes 4.2 Wall Partition Types & Finishes 4.3 Flooring Types & Finishes 4.4 ADA Compliance 5. Vertical Transition & Conveying Systems 5.1 Stairways & Ramps 5.2 Elevators 5.3 ADA Compliance 6. ADA 7. Mechanical Systems 7 .1 Heating Plants 7 .2 Cooling Plants 7 .3 Hydronic Infrastructure 7 .4 Air Handling Systems 7 .5 Terminal Devices, Sheet Metal & Air Terminals 7 .6 Building Management Systems 8. Plumbing Systems 8.1 Piping Systems 8.2 Water Heaters 8.3 Fixtures 9. Fire Protection

• 10. Electrical Systems

10.1 Power Distribution 10.2 Lighting 10.3 Fire/Life Safety Systems 10.4 Data/Technology 10.5 Security Systems

• 11. Overall Building Code Compliance

SLIDE 15

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Detailed Assessment:

A Case Study Design Collaborative

SLIDE 16

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Northside Hall Indiana University South Bend

• Constructed in 1958
• Approx. 360,000 sf
• One major addition in

1970 and numerous smaller renovations and fjnish upgrades

• Hosts nearly 45%
• f the campus’

academic classes

• Numerous key

campus destinations – Faculty Offjces – Main Auditorium – Black Box Theater – Performing Arts Support Spaces – Rooftop Greenhouse – Observatory

SLIDE 17

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Background

SLIDE 18

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Background

SLIDE 19

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Detailed Assessment Building ·How to approach the process

SLIDE 20

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Detailed Assessment Building

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

SLIDE 21

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Detailed Assessment Building

1 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 7 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 5 5 6 6 7 7 8

SLIDE 22

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Detailed Assessment Priority Level

Level 1 – Critical Urgent life safety issues that may include the following: · Structural deterioration or failure that could result in serious personal injury · Building component or system defjciency that may result in serious in personal injury · Hazardous fjre safety conditions Level 2 – Crucial Potential health and building integrity issues that may include the following: · Health issues related to the presence of mold or contamination of HVAC systems · Active leaks or building envelop damage affecting one or more building materials or systems · Structural issues causing material damage or deterioration Level 3 - Urgent Code, comfort and energy issues that may include the following: · ADA compliance issues · International Building Code defjciencies · IU Building Standard defjciencies · Energy Code compliance · Temperature control and humidity issues Level 4 – Recommended Miscellaneous life cycle improvements and aesthetic upgrades that may include the following: · Architectural fjnish upgrades and aesthetic improvements · IU branding improvements · Lighting improvements · Miscellaneous building equipment/systems replacement or upgrade

SLIDE 23 Building Structure

• a. Repair signifjcant foundation wall settlement cracks with

epoxy. Building Envelope

• a. Install vapor barrier materials over all dirt crawl space

fmoors.

• b. Infjll upper portion of walls at removed ground fmoor unit

ventilator locations. Coordinate with HVAC improvements. Building Interior & Finishes

• a. Remove all existing asbestos-containing fmoor tile.
• b. Install new VCT fmoor tile.
• c. Repaint walls in all occupied areas.
• d. Replace all existing fjnished ceiling areas with new lay-in

ceiling systems.

• e. Replace all original or damaged interior doors.

ADA Compliance

• a. Install new interior signage meeting current ADA guide-

lines.

• b. Install new lever-type hardware on all interior doors

Mechanical Systems

• a. Install new hot water piping for new VAV terminal boxes
• b. Replace Air Unit #2 with new VAV air handler
• c. Install VAV hot water reheat terminal boxes and low pres-

sure duct and diffusers for each zone

• d. Provide vapor barrier on fmoor of all crawl spaces to com-

ply with codes and to eliminate moisture

• e. Provide full DDC controls on all new terminal boxes

f. Provide full DDC controls on Unit #2 Plumbing Systems

• a. Re-insulate storm piping to prevent condensation
• b. Replace eroded and corroded piping with new all copper

piping

• c. Reinsulate domestic water piping

Corrective Action 2 3 2 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 Priority

Building Section 1 Northside Hall East, Southwest Classroom Wing

Basement (level 00) Building Section 1 Northside Hall East, Southwest Classroom Wing

1 Corrective Actions

Level 1 Critical Level 2 Crucial Level 3 Necessary Level 4 Recommended Priority Levels Urgent life safety issues that may include the following:

• Structural deterioration or failure that may result in serious personal injury
• Building component or system defjciency that may result in serious personal injury
• Hazardous fjre safety conditions

Potential health and building integrity issues that may include the following:

• Health issues related to the presence of mold or contamination of HVAC systems
• Active leaks or building envelop damage affecting one or more building materials or systems
• Structural issues causing material damage or deterioration

Code, comfort and energy issues that may include the following:

• ADA compliance issues
• International Building Code defjciencies
• IU Building Standard defjciencies
• Energy code compliance
• Temperature control and humidity issues

Miscellaneous life cycle improvements and aesthetic upgrades that may include the following:

• Architectural fjnish upgrades and aesthetic improvements
• IU branding improvements
• Lighting improvements
• Miscellaneous building equipment/systems replacement or upgrade

IUSB NORThSIDE hALL ExISTING fACILITY ASSESSMENT 33 34

1 Assessment

The Southwest Classroom Wing was constructed in 1958 as part

• f the original Northside Hall facility. The overall building area has

always functioned as classroom space and features tiered audito- rium-type classrooms at the west end of both ground (level 0) and fjrst fmoor (level 1) fmoors. Support space is limited to public restrooms and janitor closets on the ground and fjrst fmoors while the basement (level 00) is currently used for University storage, leasable Bookstore storage area and IT support space. Ground fmoor restrooms were renovated in 2013 to improve architectural, mechanical and electri- cal conditions and meet current ADA guidelines. General Building Area Description Site Context & Features Building Section 1 Northside Hall East, Southwest Classroom Wing Building Section 1 Northside Hall East, Southwest Classroom Wing This portion of the building is surrounded by lawn on the south elevation, elevated and grade-level landscaping beds on the west el- evation and elevated landscaping beds and hard sidewalk surfaces

• n the north elevation. The south lawn and landscaped areas on the

west elevation appear to slope away from the building and drain

• well. A one-foot wide horizontal stone paver was originally installed

at grade along the foundation wall, apparently to create a land- scaping buffer and potentially help deter surface erosion due from rain water washing down the two-story wall surface. The exposed aggregate sidewalk at the north building entrance also slopes away from the building. There is minimal long-term deteriora- tion at the entrance door threshold, but it is considered normal for a building of this age. A majority of the landscaping bed east of the doorway is bordered by a concrete curb approximately 6” above the sidewalk elevation. While the perimeter curbing potentially holds some rain water against the foundation, it should not be signifjcant enough to cause any concerns. A tapered concrete wall was created at the east end of the north- east planting area to vertically defmect exhaust air coming out of the auditorium exhaust grilles. Water infjltration is possible at this location, particularly in winter months when weeks of snow and ice accumulation may melt and drain into the grille openings, eventually making its way into the basement fan room. Refer to the Building Section 2 narrative for additional comments re- lated to the large hard-surface courtyard north of Building Section 1.

Building Section 1 Northside Hall East, Southwest Classroom Wing

Building Structure Building Section 1 Northside Hall East, Southwest Classroom Wing The Southwest Classroom Wing has reinforced concrete footings and foundation walls that are in good condition. The foundation walls exhibit normal shrinkage cracks and several larger settlement cracks that allow minor water infjltration into the building. There are IUSB NORThSIDE hALL ExISTING fACILITY ASSESSMENT 17 18

Detailed Assessment Example

SLIDE 24

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Detailed Assessment Typical Deliverable

SLIDE 25

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Introducing

The Design Collaborative Digital Building Assessment & Renovation Phasing Development Calculator Tool!

SLIDE 26

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Introducing

SMARTool

Solutions Modeling for Assessments and Renovations Tool

SLIDE 27

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

SMARTool - By Building Section

SLIDE 28

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

SMARTool - By Priority

SLIDE 29

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

SMARTool - By Level

SLIDE 30

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

SMARTool - By Value

SLIDE 31

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

·Helps manage and plan deferred maintenance issues into projects ·Allows you to create on-demand options based

• n your priorities

·Turns your building assessment into a useful tool Why SMARTool?

SLIDE 32

S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1

Questions? Design Collaborative