Design Collaborative SMARTool: A Case Study S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Welcome! Kevin Scully NCARB Jason Baker PE, LEED AP Principal, Registered Architect Principal, Mechanical Engineer Design Collaborative Design Collaborative S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Agenda ASSESSMENTS · WHY do you need an assessment? · WHAT are you trying to accomplish? · HOW do you accomplish it? · HOW our SMARTool can help. S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Why ·Understand Condition ·Understand Cost S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
What ·Develop a strategy/schedule to address issues ·Develop a budget ·Build a case for support from Administration/Board S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
How Campus Detailed Assessment Assessment • Provides an overview, not small details • Provides in depth information on systems • Develops a broad picture • Usually focused on a single project or building • Used to develop support and strategy • Used to solve/fjx the problem S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Design Collaborative Campus Overview Assessment S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Campus Assessment Systems/Components Evaluated Primary Systems Service Systems 1. Foundation & Substructure 9. Heating, Ventilating & Cooling 2. Structural System 10. Plumbing System 3. Exterior Wall Systems 1 1. Sprinkler System 4. Roof System 12. Electrical Service 13. Electrical Devices Secondary Systems 14. Conveying Systems 5. Ceiling System 15. Other Systems 6. Floor Covering System 16. Safety Standards 7 . Interior Wall & Partition Systems 8. Specialties S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Building Alpha Campus Assessment Example Primary Structure - Foundation System A. System Type 1) Material: Concrete Masonry Steel Wood Other 2) Type: Spread Mat Pile/Caisson B. System Evaluation Comments S A B C U 1) Cracked Walls 2) Settlement 3) Deterioration 4) Design Load 5) Exposed Finish C. Comments: stair rails non-compliant While significant vertical cracks appear in the brick veneer, most of the cracks do not appear to be caused by significant settlement or deterioration occurring in the foundation wall system. The design loads are unknown. There are several diagonal cracks that indicate settlement has occurred in the foundation walls. These are fairly minor and can be tuck pointed. Numerical Evaluation (circle one) Condition Value Multiplier D. (S) Satisfactory 1.0 (A) Remodeling A - Requires Restoration, Cost not More than 25% of Total Replacement 0.8 (± 0.1) Remodeling B - Requires Major Modernization, Cost Between 25 and 50% of Total Replacement (B) 0.5 (± 0.1) (C) Remodeling C - Requires Major Remodeling, Cost Greater than 50% of Total Replacement 0.2(± 0.1) (U) Unsatisfactory - System is Totally Unsatisfactory and Cannot be Remodeled - Demolish 0.0 Component Value Rating: 0.95 E.
Campus Assessment Value Rating Primary Systems Score Service Systems Score 1. Foundation & Substructure .95 9. Heating, Ventilating & Cooling .37 2. Structural System .92 10. Plumbing System .41 3. Exterior Wall Systems .76 1 1. Sprinkler System .87 4. Roof System .51 12. Electrical Service .38 13. Electrical Devices .86 Secondary Systems 14. Conveying Systems .91 5. Ceiling System .67 15. Other Systems N/A 6. Floor Covering System .42 16. Safety Standards .73 7 . Interior Wall & Partition Systems .78 8. Specialties .83 S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Campus Assessment Percentage Primary Systems Percentage Service Systems Percentage 1. Foundation & Substructure 7% 9. Heating, Ventilating & Cooling 16% 2. Structural System 10% 10. Plumbing System 4% 3. Exterior Wall Systems 23% 1 1. Sprinkler System 1.7% 4. Roof System 8% 12. Electrical Service 2% 13. Electrical Devices 9% Secondary Systems 14. Conveying Systems 1.5% 5. Ceiling System 2% 15. Other Systems N/A 6. Floor Covering System 3% 16. Safety Standards 0.5% 7 . Interior Wall & Partition Systems 12% 8. Specialties 0.3% S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Campus Assessment Value Formula: 10,000,000 (building cost) x .95 (value rating) = 9,500,000 x .07 (percentage) = $665,000 Primary Systems Value Service Systems Value 1. Foundation & Substructure $665,000 9. Heating, Ventilating & Cooling $592,000 2. Structural System $920,000 10. Plumbing System $164,000 3. Exterior Wall Systems $1,748,000 1 1. Sprinkler System $147 ,900 4. Roof System $408,000 12. Electrical Service $76,000 13. Electrical Devices $774,000 Secondary Systems 14. Conveying Systems $136,500 5. Ceiling System $134,000 15. Other Systems N/A 6. Floor Covering System $126,000 16. Safety Standards $36,500 7 . Interior Wall & Partition Systems $936,000 8. Specialties $249,000 Based off a $10,000,000 building Building value based on deferred maintenance: $7 ,1 12,900 S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Design Collaborative Detailed Assessment S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Detailed Assessment Systems/Components Evaluated 1. Building Site 4. Building Interiors & Finishes 8. Plumbing Systems 1.1 Entrance Accessibility 4.1 Ceiling System Types & Finishes 8.1 Piping Systems 1.2 Parking & Accessibility 4.2 Wall Partition Types & Finishes 8.2 Water Heaters 1.3 Landscaping Features 4.3 Flooring Types & Finishes 8.3 Fixtures 1.4 Service Entrances 4.4 ADA Compliance 9. Fire Protection 2. Building Structure 5. Vertical Transition & Conveying Systems 10. Electrical Systems 2.1 Foundation Walls 5.1 Stairways & Ramps 10.1 Power Distribution 2.2 Perimeter Load-Bearing Walls 5.2 Elevators 10.2 Lighting 2.3 Columns & Beams 5.3 ADA Compliance 10.3 Fire/Life Safety Systems 2.4 Intermediate Floor Systems 6. ADA 10.4 Data/Technology 2.5 Roof Framing Systems 10.5 Security Systems 7. Mechanical Systems 2.6 Misc. Structural Components 7 .1 Heating Plants 11. Overall Building Code Compliance 3. Building Envelope 7 .2 Cooling Plants 3.1 Exterior Wall Materials 7 .3 Hydronic Infrastructure & Systems 7 .4 Air Handling Systems 3.2 Windows & Doors 7 .5 Terminal Devices, Sheet Metal & 3.3 Roof Systems Air Terminals 7 .6 Building Management Systems S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Design Collaborative Detailed Assessment: A Case Study S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Northside Hall Indiana University South Bend • Numerous key • Constructed in 1958 campus destinations • Approx. 360,000 sf – Faculty Offjces • One major addition in – Main Auditorium 1970 and numerous smaller renovations – Black Box Theater and fjnish upgrades – Performing Arts Support Spaces • Hosts nearly 45% – Rooftop of the campus’ Greenhouse academic classes – Observatory S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Background S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Background S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Detailed Assessment Building ·How to approach the process S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Detailed Assessment Building 8 4 5 3 2 6 7 1 S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Detailed Assessment Building 8 4 5 3 5 3 2 6 7 1 4 5 5 3 3 2 2 6 6 7 7 1 1 S M A R T O O L : A C A S E S T U D Y | D E S I G N C O L L A B O R A T I V E | 2 0 1 8 . 0 3 . 0 1
Recommend
More recommend
