Welcome SERTP 2013 4 th Quarter Meeting Annual Transmission - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

welcome
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Welcome SERTP 2013 4 th Quarter Meeting Annual Transmission - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2013 SERTP Welcome SERTP 2013 4 th Quarter Meeting Annual Transmission Planning Summit & Assumptions Input Meeting 1 2013 SERTP The SERTP process is a transmission planning process. Please contact the respective transmission


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Welcome

SERTP 2013 – 4th Quarter Meeting

“Annual Transmission Planning Summit &

Assumptions Input Meeting”

1

2013 SERTP

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

The SERTP process is a transmission planning process. Please contact the respective transmission provider for questions related to real-time operations or OATT transmission service.

2013 SERTP

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Purposes & Goals of the Meeting

 10 Year Transmission Expansion Plan

  • East
  • West

 2013 Economic Planning Study Results  Preliminary 2014 Modeling Assumptions

  • Load Forecast
  • Generation Assumptions

 Miscellaneous Updates  Upcoming 2014 SERTP Process

3

2013 SERTP

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Ten Year Expansion Plan

2013 SERTP

slide-5
SLIDE 5

10 Year Expansion Plan Timeline

May ay Jan an Feb Mar Mar Apr pr Jun un

Base cases updated with most recent input assumptions. Begin re-evaluation of existing projects for timing and need. Approximate target for completion of year 1 – 5 evaluation. Discuss the preliminary expansion plan with the SERTP Stakeholders and

  • btain input.

Assess need for additional new projects.

Approximate Planning Time Line (Years 1 – 5)

Coordination among SERTP Sponsors and SERC members.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Aug ug Jun un Jul uly Sep ep

Approximate target for completion of year 6 – 10 evaluation.

Oct Oct No Nov Dec ec

Discuss 10 year expansion plan at the Summit. Discuss previous or obtain additional SERTP stakeholder input on expansion plan. Begin re-evaluation of existing projects for timing and need. Assess need for additional new projects. Base cases updated with most recent data. Base cases updated with most recent data and begin reviewing 10 year expansion plan. Obtain input from stakeholders on assumptions for next year’s expansion plan process.

10 Year Expansion Plan Timeline Approximate Planning Time Line (Years 6 – 10)

Coordination among SERTP Sponsors and SERC members.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The projects described in this presentation represent the ten (10) year expansion plan. The expansion plan is periodically reviewed and may be revised due to changes in assumptions. This presentation does not represent a commitment to build for projects listed in the future.

7

2013 SERTP

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The in-service date of each project is June 1st of the stated project year, unless

  • therwise specified.

The need date of each project is the same as the in-service date, unless otherwise specified.

8

2013 SERTP

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

2013 Ten Year Expansion Plan

EAST WEST

2013 SERTP

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Economic Planning Studies

2013 SERTP

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

2013 SERTP Five Economic Planning Studies

 Southern to SCPSA Border

  • 500 MW (2015 Winter Peak)

 Southern to SCE&G Border

  • 500 MW (2015 Winter Peak)

 TVA Border to Southern

  • 1500 MW (2017 Spring Valley)

 TVA Border to Southern

  • 1500 MW (2017 Summer Peak)

 Southern to PJM

  • 1000 MW (2023 Summer Peak)
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Power Flow Cases Utilized

 Study Years: 2015, 2017, 2023  Load Flow Cases:

  • 2013 Series Version 2A
  • Summer Peak
  • Shoulder
  • Winter Peak
  • Spring Valley

12

2013 SERTP

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Economic Planning Studies

 Final Report Components:

  • Thermal Analysis
  • Contingency Analysis to identify constrained elements/contingency

pairs

  • Interface Transfer Capability Impacts
  • Stability Impacts
  • Potential Solutions
  • Transmission Enhancements and Cost Estimates

13

2013 SERTP

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

The following information depicts recommended enhancements for the proposed transfer levels above and beyond existing, firm commitments. Therefore, this information does not represent a commitment to proceed with the recommended enhancements nor implies that the recommended enhancements could be implemented by the study dates (2015, 2017, 2023). These potential solutions only address constraints identified within the SERTP Sponsors’ areas that are associated with the proposed transfers. Other Balancing Areas were not monitored which could result in additional limitations and required system enhancements.

2013 SERTP

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Southern to SCPSA Border 500 MW

2013 SERTP

slide-16
SLIDE 16

 Transfer Type: Generation to Load (2015 Winter Peak)  Source: Southern Generation  Sink: Uniform load scale in SCPSA

16

Southern to SCPSA Border 500 MW

Source Sink

slide-17
SLIDE 17

0.4%

Source Sink 12.4%

3.7% 2.3% 1.1% 3.3%

DUKE 8.4% SMEPA

1.2%

APC MPC

0.0% 0.5%

Gulf

0.5% 0.7%

16.0% 74.3% PSEC GA ITS

0.9%

TVA

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Transmission System Impacts

 Thermal Constraints Identified:

  • One (1) 115 kV T.L.

Total Cost (2013$) = $9,000,000

18

Southern to SCPSA Border 500 MW

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

19

Southern to SCPSA Border 500 MW

Limiting Elements Rating (MVA) Thermal Loading (%) Without Request With Request Chatsworth – Coosawattee 115 kV TL 137 91.9 102.4

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

20

Southern to SCPSA Border 500 MW

APC GA ITS MPC Gulf

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

21

Southern to SCPSA Border 500 MW

(P1 (P1) ) Chatsworth tsworth – Coosa sawattee wattee 115 kV

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Projects Identified

22

Southern to SCPSA Border 500 MW

Item Proposed Enhancements Cost ($)

P1 Chatsworth – Coosawattee 115 kV T.L.

  • Reconductor approximately 12 miles of 336 ACSR 115 kV

transmission line with 795 ACSR at 100°C.

$9,000,000

Total Cost (2013$) = $9,000,000

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Southern to SCE&G Border 500 MW

2013 SERTP

slide-24
SLIDE 24

 Transfer Type: Generation to Load (2015 Winter Peak)  Source: Southern Generation  Sink: Uniform load scale in SCE&G

24

Southern to SCE&G Border 500 MW

Source Sink

slide-25
SLIDE 25

0.3%

Source Sink 11.9%

2.6% 2.1% 1.2% 3.3%

DUKE 8.2% SMEPA

1.2%

APC MPC

0.0% 0.5%

Gulf

0.5% 0.7%

16.6% 75.9% PSEC GA ITS

0.9%

TVA

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Transmission System Impacts

 Thermal Constraints Identified:

  • One (1) 115 kV T.L.

Total Cost (2013$) = $9,000,000

26

Southern to SCE&G Border 500 MW

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

27

Southern to SCE&G Border 500 MW

Limiting Elements Rating (MVA) Thermal Loading (%) Without Request With Request Chatsworth – Coosawattee 115 kV TL 137 91.9 102.4

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

28

Southern to SCE&G Border 500 MW

APC GA ITS MPC Gulf

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

29

Southern to SCE&G Border 500 MW

(P1 (P1) ) Chatsworth tsworth – Coosa sawattee wattee 115 kV

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Projects Identified

30

Southern to SCE&G Border 500 MW

Item Proposed Enhancements Cost ($)

P1 Chatsworth – Coosawattee 115 kV T.L.

  • Reconductor approximately 12 miles of 336 ACSR 115 kV

transmission line with 795 ACSR at 100°C.

$9,000,000

Total Cost (2013$) = $9,000,000

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW

(Spring Valley)

2013 SERTP

slide-32
SLIDE 32

 Transfer Type: Load to Generation (2017 Spring Valley)  Source: Uniform load scale in TVA  Sink: Southern Generation

32

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Spring Valley)

Source Sink

slide-33
SLIDE 33

0.3%

Source Sink 29.6% 34.7% 5.8%

0.0% 4.0%

DUKE 13.1% SMEPA

1.4%

APC MPC

0.3% 0.1%

Gulf

0.7% 1.8% 4.1%

20.1% PSEC GA ITS

2.7%

TVA

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Transmission System Impacts

 Thermal Constraints Identified:

  • None

Total Cost (2013$) = $0

34

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Spring Valley)

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW

(Summer Peak)

2013 SERTP

slide-36
SLIDE 36

 Transfer Type: Load to Generation (2017 Summer Peak)  Source: Uniform load scale in TVA  Sink: Southern Generation

36

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Summer Peak)

Source Sink

slide-37
SLIDE 37

0.2%

Source Sink 28.8% 35.8% 6.7%

0.1% 4.9%

DUKE 12.4% SMEPA

1.1%

APC MPC

0.5% 0.1%

Gulf

0.6% 1.7%

5.1% 20.8% PSEC GA ITS

2.5%

TVA

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Transmission System Impacts

 Thermal Constraints Identified:

  • One (1) 500 kV T.L.
  • Five (5) 230 kV T.L.
  • Two (2) 161 kV T.L.

Total Cost (2013$) = $137,900,000

38

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Summer Peak)

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

39

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Summer Peak)

Limiting Elements Rating (MVA) Thermal Loading (%) Without Request With Request Conasauga – Bradley TN 500 kV TL 2598 88.0 104.2 (1) South Hall – Candler 230 kV TL 509 93.8 103.0 Pinson – Oostanaula 230 kV TL 664 85.5 101.2 Bio – Vanna 230 kV TL 433 96.0 101.1 Lexington – Russell 230 kV TL 596 95.1 100.4

(1) The limiting element of this tie-line constraint is located within TVA

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

40

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Summer Peak)

APC GA ITS MPC Gulf

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

41

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Summer Peak)

  • S. Hall – Candler

r 230 kV Russ ssell – Lexington ton 230kV Bio – Vanna 230 kV Pinso son – Oosta stanaula 230 kV

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Proposed Enhancements – Pass 1

42

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Summer Peak)

(P1 (P1) ) Russ ssel Dam m – Athe thena 230kV

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Significant Constraints – Pass 1

43

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Summer Peak)

Limiting Elements Rating (MVA) Thermal Loading (%) Without Request With Request Fayette – Gorgas 161 kV TL 193 103.2 (1) 126.8 Attalla – Albertville 161 kV TL 193 96.8 122.7 Clay – Argo 230 kV TL 602 87.9 108.7 Leeds TS – Argo 230 kV TL 602 84.5 105.3

(1) A current operating procedure is sufficient to alleviate this identified constraint without the

addition of the proposed transfer. However, the additional transfer exacerbates the loading

  • n this transmission facility such that the operating procedure becomes insufficient.
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Significant Constraints – Pass 1

44

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Summer Peak)

APC GA ITS MPC Gulf

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Significant Constraints – Pass 1

45

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Summer Peak)

Faye yett tte – Gorga rgas s 161 kV Att ttalla - Albert rtvil ville 161 kV Clay y – Argo rgo – Leeds s 230 kV

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Proposed Enhancements – Pass 2

46

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Summer Peak)

(P2 (P2) ) Faye yett tte – Gorga rgas s 161 kV (P3 (P3) ) Att ttalla - Albert rtvil ville 161 kV (P (P4) ) Cl Clay – Leeds 230 kV

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Projects Identified

47

TVA Border to Southern 1500 MW (Summer Peak)

Item Proposed Enhancements Cost ($)

P1 Russell Dam – Athena 230 kV T.L.

  • 45 miles of new 230 kV Line
  • Bundled (2) 1351 ACSR at 100°C

$60,000,000 P2 Fayette – Gorgas 161 kV Line

  • Rebuild 38.8 miles with 1351 ACSR at 100°C

$36,300,000 P3 Attalla – Albertville 161 kV Line

  • Reconductor 19.6 miles with 1351 ACSR at 100°C

$20,600,000 P4 Clay TS – Leeds TS 230 kV Line

  • Reconductor 17.3 miles with bundled (2) 1351 ACSR at 100°C

$21,000,000

Total Cost (2013$) = $137,900,000

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Southern to PJM 1000 MW

2013 SERTP

slide-49
SLIDE 49

 Transfer Type: Generation to Load (2023 Summer Peak)  Source: Southern Generation  Sink: Uniform load scale in PJM

49

Southern to PJM 1000 MW

Source Sink PJM

slide-50
SLIDE 50

0.9%

Source Sink 20.8% 23.6% 5.7%

0.4% 4.3%

DUKE 11.3% SMEPA

1%

APC MPC

0.3% 0.1%

Gulf

0.3% 1.3% 2.3%

42.6% PSEC GA ITS

0.7%

TVA

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Transmission System Impacts

 Thermal Constraints Identified:

  • One (1) 230 kV T.L.
  • One (1) 115 kV T.L.

Total Cost (2013$) = $920,000

51

Southern to PJM 1000 MW

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

52

Southern to PJM 1000 MW

Limiting Elements Rating (MVA) Thermal Loading (%) Without Request With Request Vogtle – SRS 230 kV TL 137 97.8 104.5 (1) Morgan Crossroads – GS Steel 115 kV TL 112 87.6 100.4

(1) The limiting element of this tie-line constraint is located within SCE&G

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

53

Southern to PJM 1000 MW

APC GA ITS MPC Gulf

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Significant Constraints – Pass 0

54

Southern to PJM 1000 MW

(P1 (P1) ) Morg Morgan Cros rossro sroads 11 s 115 kV

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Projects Identified

55

Southern to PJM 1000 MW

Item Proposed Enhancements Cost ($)

P1 Morgan Crossroads – GS Steel 115 kV T.L.

  • Upgrade 2.5 miles from 75°C to 100°C

$920,000

Total Cost (2013$) = $920,000

slide-56
SLIDE 56

56

Modeling Assumptions Update

2013 SERTP

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Load Forecast

57

2013 SERTP

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Ratcliffe Vogtle Dahlberg Central AL CC McIntosh Harris CC

Existing Generation Future Generation

Piedmont Bio Hillabee CC Franklin CC T.A Smith I & II Yates CC Lancaster Bio Crist CT

2014 Regional Generation Assumptions

58

McDonough West GA CT Wansley Simon Solar Branch CC Camilla Solar

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Site 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 McDonough CC 6 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 841 Central Alabama CC 885 885 885 885 885 885 885 885 885 Piedmont Biomass 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 Vogtle 1 538 538 538 538 538 538 538 538 538 538 538 Baconton CT

  • Dahlberg CT

292 367 367 367 367 367 367 367 367 367 367 Ratcliffe IGCC 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 510 Branch 2

  • Branch 1

266

  • SOUTHERN

The following tables depict changes in the generation assumptions for the 2014 Transmission Expansion Planning Process1

1The years shown in the following tables represent Summer Peak conditions

2014 Regional Generation Assumptions

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Site 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Branch 3-4 1016

  • McManus 1-2

122

  • Yates 1-5

470

  • Yates 6-7

572 642 642 642 642 642 642 642 642 642 642 Vogtle 2 584 540 540 540 540 540 540 540 540 540 540 West Georgia CT

  • 298

298 298 298 298 298 298 298 298 298 Kraft 1-4 333 333

  • Franklin 2 CC
  • 625
  • Simon Solar
  • 30

30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Camilla Solar

  • 16

16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 Branch CC

  • 940

SOUTHERN (Cont.)

2014 Regional Generation Assumptions

60

slide-61
SLIDE 61

SOUTHERN (Cont.)

2014 Regional Generation Assumptions

61 Site 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Gaston 1-4 411 465 465 465 465 465 465 465 465 465 465 Hammond 1 89 89 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 Hammond 3 89 89 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 110 Harris CC 1

  • 625

625 625 625 625 625 625 625 625 Wansley CC 6 561 561 561

  • Vogtle 3
  • 504

504 504 504 504 504 504 Vogtle 4

  • 504

504 504 504 504 504 Harris CC 2 628 628 628 628 628

  • Calhoun CT 1-4

632 632 632 632 632 632 632 632 632 Crist CT

  • 300

300 Yates CC

  • 940

940

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Site 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Tiger Creek CT 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 300 Effingham CC

  • Lindsay Hill CC

300 300 150 150 150 150 Franklin CC 2 625 625 625 625 625 625 375 375 375 375 Dahlberg CT 75 262 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 450 Branch

  • Hammond 2
  • Gaston 1&2

104

  • Santa Rosa

225

  • McManus CT

30

  • Mitchell

38

  • GTC

2014 Regional Generation Assumptions

62

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Site 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Scherer 3 280 132 132 132 132 132 56 56 56 56 56 Wilson 5 CT 21

  • Yates

244

  • Franklin CC 3

620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 Warthen CT 552 552 552 552 552 552 552 552 552 552 552 Hillabee CC

  • 149

149 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 T.A. Smith I CC 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 T.A. Smith II CC 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 620 Wansley CC 6 561 561 561 561 561 561 561 561 561 561 561 Vogtle 3

  • 330

330 330 330 330 330 330 Vogtle 4

  • 330

330 330 330 330 330 Washington County

  • GTC (Cont.)

2014 Regional Generation Assumptions

63

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Site 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Vogtle 1 248 248 248 248 248 248 248 248 248 248 248 Vogtle 2 204 248 248 248 248 248 248 248 248 248 248 Vogtle 3

  • 250

250 250 250 250 250 250 Vogtle 4

  • 250

250 250 250 250 250

MEAG

Site 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Vogtle 3

  • 16

16 16 16 16 16 16 Vogtle 4

  • 16

16 16 16 16 16

Dalton

2014 Regional Generation Assumptions

64

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Site 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 McIntosh CC 6

  • 328

328 328 328

PowerSouth SMEPA:

2014 Regional Generation Assumptions

65 Site 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Ratcliffe IGCC

  • 90

90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Site 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Vogtle

  • 103

206 206 206 206 206 206 Lindsay Hill 508 300 92

  • Hammond
  • 10

10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Miller

  • 100

100

  • Harris

584 584

  • Franklin

535 535 535 535 535 535 535 535 535 535 535 Scherer 1085 1085 1011 1011 1011 1011 1011 1011 1011 1011 1011

2014 Regional Generation Assumptions

66

Generation Assumptions for the 2014 Transmission Expansion Planning Process

(Generation within the SERTP based upon PTPs)

slide-67
SLIDE 67

67

FRCC Coordination Update

2013 SERTP

slide-68
SLIDE 68

FRCC Coordination Update

  • Exchanged the latest transmission models

for the ten year planning horizon.

  • Models will be incorporated into

subsequent base cases.

68

2013 SERTP

slide-69
SLIDE 69

69

SIRPP Update

2013 SERTP

slide-70
SLIDE 70

70

Economic Planning Studies

 Shelby 500 kV (HVDC) to TVA/Southern Company (3500 MW) Study Year: 2018, Shoulder and Summer Peak Study Year: 2015  TVA to LG&E/KU (500 MW) Study Year: 2018, Shoulder and Summer Peak  Sullivan 765 kV (HVDC) to PJM/VACAR (3500 MW)

2012 – 2013 SIRPP

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Shelby to TVA/Southern 3500 MW

Transmission System Impacts for the SIRPP

  • Three (3) 500 kV Lines
  • One (1) 500/230 kV XFMR
  • Three (3) 230 kV Lines
  • One (1) 230/115 kV XFMRs
  • Thirteen (13) 161 kV Lines
  • One (1) 115 kV Line

Total Cost (2013$) = $400,605,000

71

2012 – 2013 SIRPP

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Sullivan to PJM/VACAR 3500 MW

Transmission System Impacts for the SIRPP

  • Five (5) 230 kV Lines
  • One (1) 230/115 kV XFMR
  • Eleven (11) 161 kV Lines
  • One (1) 115 kV Line
  • One (1) 115 kV SS
  • One (1) 115/100 kV XFMR
  • Two (2) 100 kV Lines

Total Cost (2013$) = $247,610,000

72

2012 – 2013 SIRPP

slide-73
SLIDE 73

TVA to LG&E/KU 500 MW

Transmission System Impacts for the SIRPP

  • None

Total Cost (2013$) = $0

73

2012 – 2013 SIRPP

slide-74
SLIDE 74

74

Economic Planning Studies

 Shelby 500 kV (HVDC) to TVA/Southern Company (3500 MW) Study Year: 2018 Study Year: 2016  TVA to LG&E/KU (700 MW) Study Year: 2018  Sullivan 765 kV (HVDC) to PJM/VACAR (3500 MW)

2013 – 2014 SIRPP

Study Year: 2015  Duke to Santee Cooper (500 MW) Study Year: 2015  SOCO to FRCC (500 MW)

slide-75
SLIDE 75

75

More detailed information concerning these studies is available on the Southeast Inter- Regional Participation Process website at the following link: http://www.southeastirpp.com/

2013 – 2014 SIRPP

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Upcoming 2014 SERTP Process *

 1st “RPSG” Meeting

  • March 2014
  • Select Five Economic Planning Studies

 Preliminary Expansion Plan Meeting

  • June 2014
  • Preliminary 10 Year Expansion Plan

 2nd “RPSG” Meeting

  • September 2014
  • Preliminary Economic Planning Study Results

 Annual Transmission Planning Summit

  • December 2014
  • Ten Year Expansion Plan / 2015 Input Assumptions
  • Final Economic Planning Study Results

*

The SERTP expects to initiate the implementation of the Order 1000 regional compliance process in June of 2014. An interim web-conference to discuss the status of compliance process will be held on December 19th, 2013.

76

2013 SERTP

slide-77
SLIDE 77

77

Questions?

2013 SERTP