Welco elcome! me!
Le Learnin arning g Se Session ssion/Summit /Summit
Day Two May 26th, 2017
Welco elcome! me! Le Learnin arning g Se Session ssion/Summit - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Welco elcome! me! Le Learnin arning g Se Session ssion/Summit /Summit Day Two May 26 th , 2017 Rec ecap of Da ap of Day On y One & e & Outline of the Days Activities Jennifer Allison 2 Outcome Outcome Data Data Su
Day Two May 26th, 2017
2
Jennifer Allison
3
Bekah Thomas
4
Source: Hospitalizations estimated from CDC WISQARS query April 2017, 2014 data; and Emergency Department treated and released cases estimated from the Healthcare Utilization Project, Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, 2013.
By May 2018, participants in the CS CoIIN will
Decrease the rate of injury-related mortality among 0-19 year
baseline rate for the CS CoIIN topic areas.
Deaths
Decrease the rate of injury-related hospitalizations among 0- 19 year olds by 3.81% relative to the participating state/jurisdiction baseline rate for the CS CoIIN topic areas.
Hospitalizations
Decrease the rate of injury-related ED visits among 0-19 year
baseline rate for the CS CoIIN topic areas.
ED Visits
5
identify emerging issues prioritize resources and strategies evaluate interventions
Source: Chretien, J., Tomich, N.E., Gaydos, J.C., Kelley, P.W.: Real-Time Public Health Surveillance for Emergency Preparedness. Am J. Pub. Health 99(8), 1360-1363 (2009)
6
Sta tate e or
Ju Juri risdiction sdiction Cause use of
Injur jury Dea eath th Ho Hosp sp. ED ED Vi Visits sits Florida Interpersonal Violence Prevention √ √ √ Indiana Child Passenger √ √ Indiana Interpersonal Violence √ √ Kentucky Interpersonal Violence √ Kentucky Child Passenger √ Massachusetts Suicide and Self Harm √ √ Tennessee Falls Prevention √ √
7
AKA your best friends for data
8
ICD-9 CM to ICD-10- CM Crosswalk Outcome Measure Worksheet
9
Evaluation
control group
QI
population, growing as knowledge is gained
than perfect data
data sources
10
Ambulance Usage Records Traumatic Brain Injury Registries Medicaid Trauma Registries Child Death Review Infant Fatality Review Poison Control Centers Syndromic Surveillance System Death Registration System
11
Source: National Association of State Head Injury Administrators. TBI Registries and Trauma Registries: State by State https://www.nashia.org/pdf/statestbi_registries_trauma_july_2016_revised.pdf Accessed May 18th, 2017
Florida
BRAIN AND SPINAL CORD INJURY CENTRAL REGISTRY (2013)
Indiana
State Medical Surveillance Registry for Traumatic Spinal Cord and Brain Injuries (2007)
Minnesota
TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND SPINAL CORD INJURY REGISTRY (1991)
Missouri
Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Registry (1986)
Nebraska
Brain and Head Injury Registry Act (1992)
New Hampshire
Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Registry (2000)
Tennessee
Title 68 Health, Safety and Environmental Protection Ch. 55: Head and Spinal Cord Injury Information System Part 2 (2010)
Virginia
Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Registry (2008)
12
What other data sources can you use? What barriers to collecting and reporting data are you facing? How do you use outcome data when you do have it?
13
Jane Taylor, Ed.D. Improvement Advisor to the Child Safety CoIIN
14
adoption
15
Improvement Hold Gains Spread
16
17
to change
affected by the change, during testing
18
Improvement Hold Gains Spread
19
Degree of belief that the changes will result in improvement High
Prototype Pilot (s) Spread
Successful changes Changes still need further testing. There is a risk of moving to spread. Unsuccessful proposed changes Low Moderate
Source: The Improvement Guide, p. 145
20
Source: E. Rogers. Diffusion of Innovation
21
Charact aracteri eristics stics
Rating
Think hink you u what what one ne it item m wor
thy of f sp spread read in in your ur project. project. Ra Rate th the chan hange ge on n a scale a scale of 1 f 1-5. . 1 1 - very y weak; weak; 3 - ok; k; 5 -very st strong
Source: The Improvement Guide, Pg. 200-201
22
2.5% 13.5% 34% 34% 16%
Innovators Early Adopters Early Majority Late Majority Laggards
Source: adapted from The Improvement Guide, pg. 212
23
Awareness
Persuasion
Decision
Implementation
Confirmation
Source: adapted from The Improvement Guide
24
Adapted from Ashkenas, 1995
SHARE INFORMATION SHAPE BEHAVIOR
(C) 2001, Sarah W. Fraser
General Publications Personal Touch Interactive Activities Public Events Face-to-face Flyers Newsletters Videos Articles Posters Letters Cards Postcards Telephone email Visits Seminars Learning sets Modeling Road shows Fairs Conferences Exhibitions Mass meetings One-to-one Mentoring Seconding Shadowing
25
What infrastructure changes be made to enable adoption? In Infra frastructure structure/r /rollout
In Indi divi vidual dual ado dopti tion
Primary infrastructure and system level changes used to achieve outcomes Balance of individual adoption decisions and infrastructure/system changes used to achieve
Primarily individual decisions to adopt changes used to achieve outcomes Source: NICHQ Forum 2007 Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
26
1. 1. Vis isio ion: Declare the importance of innovation; make it part of the project’s self image. 2. 2. For
esig ight ht: Find out where technologies & people are going. Identify articulated and unarticulated needs of customers or those you serve. 3. 3. Str tretch tch Go Goal als: To make quantum improvements. 4. 4. Em Empowerment erment: Hire or engage good people and trust them; delegate responsibilities, provide slack resources, and get out the way. 5. 5. Com
munica cati tions
rules in forums for sharing ideas, and where networking is each person’s responsibility. 6. 6. Rewar ards ds an and R d Rec ecog
nition tion: Innovation is an intensely human activity. Emphasize recognition more than monetary rewards.
Source: NICHQ Forum 2007 Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center
27
28
Set-up up
get population pulation
r audien ences es
uccess ssful ul sites s
y partn tner ers
itial ial sprea ead d plan an
Soci cial al Syst ystem em
y messenger engers
mmunities ies
nical al suppo pport
nsit ition ion issues
Kno nowle wledge ge Mana nagem emen ent Mea easur urem emen ent and nd Fee eedba back ck
Le Leader ership ship
pic is a k key y strategic gic initiat iativ ive
als and incenti tives s aligned gned
cutiv ive e spons nsor
gned
to-da day manager agers ident ntif ified ied
Bett Better er Idea eas
Develo elop p the case
ribe the ideas as
Source: The Improvement Guide, pg. 196
29
Set-up up
get population pulation
r audien ences es
uccess ssful ul sites s
y partn tner ers
itial ial sprea ead d plan an
Soci cial al Syst ystem em
y messenger engers
mmunities ies
nical al suppo pport
nsit ition ion issues
Kno nowle wledge ge Mana nagem emen ent Mea easur urem emen ent and nd Fee eedba back ck
Le Leader ership ship
pic is a k key y strategic gic initiat iativ ive
als and incenti tives s aligned gned
cutiv ive e spons nsor
gned
to-da day manager agers ident ntif ified ied
Bett Better er Idea eas
Develo elop p the case
ribe the ideas as
Source: The Improvement Guide, pg. 196
30
Set-up up
get population pulation
r audien ences es
uccess ssful ul sites s
y partn tner ers
itial ial sprea ead d plan an
Soci cial al Syst ystem em
y messenger engers
mmunities ies
nical al suppo pport
nsit ition ion issues
Kno nowle wledge ge Mana nagem emen ent Mea easur urem emen ent and nd Fee eedba back ck
Le Leader ership ship
pic is a k key y strategic gic initiat iativ ive
als and incenti tives s aligned gned
cutiv ive e spons nsor
gned
to-da day manager agers ident ntif ified ied
Bett Better er Idea eas
Develo elop p the case
ribe the ideas as
Source: The Improvement Guide, pg. 196
31
Set-up up
get population pulation
r audien ences es
uccess ssful ul sites s
y partn tner ers
itial ial sprea ead d plan an
Soci cial al Syst ystem em
y messenger engers
mmunities ies
nical al suppo pport
nsit ition ion issues
Kno nowle wledge ge Mana nagem emen ent Mea easur urem emen ent and nd Fee eedba back ck
Le Leader ership ship
pic is a k key y strategic gic initiat iativ ive
als and incenti tives s aligned gned
cutiv ive e spons nsor
gned
to-da day manager agers ident ntif ified ied
Bett Better er Idea eas
Develo elop p the case
ribe the ideas as
Source: The Improvement Guide, pg. 196
32
Set-up up
get population pulation
r audien ences es
uccess ssful ul sites s
y partn tner ers
itial ial sprea ead d plan an
Soci cial al Syst ystem em
y messenger engers
mmunities ies
nical al suppo pport
nsit ition ion issues
Kno nowle wledge ge Mana nagem emen ent Mea easur urem emen ent and nd Fee eedba back ck
Le Leader ership ship
pic is a k key y strategic gic initiat iativ ive
als and incenti tives s aligned gned
cutiv ive e spons nsor
gned
to-da day manager agers ident ntif ified ied
Bett Better er Idea eas
Develo elop p the case
ribe the ideas as
Source: The Improvement Guide, pg. 196
33
Set-up up
get population pulation
r audien ences es
uccess ssful ul sites s
y partn tner ers
itial ial sprea ead d plan an
Soci cial al Syst ystem em
y messenger engers
mmunities ies
nical al suppo pport
nsit ition ion issues
Kno nowle wledge ge Mana nagem emen ent Mea easur urem emen ent and nd Fee eedba back ck
Le Leader ership ship
pic is a k key y strategic gic initiat iativ ive
als and incenti tives s aligned gned
cutiv ive e spons nsor
gned
to-da day manager agers ident ntif ified ied
Bett Better er Idea eas
Develo elop p the case
ribe the ideas as
Source: The Improvement Guide, pg. 196
34
Set-up up
get population pulation
r audien ences es
uccess ssful ul sites s
y partn tner ers
itial ial sprea ead d plan an
Soci cial al Syst ystem em
y messenger engers
mmunities ies
nical al suppo pport
nsit ition ion issues
Kno nowle wledge ge Mana nagem emen ent Mea easur urem emen ent and nd Fee eedba back ck
Le Leader ership ship
pic is a k key y strategic gic initiat iativ ive
als and incenti tives s aligned gned
cutiv ive e spons nsor
gned
to-da day manager agers ident ntif ified ied
Bett Better er Idea eas
Develo elop p the case
ribe the ideas as
Source: The Improvement Guide, pg. 196
35
36
37
Progress of spread of night time restrictions from one pilot site to 10 over 1 year
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Jun-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 LS1 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 LS2 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Setp 02 Oct-02 Nov-02
# facilities completed
System-wide Diffusion - Medication FMEA
Adopted from Iowa Health System
38
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Jun-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 LS1 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 LS2 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Setp 02 Oct-02 Nov-02Policy Makers participating
Policy Maker Education and Conversations
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Jun-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 LS1 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 LS2 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Setp 02 Oct-02# of Police Departments Trained in the last 6 months
Enforcement- Training of Law Enforcement Officers
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Jun-01 Jul-01 Aug-01 Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 LS1 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 LS2 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02 Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Setp 02 Oct-02 Nov-02Number of Schools
Schools Requiring CheckPoints Registrations for Parking Permits
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Jun-01 Jul-01 Aug-01Sep-01 Oct-01 Nov-01 LS1 Dec-01 Jan-02 Feb-02 LS2 Mar-02 Apr-02 May-02Jun-02 Jul-02 Aug-02 Setp 02 Oct-02 Nov-02Number of Site
CheckPoints Programs for Parents
Adopted from Iowa Health System
39
1 2 3 4 5
Site 1 Site 2 Site 3 Site 4 Site 5 Site 6
Entry in each cell designates status of each of key changes in each location
Adopted from Iowa Health System Bl Blank ank= Not started; Red ed= Incomplete; Yel ellow= Partially Complete; Gr Gree een= Complete
40
strategy/plan
41
42
ession sion Go Goal als: s:
90-da day y aim aim st stat atement ement for each secondary driver you selected in your draft driver diagram
eam re recruit cruitmen ment t and and outreach utreach plan to make sure you have the appropriate partners to achieve your aim
storyboar yboard and prepare to present it to another team
feedback session
s:
43
In Inst struc ructions tions: Strategy Team 1 presents storyboard (10-15 min).
Teams discuss (5-10 min). Repeat for Strategy Team 2.
Strategy Team 1 Strategy Team 2 CNMI MI CPS Vermont CPS CNMI MI IPV Pennsylvania IPV Con
ecticut cut SSHP Massachusetts SSHP Fl Flor
da All Teams Texas CPS Ken entu tuck cky CPS Tennessee FP Mi Missouri ssouri IPV Tennessee IPV Texas xas TDS & SSHP Tennessee TDS Indiana diana CPS Missouri CPS Indiana diana IPV Minnesota IPV Ken entu tuck cky SSHP Vermont SSHP Ken entu tuck cky TDS New Hampshire TDS Ma Massac ssachusetts husetts FP Pennsylvania FP Mi Missour ssouri SSHP Virginia SSHP No North th Da Dakota ta TDS Wisconsin TDS
44
Jenny Stern-Carusone
45
Username = Firstname.Lastname Password = *Unique If you forgot your password
46
Charts
Assistance
Team Profiles PDSA Submissions Monthly Report Submissions Archives and Resources
47
Jennifer Allison
48
Jennifer Allison