Wednesday, 13 th March 2013 Jon Day GBRMPA Outline of talk - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

wednesday 13 th march 2013 jon day gbrmpa outline of talk
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Wednesday, 13 th March 2013 Jon Day GBRMPA Outline of talk - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ecosyste Ecosystem m based mana based management gement (EBM) (EBM) is the Great Barrier Reef really the gold standard for marine EBM? Copenhagen Sustainability Lecture University of Copenhagen Wednesday, 13 th March 2013 Jon Day


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Jon Day GBRMPA

Ecosyste Ecosystem m based mana based management gement (EBM) (EBM)

– is the Great Barrier Reef really the ‘gold

standard’ for marine EBM?

Copenhagen Sustainability Lecture University of Copenhagen

Wednesday, 13th March 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline of talk

  • Overview of Great Barrier Reef
  • What is Ecosystem-based Management?

(c.f traditional sectoral approach)

  • What are the elements of marine EBM?
  • ie. what key principles/criteria might be

applied?

  • How is the GBR doing against (or dealing

with) those EBM criteria?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area

Princess Charlotte Bay

  • ~ 2,300 km long
  • starts at low water mark
  • n mainland coast
  • 250 km offshore at

widest point

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Princess Charlotte Bay Cape Flattery Cape Melville

80

Kilometres

4

The Great Barrier Reef

  • ~ 3,000 separate reefs
  • over 1000 islands

Lizard Island

slide-5
SLIDE 5

GBRWHA comprises:

  • 7% coral reef
  • 61% shallow - seagrass, shoals, sand, mud
  • 15% continental slope
  • 16% deep oceanic waters
  • 1% islands

More than just coral reefs ….

  • mangroves
  • seagrass beds (shallow & deepwater)
  • algal & sponge ‘gardens’
  • sandy and muddy bottom communities
  • sandy & coral cays
  • continental islands

All these habitats are ‘interconnected’

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Great Barrier Reef – size roughly equivalent to 90% of the Baltic Sea...

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Like many natural areas, the GBRWHA is ‘under pressure’ including:

  • Climate change - bleaching, rising sea temperature,

acidification… and extreme weather events

  • Water Quality - downstream effects of land use
  • Increasing coastal developments, espec ports
  • Increasing shipping and pollution incidents
  • Some unsustainable fishing impacts
  • Increasing population growth & recreation
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Objectives

  • Main Object: Provide for "long term protection

and conservation ... environment, biodiversity and heritage values of the GBR Region" So far as is consistent with the main object:

  • Allow ecologically sustainable use of the GBR Region
  • Encourage community engagement in the protection

and management

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • commercial fishing,

including trawling in some areas

  • recreational fishing
  • shipping/ports
  • tourism
  • aquaculture
  • defence training
  • indigenous hunting
  • research/monitoring
  • permitted works,

including dredging

9

Always been a multiple use Marine Park Most reasonable activities allowed in certain zones, including:

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Legislative basis for EBM…. GBRMP Act now defines “ecosystem-based management” as:

“An integrated approach to the management of an ecosystem and of matters affecting that ecosystem …. with the primary goal of maintaining ecological processes, biodiversity and functioning biological communities”.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

How does EBM differ from more traditional approach?

Ecosystem based management

Integrated approach Multiple scales Entire ecosystems (and therefore multiple species) Humans as an integral part of ecosystems Adaptive and sustainable approach to management of complex ecosystems Long-term perspective Sustainable production but with wider perspective of ecosystem goods and services

Traditional resource management

Sectoral approach Localized geographic scale Individual species (eg. target species in fisheries) Sectoral management generally does not consider human side of management Stochastic management not integrated with monitoring Short to medium term perspectives Managing commodities alone (without the wider perspective of EBM)

(adapted from McFadden and Barnes, 2009)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Ruckelshaus, Klinger, Knowlton & DeMaster (2008) Marine Ecosystem-based Management in Practice: Scientific and Governance Challenges BioScience Vol 58 (1)

“The GBRMPA is the current gold

standard for EBM in the oceans, and its success ... is in a large part to its equal attention to both the human and natural systems parts of ecosystem management”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

EBM Criteria

Principles/criteria governing marine ecosystem‐based management (EBM) have been addressed by various groups:

  • Arkema, KK, Abramson S & Dewsbury BM. (2006) Marine

Ecosystem-based management: from characterisation to

  • implementation. Front Ecol Environ 4 (10): 525-532]
  • The Sidney Consensus was developed collaboratively by workshop

participants in British Columbia representing academia, federal government, First Nations, industry, non‐governmental

  • rganizations, and the provincial government.
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Criteria for EBM

  • 1. General criteria
  • 2. Ecological criteria
  • 3. Human dimensions criteria
  • 4. Management criteria

[after Arkema et al. (2006) Front Ecol Environ 4(10): 525-532]

24 Criteria for EBM that can be grouped into four broad categories:

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Ge General neral EBM criteria teria

  • 1a. Sustai

taina nability bility – ensuring use with capacity of the

natural resources to sustain natural process

  • 1b. Ecolo
  • logical

gical health th & i inte tegrity grity – recognise

ecosystem structure, function and key ecological processes; maintain ecological integrity

  • 1c. In

Inclusion usion of f humans s in ecosystem ystem -recognise

humans and their use of natural resources are important components of any management decisions

15

[after Arkema et al. (2006) Front Ecol Environ 4(10)]

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Zoning 2004 - today

Prese serva rvation tion Zone 0.2% (0.1%)

Marine Nat’l Park 33.3% 3% (4.6%) Scient ent. . Rese searc arch 0.05% 5% (0.01%) Bu Buffer er Zone ne

2.9% (0.1%)

Conservat’n Park rk 1.5% (0.6%) Habi bitat tat Protect’n 28.2% 2% (15.2%) Genera neral Use se 33.8% 8% (77.9%)

Zoning - one of the key spatial management tools

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Ecol

  • logical
  • gical Risk Asses

sessment sment

  • f Otter Trawl fishery

ery

Comprehensively assessed all risks to:

  • Harvested species (prawns, scallops, bugs, crabs)
  • By-catch species – hundreds of species
  • Species of conservation concern – sharks, rays,

syngnathids, seabirds, sea snakes, cetaceans

  • Benthic habitats – 10 seabed habitat types
  • Species assemblages/communities – 16 assessed
  • Ecosystem processes – physical, chemical, ecological

As far as we know, it’s the first example of inclusion of full suite of ecosystem processes as a component of an ERA:

  • Most risks from trawling have been reduced
  • Some risks remain (high risk=11 spp of skates/rays, two spp of sea-

snakes and one habitat type)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Planning ‘principles’ for new ‘no-take’ network

ELEVEN Biophysical Operating Principles:

  • minimum size
  • ensure replication
  • consider special & unique sites
  • minimum of at least 20% no-take per bioregion
  • consider connectivity
  • cross-shelf & latitudinal diversity
slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Commitment to halt and reverse the

decline in water quality entering GBR

  • Reef Rescue program in 2008
  • GBR Water Quality Guidelines
  • Revised Reef Plan included regulation
  • Working with Regional bodies/Councils on

actions and targets

  • Integrated Paddock-to-Reef Monitoring,

Modelling and Reporting program

Initial positives outcomes:

  • 4% reduction nutrients
  • 3% reduction sediments
  • 8% reduction in pesticides

Addressing water quality decline

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Draf aft t Zoning ing Plan n – mid 2003 03

1 4

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Revis vised d & fi final Zoning ning Plan n 2004 04

1 5

slide-22
SLIDE 22

1c 1c. . In Inclusi lusion

  • n of
  • f

hu huma mans ns in in ec ecos

  • sys

ystem tem

  • 111,000

000 kids in 285 schools

  • ls now

w involve ved d in stewar wardsh dship ip programs rams wh whic ich help lp lo look after ter the GBR BR

  • State

ate, , Ca Catholi

  • lic

c and Indep epen ende dent nt schools

  • ls across

ss Queenslan nsland

  • =10% of entire

ire catchment chment populati ation

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Ecolog

  • logical

ical criteria teria

  • 2a. Complexity

plexity – complex and dynamic natural

structure; functioning of the ecosystems; food webs; habitat associations; biotic and abiotic interactions

  • 2b. Temp

mporal ral – dynamic systems; attributes and

boundaries frequently change but long-term focus essential

  • 2c. Spati

tial al –a range of spatial scales; environmental

externalities; thinking outside the box

  • 2d. Connectivity

ectivity –cross shelf; long-shore; sink-source;

land-sea

  • 2e. Resilience

silience –ability to recover from disturbance

23

[after Arkema et al. (2006) Front Ecol Environ 4(10)]

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Simplified food web

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Major physical, chemical and ecological processes in the Great Barrier Reef

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Resilience of a coral reef habitat

(Source: R Kelly, ACRS)

Coral cover over time (1993-2007) for individual reefs. Each line represents percentage coral cover around perimeter of reefs.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Experts identified bioregions:

  • 30 Reef
  • 40 Non-

Reef

  • Total - 70

bioregions

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Importance of marine connectivity

(Source: R Kelly, ACRS)

The Red Emperor spends different stages of its life cycle utilising different habitats

slide-29
SLIDE 29

A resilient coral reef habitat …. able to recover when bleached and then covered by algal growth. A less resilient ecosystem may fail to recover and remain permanently in an algal dominated state

(Source: R Kelly, ACRS)

Resilience - the capacity of an ecosystem to recover from disturbance or withstand ongoing pressures

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Human man Dimension mension criteria teria

  • 3a. Ecosystem

system goods & servi rvice ces s – including such

undervalued services as nutrient recycling, climatic regulation, blue carbon, shoreline protection, etc

  • 3b. Econo

nomic mic – considering economic factors to help

determine a more realistic ‘triple-bottom line’

  • 3c. Sta

takehold holder er – engaging all interested parties in

planning and management to find common solutions

  • 3d. Cultu

ltural ral – recognise traditional and Indigenous

practices but also recognise those interests may affect resource management

30

[after Arkema et al. (2006) Front Ecol Environ 4(10)]

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Pr

Provis isio ioni ning ng serv rvic ices es - food, genetic resources,

bio-chemicals

  • Su

Supporti rting ng services vices - provision of habitat, nutrient

recycling, ‘blue carbon’ storage

  • Re

Regulat latin ing g servic vices es – climate regulation, natural

hazard protection,

  • Cultur

ural al servi vices ces – inspiration, recreation and

aesthetic values, spiritual values

slide-32
SLIDE 32

GBR BR suppo ports rts signi nific fican ant t commerc rcia ial l indus ustri tries es, , espec ecia ially lly commer erci cial al marine e touris rism and fish shin ing: g:

  • Inco

come me - in 2006/07 GBR-dependent economic

activities in the Region directly and indirectly contributed an estimated AUD$5.4 bil illi lion to Australian economy

  • Em

Employm ymen ent t - in 2006/07 GBR-dependent economic

activities in the Region and within the catchment provided employment equivalent to 54,0000 full-time positions

Figures from Access Economics Pty Ltd 2008

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Wide range of users and stakeholders

Indigenous interests Commercial fishers Ministers (Federal & State) Local communities Tourism Associations Site specific tour ops Recreational fishers Aquaculture Divers Collectors (shells, coral, trochus etc) Researchers NGOs Local Government State/Federal Govt agencies Advisory Committees Recreational boaters Roving operators

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Role of public participation

  • Written public submissions over two formal phases:
  • 10,000 submissions prior to preparing draft map
  • 21,500 submissions commenting on Draft Zoning

Plan

  • One of the most comprehensive processes of

community involvement & participatory planning for any environmental issue in Australia’s history

  • > 1,000 formal & informal meetings
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Traditional Owners and Indigenous interests

  • 70 Traditional owner groups
  • 40,000+ years in the area
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Man anag agement ement cri riteri eria a - 1

  • 4a. Scien

ience ce-ba based sed – management decisions backed

by best available science; scientific baselines

  • 4b. Policy

licy dri rive ven n – recognise the essential need for

supportive legislation and strong policy framework for effective management

  • 4c. Boundari

ries s –management must be spatially

defined, recognising both ecological relevance but also stakeholder understanding

  • 4d. Technologi
  • logical

cal –effective use of technologies to

monitor ecosystem and evaluate management actions

36

[after Arkema et al. (2006) Front Ecol Environ 4(10)]

slide-37
SLIDE 37

5

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Planning ‘principles’

ELEVEN Biophysical Operating Principles:

  • minimum size
  • ensure replication
  • consider special & unique sites
  • minimum of at least 20% no-take per bioregion
  • consider connectivity
  • cross-shelf & latitudinal diversity
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Sound governance/ legislative framework’

  • GBRMP Act 1975 specifically for Great Barrier

Reef Region

  • Complementary national legislation (EPBC Act 1999)
  • Complementary Federal/State legislation
  • Ability to legislate outside the ‘wet bits’ if

necessary

  • Strong policy base developed adaptively over 35

years

  • International conventions
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Map of ‘bioregions’

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Data

1 6

slide-42
SLIDE 42

1 7

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Man anag agement ement cri riteri eria a - 2

  • 4e. A

. Adaptive tive manageme ment nt –periodic and systematic

evaluation leading to improved management

  • 4f. Co

Co-ma manag agem emen ent t – shared responsibility between

multiple levels of government and stakeholders; also recognition of Indigenous rights and interests

  • 4g. Syste

stems ms appro roach ch – management based on a

shared vision, reliable data and knowledge, and agreed set of objectives

  • 4h. In

Inte tegra rated ted – formal and informal arrangements; inter-

sectoral, inter-disciplinary, inter-generationally

43

[after Arkema et al. (2006) Front Ecol Environ 4(10)]

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Need to be aware of changes in most marine areas:

  • rapidly changing patterns of use
  • technological change
  • social- economic changes
  • political change
  • dynamic systems natural changes

Hence need for adaptive management and some flexibility in decision making

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Zoning 1980s -2004 Zoning 2004 - today

Zoning – a key spatial planning/ management tool

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Complem plemen entar tary y fi field eld ma managemen ment

Federal ral & St State ate (Que ueen ensland) sland) Governme vernment nt agencies es cooperate rate for r field d manageme gement nt

  • St

State ate agencies ies in inclu lude: e:

Queensland Parks & Wildlife Service Queensland Boating & Fisheries Patrol Queensland Water Police

  • Federal

ral agencies ies in inclu lude: e:

Customs Coastwatch Australian Federal Police Commonwealth Department of Public Prosecutions Australian Maritime Safety Authority

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Man anag agement ement cri riteri eria a - 3

4i. . Pre recautio utiona nary ry appro roach ch – manage conservatively

when threats are uncertain

4j. . In Inte ter-disciplina isciplinary ry – management based on range of

disciplines incl ecology, sociology, economics

  • 4f. Cumulative

ulative impacts cts – shared responsibility between

multiple levels of government and stakeholders; also recognition of Indigenous rights and interests

  • 4g. Monit

itori ring– management based on a shared vision,

reliable data and knowledge, and agreed set of

  • bjectives

47

[after Arkema et al. (2006) Front Ecol Environ 4(10)]

slide-48
SLIDE 48

EBM in the GBR…

Total exposure of non-reef areas 2001–2011 to threats from:

  • tropical cyclone

waves,

  • elevated sea

surface temperatures, and

  • freshwater

plumes

Scaled to maximum value

  • f 2.5 out of a maximum

possible score of 3.

slide-49
SLIDE 49

EBM in the GBR…

  • AIMS long-term monitoring program shows hard coral

cover in GBR has declined significantly since monitoring began in 1986

  • Declines most severe in the centre and south sections.
  • Crown-of-thorns starfish and cyclones have been

responsible for most of the mortality. Hard coral cover in the Great Barrier Reef, 1986–2012

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Relation of EBM to other mgt/planning tools

slide-51
SLIDE 51

EBM in the GBR…

  • 1. Is the GBR really the ‘gold standard’ of

marine EBM?

  • 2. Have we effectively addressed all the

dimensions of EBM? Two areas in which we can certainly improve:

  • Effectively assessing ecosystem goods and

services

  • Understanding cumulative impacts -
slide-52
SLIDE 52

Thank k you

  • particularly to Kather

herine ne Richar hards dson

  • n for inviting

me to make this presentation

  • Also to the Danish Government for financial

support

For more information: www.gbr brmpa pa.go .gov. v.au au