Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and ap- plications - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and ap
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and ap- plications - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and ap- plications Based on joint work with Imma Curato and Bennet Str oh | October 9, 2019 | Institute of Mathematical Finance Robert Stelzer Page 2 Weak dependence of mixed moving average


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and ap- plications

Bennet Str¨

  • h|October 9, 2019|Institute of Mathematical Finance

Based on joint work with Imma Curato and Robert Stelzer

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Page 2 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Motivation

  • 1. Let Λ be a L´

evy basis, (At)t∈R the σ-algebra generated by the set of random variables {Λ(B), B ∈ B(S ×(−∞, t])}.

  • 2. X is called causal if Xt is adapted to At.
  • 3. Causal MMA processes are (under moment assumptions)

θ-weakly dependent.

  • 4. Weak dependence properties are used to derive central

limit theorems.

  • 5. Aim: Generalize the concept of causality and give a

suitable definition of weak dependence. Derive distributional limit theorems for such random fields.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Page 3 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Notation

◮ F∗

u is the class of bounded functions from (Rn)u to R.

◮ Fu is the class of bounded, Lipschitz functions from (Rn)u to R. ◮ F =

u∈N∗ Fu and F∗ = u∈N∗ F∗ u .

◮ Lip(G) = supx=y

|G(x)−G(y)| x1−y1+...+xn−yn, where G : Rn → R.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Page 3 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Notation

◮ F∗

u is the class of bounded functions from (Rn)u to R.

◮ Fu is the class of bounded, Lipschitz functions from (Rn)u to R. ◮ F =

u∈N∗ Fu and F∗ = u∈N∗ F∗ u .

◮ Lip(G) = supx=y

|G(x)−G(y)| x1−y1+...+xn−yn, where G : Rn → R.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Page 4 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Definition (θ-weakly dependent processes)

Let X = (Xt)t∈R be an Rn-valued stochastic process. Then, X is called θ-weakly dependent if the θ-coefficients θ(h) = sup

u,v∈N∗ θu,v(h) −

h→∞ 0,

where

θu,v(h) = sup |Cov(F(Xi1, . . . , Xiu), G(Xj1, . . . , Xjv ))| F∞Lip(G) , F ∈ F ∗

u , G ∈ Fu,

(i1, . . . , iu) ∈ Ru, (j1, . . . , jv) ∈ Rv, i1 ≤ . . . iu ≤ iu + h ≤ j1 ≤ . . . ≤ jv

  • .

Under θ-weak dependence central limit theorems can be proven under slower decay of the weak dependence coefficient compared to η-weak dependence.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Page 4 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Definition (θ-weakly dependent processes)

Let X = (Xt)t∈R be an Rn-valued stochastic process. Then, X is called θ-weakly dependent if the θ-coefficients θ(h) = sup

u,v∈N∗ θu,v(h) −

h→∞ 0,

where

θu,v(h) = sup |Cov(F(Xi1, . . . , Xiu), G(Xj1, . . . , Xjv ))| F∞Lip(G) , F ∈ F ∗

u , G ∈ Fu,

(i1, . . . , iu) ∈ Ru, (j1, . . . , jv) ∈ Rv, i1 ≤ . . . iu ≤ iu + h ≤ j1 ≤ . . . ≤ jv

  • .

Under θ-weak dependence central limit theorems can be proven under slower decay of the weak dependence coefficient compared to η-weak dependence.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Page 5 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Definition (θ-weakly dependent random fields)

Let X = (Xt)t∈Rm be an Rn-valued random field. Then, X is called θ-weakly dependent if θ(h) = sup

u,v∈N∗ θu,v(h) −

h→∞ 0,

where θu,v(h) = sup |Cov(F(XΓ), G(X˜

Γ))|

F∞Lip(G) , F ∈ F∗, G ∈ F, Γ, ˜ Γ ⊂ Rm, dist(Γ, ˜ Γ) ≥ h, |Γ| ≤ u, |˜ Γ| ≤ v

  • .

There are no central limit theorems available achieving the weaker decay demands on the weak dependence coefficient under θ-weak dependence known from the process case.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Page 5 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Definition (θ-weakly dependent random fields)

Let X = (Xt)t∈Rm be an Rn-valued random field. Then, X is called θ-weakly dependent if θ(h) = sup

u,v∈N∗ θu,v(h) −

h→∞ 0,

where θu,v(h) = sup |Cov(F(XΓ), G(X˜

Γ))|

F∞Lip(G) , F ∈ F∗, G ∈ F, Γ, ˜ Γ ⊂ Rm, dist(Γ, ˜ Γ) ≥ h, |Γ| ≤ u, |˜ Γ| ≤ v

  • .

There are no central limit theorems available achieving the weaker decay demands on the weak dependence coefficient under θ-weak dependence known from the process case.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Page 6 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Lexicographic order on Rm

Consider y = (y1, . . . , ym) ∈ Rm and z = (z1, . . . , zm) ∈ Rm. We say y <lex z if and only if y1 < z1 or yp < zp and yq = zq for some p ∈ {2, . . . , m} and q = 1, . . . , p − 1. Define the sets Vt = {s ∈ Rm : s <lex t} ∪ {t} and V h

t = Vt ∩ {s ∈ Rm : t − s∞ ≥ h} for h > 0.

  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1

  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Figure: Vt and V h

t for m = 2, h = 2 and t = (−2, 4)

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Page 7 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Definition (θ-lex-weak dependence (Curato, Stelzer and St.))

Let X = (Xt)t∈Rm be an Rn-valued random field. Then, X is called θ-lex-weakly dependent if θlex

X (h) = sup u∈N∗ θu(h) −

h→∞ 0,

where θu(h) = sup |Cov(F(XΓ), G(Xj))| F∞Lip(G) , F ∈ F∗, G ∈ F, j ∈ Rm, Γ ⊂ V h

j , |Γ| ≤ u

  • .
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Page 8 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Central Limit Theorem

Let (Dn)n∈N be a sequence of finite subsets of Zm with lim

n→∞ |Dn| = ∞ and

lim

n→∞

|Dn| |∂Dn| = 0. Consider the random quantity 1 |Dn|

1 2

  • j∈Dn

Xj. What can we say about its asymptotic distribution?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Page 9 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Central Limit Theorem (Curato, Stelzer and St.)

Let X = (Xt)t∈Zm be a stationary centered real-valued random field such that E[|Xt|2+δ] < ∞ for some δ > 0. Assume that θlex

X (h) ∈ O(h−α) with α > m(1 + 1 δ).

Let σ2 =

k∈Zm E[X0Xk|I], where I is the σ-algebra of shift

invariant sets. Then 1 |Γn|

1 2

  • j∈Dn

Xj d − − − →

n→∞ εσ,

with ε standard Gaussian, independent of σ2.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Page 10 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

(A, Λ)-influenced random fields

Let X = (Xt)t∈Rm be a random field, A = (At)t∈Rm ⊂ Rm a family

  • f Borel sets and M = {M(B), B ∈ Bb(S × Rm)} a random

measure. Assume Xt to be measurable w.r.t. σ(M(B), B ∈ Bb(S × At)). Then, A is the sphere of influence and X an (A, M)-influenced random field. If A is translation invariant (At = t + A0), the sphere of influence is described by the set A0. We call A0 the initial sphere of influence. For m = 1 and At = Vt the above definition equals the class of causal processes.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Page 10 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

(A, Λ)-influenced random fields

Let X = (Xt)t∈Rm be a random field, A = (At)t∈Rm ⊂ Rm a family

  • f Borel sets and M = {M(B), B ∈ Bb(S × Rm)} a random

measure. Assume Xt to be measurable w.r.t. σ(M(B), B ∈ Bb(S × At)). Then, A is the sphere of influence and X an (A, M)-influenced random field. If A is translation invariant (At = t + A0), the sphere of influence is described by the set A0. We call A0 the initial sphere of influence. For m = 1 and At = Vt the above definition equals the class of causal processes.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Page 10 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

(A, Λ)-influenced random fields

Let X = (Xt)t∈Rm be a random field, A = (At)t∈Rm ⊂ Rm a family

  • f Borel sets and M = {M(B), B ∈ Bb(S × Rm)} a random

measure. Assume Xt to be measurable w.r.t. σ(M(B), B ∈ Bb(S × At)). Then, A is the sphere of influence and X an (A, M)-influenced random field. If A is translation invariant (At = t + A0), the sphere of influence is described by the set A0. We call A0 the initial sphere of influence. For m = 1 and At = Vt the above definition equals the class of causal processes.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Page 10 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

(A, Λ)-influenced random fields

Let X = (Xt)t∈Rm be a random field, A = (At)t∈Rm ⊂ Rm a family

  • f Borel sets and M = {M(B), B ∈ Bb(S × Rm)} a random

measure. Assume Xt to be measurable w.r.t. σ(M(B), B ∈ Bb(S × At)). Then, A is the sphere of influence and X an (A, M)-influenced random field. If A is translation invariant (At = t + A0), the sphere of influence is described by the set A0. We call A0 the initial sphere of influence. For m = 1 and At = Vt the above definition equals the class of causal processes.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Page 11 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Definition (Mixed moving average field)

Let Λ be an Rd-valued L´ evy basis with characteristic quadruplet (γ, Σ, ν, π) and f : S × Rm → Mn×d(R) be a B(S × Rm)-measurable Λ-integrable function. Then, Xt =

  • S
  • Rm f(A, t − s)Λ(dA, ds),

is called a mixed moving average (MMA) field with kernel f.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Page 12 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

(A, Λ)-influenced MMA field

Let (At)t∈Rm be a full dimensional, translation invariant sphere of influence with initial sphere of influence A0 ⊂ V0. This also implies At ⊂ Vt. If X is adapted to the σ-algebra generated by {Λ(B), B ∈ B(S × At)} it can be written as Xt =

  • S
  • At

f(A, t − s)Λ(dA, ds) =

  • S
  • Vt

f(A, t − s)✶A0(s − t)Λ(dA, ds).

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Page 13 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Theorem (Curato, Stelzer and St.)

Let X be an (A, Λ)-influenced MMA field. Assume that

  • x>1x2ν(dx) < ∞, f ∈ L2 and Aj ⊂ K ⊂ Vj for a closed

proper cone.

  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5

Figure: Aj and K for m = 2 and j = (−2, 1)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Page 14 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Theorem (Curato, Stelzer and St.)

Then, X is θ-lex-weakly dependent with coefficients θlex

X (h) ≤ 2 S

  • A0∩V ψ(h)

tr(f(A, −s)ΣΛf(A, −s)′)dsπ(dA) +

  • S
  • A0∩V ψ(h)

f(A, −s)µΛdsπ(dA)

  • 2 1

2

, for all h > 0 and ΣΛ = Σ +

  • Rd xx′ν(dx), where ψ(h) = cKh for a

constant cK > 0.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Page 15 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Corollary (Asymptotic normality of the sample mean)

Let (Xu)u∈Zm be a zero mean (A, Λ)-influenced MMA field with f ∈ L2+δ ∩ L2 for δ > 0,

  • x>1x2+δν(dx) < ∞ and A0 ⊂ K for

a closed proper cone K ⊂ V0. Additionally assume θlex

X (h) = O(h−α), α > m(1 + 1 δ).

Then Σ =

k∈Zm E[X0X ′ k] is finite and

1 |Dn|

m 2

  • j∈Dn

Xj d − − − →

n→∞ N(0, Σ).

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Page 16 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Limit distribution of the sample autocovariance

For a zero mean random field define Yj,k = XjXj+k − E[X0Xk], j ∈ Zm, k ∈ Nm. Consider the random quantity 1 |Dn|

m 2

  • j∈Dn

Yj,k. What can we say about its asymptotic distribution?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Page 17 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Proposition (θ-lex-coefficients have hereditary properties)

◮ (Xt)t∈Rm stationary with X ∈ Lp for p > 1. ◮ h : Rn → Rk, s.t. h(0) = 0 and for 1 ≤ a < p h(x) − h(y) ≤ cx − y(1 + xa−1 + ya−1), for x, y ∈ Rn, c > 0. ◮ If X is θ-lex-weakly dependent, then Yt = h(Xt) is θ-lex-weakly dependent with θlex

Y (h) = Cθlex X (h)

p−a p−1 ,

for all r > 0 and a constant C. ◮ Extend asymptotic results to higher sample moments.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Page 17 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Proposition (θ-lex-coefficients have hereditary properties)

◮ (Xt)t∈Rm stationary with X ∈ Lp for p > 1. ◮ h : Rn → Rk, s.t. h(0) = 0 and for 1 ≤ a < p h(x) − h(y) ≤ cx − y(1 + xa−1 + ya−1), for x, y ∈ Rn, c > 0. ◮ If X is θ-lex-weakly dependent, then Yt = h(Xt) is θ-lex-weakly dependent with θlex

Y (h) = Cθlex X (h)

p−a p−1 ,

for all r > 0 and a constant C. ◮ Extend asymptotic results to higher sample moments.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Page 18 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Corollary (Asymptotic normality of the sample autocovariance function)

Let (Xu)u∈Zm be a zero mean (A, Λ)-influenced MMA field with f ∈ L4+δ ∩ L2 for δ > 0,

  • x>1x4+δν(dx) < ∞ and A0 ⊂ K for

a closed proper cone K ⊂ V0. Additionally assume θlex

X (h) = O(h−α), α > m

  • 1 + 1

δ

  • ( 3+δ

2+δ).

Then, Σk =

j∈Zm Cov(Y0,k, Yj,k) is finite and

1 |Dn|

m 2

  • j∈Dn

Yj,k d − − − →

N→∞ N (0, Σk) .

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Page 19 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Example (MSTOU processes)

◮ Introduced in [Nguyen and Veraart, 2018]. ◮ Let A = (At(x))(t,x)∈R×Rm be an ambit set, i.e. At(x) ⊂ R × Rm−1      At(x) = A0(0) + (t, x), (Translation invariant) As(x) ⊂ At(x), s < t At(x) ∩ ((t, ∞)) × Rm−1 = ∅. (Non-anticipative) ◮ The (A, Λ)-influenced MMA field Yt(x) = ∞

  • At(x)

exp(−λ(t − s))Λ(dλ, ds, dξ) is called MSTOU process.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Page 19 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Example (MSTOU processes)

◮ Introduced in [Nguyen and Veraart, 2018]. ◮ Let A = (At(x))(t,x)∈R×Rm be an ambit set, i.e. At(x) ⊂ R × Rm−1      At(x) = A0(0) + (t, x), (Translation invariant) As(x) ⊂ At(x), s < t At(x) ∩ ((t, ∞)) × Rm−1 = ∅. (Non-anticipative) ◮ The (A, Λ)-influenced MMA field Yt(x) = ∞

  • At(x)

exp(−λ(t − s))Λ(dλ, ds, dξ) is called MSTOU process.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Page 20 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Example (MSTOU processes)

◮ In the following we consider a zero mean c-class MSTOU process, i.e. At(x) = {(s, ξ) : s ≤ t, x − ξ ≤ c|t − s|}. ◮ Assume

  • |x|>1 |x|2+δν(dx) < ∞, for some δ > 0 and

π(dλ, ds, dξ) = ds dξ f(λ)dλ.

  • 8
  • 7
  • 6
  • 5
  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 4 5

Figure: c-class MSTOU process for c = 1

2 and (t, x) = (−2, 1)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Page 21 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Example (MSTOU processes)

◮ Then, Yt(x) is θ-lex-weakly dependent with coefficients θlex

Y (h)≤

  • Vm−1(c)ΣΛ

∞ (m − 1)! m−1

k=0 1 k!(2 λψ(h) c

)k (2λ)m e−2 λψ(h)

c f(λ)dλ

−✶{c>1}(2ψ(h))m−1 ∞ e−2 λψ(h)

c

− e−2λψ(h) 2λ f(λ)dλ 1

2

, Vm−1 is the volume of the m − 1-dimensional ball with radius c. ◮ Consider a Gamma(α, β) distributed mean reversion parameter λ (α > m and β > 0 ensure existence). ◮ The sample mean of Yt(x) is asymptotically normal if α > m

  • 3 + 2

δ

  • .
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Page 21 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Example (MSTOU processes)

◮ Then, Yt(x) is θ-lex-weakly dependent with coefficients θlex

Y (h)≤

  • Vm−1(c)ΣΛ

∞ (m − 1)! m−1

k=0 1 k!(2 λψ(h) c

)k (2λ)m e−2 λψ(h)

c f(λ)dλ

−✶{c>1}(2ψ(h))m−1 ∞ e−2 λψ(h)

c

− e−2λψ(h) 2λ f(λ)dλ 1

2

, Vm−1 is the volume of the m − 1-dimensional ball with radius c. ◮ Consider a Gamma(α, β) distributed mean reversion parameter λ (α > m and β > 0 ensure existence). ◮ The sample mean of Yt(x) is asymptotically normal if α > m

  • 3 + 2

δ

  • .
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Page 22 Weak dependence of mixed moving average fields and applications | Bennet Str¨

  • h |

October 9, 2019

Thank you for your attention!