WE MAKE SOLAR ENERGY PORTABLE Wherever you are you have light, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

we make solar energy portable
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

WE MAKE SOLAR ENERGY PORTABLE Wherever you are you have light, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

WE MAKE SOLAR ENERGY PORTABLE Wherever you are you have light, energy an potable water Wherever you are you have light, energy an potable water ILAND green technologies is development partner of the Swiss army BIGBOX for remote locations USERS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

WE MAKE SOLAR ENERGY PORTABLE

Wherever you are you have light, energy an potable water Wherever you are you have light, energy an potable water

ILAND green technologies is development partner of the Swiss army

slide-2
SLIDE 2

BIGBOX

for remote locations

slide-3
SLIDE 3

USERS : humanitarian camps, security, survival, expeditions, armies survival, expeditions, armies

PATENTED PRODUCTS

  • Swiss Humanitarian Aid Unit
  • NATO/NATO, UNHCR
  • International Committee of the Red Cross
  • French, Italian, Somali, Ethiopia, Morocco, Spain and Turkey armies

PATENTED PRODUCTS

  • French, Italian, Somali, Ethiopia, Morocco, Spain and Turkey armies
  • French cooperation forces
  • ESKO (worlwide logistics company)
  • Didastel Didactical Group Provence,
  • Swiss army, etc.

PATENTED PRODUCTS

interventions, energy reserve

  • Swiss army, etc.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

TEST : Marathon des sables

Sahara – Marocco No other technologies can support such extreme weather conditions No other technologies can support such extreme weather conditions

Temperature under the sun 55°C Temperature in the BIGBOX 80°C Temperature on the modules 85°C Exposition : flat on the ground Exposition : flat on the ground Performance yield: 100% from 7AM to 5PM

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why TO use amorphous silicon thin film → The world's lightest technology

 easy to integrate  easy to carry and to ship  easy to carry and to ship  unbreakable  don’t need special reinforcement

  • ff the support

→ The more efficient in the light

 module power provided best performance with low light  long term efficiency in one day  long term efficiency in one day  10%-20% more energy per installed Wp due to superior low-light performance.  Amorphous silicon has a superior irradiance coefficient. 5 coefficient.  Better performance at non- ideal angles of incidence and in low and diffuse light.  Reference : Ruther, 2003.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

WHY TO USE AMORPHOUS SILICON THIN FILM → The more efficient in the heat

 the more efficient in south countries  the more resistant

c-Si a-Si %

Marathon des Sables 2014

a-Si T

 Reverse effect of the ratio efficiency/m2 on c-Si cells and other technologies. The initial yield of each cell based on STC calculation standards.  Reference : SUPSI, 2008.  Conclusions : to compare STC standard (Watt peak - 6  Conclusions : to compare STC standard (Watt peak - Wp) of different technologies does not give proper information on the efficiency of a cell for a period of time and with temperature and light effects.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Why TO use amorphous silicon thin film Don’t SPEAK about Wpeak any more but About Performance ratio

Xunlight Real World Perform ance Ratio

 Reduction of the STC standard size : the performance ratio (PR[%]) is the annual system efficiency divided by the nominal module efficiency at STC.  PR=Yf/Yr= nav/nSTC  ILAND-XUNLIGHT modules are in the TOP 6

  • f

400 300 200 quency t

performance ratio (Tested by California Energy Commission).

Yf: production yield in [kWh/kWp] Yr: reference yield production: energy theoretically attainable by kWp measured in [kWh/kWp] at nominal STC conversion efficiency in module plane. nav= average system efficiency in module plane nSTC= module STC efficiency

200 100 Freq Xunlight

7

99.0% 96.0% 93.0% 90.0% 87.0% 84.0% 81.0% 78.0% Performance Ratio (CEC PTC Rating/STC Rating)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

WHY TO USE AMORPHOUS SILICON THIN FILM → Ecological products

 the most ecological products on the market  100% recyclable  no risk of pollution  no risk of pollution

 0.8 years payback time for a 25 years system lifetime.  Reference : Fthenakis, 2008  Reference : Fthenakis, 2008

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

REFERENCES Flat Roof Performance Data Flat Roof Performance Data → TRIPLE-JUNCTION performs as well when installed flat as most traditional crystalline PV installed at an angle

 Lugano, Switzerland  Lugano, Switzerland  Schwaerzelbach, Germany  Santa Cruz, California, USA

→ TRIPLE-JUNCTION measured flat roof performance mostly above solar

calculators estimation:  WfB Mainz, Germany (76 kWp)  Gleisbergschule Mainz, Germany (78 kWp)  Gleisbergschule Mainz, Germany (78 kWp)  Muenster, Germany (261 kWp)  Dresden, Germany (786 kWp)  Santa Olivia, Barcelona, Spain (104 kWp)  Riverside, CA, USA (104 kWp)  Riverside, CA, USA (104 kWp)

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TRIPLE-JUNCTION AMORPHOUS SILICON TECHNOLOGY PERFORMANCE LUGANO, CH: TRIPLE-JUNCTION EQUAL PERFORMANCE WHEN FLAT VS. TILTED C-SI

One of many 20-30° tilted One of many 20-30° tilted poly and mono-Si roof systems monitored by ISAAC in same region

TJ a-Si C-Si

Triple-junction laminates at

Site: Canobbio, Ticino, Switzerland

Triple-junction laminates at 3° tilt, installed on a flat membrane roof (TPO) of a school (CPT Solar)

Site: Canobbio, Ticino, Switzerland

  • Horz. Irradiance: 1234 kWh/m2

Tilt: 3° Size: 15.4 kWp Inverters:SMA SB 5000TL Installed Year: 2003 Source: TISO –ISAAC instiute- SUPSI – University of Ticino,

10

University of Ticino, Switzerland, see final report CPT SOLAR 2003-2006 and statistica impianti Ticino downloadable at www.leee.supsi.ch/

slide-11
SLIDE 11

triple-junction amorphous silicon technology Performance Schwaerzelbach : TRIPLE-JUNCTION equal performance at 8º tilt North compared to traditional crystalline at 30º tilt South or SW.

The triple-junction installation is the only installation facing Northeast, with 8° inclination The triple-junction installation is the only installation facing Northeast, with 8° inclination

Site: Schwaerzelbach, Rhoen, Germany Horz.Irradiance: 1084 kWh/m2 Size: 10-32 kWp Installed Year: 2004

11

Installed Year: 2004 Source: building owner Hoos - Centrosolar

slide-12
SLIDE 12

triple-junction amorphous silicon technology Performance Santa Cruz, USA: TRIPLE-JUNCTION equal performance at 3º tilt compared to traditional crystalline at 30º tilt

Triple-Junction framed modules and poly-Si modules at 30° tilt, on flat

TJ a-Si / 30° tilt TJ a-Si / 3° tilt

at 30° tilt, on flat roof (SPF)

c-Si / 30° tilt Site: Santa Cruz, California, USA

  • Horz. Irradiance: 1738 kWh/m2

Tilt: 3° and 30° Size: 2-3 kWp Inverters: SMA2500

Triple-Junction laminates at < 3° tilt, on membrane roof (SPF)

12

Inverters: SMA2500 Installed Year: 2003 UNI-SOLAR laminates at < 3° tilt,

  • n Source: Solarquest report

roof (SPF)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

triple-junction amorphous silicon technology Performance TRIPLE-JUNCTION installed at 5º out-performs PV SOL in Mainz

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

triple-junction amorphous silicon technology Performance TRIPLE-JUNCTION installed at 3º out-performs PV SOL in Mainz

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

triple-junction amorphous silicon technology Performance TRIPLE-JUNCTION installed at 3º equals PV SOL in Muenster

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

triple-junction amorphous silicon technology Performance TRIPLE-JUNCTION installed at 3º out-performs PV SOL in Dresden

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

triple-junction amorphous silicon technology Performance TRIPLE-JUNCTION installed at 5º tilt out-performs PV SOL in Berlin

 Renovation of 8 flat roofs of a residential complex Velten South Northern Germany, 2006  Roof type: Low sloped butterfly roof,  North-South-orientation: 5°  Modules: 120 kWp on 8 separate roofs  Modules: 120 kWp on 8 separate roofs  Inverters: Siemens SITOP Solar 4000 IP 54/65

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

triple-junction amorphous silicon technology Performance TRIPLE-JUNCTION installed at 3º tilt out-performs PV SOL in Barcelona

slide-19
SLIDE 19

triple-junction amorphous silicon technology Performance TRIPLE-JUNCTION at 3º tilt exceeds expectations in Riverside, CA, USA

slide-20
SLIDE 20

REFERENCES National HOSPITAL toledo (USA) – steel roof

slide-21
SLIDE 21

REFERENCES ILAND head quarters (Switzerland) – steel roof

slide-22
SLIDE 22

REFERENCES Industrial and residential roofs (USA) – membrane roof

slide-23
SLIDE 23

References Industrial façade (germany)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

REFERENCES CAR SHELTER (SWITZERLAND)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

REFERENCES MOBILE SOLAR SYSTEM FOR CULTURAL AND SPORT EVENTS SOLAR TRUCK 6x6 SOLAR AWNING INFLATABLE SYSTEM SOLAR AWNING PORTABLE SOLUTIONS

slide-26
SLIDE 26

REFERENCES MARATHON DES SABLES : TRUCK SOLAR POWER

5 awnings, 1 rooftop, 1 façade : 22KWh/day For TV teams,

  • rganisation, etc.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

REFERENCES STREET LAMPS

slide-28
SLIDE 28

REFERENCES LARGE TENTS FOR GRID FEEDING

slide-29
SLIDE 29

REFERENCES AWNINGS FOR RESIDENTIALS HOMES

PATENTED PRODUCTS

slide-30
SLIDE 30

REFERENCES IRRIGATION SYSTEM UNITS

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

REFERENCES HUMANITARIAN CAMPS, SCHOOLS, CLINICS, REMOTE HOUSES 15 à 30 Kwh/jour produits

Orientation de la toiture selon l’axe du soleil Orientation de la toiture selon l’axe du soleil

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Summary When using amorphous silicon modules (a-si)? FOR non optimal orientations; FOR Flat roof or façade; FOR Flat roof or façade; When the roof structure does not support heavy loads.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

HOW MANY MODULES A-SI COULD YOU INSTALL ON A FLAT ROOF?  YOU CAN INSTALL MORE A-SI POWER ON A FLAT ROOF THAN C-SI, BECAUSE C-SI HAVE TO BE INSTALLED ON STRUCTURES THAT CAUSE SHADOWS BETWEEN EACH OTEHR.  IN THE CASE OF EQUAL POWER INSTALLED, A-SI PRODUCES MORE ENERGY  IN THE CASE OF EQUAL POWER INSTALLED, A-SI PRODUCES MORE ENERGY IN A DAY THAN C-SI (SEE EXAMPLES ABOVE). SO THERE IS NO LOSS OF PERFORMANCE TO INSTALL AMORPHOUS SILICOM TECHNOLOGY!

slide-34
SLIDE 34

How much does cost an a-si facility? How much does cost an a-si facility? The price is calculated in Euro/Wp;

p

The Wp price for an asian c-si module unit is cheaper than an a-Si module unit; But The installed price of an A-Si facility can be cheaper than a C-Si. Because with a-si we don’t need bearing structure, ventilation system,

  • etc. the A-si is just welded on it’s substrate;

An a-Si facility is less expensive than a c-Si facility and with a betterpower performance (see details below).

slide-35
SLIDE 35

HOW MUCH DOES COST AN A-SI FACILITY? HOW MUCH DOES COST AN A-SI FACILITY?

C-silicon on rooftop 10m2 A-silicon on rooftop 10m2

5m 5m

COST Installed power 800Wp (average) Cost per Wp : 2.4EU/Wp Total cost of the facility : 1920EU COST Installed power 900Wp (average) Cost per Wp : 2.4EU/Wp Total cost of the facility : 2160EU On 10m2 we have more Wp installed Conclusion On 10m2 rooftop :

  • More power installed

with a-Si;

5m 2m 5m 2m

On 10m2 we have less Wp installed than a-si! Price/Wp : 2.4EU/Wp On 10m2 we have more Wp installed than c-si! Price/Wp : 2.4EU/Wp with a-Si;

  • Price per Wp is usualy

the same for a-Si and c- Si;

  • Power produced is

higher with a-si;

  • Compared price is

PERFORMACE RATIO Installed power 800Wp (average) Power produced in one year : 1624kWh Surface ratio : PERFORMACE RATIO Installed power 900Wp (average) Power produced in one year : 1890kWh Surface ratio :

  • Compared price is

cheaper with a-si. We produce 10 to 20% more energy with a-Si and save close to 20%

  • f

5m 2m 5m 2m

Surface ratio : Unit price (m2) : 192EU/m2 Watt peak price ratio : 2.4EU/Wp Surface ratio : Unit price (m2) : 216EU/M2 Watt peak price ratio : 1.80EU/Wp save close to 20%

  • f

money!

slide-36
SLIDE 36

we take care of the planet