Walk on Water Presentation Fig. 1. Image of Prototype EDSGN 100 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

walk on water presentation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Walk on Water Presentation Fig. 1. Image of Prototype EDSGN 100 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Walk on Water Presentation Fig. 1. Image of Prototype EDSGN 100 Section 014 Team 6, Submission 10/19/2017 Jon Earley, James Gaus, Alec Joshi, Jessica Kostic Table of Contents 1. Problem Definition 2. Brainstorming Process 3. Evaluation of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Walk on Water Presentation

EDSGN 100 Section 014 Team 6, Submission 10/19/2017 Jon Earley, James Gaus, Alec Joshi, Jessica Kostic

  • Fig. 1. Image of Prototype
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Table of Contents

  • 1. Problem Definition
  • 2. Brainstorming Process
  • 3. Evaluation of Ideas
  • 4. Analysis of Chosen Idea
  • 5. Construction Process
  • 6. Project Management
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Problem Statement

The Six have the opportunity to design and create shoes for less than $60 and sell them for $100 that consumer ages 8-21 will purchase to walk on water, mainly for recreational fun. The prototype will be constructed, tested, and then modified to create the best possible final product.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Opportunity presented to The Six is to design and develop shoes that allow consumers to walk on water for recreational fun.

  • Walking Definition: Moving forward self propelled on the soles of your feet while upright
  • n your own free will.
  • Client/Stakeholders: Customers (People age 8-21), Users, Purchasers, Manufacturers,

Retailers, Angel Investors, Our Professor, Creators of the product

  • Audience: People aged 8-21
  • Community of Interest: outdoorsy people, water enthusiasts, physically active, families

and children

  • Safety Risks: drowning, getting stuck in/under shoes
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Sustainability

A sustainable product is socially acceptable, eco-friendly, economically favorable, and technologically appropriate.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The Six created surveys in order to determine our Customer Needs.

  • Survey One
  • Survey Two
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Specifications were determined through customer needs and material evaluations.

  • Lightweight (under 4.53 kgs per shoe) : A
  • Easy set up (ten minutes to set up) : B
  • Durable (use at least an hour per time) : C
  • Easy to hold steady : D
  • Color : E
  • Portable (carry in arms or bag) : F
  • Safety : G
  • Cost (materials less than $80) : H
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Table 1. Specifications Table 2. Pairwise Comparison

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Each group member brainstormed ideas for the project to be evaluated.

  • Fig. 2. Idea One
  • Fig. 3. Idea Two
  • Fig. 4. Idea Three
  • Fig. 5. Idea Four
  • Fig. 6. Idea Five
slide-10
SLIDE 10

The ideas brainstormed were evaluated through concept screening and scoring.

Table 3. Concept Screening Table 4. Concept Scoring

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Calculations were done to analyze the best solution.

Table 5. Calculations

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Subsystems

Walk On Water Shoe Cost Materials Propulsion $33.92 Styrofoam Styrofoam $9.98 Duct Tape $4.27 Gorrilla Glue $9.99 Shoes Gorrilla Glue Duct Tape Shoes Buoyancy Shape Walking

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The cost analysis showed that the walk on water shoes would produce a profit.

Materials Used:

  • Styrofoam--Polystyrene (5):

$33.92

  • Duct Tape (2): $9.98
  • Gorilla Glue (1): $4.27
  • Shoes (1 pair): $9.99
  • TOTAL BOM: $58.16

Retail Price of Product:

  • Consumers willing to pay: $100

Total Profit = $100 - $58.16 = $41.84

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Construction of the prototype took a couple hours with all hands on deck.

  • Fig. 7. Image of Prototype
  • Fig. 8. Design Drawing
slide-15
SLIDE 15

The first test showed that the only adjustment we needed to make was adding more duct tape to the actual shoe.

  • Fig. 9. Video of Testing

Fig, 10. Image of Testing

slide-16
SLIDE 16

The final testing resulted in a success for Team Six.

  • Fig. 11. Video of Final Test
  • Fig. 12. Video of getting on

in the middle of the pool

slide-17
SLIDE 17

A Gantt Chart was used to keep The Six on track throughout the design process.

Table 6. Gantt Chart

slide-18
SLIDE 18

References

Durability | Sustainability Workshop. N.p., 2017. Web. "Height for Age Percentiles 2-18 Years." Height for Age Percentiles 2-18 Years. Developed by the National Center for Health Statistics,

  • 2000. Web.

Kasunka, L.G. "CORRELATION BETWEEN STANDING HEIGHT AND ARM SPAN IN YOUNG ADULTS – A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY." Applied Journal Research (2015): 242-46. Print. "Lightweighting." Lightweighting | Sustainability Workshop. N.p., n.d. Web. Mayer, Caroline E. "Safety Isn't Always Top Priority." The Washington Post. WP Company, 14 July 2001. Web. More, Maria. "The Importance of Product Design and Packaging in Branding." More Than Branding. N.p., 14 Dec. 2010. Web. "Persuasive Design." Persuasive Design | Sustainability Workshop. N.p., n.d. Web. Rieva Lesonsky - November 3, 2015. "What Do Your Customers Care About Most." SCORE. SCORE, 03 Nov. 2015. Web.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Questions?