Wake Up, The Rod Has Been Here for Over 15 Years! Where Have You - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

wake up the rod has been here for over 15 years where
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Wake Up, The Rod Has Been Here for Over 15 Years! Where Have You - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Wake Up, The Rod Has Been Here for Over 15 Years! Where Have You Been? Gil R. Ortega, MD, MPH Sonoran Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons Orthopaedic Trauma Director, Mayo Clinic Arizona Residency Program Vice Chair, Department of Surgery, Scottsdale


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Wake Up, The Rod Has Been Here for Over 15 Years! Where Have You Been?

Gil R. Ortega, MD, MPH Sonoran Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons Orthopaedic Trauma Director, Mayo Clinic Arizona Residency Program Vice Chair, Department of Surgery, Scottsdale Osborn Level 1 Trauma Center, Scottsdale, AZ, USA

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

  • Founding Member, Orthopaedic Board of

Advisors: Carbofix

  • Founding Member, Orthopaedic Board of

Advisors: Artross Nanobone

  • Consultant: Smith and Nephew
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Remember This One Slide and do the right thing for your patients…Nail Their IT fracture

  • Less blood loss with Nail
  • Less OR time with Nail
  • Less Fluoro time with Nail
  • Better gait patterns postop with Nail (lower

mobility scores with plate)

  • More total hip conversions with plate
  • Less Frustration taking resident through

Nail than Plate (Ok maybe this isn’t published, but you know its true)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Treatment Facts

  • Reduction, Reduction, Reduction

– Restores mechanics – Reduce stress on surgical implant – Leads to shorter healing time and complete fracture healing – Need to restore normal neck-shaft angle – Restore normal rotational femoral alignment and length – Eliminate translation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

TAD

  • Key is reduction and central

positioning of lag screw in femoral head

  • Tip-apex distance: Baumgaertner

et al.

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Nailing vs. Plating

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Is there evidence for shift for more Nails than Plates?

  • Anglen et al. Nail or Plate Fixation of

Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: Changing Pattern

  • f Practice
  • Nail fixation rate increasing from 3% in 1999 to 67%

in 2006

  • Change has occurred despite lack of evidence in

literature supporting change and in face of more potential complications with Nails

Jeffrey O. Anglen, James N. Weinstein; Nail or Plate Fixation of Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures: Changing Pattern of PracticeA Review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 2008 Apr;90(4):700-707.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

IM Fixation vs. SHS

Randomized/prospective trial of 210 pts.

Results

Fewer blood transfusions needed with IM

Better walking ability (unstable fxs) with IM

No shaft fxs & Fewer re-ops with IM Conclusion

  • IM fixation or SHS for stable fxs
  • IM fixation for Unstable fxs
  • Utrilla, et al. JOT 4/05
slide-10
SLIDE 10

SHS: Mechanical “Achilles'

Heal”

?

  • Iatrogenic, intraoperative

lateral wall fracture

Palm, et al JBJS(A) ‘07

A2 to A3 fx! 31% risk in A2.2&3 fxs 22% failure rate (vs. 3%)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Lateral Wall Fracture and IMN?

  • Determine incidence of intraoperative lateral wall fracture in

OTA 31.A1 and A2 fractures

  • 165 patients (31.A1/A2-231, A3-60) completed followup

– Group 1 (129 patients, 78%) consisted of patients with intact lateral wall postoperatively – Group 2 (36 patients, 22%) consisted of patients who sustained lateral wall fracture intraoperatively – Incidence of intraoperative lateral wall fracture was 21% – Fracture collapse and failure rate were not statistically significant in either groups (group 1: 1%, group 2: 5%) – Presence of lateral wall fracture did not adversely affect healing of pertrochanteric fractures

Boopalan Et al. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Apr 5.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Reverse Oblique Fractures

49 fx/10 yrs @ Mayo

56% failure with SHS

20%with DCS

Haidukewych, JBJS(A) 01

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Nails vs Plates

  • Systematic review of outcomes of

extramedullary and intramedullary fixation

  • Three Level I and 9 Level IV

studies reviewed

– Grade B (fair) evidence shows

  • Operative time reduced with IM fixation
  • Fixation failure reduced with IM fixation

Kuzyk et al. Intramedullary vs. extramedullary fixation for subtrochanteric

  • fractures. (J Orthop Trauma 2009;23:465–470)
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Remember This One Slide and do the right thing for your patients…Nail Their IT fracture

  • Less blood loss with Nail
  • Less OR time with Nail
  • Less Fluoro time with Nail
  • Better gait patterns postop with Nail (lower

mobility scores with plate)

  • More total hip conversions with plate
  • Less Frustration taking resident through

Nail than Plate (Ok maybe this isn’t published, but you know its true)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thank You