European Wake Vortex European Wake Vortex Mitigation Benefits Study - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
european wake vortex european wake vortex mitigation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

European Wake Vortex European Wake Vortex Mitigation Benefits Study - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 23, 2022 142 likes •295 views

Isdefe Isdefe European Wake Vortex European Wake Vortex Mitigation Benefits Study Mitigation Benefits Study EuroBen EuroBen NATS, ISDEFE, UK Met office NATS, ISDEFE, UK Met office th November 2005 Claire Pugh, Wakenet2- -Europe, 29

slide-1
SLIDE 1

European Wake Vortex European Wake Vortex Mitigation Benefits Study Mitigation Benefits Study

EuroBen EuroBen

NATS, ISDEFE, UK Met office NATS, ISDEFE, UK Met office

Claire Pugh, Wakenet2 Claire Pugh, Wakenet2-

  • Europe, 29

Europe, 29th

th November 2005

November 2005

Isdefe Isdefe

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Aims of Study Aims of Study

  • Establish which European airports could

Establish which European airports could benefit from: benefit from: ATC ATC-

  • Wake

Wake, , CREDOS CREDOS, , TBS TBS

– – High High-

  • level analysis of modifications/additions to

level analysis of modifications/additions to systems systems – – Estimation of no. of movements affected/gained Estimation of no. of movements affected/gained

  • NB

NB ‘ ‘gained gained’ ’ movements weather dependent movements weather dependent – –used to used to mitigate delays mitigate delays

  • Starting point for further studies on

Starting point for further studies on individual airports at greater detail individual airports at greater detail

– – European European Conops Conops Team Team

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • WV Sensors1
  • MET Sensors1
  • A-SMGCS
  • Precision Approach Radar

(PAR)

  • RNP/RNAV
  • Precision Landing

(ILS/MLS/GNSS)

  • Data Link – Based Tech.
  • WVMC Tool (HMI SW)
  • SNET Integration
  • Sequence Manager Integration
  • Trajectory Prediction Integration

ATC-Wake

CREDOS

TBS ATC-Wake

CREDOS

TBS Items Advanced Implementation Basic Implementation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

EGCC EGKK LEBL LSZH LIRF EDDM LEMD LFPG EHAM EDDF EGLL Airport

11 airports selected

  • High Demand (available spacing)
  • Aircraft separated close to minima
  • High percentage of Wake Vortex

pairs

  • Headwinds cause delay
slide-6
SLIDE 6

ATC ATC-

  • Wake

Wake

  • General assumptions (All concepts)

General assumptions (All concepts)

– – No separations less than standard IFR minima No separations less than standard IFR minima – – SFC wind only SFC wind only – – Simplistic/idealised concepts Simplistic/idealised concepts – – No consideration of operational & regulatory No consideration of operational & regulatory constraints constraints

  • Benefit only when:

Benefit only when:

– – 6kts crosswind at SFC 6kts crosswind at SFC – – Airport has high demand Airport has high demand

  • 3NM and 2.5NM

3NM and 2.5NM

slide-7
SLIDE 7

EGCC EGKK LEBL LSZH LIRF EDDM 547 LEMD 638 LFPG 1,277 EHAM 3,923 EDDF 10,858 EGLL 2.5Nm 3Nm Airport

ATC-Wake

EGCC EGKK LEBL 365 LSZH LIRF EDDM 4,653 547 LEMD 1,916 638 LFPG 5,565 1,277 EHAM 11,315 3,923 EDDF 26,280 10,858 EGLL 2.5Nm 3Nm Airport

ATC-Wake

  • Annual no. of arrivals
  • Favourable met.

conditions

  • Extra movements are

not schedulable but allow mitigation of delays

  • Extra movements when:

crosswind at times of

demand where high % of WV pairs

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CREDOS CREDOS

  • Benefit only when:

Benefit only when:

– – 6kts crosswind at SFC 6kts crosswind at SFC – – Airport has high demand Airport has high demand

  • Separations

Separations

– – 80s (average SID separation at EGLL) 80s (average SID separation at EGLL) – – 90s 90s

slide-9
SLIDE 9

EGCC EGKK LEBL 365 LSZH LIRF EDDM 273 456 4,653 547 LEMD 1,916 638 LFPG 547 638 5,565 1,277 EHAM 91 11,315 3,923 EDDF 6,843 9,490 26,280 10,858 EGLL 90s 80s 2.5Nm 3Nm Airport

CREDOS ATC-Wake

slide-10
SLIDE 10

TBS TBS

  • Benefit only when:

Benefit only when:

– – 10kts headwind at SFC 10kts headwind at SFC

  • 10

10-

  • 20, 20

20, 20-

  • 30, 30+

30, 30+ kts kts

– – Airport has high demand Airport has high demand

  • Recovered throughput

Recovered throughput

slide-11
SLIDE 11

EGCC EGKK LEBL 365 LSZH 26 LIRF EDDM 169 273 456 4,653 547 LEMD 1,916 638 LFPG 431 547 638 5,565 1,277 EHAM 2,801 91 11,315 3,923 EDDF 1,788 6,843 9,490 26,280 10,858 EGLL 90s 80s 2.5Nm 3Nm Airport

TBS CREDOS ATC-Wake

slide-12
SLIDE 12

5,110 9,125 EGCC 2,372 4,471 EGKK 91 273 LEBL 547 912 LSZH 912 1,733 LIRF 91 273 EDDM 1,095 456 1,460 547 LEMD 3,832 13,961 638 LFPG 5,200 638 9,307 1,277 EHAM 3,011 91 6,002 3,923 EDDF 10,220 9,490 12,318 10,858 EGLL

Constant Demand Current Demand Constant Demand Current Demand

Airport

CREDOS, 80s ATC-Wake, 3Nm

Future Demand Future Demand

slide-13
SLIDE 13

5,110 9,125 EGCC 2,372 4,471 EGKK 91 273 LEBL 547 912 LSZH 912 1,733 LIRF 91 273 EDDM 1,095 456 1,460 547 LEMD 3,832 13,961 638 LFPG 5,200 638 9,307 1,277 EHAM 3,011 91 6,002 3,923 EDDF 10,220 9,490 12,318 10,858 EGLL

Constant Demand Current Demand Constant Demand Current Demand

Airport

CREDOS, 80s ATC-Wake, 3Nm

Future Demand Future Demand

slide-14
SLIDE 14

People People

Andrew Harvey Claire Pugh Dan Galpin Lluis Vinagre Daniel Cobo Debi Turp

Isdefe Isdefe

Questions?

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Summary Summary

  • High

High-

  • level study

level study

– – Relative indications of magnitude of Relative indications of magnitude of benefit benefit – – Future demands could increase benefit Future demands could increase benefit significantly significantly

  • Basis for more detailed studies

Basis for more detailed studies

– – Heathrow used as test Heathrow used as test-

  • case

case – – Focus for European Focus for European Conops Conops Team Team