Voting and Elections Chapter 8 Who will guard the guardians? The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

voting and elections
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Voting and Elections Chapter 8 Who will guard the guardians? The - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Voting and Elections Chapter 8 Who will guard the guardians? The idea of being qualified to vote raises problems Our answer to this question has changed a lot over time Restrictions on Franchise Colonial times


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Voting and Elections

Chapter 8

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • “Who will guard the guardians?”

– The idea of being “qualified” to vote raises problems

  • Our answer to this question has changed a lot
  • ver time
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Restrictions on Franchise

– Colonial times (1620-1780s)

  • No women
  • Few Catholics, Jews, native Americans, or free Black

people

– i.e., some white, Protestant men could vote

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Not all white, Protestant men could vote.

– Each colony had a property qualification – Why?

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Early Americans wanted to guarantee that

voters were virtuous and independent

– Impact of Calvinism

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • That becomes the essence of the Protestant

Ethic

– Worldly success is a sign of personal salvation

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Revolutionary War (1776-1787)

– “No taxation without representation!” – By 1830s, white male suffrage

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • Women

Q: If all white men are qualified to vote, why not white women? A: Women’s rights get tangled up in racial issues

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • What changed? Politics.

– The dominant party (Republicans) came to believe women voting would help them.

  • Prohibition
slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • African-Americans

– By the 1880s, Black male suffrage in the North – By 1900, the “Jim Crow” (segregation) system was entrenched in the South

slide-11
SLIDE 11
  • In 1965, Congress passes the Voting Rights Act

– Federal government to supervise elections in the South – Southern states forced to create majority-minority electoral districts

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Young people (18-20 years old)

– 26th Amendment (1971) lowers voting age – Impact?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Given all of these struggles…

slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • In 2000, a majority of Americans chose NOT to

vote

– Many blamed:

  • Lazy young people
  • Peace & prosperity
  • Media effects
slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • BUT:

– Voter turnout was up to 60.7% in 2004 – 2008 turnout was expected to be very, very high

  • Obama/Palin effects?
slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Reality:

– 2008 turnout rate about 62% – African-American turnout very high…

  • …in the South

– 18-29 year old turnout ~ 51%

slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Moral:

– A lot of what people “know” about elections is wrong! – Many ask, “Why do so many people stay home on election day?”

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • The better question to ask is:

– “Why does anybody bother to vote in the first place?”

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Over 400 people are hit by lightning in the US

every year

slide-21
SLIDE 21

This guy has been hit by lightning 3 times!

slide-22
SLIDE 22
  • In 2008, 131,257,328 votes were cast for

President

– My vote was 1 out of the total. So was yours.

  • One vote “weighs”

– 1 / 131,257,328 = – 0.000000007618 % of the total – 7 ten-millionths of 1%!

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • In 2008, SC cast 1,920,969 votes for Pres.

– My 1 made up 0.00000052057% of the total

  • 5 millionths of 1%
slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • The odds of 1 vote deciding an election are

very, very, very small.

– People who say, “My vote doesn’t count” have a bit of a point

slide-25
SLIDE 25
  • There’s also a flipside:

– For millions of people, just going out to vote can be a challenge

slide-26
SLIDE 26
  • This is all to say something important:

– Millions of people see good reasons not to vote

slide-27
SLIDE 27
  • Here’s the point:

– Going out to vote produces benefits – We can group those benefits into 2 categories:

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Instrumental Benefit

  • A vote is a means to an end

– It’s support for a candidate, a party, an idea

slide-29
SLIDE 29
  • BUT:

– A vote is one out of millions

  • So, each vote has very little chance of affecting the

election

  • Therefore, the instrumental benefit of voting is very

small!

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Expressive Benefits

  • Yet, millions of people vote

– Are they irrational? No. – Many feel that it is important to vote

  • “Civic Duty”
  • “Responsibility”
  • “Want to have my say”
slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Since the instrumental benefit of voting is

always low:

– Most voters are motivated by expressive benefits

  • But, not everyone responds to those

psychological benefits

slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • Civics classes and campaigns like VoD try to

get young people to develop expressive benefits of voting.

– Do they work? – Not much evidence they do, and they are expensive!

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Costs of Voting

  • The benefits of voting are, at best, mostly

psychological

  • The costs of voting are felt much more directly
  • 2 types of cost:
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Opportunity Cost

  • Def: Time spent on one thing when you’d

rather do something else

– The time spent actually going out to cast a ballot

  • Travel time, standing in line, lost income, etc.
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Information Cost

  • Def: Time spent figuring out who to vote for

and why

slide-37
SLIDE 37
  • An individual will vote when:

P(Bv) – Cv ≥ 0

WTF?

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Individual Factors Affecting Turnout

  • 4 most relevant:

1. Age 2. Education 3. Region of the country 4. Race

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Age

  • Single best predictor of individual turnout

– Around age 30, likelihood of voting increases

  • Until around age 80

– Costs & benefits

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Education

  • Statistical effects of 1 year+ of college:

– Live about 8 years longer than high school dropouts – Earn about $600,000 more over the course of

  • ne’s life

– 20% more likely to vote

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • Why?

– Increasing education builds efficacy

  • Def: A belief that one’s choices / opinions “matter”
slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • In terms of politics, efficacy takes 2 forms:

– “Internal efficacy”

  • Increased ability to make sense of political info

– “External efficacy”

  • Belief that one’s choices have an impact
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Southerners

  • Residents of former Confederate states
  • Residents of states bordering the South
slide-44
SLIDE 44

Non-white

  • African-Americans & Latinos

– Each about 6% less likely to vote than Caucasians & Asian-Americans

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Problem

  • All of these factors add up:
  • Older, white, educated, northerner is almost

75% more likely to vote than a young, low- education, non-white Southerner

slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • Institutional Factors also affect turnout

– The way we do elections give people reasons not to vote

slide-47
SLIDE 47
  • Voter registration

– US is the only democracy that makes citizens register to vote – Most states require registration 30+ days before election

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Solutions

  • “Motor-Voter” Act (1993)

– Can register to vote anywhere a driver’s license can be obtained

  • Same-day registration

– 9 states let people register on election day

  • 10-12% increase in turnout
slide-49
SLIDE 49
  • “Election Day” is itself a problem

– Workday – Limited hours – Limited polling places – Lots of different elections

  • Federal, state, county, city, local, blah blah blah
slide-50
SLIDE 50
  • Solutions:
  • 1. Multiple days to vote
  • 2. Election Day holiday
  • 3. Mail-in or Internet voting
  • 4. Compulsory Voting
slide-51
SLIDE 51

The Question

  • All these factors produce voters who:

– Are disproportionately older, white, and educated

  • But is this something we should be concerned

about?

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Low Turnout is Bad – 3 Arguments

  • 1. Voters don’t represent the nation as a whole.
slide-53
SLIDE 53
  • 2. Low turnout is caused by “phony” politics.
slide-54
SLIDE 54
  • 3. Nonvoters are more isolated, more selfish,

more ignorant of the world around them.

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Low Turnout, No Problem

  • 1. Low turnout means voter satisfaction.
slide-56
SLIDE 56
  • 2. Increasing turnout means mobilizing the less

educated & less interested.

slide-57
SLIDE 57
  • 3. Elections are a farce, anyway. Big money

always wins.