Vortex Dynamos Steve Tobias (University of Leeds) Stefan Llewellyn - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

vortex dynamos
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Vortex Dynamos Steve Tobias (University of Leeds) Stefan Llewellyn - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Vortex Dynamos Steve Tobias (University of Leeds) Stefan Llewellyn Smith (UCSD) An introduction to vortices Vortices are ubiquitous in geophysical and astrophysical fluid mechanics (stratification & rotation). Coherent structures


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Vortex Dynamos

Steve Tobias (University of Leeds) Stefan Llewellyn Smith (UCSD)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

An introduction to vortices

  • Vortices are ubiquitous in geophysical and

astrophysical fluid mechanics (stratification & rotation).

  • Coherent structures that contain the local

helicity/enstrophy of the turbulence.

Here we examine the (fast?) dynamo properties

  • f interacting vortices.

Obtain dynamo from self-consistent solution to equations

  • f motion (NS).
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Vortices in Accretion Flow.

Bracco et al (1999) Li et al (2001) Vortices arise due to the interaction of shear and rotation due to the nonlinear saturation

  • f Rossby waves.

May be important for planet formation? See e.g. Colgate & Hui (2002) Tagger (2001) Balmforth & Korycansky (2001) Godon & Livio (2000) …and many others.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Vortices in Compressible Convection

In compressible convection there is a strong asymmetry between upflows and downflows. Dynamics dominated by strong downward sinking plumes from vertices of downflow network. VORTEX TUBES These vortices are observed in the solar granulation (see Simon & Weiss 1997). Brummell et al (2002)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What is a dynamo?

  • A dynamo is a system that maintains magnetic

field against dissipation.

  • Kinematic dynamo problem: does a given flow

amplify the magnetic field? Ignore Lorentz force: linear problem (in B).

  • Dynamic problem: add Lorentz force to get a

nonlinear problem.

  • Use MHD (magnetohydrodynamic equations).
  • Cowling’s theorem: an axisymmetric flow field

cannot act as a dynamo.

  • Governing parameters: Reynolds number and

magnetic Reynolds number.

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Fast Dynamos are

dynamos which continue to amplify field in the limit of high Rm.

  • Usually investigated for

carefully prescribed flows with Lagrangian Chaos (e.g. ABC flows, Galloway-Proctor Flows).

  • Need chaotic trajectories

(Vishik 1989; Kapper & Young 1995).

Fast Dynamos

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Ponomarenko Dynamos

  • The dynamo effect

(generation of magnetic field) of a vortex in isolation has been modelled by prescribing the simple Ponomarenko flow and solving the induction equation in both the kinematic and nonlinear regimes.

  • See e.g. Lortz (1968),

Ponomarenko (1973), Gilbert (1988), Ruzmaikin et al (1998), Bassom & Gilbert (1997).

Dobler et al (2002) SIMPLE FLOW OF THE FORM U=(0, rΩ, w)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Interacting vortices

  • The Ponomarenko dynamo relies on

diffusion to work: the field is generated by a single vortex.

  • A flow field will generally have many

interacting vortices, leading to a velocity field with chaotic Lagrangian properties.

  • Hence it has the potential to be a fast

dynamo.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Hydrodynamics I

Velocity field is independent of z, but has all three components. Define Vorticity Equation We consider an incompressible flow and set

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Hydrodynamics: II

Integrate up (no vertical pressure gradient) The evolution equation for w is therefore the same as for a passive scalar in 2D-turbulence. 2 differences: (a) Forcing (source term) (b) w can take either sign. Substitute into vorticity equation: (1) (2) (3)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Formation of Vortices

Choose random

random spectrum of initial conditions for both q and w. Competition between vortex formation and vortex merging.

  • q evolves via an inverse cascade to form vortex patches.

(cf. Babiano et al 1987, McWilliams 1990, Arroyo et al 1995, Provenzale 1999).

  • w evolves as a passive scalar and becomes aligned with q (gets

trapped in vortices and cancels outside of them)!

  • Hence we have the natural formation of interacting vortex

tubes. q w

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Equilibration of vortex flows I: Kinetic Energy

  • The velocity field

saturates when there is a balance between forcing and diffusion.

  • For small enough ν this

is a turbulent time- dependent state.

  • For this choice of forcing

parameters (G0 = 0.05, F0 = -0.25), the energy in the horizontal flows is larger than that in the vertical flows.

  • The level of saturation

depends on the diffusivity ν.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Equilibration of vortex flows II: Helicity and Reynolds Numbers.

  • The helical forcing leads

to a turbulent state with net (negative) helicity.

  • The vertical velocity (w)

is anti-correlated with the vertical vorticity (q).

  • The fluid Reynolds

number (Re) can only be calculated a posteriori (once the saturation level

  • f the flow is established).

Re = <u2>1/2 L / ν. ν = 0.004 Re = 505 ν = 0.002 Re = 1280 ν = 0.001 Re = 2640

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Chaotic Lagrangian Flows

  • The velocity field driven by the vortex interactions is very

chaotic.

  • Positive finite time Lyapunov exponents in all the flow, no

regions of integrability.

  • Average Lyapunov exponent O(1) (lots of stretching).
  • Chaos increases slightly as Re increases.

ν=1/1000 ν=1/500 ν=1/250 Λ = JT J (see e.g. Soward 1994)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Dynamo equations

Use these vortex solutions as velocity fields in a kinematic dynamo calculation. i.e. solve with u as before. The dynamo problem is separable in z, so set and hence solve

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Dynamo solutions

  • Vortices advect and

amplify magnetic field.

  • Small-scale magnetic

fields are amplified.

  • Growth-rate is a

function of k, Rm, Re.

q w b1 <B2>

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Growth Rates I: σ versus k, Rm

  • Look at growth-rate as a

function of k for various Rm.

  • Not as good a dynamo as

prescribed flow type dynamos.

  • Good candidate for fast

dynamo (more integrations needed).

  • More like Galloway-

Proctor than Ponomarenko.

  • Mode of maximum growth-

rate appears to move to higher k as Rm increases (but for high enough Rm is independent of Rm). Solid η=0.01 Dot-dashed η=0.002 Dot-dot-dashed η=0.001 Dashed η=0.0005

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Dynamo solutions

q b1 w <B2> w b1 ME η=1/100 η=1/1000

Lb scales as Rm-1/2 Lv

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Dynamo solutions

q b1 w ME η=1/5000 Hence at very high Rm we have very thin structures. Need high resolution (but only for induction equation – not so bad)

  • good to be in 2D!
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Growth Rates II: σ versus k, Rm, Re

Similar behaviour is found for Re = 1280, 2640. Continues to be an effective dynamo even if Re > Rm

  • Formation of coherent structures important.
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Conclusions

  • Interacting vortices are important

geo/astrophysically and have chaotic Lagrangian properties.

  • Good dynamos – candidates for fast dynamo

action.

  • Formation of coherent structures are important.

Astrophysical and geophysical flows may continue to be dynamos if Re >> Rm (Pm <<1). If coherent structures are important then spectra may have a limited role in determining dynamo action (phase information may be important).

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Future Work

Nonlinear saturation – project onto one k-mode to keep two- dimensional – not so bad if modelling rapidly rotating flows?

  • Consider dynamo properties of vortices arising from

instability of shear flow (shear contributes to formation of vortices and generation of magnetic field).

  • Inclusion of rotation via β-plane approx (QG).
  • Look at flows with similar spectra but different phases (one

with coherent structures, one without) to determine the importance of coherent structures for dynamos where Re >> Rm.

  • Three-dimensional instabilities of these vortices.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Vortices in Boussinesq Convection

  • Even in non-rotating

Boussinesq convection which has up-down symmetry and no net helicity, vortical motions appear to be important for small- scale field generation.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

The velocity field

  • The formation of vortex patches in forced or

decaying turbulence is well known from geophysical (2D) studies (e.g. McWilliams 1984, 1990; also MHD in applied field Kinney & McWilliams 1998).

  • For a dynamo we need a velocity field with all

three velocity components.

  • But for investigation of fast dynamo properties

it is helpful to have a 2D computation (can get to higher Re, Rm).

  • We consider the incompressible N-S equations

with no z-dependence.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Evolution of inviscid invariants

(and some inviscid non-invariants!)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Choice of (helical) forcing

  • In the absence of forcing

the turbulence will decay (see previous slide).

  • We choose to force the

flow with a steady forcing at wavenumber 4 (cf. Ohkitani 1991).

  • We set

Gz = G0 sin(4x) sin(4y). For simplicity we also set Fz = F0 sin(4x) sin(4y). So the forcing is. maximally helical. Gz Fz (other forcings at higher wavenumber and of non-helical nature need to be investigated.)

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Straining motions in vortex flows

  • Stretching properties of the flow can be calculated by

examining the strain matrix.

  • strain matrix has 3 eigenvalues, λ1,

, λ2, , λ3.

  • As d/dz = 0,

λ1 = = −λ −λ3; ; λ2 = = 0.

q λ1