Vibration Analysis by Robert J. Sayer, PE Applied Structural - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

vibration analysis
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Vibration Analysis by Robert J. Sayer, PE Applied Structural - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Vibration Analysis by Robert J. Sayer, PE Applied Structural Dynamics Medina, Ohio Michigan Water Environment Assn Operators Day February 05, 2013 Lansing, Michigan Vibration Analysis can be used for: Predictive/Proactive Maintenance


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Vibration Analysis

by Robert J. Sayer, PE Applied Structural Dynamics Medina, Ohio Michigan Water Environment Assn Operators Day February 05, 2013 Lansing, Michigan

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Vibration Analysis can be used for:

  • Predictive/Proactive Maintenance & Operations:

Determine if equipment requires maintenance and predict what & when such maintenance can be done such that impact on production is minimized.

  • Troubleshooting: Determine root-cause of failures or

reduced reliability.

  • Design & Certification: Vibration levels can be

specified to increase probability that equipment will meet it’s intended reliability. Vibration and Modal Testing can be performed prior to shipment to insure that specifications are met. Numerical FEA studies can be used in Design Stage prior to manufacture of equipment.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Vibration Trend

  • Typical Overall Vibration Trend. Does not

provide information as to the source of vibration.

  • Indicates change in mechanical condition.
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Vibration Severity - Mechanical Reliability

  • Rathbone Chart
  • This chart and others like it

based upon Rathbone work in the 1940's. It is still used

  • today. It does not distinguish

between equipment types and sizes.

  • Velocity = .05 ips is Very

Smooth

  • Velocity = .125 ips is Fair
  • Velocity = .40 ips Rough

(needs correction)

  • Velocity = .80 Very Rough

(correct immediately)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Vibration Severity - Mechanical Reliability

  • ISO 10816-1
  • Like Rathbone Chart is

based upon allowable velocity.

  • Distinguishes between

size of equipment and accounts for support conditions of large machines.

  • i.e. Large Machines

(>400 HP) on Rigid Support: Satisfactory = 0.16 ips; Alert = 0.40 ips; Danger = 1.0 ips

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Vibration Analysis Process

slide-7
SLIDE 7

FFT of Classic Unbalance

  • Waveform &

Frequency Spectrum

  • f Pure Unbalance.
  • Waveform is a Pure

Sine Wave.

  • Frequency Spectrum

has only one indicator and it is at the speed (frequency) of the machine.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FFT of Classic Misalignment

  • Waveform & Frequency Spectrum

(Misalignment)-High 2X Vibration

  • From Eshlemen “Basic Machinery Vibrations”
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Bearing Fault Analysis

  • The most common use of vibration analysis for

predictive/proactive maintenance is roller element bearing fault analysis.

  • Components of a roller element bearing can

develop faults which produce impact forces as a ball passes faults in the outer race (BPFO), inner race (BPFI) or faults in the roller elements (BSF)

  • r cage faults. All of these conditions occur at

distinct frequencies which can be determined for each bearing.

  • The frequency spectrum is key in tracking

bearing faults. The objective of this analysis is to determine the optimal time for bearing replacement.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Bearing Fault Analysis

  • Frequency Spectrum can be used to identify the fault

type, then to track it’s progression with time.

  • Historic bearing failure/vibration data can be used to

specify vibration level at which bearing should be removed.

  • Vibration trend at fault frequency(ies) can be used to

predict future vibration.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Fan on Isolation Base

  • Vibration Level excessive.
  • Are the Vibrations a result of a

Mechanical Source or Aerodynamic Source?

  • Do we:
  • Balance the Fan?
  • Send the Motor out for Repair?
  • Change the Belts?
  • Change Operating

Characteristics of the Fan?

  • Change the Isolator Springs?
  • All of the above & hope for the

best?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Vibration Data vs Sources

  • Fan speed controlled by VFD. At

normal operating conditions:

  • 1x Fan = 45.3 Hz
  • 1x Motor = 47.9 Hz
  • 1x Belt = 13.1 Hz
  • Most of the energy is associated

with vibration tied to the fan.

  • Thus, maintenance on motor or

belts would not be productive.

  • The vibration is not associated

with aerodynamic source.

1 X F a n 1 X M

  • t o r

2 X F a n B e l t

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Case History

Large ID Fan Exhaust Duct Noise & Vibration Problem Site suspected aerodynamic excitation from unusual placement of outlet damper.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Ductwork had 90 degree bend, made up

  • f two 45 degree

corners. Structural Steel vibrated excessively. Very Noisy under Duct.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sources of Dynamic Pressure Pulsations

  • Blade Pass Pulsation Pressure (Harmonic; Normal for all Fans)
  • (Freq = Number of Blades x Rotational Speed)
  • Turbulence (Non-Harmonic)
  • Rotating Stall (Non-Harmonic)
  • Surge (Non-Harmonic)
  • Inlet Box Vortex Shedding (Non-Harmonic)
  • Outlet Box Vortex Shedding (Non-Harmonic)
  • IVC Inlet Damper Vortex Shedding (Non-Harmonic)
  • Outlet Damper Vortex Shedding (Non-Harmonic)
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Frequency Spectrum of Pressure Pulsations Obtained using Dynamic Pressure Sensor in Duct Spectrum dominated by Pulsations @ 119.6 Hz. Fan Speed = 897 rpm = 14.95 Hz BPPF = 8 blades x 14.97 = 119.6 Hz There wasn’t any indication of vortex shedding or stall.

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • Frequency Spectrum of Duct Vibration.
  • Spectrum dominated by Pulsations @ 119.6 Hz.
  • Duct vibration directly related to BPPF pulsations.
  • Outlet Damper has no effect.
slide-18
SLIDE 18
  • Frequency Spectrum of Noise acquired with Data

Microphone.

  • Sound Pressure related to Duct Vibration which is caused

by BPPF pulsations. Moving outlet damper will not effect duct vibration and noise. However, it was structural vibration, not duct vibration, that was a concern.

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • Frequency spectrum of structural vibration dominated by

sub-harmonic response @ 7.3 Hz. This frequency did not show up in pulsation data, and thus, it was concluded that it was not associated with pressure pulsations.

  • Structure did not respond to BPPF and, thus, structural

vibration and noise issues were not directly related.

slide-20
SLIDE 20
  • Structural

Vibration due to broad band (non- harmonic) force at duct elbow acting on a un-symmetric structure.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Vibration/Modal Specification

  • WWTP Specifications for Fans are more

frequently requiring analysis and test to minimize resonance (natural frequency excitation) of fan and/or foundation.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Resonance of Fan Base

  • Natural frequency excitation can cause fan base to

vibrate such that the motor is out-of-phase with the fan. Tough on belts and bearings.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Resonance of Fan Shaft

  • Natural frequency excitation of fan shaft results in excess

stress in shaft, bearings and belts.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

FRP Fan Test Fan Wheel diameter = 54” Fan Speed = 962 rpm (16.0 Hz) Motor Speed = 1785 rpm (29.8 Hz) Natural Frequency @ 18.5 Hz (16% above Fan Speed) Natural Frequency @ 28.8 Hz too close to Motor Speed

1 8 . 5 H z 2 1 . 1 H z 2 6 . 6 H z 2 8 . 8 H z 3 2 . 3 H z

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Finite Element Analysis (FEA)

  • FEA is a numerical technique to approximate the

structural dynamic characteristics and vibration response of a machine, structure and/or foundation.

  • FEA can be performed in design stage prior to

manufacture to insure that vibration problems will not occur due to design deficiencies increasing equipment reliability.

  • FEA can be used to develop and evaluate

structural or mechanical modifications prior to implementation increasing the probability of success.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Example of FEA used to modify Pump Support

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Vertical Pump – Vibration @ Shutdown

  • Impulse occurs as check valve closes (slams shut)
  • Impulse excites system natural frequencies (ring-down

response)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

FEA of Pump, Piping & Original Support

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Flexible Spool Piece (Isolator) & Structural Modification

  • Uncoupled Pumps from Piping.
  • Structural Mod to Supports.
  • Evaluate with Future Center Pump
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Case Study - WWTP Sludge Pumps

  • Vertically Mounted Centrifugal Sludge

Pumps @ WWTP

  • Facility has 4 Pumps
  • Primary Pump = 40 hp/900 rpm
  • Peaking Pumps = 100 hp/1200 rpm
  • Motor located on elevated floor.
  • Pump located in Dry Well.
  • Two Drive Shafts (Upper & Lower)

between Motor & Pump.

  • Problem: Multiple Premature Guide

Bearing Failures & Excessive Vibration of 100 hp motors at full speed.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Case Study – WWTP Pump

  • (1) 40HP Motor and (3) 100 HP Motors
  • And VFD Controls on Upper Floor.
  • Motors on Pedestals similar to Vertical Turbine Pumps

except there isn’t any discharge pipe.

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Natural Frequency of 100 HP Motor

  • Natural Frequency = 20.8 Hz.
  • Motor and floor vibration excessive at max speed
  • Pump Speed = 1200 rpm = 20 Hz @ VFD Setting =

100% = 60 Hz

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Case Study - Motor Vibration Solution

  • Placed restriction on Operating Range.
  • Allowable VFD setting = 46 Hz - 56 Hz or 76% - 93% of Full Range.
  • This eliminated the excitation of Motor Reed Frequency mode @ VFD

= 100%.

  • The minimum VFD setting of 46 Hz (76%) was placed on the system

to eliminate the onset of cavitation in the pump.

  • The motor resonance could also have been solved by increasing the

stiffness of the support pedestal, thus, increasing the natural

  • frequency. However, the pump capacity above VFD = 93% was not

needed.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Case Study – Pump Bearing Problems

  • Views of Pump

Arrangement in Dry Well

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Case Study – Pump Bearing Problems

  • The Upper Shaft is coupled to

the Motor with U-Joint.

  • The Upper Shaft is coupled to

the Lower Shaft with U-Joint.

  • The Lower Shaft is coupled to

the Pump with U-Joint.

  • Intermediate guide bearing

located at the Upper Shaft. Bearing specified to be rigidly mounted.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Pump Bearing Vibration Data

  • Pump bearing vibration not excessive @ VFD = 56 Hz.

Vibration @ 1x almost non-detectable. Vibration @ 2x (vane pass) very low (0.02 ips). Vibration @ 4x and 6x higher than 1x and 2x.

2 X 4 X 6 X

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Dynamic Pressure Pulsation

  • Pressure Pulsation data acquired at Pump discharge

that indicated 2x pulsations due to vane pass. All

  • ther harmonics were insignificant. This led to

conclusion that harmonics in the vibration data were transmitted mechanically instead of acoustically.

2 x P u m p S p e e d

2x

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Shaft Vibration

  • Shaft vibration, obtained with a shaft stick, indicated that

shaft motion dominated at 4x when VFD ~ 56 Hz or 93%.

  • Elevated response of Shaft due to excitation of it’s natural

frequency.

4 x P u m p S p e e d = 5 6 H z

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Drive Shaft Natural Frequency Test

  • Natural Frequency of Drive Shaft = 55.8 Hz

5 5 . 8 H z

slide-40
SLIDE 40

FEA Animation

  • FEA prediction = 56.3 Hz (Impact Test = 55.8 Hz)
  • Excitable @ VFD = 93% by 4x Force
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Solution to Bearing Problem

  • Exclusion Zones:
  • Desired Pump Speed Range = 11.0 Hz - 14.8 Hz
  • VFD control range = 45 - 60 Hz
  • Approx (1X) Exclusion Zone = 11.0 - 14.8 Hz
  • Harmonic (2X) Exclusion Zone = 22.0 - 29.6 Hz
  • Harmonic (4X) Exclusion Zone = 44.0 - 59.2 Hz
  • Harmonic (6X) Exclusion Zone = 66.0 - 88.8 Hz
  • Changed Diameter of Upper Drive Shaft.
  • Natural Frequency = 64 Hz
  • Good for Operation of VFD 45 - 60 Hz; Pump Speed = 11.2
  • 14.7 Hz.