w w w. v e n a b l e . c o m
Corporate Reform Bill Becomes Law
On July 30, 2002, President Bush signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”), which affects the most significant changes in the regulation of corporate activity since the 1930s. The law was enacted by Congress and signed by the President in response to the Enron and WorldCom debacles and tightens the disclosure and corporate governance obligations of public companies and the regulation of the accounting industry. We can expect continuing rulemaking by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Act, which will require issuers to follow developments closely and formulate appropriate responses to comply with the Act. Venable will be monitoring developments closely and we welcome the opportunity to assist you in understanding and complying with the new requirements under the Act. Following is a summary of the significant provisions of the Act, which generally applies to issuers filing reports with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Corporate Responsibility
Certification of Financial Reports
The SEC will adopt rules by August 29, 2002 requiring the principal executive officer and principal financial
- fficer to certify in each of the issuer’s annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC that:
- He or she has reviewed the report;
- To his or her knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit a
material fact necessary in order to make the statements made not misleading;
- To his or her knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in the report
fairly present in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer as of and for the periods presented in the report;
- He or she (1) is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal controls, (2) has designed such
internal controls to ensure that material information relating to the issuer and its subsidiaries is made known to him or her by other officers and employees of the issuer, (3) has evaluated the effectiveness of the internal controls as of a date within 90 days prior to the report, and (4) has presented in the report his
- r her conclusions about the effectiveness of the internal controls;
- He or she has disclosed to the issuer’s auditors and audit committee (1) all significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of the internal controls that could adversely affect the issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls, and (2) any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuer’s internal controls; and
- He or she has indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls
- r in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of their
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
contiued on page 2