vector bundles on the noncommutative torus from
play

Vector bundles on the noncommutative torus from deformation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Vector bundles on the noncommutative torus from deformation quantization Francesco DAndrea ( joint work with G. Fiore & D. Franco ) 15/07/2014 Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 14 Marseille, 15-18 July 2014 Line bundles: an example.


  1. Vector bundles on the noncommutative torus from deformation quantization Francesco D’Andrea ( joint work with G. Fiore & D. Franco ) 15/07/2014 Frontiers of Fundamental Physics 14 Marseille, 15-18 July 2014

  2. Line bundles: an example. M¨ obius strip (Non-trivial) real line bundle on S 1 . A copy of R attached to any point of S 1 . • Section = function associating to any point P of S 1 a point on the line through P . • • In quantum mechanics: charged particle interacting with a magnetic monopole. ◮ wave function = section of a non-trivial vector bundle ◮ magnetic field = curvature of a connection on the bundle 1 / 20

  3. Complex line bundles on a torus. ⇒ ω 2 ω 1 • Torus algebra C ( T 2 ) : universal C ∗ -algebra generated by two commuting unitaries. Complex structures on C /Λ ≃ T 2 parametrized by τ = ω 2 /ω 1 ( Λ := ω 1 Z + ω 2 Z ). • � � • Take ω 1 = 1 and τ = ω 2 ∈ H := z ∈ C : Im ( z ) > 0 , call E τ the complex manifold. 2 / 20

  4. Summary. For 0 < θ < 1 , let A θ be the universal C ∗ -algebra generated by unitaries U and V with UV = e 2 πiθ V U . echet pre C ∗ -algebra with suitable seminorms. . . ) The dense ∗ -subalgebra (Fr´ � � � m , n ∈ Z a m , n U m V n : { a m , n } ∈ S ( Z 2 ) A ∞ θ := ⊂ A θ is a strict deformation quantization of C ( T 2 ) associated to the action of R 2 (Rieffel, 1993). ◮ finitely-generated projective A θ -modules classified by Connes and Rieffel in the ‘80s. ◮ can they be obtained as deformations of vector bundles on the torus? No action of R 2 on line bundles: Rieffel’s tecnique cannot be used. ◮ they are deformations of line bundles on the elliptic curve E τ = C /Λ τ , provided τ − pθ 2 i ∈ Z + i Z , where p ∈ Z is the 1st Chern number of the bundle. 3 / 20

  5. Credits & motivations. • Works on nc-tori and elliptic curves (quantum theta functions, etc.): Y.I. Manin, M. Marcolli, F.P . Boca, J. Plazas, A. Polishchuk, A. Schwarz, M. Vlasenko, I. Nikolaev, S. Mahanta, W.D. van Suijlekom, . . . Why? Hilbert’s 12th problem: description of the maximal abelian extension K ab of a • number field K in terms of special values of suitable meromorphic functions. ◮ K = Q : K ab generated by roots of unity, i.e. special values of e iz corresponding to torsion points of C ∗ (Kronecker-Weber theorem). ◮ K = Q ( τ ) imaginary quadratic field: K ab generated by the j -invariant j ( E τ ) and by the values of the Weierstrass’s elliptic function ℘ ( z ; τ ) at torsion points of E τ . ◮ Manin’s idea: for a real quadratic field K = Q ( θ ) , A θ plays the role of E τ . (Very ample) line bundles � realize E τ (and A θ ?) as complex projective variety. • √ • I. Nikolaev (arxiv:1404.4999) found generators of the Hilbert class field of K = Q ( D ) , i.e. the analogue of the j -invariant for nc-tori. 4 / 20

  6. — P ART I — Nc-torus and Heisenberg modules 5 / 20

  7. The deformation point of view: twisted group algebras. Let x , y ∈ R 2 . The C ∗ -algebra C ( T 2 ) is generated by the two functions: u ( x , y ) := e 2 πix , v ( x , y ) := e 2 πiy . By standard Fourier analysis, � � � a m , n u m v n : { a m , n } ∈ S ( Z 2 ) C ∞ ( T 2 ) ≡ f = . m , n ∈ Z An associative product ∗ θ on C ∞ ( T 2 ) is given on monomials by u j + m v k + n , ( u j v k ) ∗ θ ( u m v n ) = σ � � ( j , k ) , ( m , n ) ∀ j , k , m , n ∈ Z , where σ : Z 2 × Z 2 → C ∗ is a 2 -cocycle in the group cohomology complex of Z 2 , given by: := e iπθ ( jn − km ) . � � σ ( j , k ) , ( m , n ) ( C ∞ ( T 2 ) , ∗ θ ) is a ∗ -algebra (with undeformed involution), cocycle quantization of S ( Z 2 ) with convolution product. The C ∗ -completion is the twisted group C ∗ -algebra C ∗ ( Z 2 , σ ) . 6 / 20

  8. Quantization map & Moyal product. θ is given on f = � m , n ∈ Z a m , n u m v n by: An isomorphism T θ : ( C ∞ ( T 2 ) , ∗ θ ) → A ∞ � a m , n e − πimnθ U m V n . T θ ( f ) := m , n ∈ Z The phase factors are chosen to have T θ ( f ) ∗ = T θ ( f ∗ ) for all f . On the Schwartz space S ( R 2 ) one has the Moyal product (see e.g. Gayral et al., CMP 246, 2004 & references therein): � ( f ∗ θ g )( z ) = 4 4 πi θ Im ( ξ η ) dξdη , f ( z + ξ ) g ( z + η ) e θ 2 C × C where z = x + iy and dz = dx dy . Extended by duality to tempered distributions, allows to define an associative product (by restriction) on several interesting function spaces. E.g. B( R 2 ) , the set of smooth functions echet pre C ∗ -algebra. that are bounded together with all their derivatives, with ∗ θ is a Fr´ On C ∞ ( T 2 ) ⊂ B( R 2 ) one recovers the star product of the nc-torus. 7 / 20

  9. Heisenberg modules. [Connes 1980, Rieffel 1983] θ -module structure on E p , s := S ( R ) ⊗ C p is given by Let p , s ∈ Z and p � 1 . A right A ∞ � p + θ , 0 ) ⊗ ( S ∗ ) s � � � W ( s W ( 0, 1 ) ⊗ C ψ ⊳ U = ψ , ψ ⊳ V = ψ , where C , S ∈ M p ( C ) are the clock and shift operators, and W ( a , b ) unitaries on L 2 ( R ) : � � ( t ) = e − πiab e 2 πibt ψ ( t − a ) , ψ ∈ L 2 ( R ) , a , b ∈ R . W ( a , b ) ψ θ -valued Hermitian structure on E p , s is given by An A ∞ � ∞ � U m V n ( ψ ⊳ U m V n | ϕ ) t d t . � ψ , ϕ � = − ∞ m , n ∈ Z where for all ψ = ( ψ 1 , . . . , ψ p ) and ϕ = ( ϕ 1 , . . . , ϕ p ) ∈ E p , s : p � ( ψ | ϕ ) t := ψ r ( t ) ϕ r ( t ) . r = 1 θ ) p or If θ ∈ R � Q , any finitely-gen. projective right A θ -module is isomorphic either to ( A ∞ to a module E p , s , with p and s coprime ( p > 0 and s � = 0 ) or p = 1 and s = 0 . 8 / 20

  10. — P ART II — Elliptic curves and the WBZ transform 9 / 20

  11. Basics on elliptic curves. Let us identify ( x , y ) ∈ R 2 with z = x + iy ∈ C . Fix τ ∈ H and let E τ = C /Λ , Λ := Z + τ Z , be the corresponding elliptic curve with modular parameter τ . Let α : Λ × C → C ∗ be a smooth function and π : Λ → End C ∞ ( C ) given by π ( λ ) f ( z ) := α − 1 ( λ , z ) f ( z + λ ) , ∀ λ ∈ Λ , z ∈ C . ( ⋆ ) Then π is a representation of the abelian group Λ if and only if ∀ z ∈ C , λ , λ ′ ∈ Λ . α ( λ + λ ′ , z ) = α ( λ , z + λ ′ ) α ( λ ′ , z ) , ( ‡ ) An α satisfying ( ‡ ) is called a factor of automorphy for E τ . There is a corresponding line bundle L α → E τ with total space L α = C × C / ∼ , where ( z + λ , w ) ∼ ( z , α ( λ , z ) w ) , ∀ z , w ∈ C , λ ∈ Λ , All line bundles on E τ are of this form (Appell-Humbert theorem). 10 / 20

  12. Sections of line bundles. Smooth sections of L α ≡ subset Γ α ⊂ C ∞ ( C ) of invariant functions under π ( λ ) in ( ⋆ ). ◮ if α = 1 , Γ α ≡ C ∞ ( E τ ) are Λ -periodic functions (and C ∞ ( C ) is a C ∞ ( E τ ) -module). ◮ if α holomorphic � holomorphic elements of Γ α are called theta functions: they form a finite-dimensional vector space. ◮ if α unitary � elements of Γ α are quasi-periodic functions ( | f | is periodic ). Note that in this case Γ α ⊂ B( R 2 ) is in the domain of Moyal product. For any α , Γ α is a finitely-generated projective C ∞ ( E τ ) -submodule of C ∞ ( C ) . Let τ = ω x + iω y with ω x , ω y ∈ R and ω y > 0 . The smooth line bundle with degree p (unique for each p ) can be obtained from the unitary factor of automorphy β p , where: β ( m + nτ , x + iy ) = e − πiω x n 2 e − 2 πinx 11 / 20

  13. WBZ transform. For fixed τ , p , let F τ , p be the module with factor of automorphy β p . Let [ n ] := n mod p . Proposition Every f ∈ F τ , p is of the form � e 2 πinx e πin 2 ωx p f [ n ] ( y + n ω y f ( z ) = p ) , n ∈ Z for some (unique) Schwartz functions f [ 1 ] , . . . , f [ p ] ∈ S ( R ) , We denote by ϕ τ , p : F τ , p → S ( R ) ⊗ C p the bijection f �→ f = ( f [ 1 ] , . . . , f [ p ] ) t . ϕ τ , p is very similar to the Weil-Brezin-Zak transform of solid state physics (Folland, 1989). F τ , p is a pre Hilbert C ∞ ( E τ ) -module with canonical Hermitian structure ( f , g ) �→ f ∗ g . 12 / 20

  14. — P ART III — Vector bundles over the nc-torus 13 / 20

  15. Moyal deformation of bimodules. C ∞ ( R 2 ) is a A ∞ θ -bimodule, with module structure: ( U ⊲ f )( x , y ) = e 2 πix f � x , y + 1 � ( f ⊳ U )( x , y ) = e 2 πix f � x , y − 1 � 2 θ , 2 θ , ( V ⊲ f )( x , y ) = e 2 πiy f ( x − 1 ( f ⊳ V )( x , y ) = e 2 πiy f ( x + 1 2 θ , y ) , 2 θ , y ) . Let J be the antilinear involutive map: Jf ( x , y ) = f (− x , − y ) . J ( . ) J sends A ∞ θ into its commutant, and transforms the left action into the right one. The relation with Moyal is as follows. The space B( R 2 ) is an A ∞ θ sub-bimodule of C ∞ ( R 2 ) . For a ∈ A ∞ θ and f ∈ B( R 2 ) , one can check that a ⊲ f = σ θ ( a ) ∗ θ f and f ⊳ a = f ∗ θ σ θ ( a ) , where ∗ θ is Moyal product, T θ : C ∞ ( T 2 ) → A ∞ θ the quantization map introduced before and σ θ := T − 1 the symbol map. θ We will focus on right modules. . . 14 / 20

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend