variational quantum simulation of
play

Variational quantum simulation of Alliance, LLC under Contract No. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FERMILAB-SLIDES-19-040-QIS This document has been authored by Fermi Research Variational quantum simulation of Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, interacting bosons on NISQ


  1. FERMILAB-SLIDES-19-040-QIS This document has been authored by Fermi Research Variational quantum simulation of Alliance, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, interacting bosons on NISQ devices Office of High Energy Physics. Andy C. Y. Li Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP This manuscript has been authored by Fermi Research Alliance, LLC 20 May 2019 under Contract No. DE-AC02-07CH11359 with the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics Andy C. Y. Li Alex Macridin Panagiotis Spentzouris

  2. Outline • Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices • Quantum-classical hybrid variational algorithms • Variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) of interacting bosons • Proof-of-principle experiment of a 3-qubit implementation • Open questions about scalability 2 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  3. Digital quantum simulation A. A. Houck et al , Nat Phys 8, 292 (2012) control • “Nature isn’t classical, dammit, and if you want to make a simulation of nature, you’d better make it quantum mechanical” – Richard Feynman (1982) • Digital: all operations are represented by qubit gates • Time evolution, quantum phase estimation, quantum annealing, … • Targets: highly entangled quantum states, Science 334.6052 (2011): 57-61 non-perturbative system dynamics, … 3 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  4. Challenges: noise and control error Pure dephasing ( 𝑈 # ) Relaxation ( 𝑈 " ) • Decoherence: relaxation, pure dephasing, Δ𝐹(𝑢) ←noise correlated noise, … = 𝑏 0 + 𝑐 𝑓 0123 4 4 1 𝜔 𝑢 → device loses ‘quantumness’ after a limited coherence time • Control error: inaccurate gate implementation due to imperfect calibration, qubit drift, … → reliable result only within a limited number of gate operations • Only shallow circuits can be reliably implemented in the near future Martin Savage’s group: PRA 98, 032331 (2018) 4 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  5. Superconducting qubit coherence Phys. Rev. A 76, 042319 (2007) Transmon: simple design with advances in fabrication 2019 and materials 0-pi and other more advanced designs: much more complicated circuit structure Phys. Rev. A 87, 052306 (2013), Phys. Rev. X 3, 011003 (2013) = M. H. Devoret and R. J. Schoelkopf, Science 339, 1169 (2013) 5 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  6. Quantum computing for NISQ devices D-wave quantum annealing https://qutech.nl/ majorana-trilogy- – unclear quantum advantage completed/ Analog open-system simulation Phys. Rev. X 7, Fault-tolerant qubit 011016 (2017) – very limited applications – unclear path to realize Noisy Intermediate- https://ai.googleblog.com/ Scale Quantum 2018/03/a-preview-of- bristlecone-googles- (NISQ) devices: new.html ~100 pre-threshold qubits capable for shallow circuits 6 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  7. Quantum-classical hybrid variational algorithms • Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) Cost function – Approximated solutions for combinatorial optimization 𝐷( ⃗ 𝜄) problems through a series of classically optimized gate Classical Hybrid operations computing • Quantum kernel method Evaluate by Evaluate by a Quantum a classical – Support vector machine (SVM) with kernel function device computer evaluated by quantum devices • Quantum autoencoder – encoding in Hilbert space with encoder trained classically Classical optimization • Variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) algorithm – Variational ansatz represented by a list of quantum gate and optimized by a classical optimizer 7 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  8. Why hybrid variational algorithms? • Relatively shallow circuit • Tolerant to control errors (coherent rotation angle errors ) • Quantum advantage? – Heuristic and most likely problem-specific • Possible sources of quantum advantage – Quantum tunneling (QAOA) – Hilbert space size: 2 : (Quantum machine learning) – Natural way to evaluate ⟨𝐼⟩ , … (VQE) 8 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  9. Variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) • Ground-state properties Low-energy Encoding: system • Long-time scale spectrum representation qubits responses Variational ansatz: Noisy intermediate Scale parameterized circuit to Quantum (NISQ) devices prepare the trial state Update Efficient measurement Classical optimization Trial state’s energy algorithm 9 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  10. VQE applications in quantum chemistry 10 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  11. VQE: much less developed for non-fermionic systems By en:User_talk:S_kliminUpgrade (New vectorial edition) : Olivier d'ALLIVY KELLY - • Fermions ↔ Qubits en:File:Polaron_scheme1.jpg, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/i – Jordan-Wigner transformation ndex.php?curid=8461871 • Many models in high-energy and condensed- matter involve non-fermionic degrees of freedom • Goal: many-body systems with bosons • light-matter interaction • electron-phonon coupling 11 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  12. Boson encoding by qubits Goal: encode a truncated boson Hilbert space in qubits Position basis binary encoding Number basis binary encoding Ref: Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 110504 𝑦 𝑜 = 𝑂 = 1 … 11 @ 𝑦 = Δ :0" = 1 … 11 @ … # Δ 𝑜 = 2 = 0 … 10 @ 𝑦 = Δ :0" = 1 … 10 @ # 0" 𝑜 = 1 = 0 … 01 @ … 𝑜 = 0 = 0 … 00 @ 𝑦 = Δ 0:0" = 0 … 00 @ # 12 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  13. Variational ansatz Motivated by adiabatic state transfer Parameterized gates natively 𝑉 𝛽, 𝜄 = 𝑓 01 H( "0I J K LIJ M ) supported by the hardware Ground Ground state of 𝐼 O state of 𝐼 N |𝜔 ⃗ 𝑉(𝛽 F , 𝜄 F ) 𝑉(𝛽 " , 𝜄 " ) 𝜄 ⟩ |𝜔 ⃗ 𝜄 ⟩ Hardware efficient Model motivated Increasing number of Increasing circuit depth optimization parameters 13 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  14. Cost function for ground state & excited states Ground-state cost function = trial state’s energy 𝐷 F ( ⃗ 𝜄) = 𝜔 ⃗ 𝜄 𝐼 𝜔 ⃗ 𝜄 Ground state: 𝜔 F = argmin 𝐷 F |V(H)⟩ # 1st-excited state cost function: 𝐷 " = 𝜔 ⃗ 𝜄 𝐼 𝜔 ⃗ + 𝜗 𝜔 F |𝜔 ⃗ 𝜄 𝜄 Overlap with the ground state 1st-excited state: 𝜔 " = argmin 𝐷 " |V(H)⟩ # + 𝜗 𝜔 " |𝜔 ⃗ # 2nd-excited state cost function: 𝐷 # = 𝜔 ⃗ 𝜄 𝐼 𝜔 ⃗ + 𝜗 𝜔 F |𝜔 ⃗ 𝜄 𝜄 𝜄 … 14 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  15. Optimization algorithm • Expensive to evaluate gradient of cost function – Numerical differentiation, cost ~ Ο 𝑜 , where 𝑜 = number of parameters – In contrast, for neural network, cost ~ Ο log 𝑜 by back propagation – Preferable: gradient-free optimizer • Noisy cost function – Hardware fidelities, sampling error, … – Preferable: noise insensitive • Local minimums – Low energy but physically very different from the ground state (or targeted state) – Preferable: global optimizer / knowledge to make reasonably good initial guess 15 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  16. Proof-of-principle expt. – Rabi model using Rigetti’ s device TLS Rabi Hamiltonian: two-level system (TLS) coupled to a photon mode Ω 𝐼 = 𝜕𝑏 _ 𝑏 + 𝛻 2 𝜏 b + 𝑕 𝑏 _ + 𝑏 𝜏 c 𝑕 𝜕 Number-basis binary encoding: 𝑜 = 0 = 00 @ 𝑜 = 1 = 01 @ photon mode truncated to up to Photon 𝑜 = 2 = 10 @ 𝑜 = 3 = 11 @ 3 photons 16 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  17. Hardware efficient ansatz Entanglement-gate layers 1Q-gate layer Ansatz consists only of native gates supported by |𝜔 ⃗ 𝜄 ⟩ the hardware e.g. R f (𝜄) , R g (𝜄) and CZ 3 qubits with 1 entanglement layer 17 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

  18. Optimizers Optimization algorithm Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Stochastic Approximation (SPSA) Nelder-Mead Gradient-free Constrained Optimization BY Linear Gradient-free Approximations (COBYLA) Bound Optimization BY Quadratic Gradient-free Approximation (BOBYQA) Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolutionary algorithm: Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) stochastic & gradient-free 18 5/20/2019 Andy C. Y. Li | Kavli ACP Spring Workshop: Intersections QIS/HEP at the Aspen Center for Physics

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend