variables
play

Variables Variables are universally quantified in the scope of a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Variables Variables are universally quantified in the scope of a clause. A variable assignment is a function from variables into the domain. Given an interpretation and a variable assignment, each term denotes an individual and each clause is


  1. Variables Variables are universally quantified in the scope of a clause. A variable assignment is a function from variables into the domain. Given an interpretation and a variable assignment, each term denotes an individual and each clause is either true or false. A clause containing variables is true in an interpretation if it is true for all variable assignments. � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 1

  2. Queries and Answers A query is a way to ask if a body is a logical consequence of the knowledge base: ? b 1 ∧ · · · ∧ b m . An answer is either an instance of the query that is a logical consequence of the knowledge base KB , or no if no instance is a logical consequence of KB . � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 2

  3. Example Queries  in ( kim , r 123) .  KB = part of ( r 123 , cs building ) . in ( X , Y ) ← part of ( Z , Y ) ∧ in ( X , Z ) .  Query Answer ? part of ( r 123 , B ) . � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 3

  4. Example Queries  in ( kim , r 123) .  KB = part of ( r 123 , cs building ) . in ( X , Y ) ← part of ( Z , Y ) ∧ in ( X , Z ) .  Query Answer ? part of ( r 123 , B ) . part of ( r 123 , cs building ) ? part of ( r 023 , cs building ) . � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 4

  5. Example Queries  in ( kim , r 123) .  KB = part of ( r 123 , cs building ) . in ( X , Y ) ← part of ( Z , Y ) ∧ in ( X , Z ) .  Query Answer ? part of ( r 123 , B ) . part of ( r 123 , cs building ) ? part of ( r 023 , cs building ) . no ? in ( kim , r 023) . � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 5

  6. Example Queries  in ( kim , r 123) .  KB = part of ( r 123 , cs building ) . in ( X , Y ) ← part of ( Z , Y ) ∧ in ( X , Z ) .  Query Answer ? part of ( r 123 , B ) . part of ( r 123 , cs building ) ? part of ( r 023 , cs building ) . no ? in ( kim , r 023) . no ? in ( kim , B ) . � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 6

  7. Example Queries  in ( kim , r 123) .  KB = part of ( r 123 , cs building ) . in ( X , Y ) ← part of ( Z , Y ) ∧ in ( X , Z ) .  Query Answer ? part of ( r 123 , B ) . part of ( r 123 , cs building ) ? part of ( r 023 , cs building ) . no ? in ( kim , r 023) . no ? in ( kim , B ) . in ( kim , r 123) in ( kim , cs building ) � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 7

  8. Logical Consequence Atom g is a logical consequence of KB if and only if: g is a fact in KB , or there is a rule g ← b 1 ∧ . . . ∧ b k in KB such that each b i is a logical consequence of KB . � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 8

  9. Debugging false conclusions To debug answer g that is false in the intended interpretation: If g is a fact in KB , this fact is wrong. Otherwise, suppose g was proved using the rule: g ← b 1 ∧ . . . ∧ b k where each b i is a logical consequence of KB . ◮ If each b i is true in the intended interpretation, this clause is false in the intended interpretation. ◮ If some b i is false in the intended interpretation, debug b i . � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 9

  10. Electrical Environment outside power cb1 w5 s1 w1 circuit breaker cb2 s2 w2 w3 off s3 w0 switch on w6 w4 two-way p2 switch l1 light p1 l2 power outlet � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 10

  11. Axiomatizing the Electrical Environment % light ( L ) is true if L is a light light ( l 1 ) . light ( l 2 ) . % down ( S ) is true if switch S is down down ( s 1 ) . up ( s 2 ) . up ( s 3 ) . % ok ( D ) is true if D is not broken ok ( l 1 ) . ok ( l 2 ) . ok ( cb 1 ) . ok ( cb 2 ) . ? light ( l 1 ) . = ⇒ � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 11

  12. Axiomatizing the Electrical Environment % light ( L ) is true if L is a light light ( l 1 ) . light ( l 2 ) . % down ( S ) is true if switch S is down down ( s 1 ) . up ( s 2 ) . up ( s 3 ) . % ok ( D ) is true if D is not broken ok ( l 1 ) . ok ( l 2 ) . ok ( cb 1 ) . ok ( cb 2 ) . ? light ( l 1 ) . = yes ⇒ ? light ( l 6 ) . = ⇒ � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 12

  13. Axiomatizing the Electrical Environment % light ( L ) is true if L is a light light ( l 1 ) . light ( l 2 ) . % down ( S ) is true if switch S is down down ( s 1 ) . up ( s 2 ) . up ( s 3 ) . % ok ( D ) is true if D is not broken ok ( l 1 ) . ok ( l 2 ) . ok ( cb 1 ) . ok ( cb 2 ) . ? light ( l 1 ) . = yes ⇒ ? light ( l 6 ) . = no ⇒ ? up ( X ) . = ⇒ � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 13

  14. Axiomatizing the Electrical Environment % light ( L ) is true if L is a light light ( l 1 ) . light ( l 2 ) . % down ( S ) is true if switch S is down down ( s 1 ) . up ( s 2 ) . up ( s 3 ) . % ok ( D ) is true if D is not broken ok ( l 1 ) . ok ( l 2 ) . ok ( cb 1 ) . ok ( cb 2 ) . ? light ( l 1 ) . = yes ⇒ ? light ( l 6 ) . = no ⇒ ? up ( X ) . = up ( s 2 ), up ( s 3 ) ⇒ � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 14

  15. connected to ( X , Y ) is true if component X is connected to Y connected to ( w 0 , w 1 ) ← up ( s 2 ) . connected to ( w 0 , w 2 ) ← down ( s 2 ) . connected to ( w 1 , w 3 ) ← up ( s 1 ) . connected to ( w 2 , w 3 ) ← down ( s 1 ) . connected to ( w 4 , w 3 ) ← up ( s 3 ) . connected to ( p 1 , w 3 ) . ? connected to ( w 0 , W ) . = ⇒ � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 15

  16. connected to ( X , Y ) is true if component X is connected to Y connected to ( w 0 , w 1 ) ← up ( s 2 ) . connected to ( w 0 , w 2 ) ← down ( s 2 ) . connected to ( w 1 , w 3 ) ← up ( s 1 ) . connected to ( w 2 , w 3 ) ← down ( s 1 ) . connected to ( w 4 , w 3 ) ← up ( s 3 ) . connected to ( p 1 , w 3 ) . ? connected to ( w 0 , W ) . = W = w 1 ⇒ ? connected to ( w 1 , W ) . = ⇒ � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 16

  17. connected to ( X , Y ) is true if component X is connected to Y connected to ( w 0 , w 1 ) ← up ( s 2 ) . connected to ( w 0 , w 2 ) ← down ( s 2 ) . connected to ( w 1 , w 3 ) ← up ( s 1 ) . connected to ( w 2 , w 3 ) ← down ( s 1 ) . connected to ( w 4 , w 3 ) ← up ( s 3 ) . connected to ( p 1 , w 3 ) . ? connected to ( w 0 , W ) . = W = w 1 ⇒ ? connected to ( w 1 , W ) . = no ⇒ ? connected to ( Y , w 3 ) . = ⇒ � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 17

  18. connected to ( X , Y ) is true if component X is connected to Y connected to ( w 0 , w 1 ) ← up ( s 2 ) . connected to ( w 0 , w 2 ) ← down ( s 2 ) . connected to ( w 1 , w 3 ) ← up ( s 1 ) . connected to ( w 2 , w 3 ) ← down ( s 1 ) . connected to ( w 4 , w 3 ) ← up ( s 3 ) . connected to ( p 1 , w 3 ) . ? connected to ( w 0 , W ) . = W = w 1 ⇒ ? connected to ( w 1 , W ) . = no ⇒ ? connected to ( Y , w 3 ) . = Y = w 2 , Y = w 4 , Y = p 1 ⇒ ? connected to ( X , W ) . = ⇒ � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 18

  19. connected to ( X , Y ) is true if component X is connected to Y connected to ( w 0 , w 1 ) ← up ( s 2 ) . connected to ( w 0 , w 2 ) ← down ( s 2 ) . connected to ( w 1 , w 3 ) ← up ( s 1 ) . connected to ( w 2 , w 3 ) ← down ( s 1 ) . connected to ( w 4 , w 3 ) ← up ( s 3 ) . connected to ( p 1 , w 3 ) . ? connected to ( w 0 , W ) . = W = w 1 ⇒ ? connected to ( w 1 , W ) . = no ⇒ ? connected to ( Y , w 3 ) . = Y = w 2 , Y = w 4 , Y = p 1 ⇒ ? connected to ( X , W ) . = X = w 0 , W = w 1 , . . . ⇒ � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 19

  20. % lit ( L ) is true if the light L is lit lit ( L ) ← light ( L ) ∧ ok ( L ) ∧ live ( L ) . % live ( C ) is true if there is power coming into C live ( Y ) ← connected to ( Y , Z ) ∧ live ( Z ) . live ( outside ) . This is a recursive definition of live . � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 20

  21. Recursion and Mathematical Induction above ( X , Y ) ← on ( X , Y ) . above ( X , Y ) ← on ( X , Z ) ∧ above ( Z , Y ) . This can be seen as: Recursive definition of above : prove above in terms of a base case ( on ) or a simpler instance of itself; or Way to prove above by mathematical induction: the base case is when there are no blocks between X and Y , and if you can prove above when there are n blocks between them, you can prove it when there are n + 1 blocks. � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 21

  22. Limitations Suppose you had a database using the relation: enrolled ( S , C ) which is true when student S is enrolled in course C . You can’t define the relation: empty course ( C ) which is true when course C has no students enrolled in it. This is because empty course ( C ) doesn’t logically follow from a set of enrolled relations. There are always models where someone is enrolled in a course! � D. Poole and A. Mackworth 2010 c Artificial Intelligence, Lecture 12.3, Page 22

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend