v vacuum electron device el t d i limitations for high
play

V Vacuum Electron Device El t D i Limitations for High-Power - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

V Vacuum Electron Device El t D i Limitations for High-Power RF Sources Heinz Bohlen, Thomas Grant Microwave Power Products Division CPI, Palo Alto l l 1 Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Devices


  1. V Vacuum Electron Device El t D i Limitations for High-Power RF Sources Heinz Bohlen, Thomas Grant Microwave Power Products Division CPI, Palo Alto l l 1

  2. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Devices discussed in this presentation: CW and High Average Power Amplifiers CW and High Average Power Amplifiers - Single-Beam Klystrons - Multi-Beam Klystrons (MBK) - Single-Beam Inductive Output Tubes (IOT) Si l B I d ti O t t T b (IOT) - Higher-Order-Mode IOT (HOM-IOT) 2

  3. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g CW and High Average Power Devices not (yet) considered here: - Sheet Beam Klystrons (early state of development) - Coaxial IOT (early state of development) - Gyrotrons Gyrotrons - Traveling Wave Tubes 3

  4. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Warning: - Numerous papers on this subject have been written already. - Device limitations are shifting with time and effort. g - “Absolute” limits have been proven wrong, again and again. Thus: Thus: - In the limited time frame available, just expect a chat about some of the borderlines that are presently under siege. f h b d li h l d i 4

  5. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Limitations discussed in the following VED technology related - Size Size - Output window capability - Output cavity capability - HV breakdown in electron guns HV b kd i l t - Cathode emission limitations Other reasons - Manufacturing capacity - Reproducibility Reproducibility - Demand 5 - “Blinkers”

  6. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Klystron technology limitations (debated) l h l li i i (d b d) 6

  7. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Considerable part of former klystron domain claimed by IOTs Considerable part of former klystron domain claimed by IOTs Why? 0.1 1 10 100 1000 7 Frequency (GHz)

  8. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g IOTs have operational advantages… IOTs have operational advantages… - Efficiency - Absence of saturation - Pulse-able via RF - Small size - High linearity …and they are less expensive! Di Disadvantage: d t - Low gain (± 22 dB) 8

  9. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Thus IOTs have replaced klystrons in a Thus IOTs have replaced klystrons in a growing number of applications. E Example: l External cavity IOTs Here: CHK2800W - tunable 470 – 860 MHz tunable 470 860 MHz - 130 kW in digital TV - 80 kW CW at 500 MHz 9

  10. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g IOT limitations discussed here: - Size Size - Average output power - Operational frequency IOT domain 0.1 1 10 100 1000 Frequency (GHz) 10

  11. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Linear-beam IOTs feature a size Linear-beam IOTs feature a size limitation at frequencies lower than ~ 200 MHz, due to their waveguide-type output cavities. id t t t iti Example here: “Chalk River” IOT 250 kW CW at 267 MHz 250 kW CW at 267 MHz 73 % efficiency C Coaxial IOTs do not suffer from i l IOT d t ff f that restriction! 11

  12. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Safe operation of external cavities Safe operation of external cavities is limited to ~ 80 kW. Beyond that level integrated cavities become necessary. This example: 500 MHz / 90 KW CW 500 MHz / 90 KW CW IOT K5H90W (here at BESSY/PTB, Berlin) 12

  13. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam voltage and higher beam current. Both are limited: 13

  14. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam voltage and higher beam current. Both are limited: - The beam voltage in continuous operation should not exceed 120 kV by a larger margin, independent from the size of the electron gun electron gun. 14

  15. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam voltage and higher beam current. Both are limited: - The beam voltage in continuous operation should not exceed 120 kV by a larger margin, independent from the size of the electron gun electron gun. - Due to the control grid, overall perveances exceeding 0.4 µA/V 3/2 are difficult to achieve in class C operation in a linear- A/V 3/2 diffi lt t hi i l C ti i li beam IOT. 15

  16. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam voltage and higher beam current. Both are limited: - The beam voltage in continuous operation should not exceed 120 kV by a larger margin, independent from the size of the electron gun electron gun. - Due to the control grid, overall perveances exceeding 0.4 µA/V 3/2 are difficult to achieve in class C operation in a linear- A/V 3/2 diffi lt t hi i l C ti i li beam IOT. - IOT devices in the MW range therefore require different approaches. 16

  17. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam Higher power from a linear-beam IOT requires both higher beam voltage and higher beam current. Both are limited. First approach to 1 MW: HOM-IOT with annular cathode and grid cathode and grid. Development sponsored b LANL by LANL. Proved the principle, but turned out to be too vulnarable. 17

  18. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Second approach to 1 MW level: d h l l HOM-IOT with n single beams. 18

  19. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Presently under development: y p 19

  20. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g The operational frequency of IOTs is limited due to transit time h i l f f i li i d d i i limitations in the cathode-grid space. 20

  21. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g The operational frequency of IOTs is limited due to transit time h i l f f i li i d d i i limitations in the cathode-grid space. For reliability reasons the distance between cathode and grid must be kept at a and grid must be kept at a certain minimum. The resulting transit time restricts the achievable fundamental frequency RF u d e eque cy current. 21

  22. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g The operational frequency of IOTs is limited due to transit time h i l f f i li i d d i i limitations in the cathode-grid space. For reliability reasons the Simulated example: distance between cathode 1.6 and grid must be kept at a and grid must be kept at a 1 4 1.4 1.2 certain minimum. 1 und [A] 0.8 I fu The resulting transit time 0.6 0.4 restricts the achievable 0.2 fundamental frequency RF u d e eque cy 0 0 current. 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 f [MHz] 22

  23. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Frequencies up to 2 GHz still easily viable with existing technology Frequencies up to 2 GHz still easily viable with existing technology Example: 1.3 GHz IOT 30 kW CW 30 kW CW 22 dB gain 232323 23

  24. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Under development: Under development: 1.3 GHz High-Power IOT 60 – 120 kW CW (Development sponsored by DESY) 24

  25. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Back to device limitations in the klystron sector: Back to device limitations in the klystron sector: Size (1) is much more an issue here than in the IOT domain. 25

  26. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g For save degassing VEDs need to be For save degassing VEDs need to be pumped at high temperatures in exhaust ovens. Their size limits the size of the klystrons. i f th kl t A klystron at the very size limit: YK 1320, up to 3 MW long-pulse Overall height: 5 m (Th (The engineer in the foreground is i i th f d i 1.84 m tall) 26

  27. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Still large but easier to manufacture: Still large, but easier to manufacture: VKP-7952A/B, 700/704 MHz, 1 MW CW 27

  28. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Still large but easier to manufacture: Still large, but easier to manufacture: VKP-7952A/B, 700/704 MHz, 1 MW CW and VKP-7958A, 500 MHz, 800 kW CW 28

  29. Vacuum Electron Device Limitations for High-Power RF Sources g Like in the IOT domain, high-voltage limitations , g g in the gun and cathode emission density considerations lead to multi-beam devices. 29

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend