UT Participatory Day 2019 Yes, if versus No, unless 15:30 till - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

• Dr. Hans van den Berg, DipM

Centre of Expertise in Learning & Teaching University of Twente

UT Participatory Day 2019 “Yes, if” – versus – “No, unless”

15:30 till 16:10ish 25 September 2019

https://www.utwente.nl/en/ces/celt/programme-committee/

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Agenda proposal

2

15:30 – 15:50 Kick-off, getting acquainted On the PC and its context PC: where do you stand and where do you want to be? 15:50 – 16:10

A

What does your PC need? Tree metaphor

B A B

Probably wise to chose between and

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Who is Hans?

3

Chemist (PhD) Marketer (DipM) Graphic Arts industry Research & Tech director Drinking water research, manager Consulting firm, management consultant Trainer, advisor, evaluator, assessor

e.g. EB, PC

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Who are you?

4

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

The Programme Committee in UT’s bigger picture

5

ADMINISTRATION Supervisory Board Faculty board Programme director Examination board University council Faculty council Programme Committee Eight Service Councils Institute board Institute council PARTICIPATION COUNCILS

= Supervisory

Service Department director Executive Board, EB

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

How to tackle WHW?

6

For a PC, it is vital to know the details. For training purposes, I tend to use summary information

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Legal tasks of a Programme Committee

WHW, reference date: December 2018

7

WHW states rules for composition Programme Committee Legal rights and tasks 

• a. Consent on parts of the

EER

• b. Annual assessment of EER

implementation

• c. Advice on parts of the EER
• d. Right to give advice and

making proposals

• e. Task of discussing visitation

report

• f. (and more)

Election or appointment: Faculty Regulations

Chair

Slides in website

PROGRAMME DIRECTOR

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Seven themes arise from UT training / evaluation experiences and some UT / Dutch reports

8

• 1. CONNECTIONS

E.g.:

• the EER
• ‘What is good education?’
• “Yes, if” versus “No, unless”
• 2. HANDLING COMPLEXITY
• Connecting with

Programme Director

• Connecting annual

cycles

• FC meetings
• FC’s visibility
• 3. PROCESSES

‘Why don’t you read me?’ Re: Paul Simon

• 4. READING
• 5. CONTINUITY

PC development opportunities

• 6. PC STRATEGY
• Evaluate PCs
• Link PCs to FC
• A PC Platform
• 7. STRUCTURING

years

Reactive Proactive

PC

Exam Board FC PCs Students Programme staff Outside experts

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

References

Mostly in Dutch

9

Further reading Hans van den Berg, The Programme Committee,version 1.0, August 2019. Available at

https://www.utwente.nl/en/ces/celt/programme-committee/

Experiences

e.g. visitation-related workshops with Programme Committees and Examination Boards; rehearsal visitations; training workshops with Programme Committees and Service Councils; evaluation workshop; talks with dean(s), PC chairs, and programme directors.

Resources

WHW (Dutch Higher Education and Research Act), in Dutch: www.wetten.nl

Reports (all but one of them in Dutch)

• OC-Wijzer – De handleiding voor je opleidingscommissie. LSVb, 2018
• Report on facilitation of participatory bodies at the University of Twente (draft). Contact persons: Marc-Jan Zeeman and

Chris Rouwenhorst. 24 August 2018

• Handleiding voor Opleidingscommissies. UvA, Faculteit Geesteswetenschappen, 2018
• Algemene Rekenkamer, Voorinvesteringen en medezeggenschap hoger onderwijs. 2018
• Monitor Medezeggenschap Hoger Onderwijs – derde peiling 2017-2018. 2018
• Tim Cardol, Grote verschillen in functioneren opleidingscommissies. ScienceGuide 29 March 2018

https://www.scienceguide.nl/2018/03/grote-verschillen-in-functioneren-opleidingscommissies/

• Inspectie van het Onderwijs, Recht van spreken – Het functioneren van opleidingscommissies in het bekostigd hoger
• nderwijs in 2016. 2016
• Jet Bussemaker, minister OCW, Letter: Inwerkingtreding Wet versterking bestuurskracht, 20 december 2016
• Harry van den Tillaart, John Warmerdam en Evelien Sombekke, Monitor medezeggenschap op universiteiten en
• hogescholen. ISO – ITS Peiling 2015
• A.G.T. Bronzwaer en E.A.A. van Gorp, Onderzoek naar de participatie in medezeggenschapsraden van de Universiteit
• Twente. Wetenschapswinkel UT, 2011
• Investeren in Onderwijskwaliteit – Kwaliteitsafspraken 2019-2024. ISO – LSVb – OCW – VH – VSNU, 2018

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

10

Exercise A You can work on the A3 paper

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Relationship between PC and Programme Management

11

1 2 3 4 PC Works in isolation PC Works together with PM PC Works reactive PC Works proactive A EXERCISE

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Indicate the current position ( ) of the PC vis-à-vis the PM, and what position you would like the UC to have ( ). And draw a line between both

12

1 2 3 4 PC Works in isolation PC Works together with PM PC Works reactive PC Works proactive Please use a THIN line to make this less ‘crowded’ A EXERCISE

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

13

Exercise B You can work on the A3 paper

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Operation of a Programme Committee metaphor = tree

This is where one feeds the tree: firm soil, clean water, ‘pokon’

14

Good feed and attention assure a strong trunk From the crown one picks the fruits

EXERCISE B

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Possible translation to Programme Committee (PC) Instruction = verbally

15

EXERCISE HANDOUT B

UT Participatory Day – PC Workshop CELT 25sep2019

Statement: This was a good workshop

16

• A. Yes
• B. A bit
• C. No

G R W

Would you like to have a report of this workshop?

G R W