Using psychology to inform genetics and vice versa: Examples from - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

using psychology to inform genetics and vice versa
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Using psychology to inform genetics and vice versa: Examples from - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Using psychology to inform genetics and vice versa: Examples from neurodevelopmental disorders Dorothy Bishop Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellow University of Oxford 1 Neurodevelopmental disorders of unknown origin Specific Language


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Using psychology to inform genetics and vice versa:

Examples from neurodevelopmental disorders

Dorothy Bishop

Wellcome Trust Principal Research Fellow

University of Oxford

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Neurodevelopmental disorders of unknown origin

Dyslexia Specific Language Impairment Autism Dyspraxia Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Neurodevelopmental disorders of unknown origin

Specific Language Impairment

♦ Language does not follow normal

developmental course – immature speech sounds/grammar

♦ No obvious explanation (e.g.

hearing loss, physical abnormality, acquired brain damage)

♦ Normal development in other areas

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/2638889.stm Thursday, 9 January, 2003, 11:15 GMT

Daily grunt parents hold children back

Not enough talking going on

Parents who do little more than grunt at their children every day are damaging their language development, a literacy expert has said. Alan Wells, director of the Basic Skills Agency, says parents no longer talk to their children and instead just let them sit in front of the television or computer for hours.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Dizygotic/Fraternal (DZ twins): share 50% of polymorphic genes Question: Is concordance for disorder higher in identical than in fraternal twins?

Twin Study Method

Monozygotic (MZ) twins: genetically identical

slide-6
SLIDE 6

handic

Identical twins Fraternal twins

Specific language impairment Low language History of therapy Low IQ Unaffected

Status of co-twins of children diagnosed with specific language impairment

Bishop, D. V. M., North, T., & Donlan, C. (1995). Genetic basis of specific language impairment: evidence from a twin study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 37, 56-71.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Conclude……..

  • Substantial genetic influence on SLI
  • But traditional definition of disorder does not

“carve nature at its joints”

  • Need for better specification of phenotype –

use theoretically informed measures

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Some promising component skills

  • Auditory processing skills
  • Phonological short-term memory
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

One promising candidate skill:

Auditory temporal processing

Stimuli: 75 ms tones, high and low frequencies Child learns to press button 1 for high tone, and button 2 for low tone Then responds to tone sequences, varying in

  • Rate of presentation
  • Length of sequence

Bishop, D. V. M., et al 1999. Different origin of auditory and phonological processing problems in children with language impairment: evidence from a twin study, Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 42: 155-168.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Children’s Nonword Repetition Test

Child listens to spoken nonwords and repeats, e.g. 2 syllables: hampent 3 syllables: dopelate 4 syllables: confrantually 5 syllables: pristoractional

Gathercole, S. E., Willis, C., Baddeley, A. D., & Emslie, H. (1994). The children's test of nonword repetition: a test of phonological working memory. Memory, 2, 103-127.

Another promising candidate skill:

Phonological short-term memory

slide-11
SLIDE 11

DeFries-Fulker (DF) analysis

z-score

  • 2

Fraternal Identical Co-twin Co-twin Proband Proband genes only shared environment only nonshared environment only

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Auditory Repetition Test: DF analysis

0.5 0.0

  • 0.5
  • 1.0
  • 1.5

2.0

z-score proband proband co-twin co-twin

  • 2..

Fraternal Identical

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Nonword Repetition Test: DF analysis

0.5 0.0

  • 0.5
  • 1.0
  • 1.5
  • 2.0
  • 2.5

z-score proband proband co-twin co-twin

  • 2..

Fraternal Identical

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusions from twin studies

14

Auditory deficit phonological STM deficit Environmental factors Morphosyntax deficit phonological STM deficit Genetic risk Phonological STM deficit

Twins resemble each other regardless of whether MZ

  • r DZ

MZ twins more similar to each

  • ther than DZ
slide-15
SLIDE 15

The bottom line

  • Traditional diagnostic categories do not

identify aetiologically distinct conditions

  • We will get more coherent results from

molecular genetic studies if we first use behaviour genetics to identify heritable phenotypes

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Dorothy Bishop Oxford Study of Children’s Communication Impairments, Department of Experimental Psychology, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, England. http://psyweb.psy.ox.ac.uk/oscci/ Blog: http://deevybee.blogspot.co.uk/