Using Data to Promote Educator Recruitment and Retention in Alaska - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

using data to promote educator recruitment and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Using Data to Promote Educator Recruitment and Retention in Alaska - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Using Data to Promote Educator Recruitment and Retention in Alaska Didactic Session Hella Bel Hadj Amor, Ph.D. Leader: Applied Research and Technical Support Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Northwest About REL Northwest Regional


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Using Data to Promote Educator Recruitment and Retention in Alaska

Didactic Session

Hella Bel Hadj Amor, Ph.D. Leader: Applied Research and Technical Support

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Regional Educational Laboratory (REL) Northwest

slide-3
SLIDE 3

About REL Northwest

3

Regional Educational Laboratories (RELs) partner with practitioners and policymakers to use data and evidence to help solve educational problems that impede student

  • success. We do this by:
  • Conducting rigorous research and data analysis
  • Delivering customized training, coaching, and technical support
  • Providing engaging learning opportunities
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Alaska State Policy Research Alliance (ASPRA)

4

Goal: Produce and share evidence on Alaska education issues that matter most

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Agenda

5

Introduction Research context Process Practice Closing

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Goal and Objectives

6

  • Goal: To be able to identify and use data relevant to teacher recruitment and retention

to better understand and address those issues in local contexts

  • Objectives

– Become familiar with the problem of practice technique – Practice engaging in a problem of practice to begin to address a relevant challenge in collaboration with peers

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Research Context

7

Educator Retention and Turnover Under the Midnight Sun: Examining Trends and Relationships in Teacher, Principal, and Superintendent Movement in Alaska:

  • Study: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED598351.pdf
  • Infographic: https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/northwest/pdf/ak-educator-retention-

infographic.pdf

Source: Vazquez Cano, Bel Hadj Amor, & Pierson, 2019

slide-8
SLIDE 8

The percentage of teachers who did not return to their school or role has been steady over time

8

Source: Vazquez Cano et al., 2019

slide-9
SLIDE 9

The percentage of principals who did not return to their school or role varied over time

9

Source: Vazquez Cano et al., 2019

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The percentage of superintendents who did not return to their district

  • r role varied over time

10

Source: Vazquez Cano et al., 2019 Note that we did not have data for superintendents in 2012/13

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Higher percentages of rural teachers (and principals) did not return to their school or role

11

Source: Vazquez Cano et al., 2019

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Teachers prepared outside Alaska had higher turnover rates

12

Source: Vazquez Cano et al., 2019

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Schools with higher percentages of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch had higher turnover rates

13

Source: Vazquez Cano et al., 2019

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Process

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Process Description

15

  • A problem of practice protocol is an opportunity for a participant to present a challenge

they are addressing and receive constructive feedback from other participants

  • Usual key steps:

– Review of process and roles – Presentation of the problem of practice – Group clarification questions – Group collaborative inquiry – Group resulting ideas – Presenter response – Group debrief

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Practice

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Review of Process and Roles for Today

17

  • Simplified roles for today
  • Pre-selected problem of practice
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Clarification Questions

18

  • Why is this a problem?
  • Does your school face this problem? How do you know?
  • If you have faced this problem, what have you done? What have you not done?
  • Who are the right people in your school or district to act on this problem?

Source: West Wind Education Policy, 2016

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Group Collaborative Inquiry

19

  • What is really happening? What are different ways to interpret what is happening?
  • What hypotheses are we making when we say why this is a problem? What values do

we hold, and how might they affect the way we are looking at this problem?

  • How could we test our hypotheses?
  • What are different ways to think about the nature of the problem? How might the

problem be redefined?

Source: West Wind Education Policy, 2016

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Group Resulting Ideas

20

  • What ideas do you have for next steps?
  • Are there hypotheses we have not considered, and how would this change our answers?
  • How might you build on work already underway to solve this problem?
  • What are some smart risks or small experiments you might take in the next 30 to 90

days?

  • How might you know if the solutions are working?

Source: West Wind Education Policy, 2016

slide-21
SLIDE 21

“Presenter” Response

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Closing

22

Quyana Thank you Baasee’

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Contact Us

REL Northwest at Education Northwest 101 SW Main Street Suite 500 Portland, OR 97204-3213 ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/northwest

@relnw

relnw@educationnorthwest.org 800.547.6339

Hella Bel Hadj Amor, Ph.D. hella.belhadjamor@educationnorthwest.org 503.275.9587

slide-24
SLIDE 24

References

24

  • Vazquez Cano, M., Bel Hadj Amor, H., & Pierson, A. (2019). Educator retention and

turnover under the midnight sun: Examining trends and relationships in teacher, principal, and superintendent movement in Alaska. Portland, OR: Education Northwest, Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=ED598351&id=ED598351

  • West Wind Education Policy (2016). Leadership and educator effectiveness, a

collaborative inquiry protocol. Iowa City, IA: Author.