Using Balanced Scorecard to help achieve CMMI Maturity Level 4 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

using balanced scorecard to help achieve cmmi maturity
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Using Balanced Scorecard to help achieve CMMI Maturity Level 4 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

M i s s i o n C r i t i c a l S y s t e m s f o r H e a l t h c a r e a n d D e f e n c e Using Balanced Scorecard to help achieve CMMI Maturity Level 4 European SEPG 2005 Peter Voldby Petersen, Systematic Kent Johnson, Borland Agenda


slide-1
SLIDE 1

M i s s i o n C r i t i c a l S y s t e m s f o r H e a l t h c a r e a n d D e f e n c e

European SEPG 2005

Peter Voldby Petersen, Systematic Kent Johnson, Borland

Using Balanced Scorecard to help achieve CMMI Maturity Level 4

slide-2
SLIDE 2

$Revision: 1.7 $

2

Agenda

Who are we? Focus of CMMI Maturity Level 4 Highlights of Balanced ScoreCard Methodology Goal Flow-down Integrating Level 4 and BSC Deploying Balanced ScoreCard Lessons and Results

slide-3
SLIDE 3

$Revision: 1.7 $

3

Systematic Software Engineering A/S

  • High solidity. No bank debt –

fully self-financing

  • CMMI Level 4 and ISO 9001:2000

and AQAP 110 + 150

  • Supplier of products and projects to

more than 27 countries, export

share is 60%

  • 97% of our customers would

recommend Systematic to other

customers

  • For further information – see

www.systematic.dk

Mission Critical

  • Established in 1985 and now Denmark’s

largest privately-owned software and

systems company

  • 370+ employees; 70% hold a MSc or PhD in

software engineering

  • High employee satisfaction – attractive

workplace for ambitious software engineers

  • Dun & Bradstreet credit rating: AAA
slide-4
SLIDE 4

$Revision: 1.7 $

4

Borland TeraQuest

Statz

VP Knowledge Management

Curtis

Chief Process Officer

Oxley

VP Process Management

Layman

  • Sr. Dir.

Epner

VP

Experience 11 Lead Appraisers 20+ yrs. each Process Optimization:

World Leader in CMM/ CMMI -based services

slide-5
SLIDE 5

$Revision: 1.7 $

5

  • I mportant Level 4 Concepts:
  • Level 4 is focused on predicting the performance of the processes

based on historical and project data and managing according.

  • Quality and Process Performance Objectives – important

goals based on business objectives and past performance

CMMI4 – to Control and to Predict

Control process variation

Vision

Known effort, costs and quality

Focus

Primarily past (Measures)

Method

Predict quality and process performance

Predict results, e.g. number of defects Primarily future (Estimates) Prediction models Remove special causes for variation

Source: I nterpreting the CMMI

slide-6
SLIDE 6

$Revision: 1.7 $

6

CMMI4 – to Control and to Predict

Lower Control Limit Upper Control Limit Process Average Exception process variation

Actual Performance (Defect Density for Process X)

Prediction Actual

Source: I nterpreting the CMMI

Event Level Measure – a measure

taken at the completion of an event

Process Performance Baseline (PPB)

– documents the historical results from a process. Used as a benchmark against actual project performance.

Process Performance Model (PPM) –

describes the relationship among attributes of a process and its work

  • products. Based on PPBs and

calibrated to the project. Used to

estimate or predict a critical project value that cannot be measured until later in the project’s life (e.g., no. of delivered defects or total effort).

slide-7
SLIDE 7

$Revision: 1.7 $

7

Status Measures

Size Effort Cost Schedule

Event Level Measures

Hours per event - Productivity Requirement (defined) Requirement (designed) Object Implemented Test Executed Defects, Size, Hours per Event –

Quality

Design Review Inspection Test Executed Days Late or Early - Schedule Task Completed

Process Performance Baselines

Review Baseline Defects per page and per hour Productivity Baseline Hours per requirement by phase Effort Distribution Percentage of effort by phase

Process Performance Models

Effort (estimation and prediction) New Development Maintenance Defect Insertion and Removal New Development Maintenance

Real Project Decisions

Process Performance Baselines and Models

slide-8
SLIDE 8

$Revision: 1.7 $

8

Process I mprovement Recommendations and Measures

Strategic Goal

supporting goal supporting goal supporting goal supporting goal supporting goal measure measure measure measure measure

Corporate Business Goals and Measures

recommendation recommendation measure measure measure measure

Selecting the Right Business Objectives

slide-9
SLIDE 9

$Revision: 1.7 $

9

Using Balanced Scorecard (BSC) for Goals

  • BSC provides a mechanism to balance
  • internal goals and external goals
  • past performance and drivers for future performance
  • short term and long term performance
  • People, Process, and Technology investment

Finance Learning/growth. Customers Internal proces.

Vision

  • Generally used categories

dimensions

  • Customers
  • Finance
  • Internal processes
  • Learning & growth
slide-10
SLIDE 10

$Revision: 1.7 $

10

Setting up Balanced Scorecards

First, establish and communicate a strategy

throughout the organization

identify key needs of customers and market segments; link

those to financial goals

set financial objectives focus on internal business processes and efficiencies in meeting

customer needs

invest in learning and growth to excel with the processes

Within the scorecard

identify how to see financial goals are met set targets for meeting customer needs identify process changes or innovations needed match learning and improvement objectives to these

slide-11
SLIDE 11

$Revision: 1.7 $

11

It is not a simple task!

Strategy and Objectives Insight and Alignment

Strategic Tactical

Growth Efficiency Competence Time Cost Quality

Focus

Making two different worlds work together…

slide-12
SLIDE 12

$Revision: 1.7 $

12

Project Organizations are Dynamic

2005 2006

  • = Definition of objectives

Effort Time

slide-13
SLIDE 13

$Revision: 1.7 $

13

Alignment

The Idea!

Goal flow down Define Collect Control Predict Present Analyze Conclude Act!

I ntegrate the Balanced Scorecard and CMMI Maturity Level 4

slide-14
SLIDE 14

$Revision: 1.7 $

14

Initial Thoughts

  • T

h e p r

  • j

e c t m u s t d e f i n e t h e i r

  • w

n B S C

  • B
  • t

h m

  • d

e l s a r e a b

  • u

t b u s i n e s s

  • b

j e c t i v e s , m e a s u r e s , i n d i c a t

  • r

s e t c

  • B
  • t

h m

  • d

e l s m u s t b e i n t e g r a t e d i n t

  • t

h e w a y t h e p r

  • j

e c t s w

  • r

k ( p a r t

  • f

t h e P r

  • j

e c t s ’ D e f i n e d P r

  • c

e s s )

  • T

w

  • r

e p

  • r

t i n g m e c h a n i s m s a r e

  • n

e t

  • m

a n y !

slide-15
SLIDE 15

$Revision: 1.7 $

15

Balanced Scorecard: Quantifying the Strategy

To succeed financially how should we appear to our shareholders? Finance To achieve our vision, how will we sustain

  • ur ability to change

and improve? Learning & growth To achieve our vision how should we appear to our customers? Customers To satisfy our share- holders and customers, at what business processes must we excel? Internal Processes

Vision and Strategy

Vision and strategy Focus Areas Objectives Targets

E x a m p l e

slide-16
SLIDE 16

$Revision: 1.7 $

16

Delegation and Goal Flow-down

Corporate BSC Project’s BSC

delegation and goal flow-down

Do not define objective Omit Define objective aligned with Stategic Focus Area Redefine Change target value Change Use objective as is Include

Types of goal flow-down Types of delegation

Project Staff ”Virtual”

slide-17
SLIDE 17

$Revision: 1.7 $

17

Defining Objectives

Corporate BSC Project’s BSC

Strategic Focus Area: ”I ncreased Productivity” Objective: LOC pr project hour Target: > X Objective: LOC pr implementation hour Target: > Y

Redefine

Strategic Focus Area: ”Stable and reliable ability to deliver” Objective: Deliveries according to schedule Target: > 90% Objective: “The same” Target: 100%

”Standard Project BSC”

Change

slide-18
SLIDE 18

$Revision: 1.7 $

18

Quality and Process-Performance Objectives

Project Organization Extrovert I ntrovert

Product Project Process Strategy

Functional requirements (ie. scope & size) Qualitative requirements (eg. usability, response time, scalability, testability, etc) Duration, Staffing, Costs, etc Resource consumption, Cycle time, Defect injection rates, Defect removal efficiency, Delivery rate, etc Finance, Customer, Internal Processes, Employees

slide-19
SLIDE 19

$Revision: 1.7 $

19

BSC Dimensions and Degree of Control

Employees Internal Processes Customer Finance Predict Statistically control Control using thresholds Plan and track Monitor

slide-20
SLIDE 20

$Revision: 1.7 $

20

CMMI level 4

  • Focus primarily on implementing project goals
  • Strong in implementing known/defined objectives
  • Little guidance in finding the right objectives

Synergy of Models

Definition

BSC CMMI 4

Implementation

Balanced Scorecard

  • Focus primarily on defining strategy
  • Strong in defining (balanced) goals
  • Little guidance in implementation

1 2 3 4 5

Finance Learn./growth. Customers

  • Intern. proces.

Vision

slide-21
SLIDE 21

$Revision: 1.7 $

21

Important Lessons

Change Progress I ndicators Wall of Fame Communicate the vision Plan and follow up

slide-22
SLIDE 22

$Revision: 1.7 $

22

The Results

Systematic gets (the Business Challenges) Improved Implementation of Strategy Increased Insight into the right Project Parameters The Projects get Explicit, balanced objectives and evaluation Management Decisions based on Quantitative Data The Customers get Improved Product Quality Predictability The Employees get Increased Focus on Employee Development

slide-23
SLIDE 23

$Revision: 1.7 $

23

Improvement of Estimation Ability

  • Estimation precision has

improved significantly since 1996

  • The gap between hours

spent and hours estimated has been reduced to one fifth

  • The variation in the

ability to meet estimates is reduced by 50%

Systematic I ntellectual Capital Report 2004

slide-24
SLIDE 24

$Revision: 1.7 $

24

Delivery on Time

89% of all deliveries in 2003 were on time

  • Deliveries on time

66% in 2001 79% in 2002 89% in 2003

  • In 2004 we expect to

fulfill our objective that we deliver at least 90% on time

Systematic I ntellectual Capital Report 2004

slide-25
SLIDE 25

$Revision: 1.7 $

25

Contact information

Kent A. Johnson

  • Sr. Principal Consultant

Borland TeraQuest 11 Twelve Oaks Trail Ormond Beach, FL 32174 USA + 1 386 673 1384 kent.johnson@borland.com Peter Voldby Petersen Chief Programme Manager Systematic Software Engineering A/ S Søren Frichsvej 39 DK-8000 Århus C + 45 8943 2000 pvp@systematic.dk