Use of Age, Height and Weight to Predict Injury in Pediatric - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

use of age height and weight to predict injury in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Use of Age, Height and Weight to Predict Injury in Pediatric - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Use of Age, Height and Weight to Predict Injury in Pediatric Advanced Automatic Crash Notification Joel Stitzel, PhD PI Andrea Doud MD, Ashley Weaver PhD, Jennifer Talton MS, Ryan Barnard MS, Samantha Schoell BS, Wayne Meredith MD, Shayn


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Use of Age, Height and Weight to Predict Injury in Pediatric Advanced Automatic Crash Notification

Joel Stitzel, PhD – PI Andrea Doud MD, Ashley Weaver PhD, Jennifer Talton MS, Ryan Barnard MS, Samantha Schoell BS, Wayne Meredith MD, Shayn Martin MD, John Petty MD

Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Virginia Tech – Wake Forest University Center for Injury Biomechanics

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Disclosures

  • Funded by the Center for Child Injury

Prevention Studies (CChIPS)

  • Multi-university Industry/University

Cooperative Research Center (I/UCRC)

  • Supported by Childress Institute for Pediatric

Trauma

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

What is Advanced Automatic Crash Notification?

  • Automatic Crash Notification (ACN): Technology that

automatically alerts response centers when a motor vehicle crash (MVC) has taken place

  • Advanced Automatic Crash Notification (AACN):

Technology that uses vehicle telemetry data from Event Data Recorder (EDR) to predict risk of serious injury among

  • ccupants

Direction

  • f Impact

Speed at time of crash Restraint/ Car seat Use Injury Risk Occupant Information

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Pediatric AACN

  • A child’s developmental stage affects the injuries incurred
  • Thus, a pediatric AACN algorithm should have some quantification of

developmental stage to help determine injury risk

  • Goal of this project was to determine best metric of

development to use in a pediatric AACN (age, height or weight) Crash Type Delta V Restraint/ Car seat Use Injury Risk Developmental Stage

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Occupants classified as optimally, sub-

  • ptimally or unrestrained

Methods

 Occupants classified as obese,

  • verweight, normal weight or

underweight

National Automotive Sampling System 2000-2011

  • Maintained by NHTSA
  • Provides representative sample of all crashes in the US

Evaluation of Occupants

 Age, height & weight evaluated &

  • ccupants with impossible/missing

values removed

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Methods (Cont)

Evaluation of Crash

 Crash mode classified as rollover, frontal, rear, near-side or far-side  Change in speed of vehicle at time of crash (delta V) recorded

Evaluation of Injuries

 Anatomic Patterns of Injuries

  • Body regions affected

 “Mechanistic” Patterns of Injuries

  • Presence/Absence of Fracture
  • Hemorrhagic Component
  • AIS Severity (2+ vs 3+)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Anatomic Patterns by Age

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Head Face Neck Thorax Abdomen Spine UppExt LowExt 0-1yr Age 1 Age 2 age 3 age 4 age 5 age 6 age 7 age 8 age 9 age 10 age 11 age 12 age 13 Increasing Age (0yr)  (18yr)

Relative % of Injuries Involving Specified Body Region

Head Face Neck Thorax Abdomen Spine UppExt LowExt Percent of Injuries Involving Specific Body Region by Age

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Methods: Logistic Regression

 Occupant assigned dichotomous “Y/N” outcomes for each injury type  Logistic regression employed to determine odds of each injury type given change in age, height or weight while controlling for cofounders (crash type, delta V, restraint/car seat use & gender)

Crash Type Delta V Restraint/ Car seat Use Injury Risk Developmental Stage

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Head Injuries

0.94 0.96 0.98 1 1.02 1.04 1.06

AIS 2+ Head Injury AIS 3+ Head Injury Hemorrhagic Brain Injury Skull Fracture

Adjusted Odds Ratios

Adjusted Odds of Injury per Given Increase in Age, Height or Weight

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Thoracic Injuries

0.99 1 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 AIS 2+ Thoracic Injuries Thoracic Wall Fractures Internal Thoracic Injuries AIS 3 + Thoracic Injuries

Adjusted Odds Ratios Adjusted Odds of Injury per Given Increase in Age, Height or Weight

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Abdominal Injuries

AIS 2+ Abdominal Injuries Hemorrhagic Abdominal Injuries AIS 3+ Abdominal Injuries

Adjusted Odds Ratios Adjusted Odds of Injury per Given Increase in Age, Height or Weight

0.99 1 1.01 1.02 1.03 1.04 1.05

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Spine Injuries

0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15 AIS 2+ Spine Injuries Spinal Fractures AIS 3+ Spine Injuries

Adjusted Odds Ratios

Adjusted Odds of Injury per Given Increase in Age, Height or Weight

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Extremity Injuries

AIS 2+ Upper Extremity Injury AIS 2+ Lower Extremity Injury

Adjusted Odds Ratios Adjusted Odds of Injury per Given Increase in Age, Height or Weight

0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The BMI Effect

0.9 0.95 1 1.05 1.1 1.15

Adjusted Odds Ratio of Injury per Given Increase in Age, Height or Weight

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Age, Height or Weight?

Weight was not a significant predictor of injury in many of the models Height would be nearly impossible to keep track of by a vehicle for use in an AACN algorithm Age was a significant predictor of all injury types, even after controlling for BMI Age can be programmed into vehicle’s AACN software via birthdate

Age is likely to be the best predictor for our purposes

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Thank you! Questions?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Back Up Slides

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Scope of the Problem

  • Unintentional injury is the leading cause of death in

children aged 1-19 years in the US

  • In 2012, Motor Vehicle Crashes (MVCs) accounted

for the majority of these fatalities

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

  • Trauma Triage: Process of

determining which patient needs the most urgent treatment and where (TC vs Non-TC)

  • “Golden Hour” of Trauma
  • Want to make triage decisions

as quickly as possible

  • Need best information to make

best decisions

Trauma Triage

Right time Triage

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Flow of Events after MVC = Process

  • f Trauma Triage
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

How can we speed and decrease risk of error after MVC?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Determining the Most Frequent Injuries

Weighted Injury Count Cumulative Percent

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 10000 20000 30000 40000 50000 60000

1 51 101 151 201 251 301 351 401 451 501 551

0 50 100 150 200 250 200 350 400 450 500 550

95%: 195 Unique Injuries 100%: 551 Unique Injuries 2000-2011

Excluded 2009-2011 with MY > 10 yrs (injury data missing)

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age < 19yo
  • AIS 2+ Injuries

NASS 2000-2011 AIS 2+ Injury Ranking

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center

Descriptive Statistics

After exclusions, 11,541 occupants for evaluation

  • Mean Age: 12.6 yrs +/- 5.6 yr
  • Gender: 48% female
  • BMI Category
  • 5% Underweight
  • 58% normal weight
  • 14% overweight
  • 21% obese
  • Restraint Status
  • 25% unrestrained,
  • 54% optimally restrained
  • 20% sub-optimally restrained
  • Impacts
  • 52% frontal impacts
  • 21% rollover
  • 10% far-side
  • 9% near-side
  • 6% rear