update in community update in community acquired
play

Update in Community- Update in Community- Acquired Pneumonia - PDF document

Update in Community- Update in Community- Acquired Pneumonia Acquired Pneumonia Brad Sharpe, M.D. I have no relevant financial relationships to disclose. Professor of Clinical Medicine Department of Medicine, UCSF sharpeb@medicine.ucsf.edu


  1. Update in Community- Update in Community- Acquired Pneumonia Acquired Pneumonia Brad Sharpe, M.D. I have no relevant financial relationships to disclose. Professor of Clinical Medicine Department of Medicine, UCSF sharpeb@medicine.ucsf.edu sharpeb@medicine.ucsf.edu Roadmap Specific Goals: • Describe the most common causes of • Background community-acquired pneumonia in the • Etiology outpatient setting • Diagnosis • Order appropriate diagnostic tests for CAP • Initiate appropriate antibiotics in the treatment • Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) • Prevention • State the optimal duration of therapy in CAP • State the benefits and need for preventative measures for CAP CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future 1

  2. Caveats CAP: Background • Will not talk about healthcare-associated • 5 million cases/year in the U.S. pneumonia (HCAP) • 80% of CAP is treated outpatient • Will not discuss admission decision (complex) • Syllabus (sharpeb@medicine.ucsf.edu) • Sixth leading cause of death • Inpatient mortality 10-35% • Outpatient mortality < 1% CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future CAP: Background CAP: Background • Higher mortality among Caucasians Cough 90%* • Some evidence that quality of care for Dyspnea 66% African-Americans with CAP is worse Sputum 66% Pleuritic chest pain 50% * Yet, only 4% of all visits for cough are pneumonia Halm EA, Teirstein AS. N Engl J Med 2002;347(25):2039. Mortensen EM, et al. BMC Health Serv Res . 2004;4:20. CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future Mayr FB, et al. Crit Care Med . 2010;38:759. 2

  3. Clinical Presentation: Geriatrics “Typical” vs. “Atypical” • Less “classic” presentations • Classic teaching is not supported by the ♦ 10% have NONE of the classic signs or literature symptoms • Some general trends • Up to 40% will not have fever ♦ S. pneumoniae in older pts, co-morbidities • Up to 45% will have altered mental status ♦ Viruses more common in older patients ♦ Mycoplasma in patients < 50 years old Mehr DR, et al. J Fam Prac 2001;50(11):1101. Riquelme R, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156:1908. CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future “Typical” vs. “Atypical” Microbiology of CAP • Classic teaching is not supported by the • Prospective study of 2320 patients with literature CAP admitted to 5 hospitals • Some general trends • All extensive diagnostic evaluation Blood cultures, sputum cultures • • But - no history, exam, laboratory, or Urine antigen for S. pneumoniae & Legionella • radiographic features predict organism Nasopharyngeal PCR for viruses, • ♦ “Walking pneumonia” Chlamydophila , Mycoplasma ♦ “Classic lobar pneumonia” Some serologic testing • Jain S, et al. NEJM. 2015. CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future 3

  4. Microbiology of CAP Microbiology of CAP • Real-time PCR was applied to sputum samples from 323 patients with CAP • Pathogen confirmed in 87% of patients H. Flu and Strep pneumo most common 1) Rhinovirus • Viruses in 30% but > 80% co-infections • 2) Influenza 3) Streptococcus pneumoniae Jain S, et al. NEJM. 2015. Gadsby NJ, et al. Clin Infect Dis . 2016;April. CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future Etiology of CAP Take Home Points Outpatients (mild) Non-ICU inpatients ICU inpatient 1) 2) • Resp. viruses • S pneumoniae • Resp. viruses • S pneumoniae • Legionella • S pneumoniae 3) • M pneumoniae • H influenzae • M pneumoniae 4) • C pneumoniae • GNRs • C pneumoniae • H influenzae • S aureus • H influenzae 5) • Resp. viruses (?) • Legionella spp Community-Acquired File TM. Lancet 2003;362:1991. CAP: Current & Future Pneumonia Metlay JP, et al. JAMA 1997;278(17):1440. 4

  5. Diagnosis of CAP Chest Radiograph – Gold Standard • All expert guidelines state should have 1) Select clinical features positive CXR to make diagnosis (e.g. cough, fever, sputum, pleuritic chest pain) ● History, exam, etc. not good enough • In outpt setting, should see an infiltrate. AND ● Order CXR if you are concerned about CAP ● If CXR negative, likely should not treat for CAP 2) Infiltrate by CXR or other imaging • In the inpatient setting, the CXR can be negative IDSA/ATS Guidelines. CID . 2007;44:S27-72. CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future Chest Radiograph – Gold Standard? Blood Cultures • Should order CXR in all patients with • Specific organism vs. contaminants, cost suspected pneumonia. • Reality: • In the hospital, a positive CXR is not No evidence of a benefit • necessary to treat as CAP (but consider other Rarely positive = _____ • diagnoses) . Contaminant rate = _____ • More likely to be positive if sicker • ICU, septic shock, etc. • CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future 5

  6. Blood Cultures in CAP Sputum for CAP • Complicated and controversial • In general, do not get blood cultures for outpatient CAP • Simple, inexpensive, specific for pneumococcus • For inpatient CAP, blood cultures are • Problems include: optional • Consider if risk factors: Up to 30% could not produce adequate • sputum • ICU, severe sepsis, cavitary infiltrates, pleural effusion Good quality available in only 14% • Most don’t narrow antibiotics • IDSA/ATS Guidelines. CID . 2007;44:S27-72. CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future The future in CAP - biomarkers Sputum Cultures in CAP • Procalcitonin: precursor of calcitonin • In general, sputum cultures are not indicated in outpatient CAP ● No hormonal activity ● Inflammatory marker ● Increased in sepsis, bacterial infection • For inpatient CAP, sputum is indicated: High-quality specimen, right to the lab • ICU, cavitary infiltrates, underlying lung • disease IDSA/ATS Guidelines. CID . 2007;44:S27-72. CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future 6

  7. Meta-analysis/systematic review Take Home Points • Four studies, ~3500 patients with 1) Cover typical and atypical bacteria respiratory tract infections 2) • Less antibiotic exposure** 3) A 22% decrease in prescriptions • 4) Average 2.3 days less abx overall • 5) • No difference in mortality/clinical outcomes Soni NJ, et al. JHM . 2013;8:530. CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future Treatment Principle #1 Roadmap • Background Outpatients (mild) • Etiology • Resp. viruses • S pneumoniae • Diagnosis Must cover all these organisms* • M pneumoniae • Treatment • C pneumoniae • H influenzae • Prevention • Come back on Friday for a review of new data on atypical coverage CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future 7

  8. Treatment Principle #2 Risk Factors for DRSP • Age > 65 years old Outpatients (mild) • Chronic disease • Resp. viruses ▪ Heart, lung, renal, liver • S pneumoniae “Wimpy” pneumococcus • Diabetes mellitus • M pneumoniae • C pneumoniae • Alcoholism • H influenzae Drug-resistant S. pneumoniae • Malignancy (active) (DRSP) • Immunosuppression • Antibiotics in the last 3 months Penicillin, erythromycin, macrolides, etc. CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future Treatment CAP Treatment CAP Outpatient, Oral fluoroquinolone Outpatient, healthy, no Doxycycline or macrolide OR DRSP risk factors DRSP risk factors Oral  -lactam + doxy or  -lactam + macrolide ● Oral fluoroquinolone: moxi, gemi, levofloxacin ●  -lactam: High-dose amoxicillin (1gm PO tid) Augmentin (875mg PO bid) Macrolide = azithro, clarithro, erythro CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future 8

  9. Treatment CAP Take Home Points 1) Cover typical and atypical bacteria Inpatient, non-ICU Fluoroquinolone OR 2) Get the CXR, skip the cultures  -lactam + macrolide 3) IV  -lactam + macrolide + 4) Inpatient, ICU vancomycin OR 5) IV  -lactam + fluoroquinolone + vancomycin CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future Duration of therapy? Duration of therapy? • Meta-analysis of 15 RCTs, 2796 patients • No difference in clinical failure with mild to moderate CAP • No difference in bacterial eradication • Compared short-course (< 7 days) with • No difference in mortality longer courses. • Looked at clinical failure, bacterial • In subgroup analysis, trend toward eradication, and mortality. favorable efficacy with short-course. Li JZ, et al. Am J Med . 2007;120:783. Li JZ, et al. Am J Med . 2007;120:783. CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future 9

  10. Duration of therapy? Duration of therapy • RCT of 312 pts. admitted with CAP • Start at 5 days total • Randomized to 5 days vs. usual care • If afebrile x 48 hours and clinically well • Can extend at your discretion If afebrile x 48 hours • Most will only need 7 days or less • No difference in cure rates or mortality Uranga A, et al. JAMA Int Med . 2016;176:1257. CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future Steroids in Pneumonia? Take Home Points 1) Cover typical and atypical bacteria 2) Get the CXR, skip the cultures 3) Outpatient: Brad Pitt vs. Donald Rumsfeld 4) 5) CAP: Current & Future CAP: Current & Future 10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend