UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO Board of Trustees Retreat July - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO Board of Trustees Retreat July 20, 2011

1

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO You may recognize some of our brands

2

UIC Strategic Plan

3

Goal als:

• 1. UIC will offer an outstanding education at all levels to a diverse student body.
• 2. UIC w ill excel as an internationally recognized center for

research and creativity.

• 3. Through our Great Cities Commitment, UIC will engage with the people,

communities, and institutions of Chicago and other great cities of the world in ways that transform lives.

• 4. UIC will build areas of excellence in disease prevention, health promotion,

patient care, education, and research within a highly competitive health care market.

• 5. UIC will be a destination where students, faculty, and staff want to study, work,

and live, attracting visitors from around the world.

• 6. UIC w ill secure the resources needed to achieve its goals from

a w ide variety of sources and use those resources w isely.

• 7. UIC will implement a comprehensive marketing and public relations program to

increase its visibility and improve its image among key external constituents.

UIC Strategic Plan

4

GOAL 2 UIC w ill excel as an internationally recognized center for research and creativity by advancing and disseminating know ledge w ithin and across disciplinary boundaries and by translating discovery into application, practice and market place. Her ere e ar are e the e met etrics we e used ed to as ascer ertai ain whet ether er or not we’ e’ve e met et our objec ectives es for

• r t

this goa goal:

• Total R&D funding and growth broken down by funding source
• Reputational measures of faculty achievement, publications, citations, fellowships,

prizes and other recognition

• Number and significance of external partnerships and collaborations
• Number of patents awarded
• Royalty income from UIC intellectual property

5

DECENTRALIZED FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY

• The

The C College’s annua nnual budg budget is de define ned

• The

The C Cha hanc ncellor / Provost conv nvey campus pus pr priorities

• The D

e Dean eans d def efine e the m e mean eans by which t thei eir c colleg eges es meet eet t thei eir b budget et tar arget ets an and ac achiev eve e cam ampus pri riori riti ties

• Each

h college de develops ps its o

• wn

n solut ution ba n based o d on n its mission, n, cul ultur ure, i inc ncome a and nd expe pendi nditur ures

6

Exam ample: e: LAS

Asse ssess ss  Divest st 2000 2000–201 2010

• LAS dec

ecreas eases es ten enure e system em fac aculty by 65 65 FTE; 16% 16% from 412 412 down to 347; 347; $4, $4,500, 500,00 000 2010 2010

• LAS dives

ests $880, $880,000 000 Scho hool of Li Literatur ure, Cul ultur ural Studi udies & Li Ling ngui uistics Cen entral alized ed s ser ervices es Def efine e  Invest st 2010 2010–201 2011

• LA

LAS conduc nducts int nterna nal Acade demic Priorities study udy

• UIC conduc

nducts ful ull campus pus Acade demic D Directions ns S Study udy

• LAS prep

epar ares es t to hire e ~20 20 new ew fac aculty in spec ecific ar areas eas

• f ex

excel ellen ence an and spec ecific ar areas eas of need eed

DECENTRALIZED FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY

7

ARR:

ASSESS  DIVEST DEFINE  INVEST

• Shrink the Footprint
• Enhance Excellence
• Enhance Access and

Success

8

ONGOING COST SAVING INITIATIVES

Category Prior FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 Projected Administrative cost reductions: Shared service centers $418,500 $600,000 $607,601 $789,181 $579,757 Purchasing/procurement (iBuy) $3,000,000 tbd Eliminate senior administrative positions $580,000 Facilities Management $750,000 Information Technology (IT) $695,619 $363,927 $28,400 Academic program cost reductions $330,000 Other program closures $640,000 Avoided Costs: Financial Aid $4,400,000 Utilities $1,000,000 TOTAL $748,500 $1,295,619 $1,937,601 $5,793,108 $5,008,157 Recurring Cost Savings

9

ACADEMIC DIRECTIONS I 2010 – 2011

Rat ate acad e academ emic c qual ality an and co contribution of 91 91 units s in 12 12 co colleg eges es based ased on:

• Per

erforman ance ce I Indicat cators f s from I Inst stitutional al Resear esearch ch

• Facul

ulty a and nd Uni Unit Benc nchm hmarking ng f from Acad cadem emic A c Anal alytics cs

• Uni

Unit S Sur urveys

10

Perf rforma rmance Indicators rs fro rom m Institutional al R Res esear earch

Dep ept 1: 1: Dep ept 2: 2: Facul ulty ty R Research h Produc ducti tivity ty Per ercen entile R e Ran ankings

Book

• oks

Awar ards Gr Grants ts Cita tati tions Jour urna nal Publ ublications ns

Qui Quint ntile # #

1 2 3 4 5

Qui Quint ntile # #

1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 6 5

# o # of Fac aculty

Jour urna nal Publ ublications ns Gr Grants ts Awar ards Book

• oks

Cita tati tions

# o # of Fac aculty

100 100th per ercen entile 50 50th per ercen entile e Dept pt r rank nking ng 1 2 3 4 6 5

Facul ulty y and nd Uni nit Benc nchm hmarking ng from Aca cademic c Analytics cs

11

12

Acad adem emic Anal alytics b bec ecam ame f e fas ascinat ated ed with our Aca cademic D c Direct ctions p s proce cess. ss. UIC w was as as asked ed t to s ser erve e as as a a cas ase s e study by Acad adem emic A Anal alytics an and to pres esen ent at at its r reg egional al meet eeting. M IT w was as t the o e other er cas ase s e study.

Academic Analytics uses UIC and MIT as their case studies

SCHOOL OF ART AND DESIGN Analysis The School of Art and Design is an outstanding academic unit with clearly articulated vision and mission statements that align well with the mission of the university, and that emphasize collaborative research and creativity, as well as engagement with the public sphere. In addition, the school is devoting strategic consideration to potential areas of focus and growth. The unit clearly is an asset to UIC, with numerous strengths in both its educational and scholarly activities

• The faculty comprises an outstanding group of professional artists and designers who

have achieved a high level of recognition, including numerous prestigious awards (e.g., Guggenheim Fellowships).

• Both the Art and Design programs are well connected to UIC’s urban mission and

emphasize engagement with the community. The school has forged strong corporate linkages and collaborations.

• The Art Program maintains a unique educational niche based on its commitment to

contemporary issues.

• The Design Program strongly emphasizes industrial design, setting it apart from most
• ther programs, which emphasize graphic design.
• The school sponsors several innovative programs, including the “Design for Democracy”

initiative, which demonstrates robust collaboration and a commitment to the essential role

• f design in positive social and political transformation.
• The school is strongly involved in diversity and urban issues. Women and minorities both

are well represented on the faculty and in the student body.

• Student enrollment has grown slightly over the past few years; the increase in MFA

enrollment is larger, proportionally, than the increase in undergraduate enrollment.

• Art and design classes serve far more students than are involved in the majors.
• The school collaborates with multiple units on campus, and is a strong player in the UIC

Innovation Center.

• The school has built a history of successful products, both in design and art.

Recommendations The School of Art and Design is a spire of excellence at UIC and merits further

• investment. Building on collaborative strengths that may also bring opportunities for external

funding is one option for the future that should be explored. Attention should also be paid to increasing the visibility and prominence of the unit within UIC.

Recommendations The School of Art and Design is a spire of excellence at UIC and merits further

• investment. Building on collaborative strengths that may also bring opportunities for external

funding is one option for the future that should be explored. Attention should also be paid to increasing the visibility and prominence of the unit within UIC.

13

Sam ample U e Unit Rep eport

3.

• 3. M ission R

Rel elev evan ance e from a a Unit S Study

Next Step: ACADEMIC DIRECTIONS II 2011 – 2012

• Strategic Plan
• Centers and Institutes
• Infrastructure

14

Repur purpo posed I d Inv nvestment nt i in n Interd rdisciplinary P ry Pro rogra rams ms

• Cen

enter er f for Clinical al an and Tran anslat ational al S Scien ence

• Can

ancer er C Cen enter er

• Bi

Bio-engin ineerin ing I Init itia iativ ive

• Lab

aborat atory of Integ egrat ated ed N Neu euroscien ence

• Inno

nnovation C n Cent nter

• Ins

nstitut ute for Research o h on R n Race a and P nd Publ ublic Policy

• Chancellor’

r’s Discovery ry Pro rogra ram f m for M r M ulti ti- dis iscip iplin linary P Pilo ilot Research Proje jects

15

Inv nvestm tment i nt in n Stude tudents nts

• Chan

ancel ellor’s S Supplem emen ental al Grad aduat ate e Fello llowship ips

• Chan

ancel ellor’s U Under ergrad aduat ate R e Res esear earch A Awar ards

• Cha

hanc ncellor’s P Publ ublic Polic licy F Fello llowship ips

16

Inves estmen ent i in Fac Facilities es R& R

• Classr

assroom R Ren enovat ation an and M oder ernizat ation

• Appear

earan ance ce of Public S c Space ace

• Ener

ergy E Effici cien ency cy

17

Lin incoln ln Ha Hall ll Do Dougla las Ha Hall ll Gran ant H Hal all

18

Sel elec ect Res esear earch P Priorities es

• Communit

ity D Dis isparit itie ies

Population He alth, Succe ssful Live s, STEM e ducation, Social J ustice , Educational and Economic Disparitie s, Stre ngthe n Community Re se arch (ie . Civic e ngage me nt in a scholarly way)

• Biomedica

cal D Disco scovery

Mole cular Bioscie nce , Pre dictive Life Scie nce , Ge ne tics and Ge nomics, Ne uroscie nce , Ste m-Ce ll Base d The rapie s, Transplantation Scie nce , Vascular Pathobiology, Cance r Biology

• Urba

ban n Resilienc nce a and nd the he Globa bal Env nvironm nment nt

Transportation, Economics, Global Change , Infrastructure , Sustainability , Art and Archite cture , Sustainability

• In

Info formatics

19 150 200 250 300 350 400 2007 2007 2008 2008 2009 2009 2010 2010 201 2011 1 (Pre relimi minary ry) Expendit itures ( (in in millio illions of d dolla llars)

Trends nds i in n Spo pons nsored d Program Expe pendi nditur ures

Tot

• tal S

Spon

• nsored Program

Expe pendi nditur ures Total al R Res esear earch E Expen enditures es Total al Fed eder eral al R Res esear earch Expe pendi nditur ures

20

INITIATIVES UNDER CONSIDERATION AND DEVELOPMENT

• Facu

aculty R Recr ecruitmen ent/ Ret eten ention/Clust ster er H Hires/ es/ Diver ersi sity

• Unde

Undergradua duate S Stude udent nts

• Recrui

uitment nt

• Aca

cademic c Advisi sing

• Cam

ampus M s M ast aster er Plan an

• UIC O

C On-Li Line ne/e-lear earning

• Inte

tern rnati tional I Insti titu tute te

21