UNITAR training series – funding module
Overview of funding trends
ANDREW MACPHERSON, Economic Affairs Officer, Office of ECOSOC Support and Coordination, UN DESA 24 May2016, New York
UNITAR training series funding module Overview of funding trends - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
UNITAR training series funding module Overview of funding trends ANDREW MACPHERSON, Economic Affairs Officer, Office of ECOSOC Support and Coordination, UN DESA 24 May2016, New York Volume of funding flows Real change over time of funding
ANDREW MACPHERSON, Economic Affairs Officer, Office of ECOSOC Support and Coordination, UN DESA 24 May2016, New York
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 5 10 15 20 25 30 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010
UN-OAD funding UN-OAD share of DAC-ODA Funding to UN-OAD (real terms, billions $US) Funding for UN-OAD as share of DAC-ODA
In 1997, non-core funding exceeds core funding for the first time
United Nations development system 31% European Commission 22% Regional Development Banks 8% World Bank Group 22% Other 17%
Total use of multilateral system (2014): $62.3 billion
Source: OECD.Stat
UN development system is the largest channel for direct multilateral aid
5 10 15 20 25 30 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014
Development core Development non-core Humanitarian core Humanitarian non-core Development related +101% Billions of 2013 $US Humanitarian- assistance related +136% +20% +202% +1% +190% Total + 114%
95% of funding growth in last 15 years has been in the form of earmarked resources
5 10 15 20 25 30 2007 2010 2013 Development core Development non-core Humanitarian core Humanitarian non-core Development related +11%
Billions of 2013 $US
Humanitarian- assistance related +102% +2% +113% +56% +17% Total + 36%
Since 2007, almost all growth has gone to finance humanitarian activities.
UNDP UNFPA UNICEF WFP UNHCR UNRWA FAO WHO UNESCO ILO 24
1 000 2 000 3 000 4 000 5 000 6 000 250 500 750 1 000 1 250 1 500 1 750
Non-core resources (Millions ) Core resources (Millions)
non-core > core core > non-core Total contributions: $28.4 billion
(Size of bubbles are proportional to total contributions)
Resources are concentrated in a relatively small number of UN entities
European Commission 7% Others 16% MDTFs, 3% US, 21% UK, 7% Governments 77% Others, 23% Total contributions: $28.4 billion Next six largest donors 22%
The UN continues to rely heavily on a few Government donors
United States United Kingdom Japan Germany Sweden Norway Canada NGO/Private European Commission
Local resources
MDTFs Global funds Netherlands Denmark Developing countries Australia
1 000 2 000 3 000 4 000 5 000 6 000
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Non-core resources (millions $US) Core resources (millions of $US)
non-core > core core > non-core (Size of bubbles are proportional to total contributions)
Bi-multilateral 75% Global/vertical funds 5% Local resources 6% Development Multi donor trust funds 4% Thematic Funds (Entities) 3% Pooled 14% Humanitarian Multi donor trust funds 5% Joint Programmes 1%
Restrictively earmarked by individual donors to specific projects
One-off $500 million contribution to the Saudi Humanitarian Fund for Iraq in 2014
Africa 31% Asia/Pacific 14% Americas 6% Western Asia 17% Europe 3% Regional/global 14% Programme support /management /administration 11% Not attributed 4% Other 15% $28.4 billion
Programme activities - Country level 71%
53% of country-level expenditures to LDCs; 41% of country-level expenditures to Fragile States (World Bank definition).
20 (14%) 7 (5%) 26 (18%) 33 (23%) 60 (41%) 26% 29% 60% 84% 100%
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 10 20 30 40 50 60
> 40 % 30-40% 20-30% 10-20% < 10%
Cumulative share of total # of programme countries Share of total ODA at country level Number of programme countries Cumulative share of expenditures
(excludes local resources)
16% of UN resources were spread-out thinly across 60 programme countries
20% 46% 25% 9% 17% 42% 20% 21% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% To a large extent To a moderate extent To a small extent Not at all Source: 2014 and 2015 Survey of Programme Country Governments
2014 2015
Significantly higher share of core resources are being spent on non-programme costs (i.e. programme support, management, administration, etc.)
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Core Non-core
Programme activities Non-programme activities
68.1% 91.6%
Source: UN-DESA survey of UN entity headquarters
Increased incentive for donors to provide non-core funds Greater subsidization of non- core activities from core resources Growing core / non-core imbalance