UNITAR training series funding module Overview of funding trends - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

unitar training series funding module
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

UNITAR training series funding module Overview of funding trends - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

UNITAR training series funding module Overview of funding trends ANDREW MACPHERSON, Economic Affairs Officer, Office of ECOSOC Support and Coordination, UN DESA 24 May2016, New York Volume of funding flows Real change over time of funding


slide-1
SLIDE 1

UNITAR training series – funding module

Overview of funding trends

ANDREW MACPHERSON, Economic Affairs Officer, Office of ECOSOC Support and Coordination, UN DESA 24 May2016, New York

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Volume of funding flows

Real change over time of funding for UN-OAD and as share of ODA, 1965-2014

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 5 10 15 20 25 30 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010

UN-OAD funding UN-OAD share of DAC-ODA Funding to UN-OAD (real terms, billions $US) Funding for UN-OAD as share of DAC-ODA

In 1997, non-core funding exceeds core funding for the first time

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Volume of funding flows

Channels of multilateral aid in 2014

United Nations development system 31% European Commission 22% Regional Development Banks 8% World Bank Group 22% Other 17%

Total use of multilateral system (2014): $62.3 billion

Source: OECD.Stat

UN development system is the largest channel for direct multilateral aid

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Volume of funding flows

5 10 15 20 25 30 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 2014

Development core Development non-core Humanitarian core Humanitarian non-core Development related +101% Billions of 2013 $US Humanitarian- assistance related +136% +20% +202% +1% +190% Total + 114%

Real change over time of funding for UN-OAD, 1999-2014

95% of funding growth in last 15 years has been in the form of earmarked resources

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Volume of funding flows

Real change over time of funding for UN-OAD, since 2007 TCPR

5 10 15 20 25 30 2007 2010 2013 Development core Development non-core Humanitarian core Humanitarian non-core Development related +11%

Billions of 2013 $US

Humanitarian- assistance related +102% +2% +113% +56% +17% Total + 36%

Since 2007, almost all growth has gone to finance humanitarian activities.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Volume of funding flows

Contributions received by UN entities in 2014

UNDP UNFPA UNICEF WFP UNHCR UNRWA FAO WHO UNESCO ILO 24

  • thers

1 000 2 000 3 000 4 000 5 000 6 000 250 500 750 1 000 1 250 1 500 1 750

Non-core resources (Millions ) Core resources (Millions)

non-core > core core > non-core Total contributions: $28.4 billion

(Size of bubbles are proportional to total contributions)

Resources are concentrated in a relatively small number of UN entities

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Sources of funding

Main groups of funding sources in 2014

European Commission 7% Others 16% MDTFs, 3% US, 21% UK, 7% Governments 77% Others, 23% Total contributions: $28.4 billion Next six largest donors 22%

The UN continues to rely heavily on a few Government donors

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Sources of funding

Main financial contributors in 2014

United States United Kingdom Japan Germany Sweden Norway Canada NGO/Private European Commission

Local resources

MDTFs Global funds Netherlands Denmark Developing countries Australia

1 000 2 000 3 000 4 000 5 000 6 000

  • 100

100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

Non-core resources (millions $US) Core resources (millions of $US)

non-core > core core > non-core (Size of bubbles are proportional to total contributions)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Quality of earmarked funding

Volume of resources channeled through different non- core funding modalities in 2014

Bi-multilateral 75% Global/vertical funds 5% Local resources 6% Development Multi donor trust funds 4% Thematic Funds (Entities) 3% Pooled 14% Humanitarian Multi donor trust funds 5% Joint Programmes 1%

Restrictively earmarked by individual donors to specific projects

One-off $500 million contribution to the Saudi Humanitarian Fund for Iraq in 2014

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Distribution and Fragmentation

Expenditures by region in 2014

Africa 31% Asia/Pacific 14% Americas 6% Western Asia 17% Europe 3% Regional/global 14% Programme support /management /administration 11% Not attributed 4% Other 15% $28.4 billion

Programme activities - Country level 71%

53% of country-level expenditures to LDCs; 41% of country-level expenditures to Fragile States (World Bank definition).

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Distribution and Fragmentation

Country-level UN-OAD expenditures as a share of ODA in 2013

20 (14%) 7 (5%) 26 (18%) 33 (23%) 60 (41%) 26% 29% 60% 84% 100%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 10 20 30 40 50 60

> 40 % 30-40% 20-30% 10-20% < 10%

Cumulative share of total # of programme countries Share of total ODA at country level Number of programme countries Cumulative share of expenditures

(excludes local resources)

16% of UN resources were spread-out thinly across 60 programme countries

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Competition among entities

Survey question: To what extent to which UN entities compete with each other for donor funding?

20% 46% 25% 9% 17% 42% 20% 21% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% To a large extent To a moderate extent To a small extent Not at all Source: 2014 and 2015 Survey of Programme Country Governments

2014 2015

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Cost Recovery

High-level breakdown of expenditures in 2014

Significantly higher share of core resources are being spent on non-programme costs (i.e. programme support, management, administration, etc.)

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Core Non-core

Programme activities Non-programme activities

68.1% 91.6%

Source: UN-DESA survey of UN entity headquarters

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Cost Recovery

Another contributing factor to core/non-core imbalance

Increased incentive for donors to provide non-core funds Greater subsidization of non- core activities from core resources Growing core / non-core imbalance

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thank you