underwater acoustic ofdm past present and future
play

Underwater Acoustic OFDM: Past, Present, and Future Shengli Zhou - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Underwater Acoustic OFDM: Past, Present, and Future Shengli Zhou Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Connecticut http://uwsn.engr.uconn.edu WUWNET11 Dec. 2, 2011 Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary


  1. Underwater Acoustic OFDM: Past, Present, and Future Shengli Zhou Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Connecticut http://uwsn.engr.uconn.edu WUWNET’11 Dec. 2, 2011 Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 1 / 26

  2. Underwater Communications Cable Acoustic communications (ACOMM) Electromagnetic communications (Wireless Fibre Systems) Optical communications (Blue-Green Laser) Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 2 / 26

  3. ACOMM Techniques Frequency shift keying (FSK) ◮ e.g., Teledyne Benthos, WHOI Micro-modem Direct sequence spread spectrum (DSSS) ◮ e.g., LinkQuest, DSPCOMM, Tritech Single carrier phase-shift-keying (PSK) transmissions ◮ e.g., WHOI Micro-modem, Benthos (additional processing card) Multicarrier modulation (in the form of OFDM) Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 3 / 26

  4. OFDM: A Prevalent Choice for Broadband Wireless Systems DSL Modem WiFi (IEEE 802.11) WiMax (IEEE 802.16) 3GPP-LTE 4G and beyond Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 4 / 26

  5. Number of Publications on OFDM 14 12 10 OCEANS Conference Papers Number of Publications IEEE/JASA Journal Papers 8 6 4 2 0 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 Year 1994 - 2005: sporadic effort and little progress 2006 - 2011: sustained effort and great progress Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 5 / 26

  6. Outline OFDM basics: Pros and Cons Algorithm development Prototype development Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 6 / 26

  7. Underwater Acoustic Channel Characteristics The sound propagates too slow! ◮ Long multipath ◮ Fast variation The SPACE’08 experiment, Martha’s Vineyard, depth 15 m 100 80 amplitude 60 40 20 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 delay [ms] Fast-varying multipath channel with a large delay spread Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 7 / 26

  8. Block Transmission over LTI Channels Consider a linear time invariant (LTI) multipath channel N p � h ( t ) = A p δ ( τ − τ p ) p =1 Time domain waveform distortion; intersymbol interference (ISI) arises; complex channel equalizer needed y ( t ) = s ( t ) ∗ h ( t ) Frequency domain Y ( f ) = H ( f ) S ( f ) If s ( t ) is carefully constructed with no ISI in frequency domain S ( f ) | f = f m = s [ m ] Then no ISI at the receiver side Y ( f ) | f = f m = H ( f m ) s [ m ] Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 8 / 26

  9. Basics of Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing Frequency domain; f m − f k = ( m − k ) 1 T � � � S ( f ) = s [ k ] sinc ( f − f k ) T S ( f ) | f = f m = s [ m ] , k 1.2 s[k] s[k+1] s[k−1] 1 0.8 Frequency Fesponse 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 −0.2 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 4 5 Frequency Time domain waveform; g ( t ) : rectangular pulse shaper f k = f c + k � s [ k ] e j 2 πf k t g ( t ) , s ( t ) = T k Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 9 / 26

  10. Pros and Cons of OFDM Pros: ◮ Convert a dispersive channel to a set of parallel simple channels � K/ 2 − 1 � z m = H ( f m ) s [ m ] + n m m = − K/ 2 ◮ Receiver complexity does not depend on the channel delay spread! Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 10 / 26

  11. Pros and Cons of OFDM Pros: ◮ Convert a dispersive channel to a set of parallel simple channels � K/ 2 − 1 � z m = H ( f m ) s [ m ] + n m m = − K/ 2 ◮ Receiver complexity does not depend on the channel delay spread! Cons: ◮ Poor performance on faded subchannels. ◮ Sensitive to the Doppler effect ⋆ Doppler shifts destroy the subcarrier orthogonality, and hence leads to intercarrier interference (ICI) ◮ Large peak -to-average power ratio (PAPR) Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 10 / 26

  12. How to Drastically Enhance Performance in Fading Channels? 9 0 10 fading AWGN 8 fading AWGN −1 10 7 −2 6 10 average BER Capacity 5 −3 10 4 −4 10 3 2 −5 10 1 −6 10 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 −5 0 5 10 15 20 25 SNR(dB) SNR(dB) (a) BER vs SNR (b) Capacity vs SNR Fading channel drastically affects the uncoded performance Fading channel has the potential for reliable data transmission Solution: coded OFDM with strong codes, e.g., Turbo, LDPC codes that are capacity -achieving Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 11 / 26

  13. How to Deal With the Doppler Effect? ICI is inevitable! Need signal processing algorithms to address ICI explicitly Signal processing� tailored to� OFDM� underwater� demodulation� channels� One example: Progressive receiver [JSTSP’2011] There are other alternative approaches Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 12 / 26

  14. Progressive Receiver Adapt the receiver to channel conditions automatically without any a priori information Achieves both low complexity and robust performance over time -varying UWA channels H 0 H 1 H 2 H 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . z s n . . . = . . . + . . . . . . . . . . . . Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 13 / 26

  15. Receiver Structure Pre-processing; set D = 0 1. The system model keeps z = H D s + n being updated Channel estimation Increase the span of ICI in equalization model Noise variance estimation Increase the maximum Increase D ; provide soft possible Doppler spread information ICI equalization in channel estimation 2. Soft information from the Nonbinary LDPC decoding channel decoder is utilized 3. No extra pilot -overhead No success or needed D = D max Yes Output decisions Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 14 / 26

  16. Block Success Percentage: SPACE08 Success percentage vs. number of phones Success percentage vs. number of phones 1 1 D = 3 0.9 0.9 D = 3 D = 2 0.8 0.8 D = 2 D = 1 0.7 0.7 D = 1 D = 0 0.6 0.6 D = 0 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 S1 (60 m) S5 (1000 m) Averaged over Julian dates 295 -302 With 4 phones: 90% (D = 0), 95% (D = 1), and up to 98.8% (D = 3) Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 15 / 26

  17. How to Alleviate the PAPR Impact? 0 10 Multicarrier −1 10 without Pr(PAPR>Thresh) PAPR control Single−Carrier Multicarrier with PAPR control −2 10 QPSK 8−QAM 16−QAM −3 10 6 8 10 12 14 16 Thresh [dB] QPSK: The gap between OFDM and single -carrier is about 6dB QAMs: The gap between OFDM and single-carrier is about 4dB Design considerations on power amplifier and transducer: ◮ Peak or average power constrained? Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 16 / 26

  18. Summary OFDM is an elegant scheme It has a clear advantage for short -range long dispersive multipath channels. It is an appealing technique for shallow-water high-data-rate acoustic applications Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 17 / 26

  19. WUWNet’07 Demo, Sept. 2007 Link A to B Link B to A Single -input single-output (SISO) OFDM in-air demonstration The data rate is 3.1 kb/s, with QPSK modulation, rate 1/2 LDPC coding, and bandwidth of 5.5 kHz Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 18 / 26

  20. WUWNet’08 Demo, Sept. 2008 Multi -input multi-output ( 2 × 2 ) OFDM in-air demonstration The data rate is 6.2 kb/s, with QPSK modulation, rate 1/2 LDPC coding, and bandwidth of 5.5 kHz Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 19 / 26

  21. WUWNet’09 and ’10 Demo, Nov. 2009 & Nov. 2010 Aqua -fModem Prototype: With keyboard input and LCD display Floating-point TMS320C6713 DSP board; running @ 225 MHz Fixed-point TMS320C6416 DSP board; running @ 1 GHz Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 20 / 26

  22. WUWNET’11 Demo: A Network of Modems One -hop network, RTS/CTS based MAC protocol Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 21 / 26

  23. Current / Future Issues (1) Multi -input multi-output (MIMO) ◮ Co-located: Increase the data rate via spatial modulation h 11 x 1 y 1 h 12 x 2 y 2 . . . . . . x Nt y Nr h NtNr ◮ Distributed MIMO, asynchronous MIMO User 3 User 1 User 2 v 3 = 0 v 1 v 2 Recivers Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 22 / 26

  24. Current / Future Issues (2) Interference (Sonar, impulse interference, multiuser interference) Timedomain_for_637_phone_10 600 400 200 0 −200 −400 −600 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 6 x 10 ◮ Interference mitigation / avoidance / alignment / management Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 23 / 26

  25. Current / Future Issues (3) Networking issues ◮ MAC ◮ Routing ◮ Reliable data transfer ◮ Applications How to efficiently interact with higher layers? Joint optimization (cross -layer design)? Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 24 / 26

  26. Thank you! Shengli Zhou (University of Connecticut) Plenary Talk Dec. 2, 2011 25 / 26

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend