Tyumen 2007 International Geoscience Conference Tyumen, Russia 4-7 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

tyumen 2007
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Tyumen 2007 International Geoscience Conference Tyumen, Russia 4-7 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tyumen 2007 International Geoscience Conference Tyumen, Russia 4-7 December 2007 Reserves and Resource Reporting Guidelines: Russian Federation Classification (Proposed 2005) vs SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum Resources Management System (2007


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Tyumen 2007

International Geoscience Conference

Tyumen, Russia 4-7 December 2007

Reserves and Resource Reporting Guidelines: Russian Federation Classification (Proposed 2005) vs SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum Resources Management System (2007 PRMS) John Hodgin, Ryder Scott Company, Houston, Texas

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Object of This Paper

  • Introduce those familiar with the Russian

Federation Classification as proposed in 2005 (RF-2005) to the terminology, similarity and differences in the classification scheme and overall structure

  • f the SPE/WPC/AAPG/SPEE Petroleum

Resources Management System (SPE- PRMS 2007)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Why We All Need to Gain a Better Understanding of the SPE-PRMS 2007

The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board was The U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board was established in 1973 as the designated organization for established in 1973 as the designated organization for the private sector for establishing standards of financial the private sector for establishing standards of financial accounting and reporting. accounting and reporting. The London The London-

  • based International Accounting

based International Accounting Standards Board is committed to developing a single Standards Board is committed to developing a single set of high quality, understandable and enforceable global set of high quality, understandable and enforceable global accounting standards. accounting standards. In October 2001, the FASB and the In October 2001, the FASB and the IASB announced their formal IASB announced their formal commitment to convergence of commitment to convergence of U.S. and International accounting U.S. and International accounting standards. standards. The IASB participated as an The IASB participated as an

  • bserver

to the Oil and Gas

  • bserver

to the Oil and Gas Reserves Committee that drafted Reserves Committee that drafted the 2007 SPE Definitions. Most the 2007 SPE Definitions. Most

  • bservers believe the 2007 SPE
  • bservers believe the 2007 SPE

Definitions will be adopted in some Definitions will be adopted in some form as part of a the resulting form as part of a the resulting accounting standards as a result of accounting standards as a result of the convergence. the convergence.

The goal of the IASB to set one global standard for financial reporting and is leaning toward the Adoption of the SPE-PRMS 2007 to guide oil and gas accounting.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Major Elements Reserves and Resources Classification Systems

Chance of Development Chance of Discovery

E&P Life Cycle for One Project Prospect Exploration & Appraisal Appraisal & Development Prospective Resources Contingent Resources Reserves

Volume Uncertainty Chance of Commerciality

Follow Progression of Changes In E&P Life Cycle of a Reservoir, Field or Project as We Obtain More Technical Data or as a Result of a Change in Economic Status Address Chance of Discovery and Chance of Development Incorporate a Scheme to Address Technical Uncertainty in the Volumes and Increasing Levels of Commerciality or Project Maturity

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Correlation of Russian Federation 2005 and SPE-PRMS 2007 Classifications

SUB-COMMERCIAL

Not to scale

RESERVES

PRO DUCTIO N

PRO SPECTIVE RESO URCES

UNR ECO VERABLE UN RECO VERABLE

Low Estimate Best Estimate

Range of Uncertainty

TOTAL PETROLEUM INITIALLY-IN-PLACE (PIIP)

DISCOVERED PIIP

UNDISCOVERED PIIP

CO NTING ENT RESO URCES

Probable Possible Proved

1P 2P 1C 2C 3C

High Estimate

3P Increasing Chance of Commerciality

COMMERCIAL SB-COMMERCIAL

Discovered PIIP Undiscovered PIIP

Recoverable Reserves Produced Reserves

UNRECOVERABLE RESRERVES

Sub-economic (In-Place)

Predicted D3 (In-place estimates only) Prospective D2 (in-place estimates only)

TOTAL PETROLEUM INITIALLY-IN-PLACE (PIIP) DISCOVERED PIIP

GEOLOGICAL RESERVES

UNDISCOVERED PIIP

GEOLOGICAL RESOURCES

UNRECOVERABLE RESOURCES

Indefinitely Profitable (In-Place) Potentially Profitable Economic Contingently Profitable Economic Normally Profitable

Low Estimate Best Estimate

Reasonably Assured A Identified B Estimated C1 Inferred C2

(In-place estimates only) Degree of Geological Exploration Knowledge And Maturity for Production (field project status) Geological Exploration Knowledge & Degree of Maturity for Economic Development

Identified B Estimated C1 Inferred C2 Recoverable Resources Localized D1 Prospective D2 Predicted D3

Although the terminology varies, there is a high degree of commonality with both classification systems sharing a similar overall structure denoting petroleum initially in-place, recoverable and unrecoverable volumes, resources and reserves.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Correlation of Status Categories Different Terminology

Total Petroleum Initially In-Place Total Petroleum Initially In-Place Total Petroleum Initially In-Place Discovered Petroleum Initially In-Place Discovered Petroleum Initially In-Place Geological Reserves Undiscovered Petroleum Initially In-Place Undiscovered Petroleum Initially In-Place Geological Resources

SPE-PRMS 2007 RF-2005 In-Place SPE-PRMS 2007 RF-2005 Unrecoverable

Undiscovered Unrecoverable (Undiscovered) Unrecoverable Unrecoverable Resources Discovered Unrecoverable (Discovered) Unrecoverable Unrecoverable Reserves

SPE-PRMS 2007 RF-2005 Recoverable

Discovered Commercial Discovered Sub-commercial Reserves (Recoverable) Contingent (Recoverable) Resources Economic Normally Profitable Reserves Economic Contingently (Recoverable) & Sub-economic (In-Place) Reserves Undiscovered Prospective (Recoverable) Resources Potentially Profitable (Recoverable) & Indefinitely Profitable (In-Place) Resources Produced Production Produced Reserves Total Petroleum Initially In-Place Total Petroleum Initially In-Place Total Petroleum Initially In-Place Discovered Petroleum Initially In-Place Discovered Petroleum Initially In-Place Geological Reserves Undiscovered Petroleum Initially In-Place Undiscovered Petroleum Initially In-Place Geological Resources

SPE-PRMS 2007 RF-2005 In-Place SPE-PRMS 2007 RF-2005 Unrecoverable

Undiscovered Unrecoverable (Undiscovered) Unrecoverable Unrecoverable Resources Discovered Unrecoverable (Discovered) Unrecoverable Unrecoverable Reserves

SPE-PRMS 2007 RF-2005 Recoverable

Discovered Commercial Discovered Sub-commercial Reserves (Recoverable) Contingent (Recoverable) Resources Economic Normally Profitable Reserves Economic Contingently (Recoverable) & Sub-economic (In-Place) Reserves Undiscovered Prospective (Recoverable) Resources Potentially Profitable (Recoverable) & Indefinitely Profitable (In-Place) Resources Produced Production Produced Reserves

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

SPE-PRMS 2007 TERMS

Prospective Resources (Undiscovered)

  • Defined as “those quantities of petroleum

estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from undiscovered accumulations by future development projects.

  • The evaluator must address the chance of

discovery as part of assessing the chance

  • f the project’s commerciality.
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

SPE-PRMS 2007 TERMS

Contingent Resources (Discovered Sub- Commercial)

  • Defined as “those quantities of petroleum

estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations, but which are not currently considered commercially recoverable.

  • May include

– Projects with no viable market – Projects depending on technology under development – Projects in the early stage of evaluation

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

SPE-PRMS 2007 TERMS

Reserves (Discovered Commercial)

  • Defined as “those quantities of petroleum

anticipated to be commercially recoverable from known accumulations from a given date forward under defined conditions.

  • Reserves must satisfy four criteria:

1. Must be discovered 2. Must be recoverable 3. Must be commercial 4. Must be remaining as of a given date as well as associated with an identified development project

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Greatest Level of Divergence in Terminology Occurs Within the Class Categories for Technical Certainty

  • SPE-PRMS 2007 reserves and resource categories are

based on the uncertainty of the hydrocarbon sales volumes associated with a project (Example Proved-Probable-Possible Reserve Categories).

  • This uncertainty includes technical uncertainty for the

reservoir in-place volumes plus the uncertainty of the project recovery efficiency, plus commercial uncertainty for such conditions as timetable of development, assessment of future economic conditions, expectation of a market, facilities are or will be available, legal, contractual, social, environmental and economic concerns will be met, commitment by the company, partners, and government approvals and assurance that the project is economic according to the criteria defined by the

  • evaluator. Failure to meet any of these criteria also will be the

difference between in classification as a reserve or as a contingent resource under the SPE-PRMS 2007 guidelines.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Correlation of Certainty Classes for Recoverable Volumes

Discovered Sub-commercial Contingent Resources Economic Contingently Profitable & Sub-economic* Reserves

SPE-PRMS 2007 RF-2005 Recoverable

Discovered Commercial Reserves Economic Normally Profitable Reserves Undiscovered Prospective Resources

Potentially Profitable Recoverable & Indefinitely Profitable* Resources

Produced Production Produced Reserves

Reserve Categories Proved Probable Possible Reserves Categories A, B, C1 C2 C2 Reserve Categories

1P-Proved 2P-Proved + Probable 3P-Proved+Probable+Possible

Reserve Categories

A + B + C1 A + B + C1 + C2 A + B + C1 + C2

Cumulative Volumes

Low Estimate-P90 Best Estimate-P50 High Estimate-P10

Incremental Volumes

Resource Categories Cumulative 1C Cumulative 2C Cumulative 3C Economic Contingently Profitable Reserves Categories** Incremental B Incremental C1 Incremental C2

Cumulative Volumes

Low Estimate-P90 Best Estimate-P50 High Estimate-P10 Resource Categories Cumulative Low Estimate Cumulative Best Estimate Cumulative High Estimate Potentially Profitable Resources Categories** Incremental Localized D1 Incremental Prospective D2 Incremental Predicted D3

Cumulative Volumes

Low Estimate-P90 Best Estimate-P50 High Estimate-P10

*Discovered Sub-economic Reserves and Indefinitely Profitable Resources are expressed as in-place volumes only **Discovered Economic Contintently Profitable Reserves and Undiscovered Potentially Profitable Resources are expressed as incremental volumes only

Discovered Sub-commercial Contingent Resources Economic Contingently Profitable & Sub-economic* Reserves

SPE-PRMS 2007 RF-2005 Recoverable

Discovered Commercial Reserves Economic Normally Profitable Reserves Undiscovered Prospective Resources

Potentially Profitable Recoverable & Indefinitely Profitable* Resources

Produced Production Produced Reserves

Reserve Categories Proved Probable Possible Reserves Categories A, B, C1 C2 C2 Reserve Categories

1P-Proved 2P-Proved + Probable 3P-Proved+Probable+Possible

Reserve Categories

A + B + C1 A + B + C1 + C2 A + B + C1 + C2

Cumulative Volumes

Low Estimate-P90 Best Estimate-P50 High Estimate-P10

Incremental Volumes

Resource Categories Cumulative 1C Cumulative 2C Cumulative 3C Economic Contingently Profitable Reserves Categories** Incremental B Incremental C1 Incremental C2

Cumulative Volumes

Low Estimate-P90 Best Estimate-P50 High Estimate-P10 Resource Categories Cumulative Low Estimate Cumulative Best Estimate Cumulative High Estimate Potentially Profitable Resources Categories** Incremental Localized D1 Incremental Prospective D2 Incremental Predicted D3

Cumulative Volumes

Low Estimate-P90 Best Estimate-P50 High Estimate-P10

*Discovered Sub-economic Reserves and Indefinitely Profitable Resources are expressed as in-place volumes only **Discovered Economic Contintently Profitable Reserves and Undiscovered Potentially Profitable Resources are expressed as incremental volumes only

The SPE-PRMS 2007 includes both incremental volumes such as Proved, Probable and Possible And cumulative volumes such as 1P for Proved, 2P for Proved+Probable and 3P for Proved+Probable+Possible

  • volumes. The SPE-PRMS 2007

includes cumulative volumes for each of the reserve and Resource class. The SPE-PRMS 2007 also allows for the use of probabilistic volumes.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Notable Difference Between SPE-PRMS 2007 Prospective Resources and RF-2005 Potentially Profitable Resources

  • RF-2005 classification splits the Undiscovered

Recoverable Resources into three subdivisions by geological or project maturity:

  • D1-Prospects
  • D2-Leads
  • D3-Plays
  • SPE-PRMS 2007 classification encompasses

these variations in project maturity within the single classification of Prospective Resources but addresses uncertainty in the volumes with low, mid and high estimates.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Correlation of Reserves and Producing Status Categories

Commercial Proved (Pv)

Reasonable Certainty

SPE-PRMS 2007

PvDP Proved Developed Producing PvNP Proved Developed Non-Producing PvUD Proved Undeveloped

Cumulative Volumes Pv-1P Low Estimate P90 Cumulative Volumes Pv + Pb-2P Best Estimate P50 Cumulative Volumes Pv + Pb + Ps-3P High Estimate P10

RF-2005

Economic Normally Profitable

PbDP, PbNP, PbUD

Probable (Pb)

More Likely Than Not

Possible (Ps)

Less Likely Than Not

Producing Status Recoverable Reserves Categories

PsDP, PsNP, PsUD

Recoverable Reserves Categories

A Reasonably Assured B Identified C1 Estimated

Producing Status

Similar to Developed Producing Similar to Developed Non-Producing Similar to Undeveloped C2 Inferred Similar to Undeveloped

Cumulative Volumes A+B+C1+C2 Similar to 1P Low Estimate P90 Cumulative Volumes A+B+C1+C2 Similar to 2P Best Estimate P50 Cumulative Volumes A+B+C1+C2 Similar to 3P High Estimate P10

Commercial Proved (Pv)

Reasonable Certainty

SPE-PRMS 2007

PvDP Proved Developed Producing PvNP Proved Developed Non-Producing PvUD Proved Undeveloped PvDP Proved Developed Producing PvNP Proved Developed Non-Producing PvUD Proved Undeveloped

Cumulative Volumes Pv-1P Low Estimate P90 Cumulative Volumes Pv + Pb-2P Best Estimate P50 Cumulative Volumes Pv + Pb + Ps-3P High Estimate P10

RF-2005

Economic Normally Profitable

PbDP, PbNP, PbUD

Probable (Pb)

More Likely Than Not

Possible (Ps)

Less Likely Than Not

Producing Status Recoverable Reserves Categories

PsDP, PsNP, PsUD

Recoverable Reserves Categories

A Reasonably Assured B Identified C1 Estimated A Reasonably Assured B Identified C1 Estimated

Producing Status

Similar to Developed Producing Similar to Developed Non-Producing Similar to Undeveloped Similar to Developed Producing Similar to Developed Non-Producing Similar to Undeveloped C2 Inferred Similar to Undeveloped

Cumulative Volumes A+B+C1+C2 Similar to 1P Low Estimate P90 Cumulative Volumes A+B+C1+C2 Similar to 2P Best Estimate P50 Cumulative Volumes A+B+C1+C2 Similar to 3P High Estimate P10 Cumulative Volumes A+B+C1+C2 Similar to 1P Low Estimate P90 Cumulative Volumes A+B+C1+C2 Similar to 2P Best Estimate P50 Cumulative Volumes A+B+C1+C2 Similar to 3P High Estimate P10

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Unconventional Hydrocarbons

  • SPE-PRMS 2007 allows for the inclusion
  • f certain unconventional hydrocarbons as

both resources and reserves

– Tight Gas – Coal Bed Methane – Shale Gas – Gas Hydrates – Natural Bitumen (Including Mined Volumes) – Oil Shales

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Conclusion

By comparing and contrasting the overall structure, terminology and key principals evaluators can begin to develop a better understanding of the comparability between the two hydrocarbon classification systems.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

ТЮМЕНЬ 2007

Acknowledgements

The comparisons made by the author rely primarily on the work contained in the SPE Oil and Gas Reserves Committee (OGRC) Mapping Subcommittee Final Report

  • f December 2005 and the final PRMS guidelines. The

author is grateful to Mr. Dmitri P. Zabrodin, Ph.D and the staff of FDP Engineering, LLP, Moscow for the critical review and the revisions relating to the SPE’s interpretation of the RF-2005. This paper is intended to provide a generalized comparison and does not purport to represent the authoritative version of these agencies’

  • guidelines. Readers should obtain official copies of the

guidelines directly from the issuing agencies. www.spe.org For this and other reserve related articles visit our website. www.ryderscott.com