Two Universal String Predictions for Heavy Ion Collisions David - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

two universal string predictions for heavy ion collisions
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Two Universal String Predictions for Heavy Ion Collisions David - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Two Universal String Predictions for Heavy Ion Collisions David Mateos ICREA & University of Barcelona Plan Recap from this morning. Phase transitions for mesons. Photon emission by sQGP . Implications for HIC. A new


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Two Universal String Predictions for Heavy Ion Collisions

David Mateos

ICREA & University of Barcelona

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Plan

  • Recap from this morning.
  • Phase transitions for mesons.
  • Photon emission by sQGP

.

  • Implications for HIC.
  • A new mechanism for quark energy loss.
  • Remarks and concluding thoughts.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

The QCD challenge

  • QCD remains a challenge after 36 years!
slide-4
SLIDE 4

The QCD challenge

  • QCD remains a challenge after 36 years!
  • No analytic and truly systematic methods.
  • Lattice is good for static properties, but

not for real-time physics...

  • ... and for a theorist it is a black box.
  • A string reformulation might help.
  • Topic of this talk -- with focus on QGP

.

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Certain quantitative observables (eg. T=0 spectrum)

will require going beyond supergravity.

  • However, certain predictions may be universal

enough to apply in certain regimes.

The QCD challenge

  • Problem: Dual of QCD is inaccessible within SUGRA.
  • Good example:

Policastro, Son & Starinets ’01 Kovtun, Son & Starinets ‘03

η s = 1 4π

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Exploit two universal properties

BH

Deconfined plasma

Witten ‘98

slide-7
SLIDE 7

q

BH

Karch & Randall ’01 Karch & Katz ‘02

Glueballs Mesons

q

Free quarks

quark flavours Nf ≪ Nc

  • Exploit two universal properties
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Phase transitions for mesons

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Mq T

First order phase transition at Tfun

(Gluons are deconfined in both phases!)

Babington, Erdmenger, Guralnik & Kirsch ’03 Kruczenski, D.M., Myers & Winters ‘03 Kirsch ‘04 D.M., Myers & Thomson ’06

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Mq T

  • Discrete set of mesons with mass gap:

Mmes ∼ Mq √ λ ∼ Tfun

  • Massive quarks.
  • Heavy mesons survive deconfinement!

First order phase transition at Tfun

  • In good agreement with lattice QCD, eg. for J/Ψ:

Tfun ∼ 1.6 Tc − 2.1Tc

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Mq T

  • No quasi-particle excitations!

First order phase transition at Tfun

Hoyos-Badajoz, Landsteiner & Montero ‘06 D.M., Myers & Thomson ’06

  • Will illustrate this by computing a spectral function of

electromagnetic currents, related to photon production:

J

EM

µ J

EM

µ

D.M., Patiño-Jaidar ‘07

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Mesons absolutely stable at , but acquire widths away

from this limit. Nc → ∞ , λ → ∞

  • rm

r0

rm

  • S3
  • r
  • r( )

r

  • Finite coupling: String worldsheet instantons.

Faulkner & Liu ‘08

Γ ∼ e−

√ λ ∼ e−Mq/T

  • Finite N: Hawking radiation.

Γ ∼ 1/N 2

c

Phase transitions for mesons

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Photon emission by sQGP

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • QGP is optically thin → Photons carry valuable information.

Caron-Huot, Kovtun, Moore, Starinets & Y affe ’06 Parnachev & Sahakian ‘06

  • Holographic results for massless matter:

Why photons?

γ

slide-15
SLIDE 15

dΓ ddk = e2 (2π)d 2|k| 1 ek0/T − 1 ηµνχµν(k)

| | − re k = (k0, k), with k0 = |k|, is the photon null momentum,

χµν(k) = −2 Im GR

µν(k) is the spectral density,

GR

µν(k) = −i

  • dd+1x e−ik·x Θ(x0)[J EM

µ (x), J EM ν

(0)]

  • To leading order in the electromagnetic coupling constant:
slide-16
SLIDE 16

χ =

  • delta functions

Spectral function for Minkowski

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Spectral function for BH

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

ω = k0/2πT

χµ

µ(ω)

2NfNcT 2ω

Maximum Mq

Mq = 0

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Approaching the critical embedding:

Mq T

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

ω = k0/2πT

χµ

µ(ω)

2NfNcT 2ω

Peaks at null momentum!

slide-19
SLIDE 19

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

ω = k0/2πT

χµ

µ(ω)

2NfNcT 2ω

Peaks at null momentum!

Mq T

Mass gap

ω ∼ v| k| v < 1

ω = | k|

Approaching the critical embedding:

Dispersion relation for mesons

D.M., Myers & Thomson ‘07 Ejaz, Faulkner, Liu, Rajagopal & Wiedemann ‘07

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Mq T

Limiting velocity = Local speed of light at the tip

Approaching the critical embedding:

Mass gap

ω = | k| Dispersion relation for mesons

D.M., Myers & Thomson ‘07 Ejaz, Faulkner, Liu, Rajagopal & Wiedemann ‘07

ω ∼ v| k| v < 1

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Mq T

Approaching the critical embedding:

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

ω = k0/2πT

χµ

µ(ω)

2NfNcT 2ω

Meson with null momentum

Mass gap

ω = | k| Dispersion relation for mesons

D.M., Myers & Thomson ‘07 Ejaz, Faulkner, Liu, Rajagopal & Wiedemann ‘07

ω ∼ v| k| v < 1 γ γ

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Implications for HIC

slide-23
SLIDE 23
  • Comparison with HIC experiments requires model for

spacetime evolution of the fireball, number and distribution of J/Ψ’s, etc.

Casalderey-Solana, D.M. ‘08

Implications for HIC

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Simple model yields, for LHC energies:

3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2

ω [GeV]

Tdiss = 1.25 Tc

  • Result exponentially sensitive to many parameters.
  • Location of the peak between 3-5 GeV

.

Thermal background from light quarks

J/Ψ signal

  • Quadratically sensitive to cross-section
  • - not observable at RHIC.

c¯ c

slide-25
SLIDE 25

(GeV/c)

T

p

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

  • 2

dy) (GeV/c)

2 T

dp

  • N/(

2

d

  • 7

10

  • 6

10

  • 5

10

  • 4

10

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

  • 1

10 1 10

2

10

3

10

: prompt + thermal

  • Total

= 50 GeV

c

  • loss

, E

coll

N

  • Prompt: NLO

Thermal: QGP Thermal: HRG

+X, 5.5 TeV [0-10% central]

  • Pb-Pb

=0.1 fm/c) = 650 MeV

  • (

T

  • Signal is also comparable (or larger) than pQCD background:

Arleo, d’Enterria and Peressounko ‘07

slide-26
SLIDE 26

A new mechanism for quark energy loss

slide-27
SLIDE 27

BH Boundary

v > vlim

Chesler, Jensen, Karch & Y affe ‘08

A new mechanism for quark energy loss

Casalderey-Solana, Fernandez & D.M. (to appear)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Cherenkov radiation

BH Boundary

v > vlim

Vector mesons ↔ Aµ

A new mechanism for quark energy loss

Casalderey-Solana, Fernandez & D.M. (to appear)

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Comments

  • Will also radiate

scalar mesons:

S ∼ − 1 gs

  • d8x
  • − det(g + F) −
  • dτAµ

dxµ dτ −

  • dτφi

dxi dσ

  • Will also radiate R-charged

mesons:

  • Energy loss is of order .

1/Nc

  • But exactly calculable and not necessarily subleading

for real-world QGP .

  • Characteristic v-dependence.
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Preliminary results for D3/D7

  • Focus on sphere zero mode since QCD has no sphere.
  • Expand in normalizable modes in radial direction:

Infinite tower of massive 4D vector mesons.

  • Energy loss in longitudinal and transverse modes.
slide-31
SLIDE 31

BH Boundary

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 10 10 20 30
  • Coupling to each mode is proportional to meson

radial wave function at the location of the quark.

n=0 n=1

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Preliminary results for D3/D7

2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8

quark position quark velocity dE/dt dE/dt

(n=0, transverse mode)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Remarks

slide-34
SLIDE 34
  • Photon peak and energy loss may exist in

QCD, irrespectively of whether a string dual exists.

J/ψ, Υ, ...

  • V

ector mesons ( ) survive deconfinement.

Lattice, effective potentials, etc.

  • Their limiting velocity in the QGP is subluminal.

Heuristically:

Teff(v) = T (1 − v2)1/4

  • Depends on only two assumptions:
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Deconfinement

BH

Quarks

  • V

erifying in QCD is hard. Reassuring that effect is universal property of all gauge theories with gravity dual:

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Two phases:

Heavy mesons survive deconfinement.

ω ∼ v| k| v < 1

3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2

ω [GeV]

BH

v > vlim

Vector mesons ↔ Aµ

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Thank you.