Two Universal String Predictions for Heavy Ion Collisions David - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Two Universal String Predictions for Heavy Ion Collisions David - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Two Universal String Predictions for Heavy Ion Collisions David Mateos ICREA & University of Barcelona Plan Recap from this morning. Phase transitions for mesons. Photon emission by sQGP . Implications for HIC. A new
Plan
- Recap from this morning.
- Phase transitions for mesons.
- Photon emission by sQGP
.
- Implications for HIC.
- A new mechanism for quark energy loss.
- Remarks and concluding thoughts.
The QCD challenge
- QCD remains a challenge after 36 years!
The QCD challenge
- QCD remains a challenge after 36 years!
- No analytic and truly systematic methods.
- Lattice is good for static properties, but
not for real-time physics...
- ... and for a theorist it is a black box.
- A string reformulation might help.
- Topic of this talk -- with focus on QGP
.
- Certain quantitative observables (eg. T=0 spectrum)
will require going beyond supergravity.
- However, certain predictions may be universal
enough to apply in certain regimes.
The QCD challenge
- Problem: Dual of QCD is inaccessible within SUGRA.
- Good example:
Policastro, Son & Starinets ’01 Kovtun, Son & Starinets ‘03
η s = 1 4π
Exploit two universal properties
BH
Deconfined plasma
Witten ‘98
q
BH
Karch & Randall ’01 Karch & Katz ‘02
Glueballs Mesons
q¯
q
Free quarks
quark flavours Nf ≪ Nc
- Exploit two universal properties
Phase transitions for mesons
Mq T
First order phase transition at Tfun
(Gluons are deconfined in both phases!)
Babington, Erdmenger, Guralnik & Kirsch ’03 Kruczenski, D.M., Myers & Winters ‘03 Kirsch ‘04 D.M., Myers & Thomson ’06
Mq T
- Discrete set of mesons with mass gap:
Mmes ∼ Mq √ λ ∼ Tfun
- Massive quarks.
- Heavy mesons survive deconfinement!
First order phase transition at Tfun
- In good agreement with lattice QCD, eg. for J/Ψ:
Tfun ∼ 1.6 Tc − 2.1Tc
Mq T
- No quasi-particle excitations!
First order phase transition at Tfun
Hoyos-Badajoz, Landsteiner & Montero ‘06 D.M., Myers & Thomson ’06
- Will illustrate this by computing a spectral function of
electromagnetic currents, related to photon production:
J
EM
µ J
EM
µ
D.M., Patiño-Jaidar ‘07
- Mesons absolutely stable at , but acquire widths away
from this limit. Nc → ∞ , λ → ∞
- rm
r0
’
rm
- S3
- r
- r( )
r
- Finite coupling: String worldsheet instantons.
Faulkner & Liu ‘08
Γ ∼ e−
√ λ ∼ e−Mq/T
- Finite N: Hawking radiation.
Γ ∼ 1/N 2
c
Phase transitions for mesons
Photon emission by sQGP
- QGP is optically thin → Photons carry valuable information.
Caron-Huot, Kovtun, Moore, Starinets & Y affe ’06 Parnachev & Sahakian ‘06
- Holographic results for massless matter:
Why photons?
γ
dΓ ddk = e2 (2π)d 2|k| 1 ek0/T − 1 ηµνχµν(k)
| | − re k = (k0, k), with k0 = |k|, is the photon null momentum,
χµν(k) = −2 Im GR
µν(k) is the spectral density,
GR
µν(k) = −i
- dd+1x e−ik·x Θ(x0)[J EM
µ (x), J EM ν
(0)]
- To leading order in the electromagnetic coupling constant:
χ =
- delta functions
Spectral function for Minkowski
Spectral function for BH
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
ω = k0/2πT
χµ
µ(ω)
2NfNcT 2ω
Maximum Mq
Mq = 0
Approaching the critical embedding:
Mq T
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
ω = k0/2πT
χµ
µ(ω)
2NfNcT 2ω
Peaks at null momentum!
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
ω = k0/2πT
χµ
µ(ω)
2NfNcT 2ω
Peaks at null momentum!
Mq T
Mass gap
ω ∼ v| k| v < 1
ω = | k|
Approaching the critical embedding:
Dispersion relation for mesons
D.M., Myers & Thomson ‘07 Ejaz, Faulkner, Liu, Rajagopal & Wiedemann ‘07
Mq T
Limiting velocity = Local speed of light at the tip
Approaching the critical embedding:
Mass gap
ω = | k| Dispersion relation for mesons
D.M., Myers & Thomson ‘07 Ejaz, Faulkner, Liu, Rajagopal & Wiedemann ‘07
ω ∼ v| k| v < 1
Mq T
Approaching the critical embedding:
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
ω = k0/2πT
χµ
µ(ω)
2NfNcT 2ω
Meson with null momentum
Mass gap
ω = | k| Dispersion relation for mesons
D.M., Myers & Thomson ‘07 Ejaz, Faulkner, Liu, Rajagopal & Wiedemann ‘07
ω ∼ v| k| v < 1 γ γ
Implications for HIC
- Comparison with HIC experiments requires model for
spacetime evolution of the fireball, number and distribution of J/Ψ’s, etc.
Casalderey-Solana, D.M. ‘08
Implications for HIC
- Simple model yields, for LHC energies:
3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2
ω [GeV]
Tdiss = 1.25 Tc
Nγ
- Result exponentially sensitive to many parameters.
- Location of the peak between 3-5 GeV
.
Thermal background from light quarks
J/Ψ signal
- Quadratically sensitive to cross-section
- - not observable at RHIC.
c¯ c
(GeV/c)
T
p
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
- 2
dy) (GeV/c)
2 T
dp
- N/(
2
d
- 7
10
- 6
10
- 5
10
- 4
10
- 3
10
- 2
10
- 1
10 1 10
2
10
3
10
: prompt + thermal
- Total
= 50 GeV
c
- loss
, E
coll
N
- Prompt: NLO
Thermal: QGP Thermal: HRG
+X, 5.5 TeV [0-10% central]
- Pb-Pb
=0.1 fm/c) = 650 MeV
- (
T
- Signal is also comparable (or larger) than pQCD background:
Arleo, d’Enterria and Peressounko ‘07
A new mechanism for quark energy loss
BH Boundary
v > vlim
Chesler, Jensen, Karch & Y affe ‘08
A new mechanism for quark energy loss
Casalderey-Solana, Fernandez & D.M. (to appear)
Cherenkov radiation
BH Boundary
v > vlim
Vector mesons ↔ Aµ
A new mechanism for quark energy loss
Casalderey-Solana, Fernandez & D.M. (to appear)
Comments
- Will also radiate
scalar mesons:
S ∼ − 1 gs
- d8x
- − det(g + F) −
- dτAµ
dxµ dτ −
- dτφi
dxi dσ
- Will also radiate R-charged
mesons:
- Energy loss is of order .
1/Nc
- But exactly calculable and not necessarily subleading
for real-world QGP .
- Characteristic v-dependence.
Preliminary results for D3/D7
- Focus on sphere zero mode since QCD has no sphere.
- Expand in normalizable modes in radial direction:
Infinite tower of massive 4D vector mesons.
- Energy loss in longitudinal and transverse modes.
BH Boundary
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 10 10 20 30- Coupling to each mode is proportional to meson
radial wave function at the location of the quark.
n=0 n=1
Preliminary results for D3/D7
2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
0.90 0.92 0.94 0.96 0.98 1.00 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
quark position quark velocity dE/dt dE/dt
(n=0, transverse mode)
Remarks
- Photon peak and energy loss may exist in
QCD, irrespectively of whether a string dual exists.
J/ψ, Υ, ...
- V
ector mesons ( ) survive deconfinement.
Lattice, effective potentials, etc.
- Their limiting velocity in the QGP is subluminal.
Heuristically:
Teff(v) = T (1 − v2)1/4
- Depends on only two assumptions:
Deconfinement
BH
Quarks
- V
erifying in QCD is hard. Reassuring that effect is universal property of all gauge theories with gravity dual:
Two phases:
Heavy mesons survive deconfinement.
ω ∼ v| k| v < 1
3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5 1.75 2
ω [GeV]
Nγ
BH
v > vlim
Vector mesons ↔ Aµ