Module Testing For CMS FPIX Upgrade and Improving Tracking - - PDF document

¡ 1 ¡

Module Testing For CMS FPIX Upgrade and Improving Tracking Performance Using New Algorithms

Suvadeep Bose (University of Nebraska Lincoln) Duration: October 1, 2013 – September 30, 2014 I would like to propose a twofold program, namely, module testing for the Phase1 upgrade for CMS pixel detector and improving tracking performance by developing improved tracking algorithms for the upgrade geometry. Both these projects are intricately connected. The software improvements that I propose to work on will benefit tracking in the upgraded CMS detector, for which I shall perform testing of the new pixel modules. The precise and efficient determination of charged particle momenta is a critical component of the physics program of CMS, as it impacts the ability to reconstruct leptons, charged hadrons, jets, and photon conversions, which are the basic physics

• bjects needed to understand proton-proton collisions at LHC. To achieve such a

challenging goal, in the innermost region, the high precision and low-background tracking of CMS is based on a Silicon pixel detector [1]. Current planning for the LHC and injector chain foresees a series of three long shutdowns, designated LS1, LS2, and

• LS3. In LS1 (in the period 2013-2014), the center of mass energy will be increased to 13
• TeV. Based on the excellent LHC performance to date, and the upgrade plans for the

accelerators, it is anticipated that the peak luminosity will be close to 2 x1034 cm-2s-1 before LS2. As a result, CMS must be prepared to operate for the rest of this decade with average event pile-up of 50 as a baseline, with the possibility that it may be significantly higher at the beginning of LHC fills. Higher read out causes increased fake rates in

• tracking. Due to data losses in the read out chip (ROC), the present CMS pixel detector

will not sustain the extreme operating conditions expected in Phase 1. CMS has already proposed [2] to replace the present system with a four-layers/three-disks, low mass silicon pixel tracker capable of delivering high performance tracking in the high luminosity environment of the LHC through LS3 (referred as Phase1). With the additional barrel layer and end cap disks, the upgraded pixel detector will have excellent four-hit coverage over its whole η range. This allows for the creation of four-hit (“quadruplet”) track seeds with an intrinsically lower fake rate than that of three hit (“triplet”) seeds. For the upgrade detector the first tracking step uses quadruplet seeds, before triplet seeds are used. Other than that the tracking step procedure for the upgrade detector proceeds in the same fashion as for the current detector. The Pixel detector provides high resolution, three-dimensional space points allowing for precise pattern recognition. With three pixel hits per charged particle, using only the pixel data tracks can be reconstructed and primary vertices can be found. Such pixel-only track reconstruction is useful for track seeding, primary vertex finding and in a variety of High Level Trigger (HLT) algorithms. The Pixel detector is the most suitable for these tasks due to its good spatial resolution. The pixel standalone reconstruction is useful for the

• nline HLT event selection. I played a significant role in studying the efficiency and

¡ 2 ¡ purity (as a function of η and pT) of the pixel-only tracks and compare their performance with the general tracks with LHC Run 1 data collected by CMS [3]. In the upgrade scenario we plan to use pixel only tracks for the HLT and tuning pixel tracking parameters using current pixel triplet and quadruplet functionality. I want to study ways to make triplet merging faster by using methods such as kd-tree (a method of binary partitioning). I will also work on iterative tracking algorithms for pixel tracks with help from resident experts such as Kevin Stenson (a current LPC fellow). I will also investigate the use of newer algorithms being looked at for Run 2 offline tracking, e.g. cellular automata [4][5], Hough transform (which ALICE has already implemented in its TPC) [6]. I believe that I am well positioned to execute such a program. These improvements, once implemented, will be applicable to a wide range of future CMS analyses at 13 TeV. During the Run 1 of LHC the pixel detector of CMS consisted of two parts – the barrels and the disks. The disks constitute the Forward Pixel detector. The basic detector module is called a plaquette. It is a multilayer structure assembled in many steps. It consists of a sensor, readout chips (ROC), and a flex circuit glued to a thin silicon plate. The plaquettes are the smallest components for which fully automated tests were performed prior to their assembly into larger units (panel, blades and finally disks). For the Run 2 of LHC (upgrade) 672 pixel detector modules will be assembled onto 12 half disks that will then be installed onto 4 half cylinders. Each half disk is separated into an outer assembly with 34 pixel modules and an inner assembly with 22 modules. The assembly of the half disks and half cylinders starts with the reception of the assembled modules from assembly sites at Purdue University and University of Nebraska. The final step in testing and assembly (before it is transported to CERN) will occur at Fermilab’s Silicon Detector Facility (SiDet). At Fermilab the modules will first undergo a visual inspection to check for broken wire bonds between the HDI, the readout chips and the sensors, followed by a full calibration of the sensors (I-V curve) and of the readout chip at both room temperature and at the operating temperature of -20 C. The module test stand require the development of a suite of programs that in addition to reading out the data from the PSI test boards also have an interface with the low voltage and high voltage power supply, with the thermometers and eventually with the controller

• f the X-ray sources. The European groups have already developed an entire software

framework for performing these tests, based on the psi46expert program for the interactive with the test boards. At Fermilab tests of the original FPIX detector were performed using a different software suite, Renaissance. I am among the first to extensively exercise the psi46expert software at Fermilab and this expertise will be crucial at a later stage in guiding the graduate students from various US institutions who will come to Fermilab to participate in testing this module in the next year. While we will use the psi46expert system for production testing, I would like to contribute to its further development to make it more interactive and eventually port the interface to the test board the psi46expert to the Renaissance program. The initial inspection for mechanical integrity will require the support of a Fermilab technician.

¡ 3 ¡ I worked on testing radiation hard sensors, namely diamond sensors and 3D sensors, at the Fermilab Meson Test Beam Facility (MTest) and that experience helps me to be familiar with the read out of the sensor chips. I have joined the upgrade activities in its preparatory stage of module testing and software development. This will help me to gain expertise by the timeline of the fellowship. I hope to set up a functioning testing facility at Fermilab’s Sidet by beginning of next year when we shall have all the test boards, cold boxes and other equipment in place. With the help of resident Fermilab scientists and engineers I hope to get the facility ready for students and young postdocs are come take shifts to test the modules and I shall play a supervisory role to help them trouble shoot any problem that may arise during the module testing phase. This way, we can set up a core team of people locally at the LPC that will play a lading role in the final assembly and testing of the FPIX before they are shipped to CERN. Bibliography: [1] The CMS tracker system project : Technical Design Report CERN-LHCC-98-006; CMS-TDR-5 (1997). [2] CMS Technical Design Report for the Pixel Detector Upgrade, CERN-LHCC-2012- 016; CMS-TDR-11 (2012). [3] Description and performance of CMS track & PV reconstruction, CMS PAS TRK-11- 001 (awaiting approval). [4] Glazov, A., Kisel, I., Konotopskaya, E. and Ososkov, G., “Filtering tracks in discrete detectors using a cellular automaton”, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 329 (1993) 263. [5] Abt, I., Emeliyanov, D., Kisel, I. and Masciocchi, S., CATS, “A cellular automaton for tracking in silicon for the HERA-B vertex detector”, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 489 (2002) 389. [6] Cheshkov, C, “Fast Hough-Transform track reconstruction for the ALICE TPC”,

• Nucl. Instr. and Meth. A 566 (2006) 35.

¡ 4 ¡

Plan for residency and Budget for Suvadeep Bose

In the interests of building UNL’s permanent presence at Fermilab LPC, and contributing to the effort to establish a US center of expertise here, I have been posted at the LPC since Fall 2009. A full-time residence at Fermilab has enabled my interaction with experts and increased participation in LPC and CMS activities that align with the institutional interests and commitments of the UNL group, strengthening it and helping it move forward. In this LPC Fellowship proposal, I would like to request support for my stay at the LPC for 12 months starting October 2013. As mentioned in the research proposal, the focus of the proposed stay at the LPC for the duration of the fellowship will be to play a leading role in design and development of the pixel detector upgrade. This proposal is my response to recent interactions at LPC that demonstrated the need of more person power in the upgrade activities both in the hardware and software sides. Postdocs with University of Nebraska played a major role in testing the original forward pixel (FPIX) modules before the LHC start up. As Nebraska is one of the two institutes for assembly of the modules for the Phase1 upgrade, I am uniquely positioned to communicate between the assembly site and the testing site. Nebraska Postdocs and students have been participating in the pixel hardware activities at PSI through the NSF PIRE project and I will be able to channelize their expertise to Fermilab whenever needed. On the software side, study of pixel only tracks and vertices has had a strong Nebraska influence in the past through the work of Aaron Dominguez and later myself. Continuing in the vein I shall try to build up a group of activity locally at the LPC which is currently lacking. With the help of senior resident experts at LPC, I would train and encourage young postdocs and graduate students at the LPC to join this effort, and as an LPC fellow, I would establish a team of young people at the LPC who will participate in the pixel upgrade effort – both in hardware and software – which will result in a major LPC contribution to CMS. During the duration of the fellowship I will be frequently travelling to Nebraska to keep myself updated with the assembly of the modules (which will help us in testing of the modules at Fermilab) and to CERN/PSI for learning latest developments of the PSI software and other tools to be used for testing the modules here at Fermilab. Finally, a grant of $76,821 from the LPC fellowship program is sought to support Bose’s salary + fringe. An additional travel allowance for trips to Nebraska, CERN/PSI (Switzerland) and to travel to conferences to present work will be highly appreciated. The detailed break up is as follows: 12-month salary $57329 Fringe (34%) $19492 Total $76821 Travel cost $20000 Grand Total $96821