twenty third annual general assembly
play

Twenty-Third Annual General Assembly Creative Investments and - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Twenty-Third Annual General Assembly Creative Investments and Partnerships to Stimulate Innovation Friday, December 7, 2012 3:00 5:30 pm New York Pharma Forum 23 rd Annual General Assembly New York, NY December 7, 2012 James Greenwood


  1. Twenty-Third Annual General Assembly Creative Investments and Partnerships to Stimulate Innovation Friday, December 7, 2012 3:00 – 5:30 pm

  2. New York Pharma Forum 23 rd Annual General Assembly New York, NY December 7, 2012 James Greenwood President & CEO BIO 1

  3. Creative Investments and Partnerships to Stimulate Innovation 2 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  4. Is the traditional model broken? Academic/Discovery Biotech (VC/IPO) Pharma (Buys them) Late-Stage/Marketing/Sales Early-Stage Mid-/Late-Stage Traditional Model : Development of academic discovery financed by private sector (biotechs) and then handed over to Pharma 3 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  5. Challenges to innovation Intellectual Property Regulatory Access Reimbursement to capital 4 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  6. Annual VC funding 5 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON Source: NVCA/PwC, November 7th, 2012

  7. U.S. venture investment in biotechnology – 1 st round deals 60 # First Round Deals 50 48 40 37 30 20 15 17 17 10 0 2002-1 2002-3 2003-1 2003-3 2004-1 2004-3 2005-1 2005-3 2006-1 2006-3 2007-1 2007-3 2008-1 2008-3 2009-1 2009-3 2010-1 2010-3 2011-1 2011-3 2012-1 2012-3 Source: NVCA/PwC, November 7th, 2012 6

  8. Venture investment shifting away from Biopharma and Medical Devices 7 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  9. Venture capital investment moving away from biotech innovation Past 3 Years Change in Biopharma Next 3 Years Expected Change in Investment Biopharma Investment % of Respondents % of Respondents 15% 14% Increased Increased 40% 41% Decreased Decreased 8 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  10. Fewer VC firms investing in biotech 9

  11. U.S. Biotech IPOs by year Source: E&Y 1 0

  12. Less than 10% of pre-phase II candidates will ever reach market Estimated 35 to 40% of Proof of concept R&D cost is pre-phase II 350M 100M 170M 370M 70M 240M Discovery/ Phase I Phase II Phase III Approva l Other/ preclinical Phase IV Source: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America 1 1 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  13. New drug approvals not keeping pace with R&D spending Pharma R&D Spending vs. NMEs Approved 1 2 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  14. Regulatory issues Risk-averse FDA (and Congress) Longer drug development times Clinical trials – take longer – more complex – more expensive Lack of transparency, predictability Regulatory science has not kept up FDA funding – resources and staffing 1 3 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  15. A 21 st Century FDA (TREAT Act) Elevating FDA and Empowering Operational Excellence • FDA mission statement • Management Review Board Advancing Regulatory Science and Innovation • Chief Innovation Director • Enhancing access to external scientific and medical expertise Enabling Modernized Patient-Centric Clinical Development • Modernizing and expanding the Accelerated Approval pathway • Electronic health records and FDA Clinical Informatics Coordinator • Disclosure to drug sponsors of reasons for non-approval 1 4 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  16. Clearing the path for investment in innovation R&D partnership structures Net operating loss reform Capital gains rate reform for small biotechs Faster cost recovery for intangible assets (accelerated amortization) Incentives for repatriated investments Expand Therapeutic Discovery Project program 1 5 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  17. Reimbursement issues Governments want healthcare savings Industry-wide price cuts Mandatory pricing systems and rebates Imports of drugs from lower-cost countries Shifting patient burden with higher co-payments Generic substitution IPAB Comparative Effectiveness 1 6 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  18. Drug industry is a target for deficit proposals Reduce payment to Prohibit patent Reduce exclusivity for physicians for Part B settlement practices innovator biologics drugs Require industry to Expand 340B drug Apply LCA policies to pay rebates on discount program Part B drugs Medicare Part D beneficiaries Allow the gov’t to Reclassify certain Part Restructure cost negotiate Part D Drug B drugs to sharing for low Prices Part D income Medicare beneficiaries 1 7 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  19. Intellectual Property challenges US top court to rule if companies can patent genes WASHINGTON — The US Supreme Court said Friday it would examine whether companies should be able to patent human genes they have isolated and identified, a decision that could have far- reaching implications for genetic research. 1 8 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  20. Creative collaboration(s) “The advantages of collaboration are greater network involvement in problem solving and testing, a reduction in transaction costs to acquire new knowledge, and a reduction in licensing costs when firms can access knowledge produced by the collaborative network at low or no cost.” The Bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a Policy Agenda OECD study

  21. Co-opetition: a new model for R&D • Eli Lilly, Merck, and Pfizer form not-for-profit to focus on cancer research • Asian Cancer Research Group focuses on most commonly diagnosed cancers in Asia • Pooled resources to bring down the cost for innovative treatments 2 0

  22. Creating value through R&D efficiency 10 pharma companies collaborate to solve common drug development challenges and increase R&D efficiency: 2 1

  23. Academic discovery alliances 2 2

  24. Filling funding gaps: private, philanthropy, patient advocacy Disease focused groups step in while VC funding moves to later stages. 2 3

  25. Increased federal role in translational research Federal government takes larger role in early stage drug R&D NIH Programs – National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) – Cures Acceleration Network (CAN) 2 4 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  26. Our panel Tadataka ( Tachi) Yam ada , M.D., Executive Vice President and Board Member, Chief Medical & Scientific Officer, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Alan Paau , CLP, MBA, PhD, Vice Provost, Cornell University President, Cornell Research Foundation, Inc.; Executive Director, Cornell Center for Technology Enterprise and Commercialization Ann Li , Executive VP, Business Development, New York City Economic Development Corporation Greg W iederrecht , Ph.D., Vice President & Head of External Scientific Affairs, Worldwide Licensing & Acquisitions, Merck & Co.,Inc. Jam es Greenw ood ( m oderator) , President & CEO, Biotechnology Industry Organization 2 5 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  27. Dr. Tadataka Yamada Executive Vice President and Board Member Chief Medical & Scientific Officer Takeda Pharmaceuticals

  28. New York Pharma Forum 23 rd Annual General Assembly New York, NY December 7, 2012 James Greenwood President & CEO BIO 1

  29. Creative Investments and Partnerships to Stimulate Innovation 2 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  30. Is the traditional model broken? Academic/Discovery Biotech (VC/IPO) Pharma (Buys them) Late-Stage/Marketing/Sales Early-Stage Mid-/Late-Stage Traditional Model : Development of academic discovery financed by private sector (biotechs) and then handed over to Pharma 3 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  31. Challenges to innovation Intellectual Property Regulatory Access Reimbursement to capital 4 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  32. Annual VC funding 5 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON Source: NVCA/PwC, November 7th, 2012

  33. U.S. venture investment in biotechnology – 1 st round deals 60 # First Round Deals 50 48 40 37 30 20 15 17 17 10 0 2002-1 2002-3 2003-1 2003-3 2004-1 2004-3 2005-1 2005-3 2006-1 2006-3 2007-1 2007-3 2008-1 2008-3 2009-1 2009-3 2010-1 2010-3 2011-1 2011-3 2012-1 2012-3 Source: NVCA/PwC, November 7th, 2012 6

  34. Venture investment shifting away from Biopharma and Medical Devices 7 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  35. Venture capital investment moving away from biotech innovation Past 3 Years Change in Biopharma Next 3 Years Expected Change in Investment Biopharma Investment % of Respondents % of Respondents 15% 14% Increased Increased 40% 41% Decreased Decreased 8 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  36. Fewer VC firms investing in biotech 9

  37. U.S. Biotech IPOs by year Source: E&Y 1 0

  38. Less than 10% of pre-phase II candidates will ever reach market Estimated 35 to 40% of Proof of concept R&D cost is pre-phase II 350M 100M 170M 370M 70M 240M Discovery/ Phase I Phase II Phase III Approva l Other/ preclinical Phase IV Source: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America 1 1 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  39. New drug approvals not keeping pace with R&D spending Pharma R&D Spending vs. NMEs Approved 1 2 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

  40. Regulatory issues Risk-averse FDA (and Congress) Longer drug development times Clinical trials – take longer – more complex – more expensive Lack of transparency, predictability Regulatory science has not kept up FDA funding – resources and staffing 1 3 BI OTECHNOLOGY I NDUSTRY ORGANI ZATI ON

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend