Turned the Corner, Aiming for Excellence Bruce Van Saun Chief - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

turned the corner aiming for excellence
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Turned the Corner, Aiming for Excellence Bruce Van Saun Chief - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Turned the Corner, Aiming for Excellence Bruce Van Saun Chief Executive Officer December 4, 2018 Forward-looking statements and use of key performance metrics and non-GAAP financial measures This document contains forward-looking statements


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Turned the Corner, Aiming for Excellence

Bruce Van Saun Chief Executive Officer

December 4, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Forward-looking statements and use of key performance metrics and non-GAAP financial measures

1

This document contains forward-looking statements within the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements regarding potential future share repurchases and future dividends are forward-looking statements. Also, any statement that does not describe historical or current facts is a forward-looking statement. These statements often include the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “goals,” “targets,” “initiatives,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.” Forward-looking statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of management, and on information currently available to management. Our statements speak as of the date hereof, and we do not assume any obligation to update these statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in such statements in light of new information or future events. We caution you, therefore, against relying on any of these forward-looking statements. They are neither statements of historical fact nor guarantees or assurances of future performance. While there is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include the following, without limitation:

  • Negative economic and political conditions that adversely affect the general economy, housing prices, the job market, consumer confidence and spending habits which may affect, among other things, the level of

nonperforming assets, charge-offs and provision expense;

  • The rate of growth in the economy and employment levels, as well as general business and economic conditions, and changes in the competitive environment;
  • Our ability to implement our business strategy, including the cost savings and efficiency components, and achieve our financial performance goals;
  • Our ability to meet heightened supervisory requirements and expectations;
  • Liabilities and business restrictions resulting from litigation and regulatory investigations;
  • Our capital and liquidity requirements (including under regulatory capital standards, such as the U.S. Basel III capital rules) and our ability to generate capital internally or raise capital on favorable terms;
  • The effect of changes in interest rates on our net interest income, net interest margin and our mortgage originations, mortgage servicing rights and mortgages held for sale;
  • Changes in interest rates and market liquidity, as well as the magnitude of such changes, which may reduce interest margins, impact funding sources and affect the ability to originate and distribute financial

products in the primary and secondary markets;

  • The effect of changes in the level of checking or savings account deposits on our funding costs and net interest margin;
  • Financial services reform and other current, pending or future legislation or regulation that could have a negative effect on our revenue and businesses, including the Dodd-Frank Act and other legislation and

regulation relating to bank products and services;

  • A failure in or breach of our operational or security systems or infrastructure, or those of our third party vendors or other service providers, including as a result of cyber-attacks; and
  • Management’s ability to identify and manage these and other risks.

In addition to the above factors, we also caution that the amount and timing of any future common stock dividends or share repurchases will depend on our financial condition, earnings, cash needs, regulatory constraints, capital requirements (including requirements of our subsidiaries), and any other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant in making such a determination. Therefore, there can be no assurance that we will repurchase shares or pay any dividends to holders of our common stock, or as to the amount of any such repurchases or dividends. More information about factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be found under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Key Performance Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Reconciliations Key Performance Metrics: Our Management uses certain key performance metrics (KPMs) to gauge our progress against strategic and operational goals, as well as to compare our performance against peers. The KPMs are referred to in our Registration Statements on Form S-1 and our external financial reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The KPMs include:

  • Return on average tangible common equity (ROTCE);
  • Return on average total tangible assets (ROTA);
  • Efficiency ratio;
  • Operating leverage; and
  • Common equity tier 1 capital ratio.

Established targets for the KPMs are based on Management-reporting results and are referred to by the Company as “Underlying” results. We believe that “Underlying” results, which exclude notable items, as applicable, provide the best representation of our underlying financial progress toward the KPMs as they exclude items that our Management does not consider indicative of our on-going financial performance. We have consistently shown these metrics on this basis to investors since our initial public offering in September of 2014. KPMs that reflect “Underlying” results are considered non-GAAP financial measures. Non-GAAP Financial Measures: This document contains non-GAAP financial measures denoted as “Underlying” results. “Underlying” results for any given reporting period exclude certain items that may occur in that period which Management does not consider indicative of the Company’s on-going financial performance. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide useful information to investors because they are used by our Management to evaluate our

  • perating performance and make day-to-day operating decisions. In addition, we believe our “Underlying” results in any given reporting period reflect our on-going financial performance in that period and, accordingly, are

useful to consider in addition to our GAAP financial results. We further believe the presentation of “Underlying” results increases comparability of period-to-period results. The tables in the appendix present reconciliations

  • f our non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.

Other companies may use similarly titled non-GAAP financial measures that are calculated differently from the way we calculate such measures. Accordingly, our non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similar measures used by such companies. We caution investors not to place undue reliance on such non-GAAP financial measures, but to consider them with the most directly comparable GAAP measures. Non-GAAP financial measures have limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for our results reported under GAAP.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

We’ve Turned the Corner

Good foundation with attractive franchise − Geographic footprint with large affluent and mass

affluent segments

− Balanced Commercial and Consumer business mix − Strong capital position RBS challenges impacted Citizens − Forced balance sheet shrinkage hurt profitability − Underinvestment in technology, talent

and capabilities

− Lack of scale in key fee businesses Leveraging top-flight board & management team Consistent improvement in financial performance Have smartly re-gained balance sheet scale Highly disciplined on credit Building fee capabilities organically and through

targeted acquisitions

Continuously streamlining expense base to self-fund

investments for future growth

Rationalizing capital base

Where we’ve come from We’ve turned the corner

13.5% 9.8% 7.6% 6.7% 6.1% 4.3% 3Q18 2017 2016 2015 2014 3Q13

ROTCE(1)

(Return on average tangible common equity)

(2)

$2.58 $1.93 $1.61 $1.04 $1.42 2017 2016 2015 2014 3Q13 annualized

(2,3)

EPS(1)

(Diluted EPS)

$2.58 $1.87

3Q18 YTD 3Q17 YTD

1) Adjusted/Underlying results. Please see important information on Key Performance Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures at the beginning and end of this presentation for an explanation of our use of these metrics and non-GAAP financial measures and their reconciliation to GAAP financial measures. “Adjusted” or “Underlying” results exclude restructuring charges, special items and/or notable items, as applicable. Where there is a reference to “Adjusted”, “Underlying” or “Adjusted/Underlying” results in a paragraph, all measures that follow these references are on the same basis, when applicable. CAGR is calculated from annualized 3Q13-2017. 2) Commencement of separation effort from RBS. 3) Earnings per share for 3Q13 is the annualized calculation of earnings per share of $0.26 multiplied by 4.

2

38%

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Next phase: Aiming for Excellence

To help our customers, colleagues and communities reach their potential Objective is to be a top-performing bank that delivers well for

all stakeholders

Committed to excellence in every dimension Focused on long-term franchise value and consistent delivery of earnings

growth and attractive returns

3

Trusted advisor to

  • ur customers

Strong leaders and best-in-

class talent

Build seamless, multi-channel

and digitized customer experiences

Advanced data & analytics

drive insight, advice and tailored solutions

Innovative, customer-centric

  • rganization

Engage, inspire and develop

  • ur colleagues to deliver for
  • ur customers

Enhance our communities

through strength of the company and involvement of

  • ur colleagues

Prudently grow and optimize

  • ur balance sheet

Self-fund investments through

efficiency and mindset of continuous improvement

Utilize new technologies to

deliver more effective

  • utcomes at lower costs

Good stewards of capital

Strengthening

  • ur franchise

while delivering results Mission

Excellence in key areas Strong culture Financial discipline

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Average industry experience of ~30 years

Leadership Team Member Title Bruce Van Saun Chairman and Chief Executive Officer John F . Woods Chief Financial Officer Mary Ellen Baker Head of Business Services Brad Conner Head of Consumer Banking Brendan Coughlin President, Consumer Deposits and Lending Stephen Gannon General Counsel Malcolm Griggs Chief Risk Officer Beth Johnson Chief Marketing Officer and Head of Consumer Strategy Susan LaMonica Chief Human Resource Officer Don McCree Head of Commercial Banking Brian O’Connell Head of Technology Services Ted Swimmer Head of Corporate Finance and Capital Markets

We are led by a strong and experienced board & leadership team

Since January 2015, have attracted or promoted from within ~45% of our Executive Leadership Group (~top 130)

Green highlighting denotes new additions since January 2015.

  • Committee Chair

Note: Announced appointment of Terrance (“Terry”) J. Lillis to the board of directors, effective Feb. 1, 2019 and Anthony Di Iorio to retire from the board after his current term expires at the end of April 2019.

4

Board Member Committees Bruce Van Saun Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Arthur F . Ryan Lead Director; Compensation and Human Resources*; Nominating and Corporate Governance Mark Casady Risk Christine Cumming Risk Anthony Di Iorio Audit; Nominating and Corporate Governance William P . Hankowsky Audit; Compensation and Human Resources Howard W. Hanna III Audit; Nominating and Corporate Governance Lee Higdon Audit; Compensation and Human Resources Charles J. (“Bud”) Koch Risk*; Audit Shivan S. Subramaniam Nominating and Corporate Governance*; Risk Wendy A. Watson Audit*; Risk; Compensation and Human Resources Marita Zuraitis Risk

slide-6
SLIDE 6

$0.57 $0.61 $0.63 $0.68 $0.71 $0.78 $0.88 $0.91 $0.71 $0.26 $0.30 $0.30 $0.37 $0.36 $0.39 $0.39 $0.40 $0.40 $0.42 $0.41 $0.46 $0.52 $0.55 $0.88 $0.93 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 3Q15 4Q15 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 13.9%13.5%13.4%13.3%12.9%12.4%12.2%11.8%11.8%11.7%11.6%11.5%11.3%11.2%11.2%11.2%11.1%11.2%11.2%11.2%10.8% 9.6% 10.4%11.7%12.9% 13.3% 9.0% 13.5% 4.3% 5.2% 5.2% 6.3% 6.2% 6.8% 6.7% 6.7% 6.6% 6.8% 6.6% 7.3% 8.0% 8.4% 10.1%

Have made consistent progress against our financial goals

Adjusted/ Underlying efficiency ratio(1)

~13 - 15% Key Indicators

Adjusted/ Underlying ROTCE(1)

EPS

Adjusted/Underlying diluted EPS(1)

Common equity tier 1 ratio(2)

(3)

Underlying results(1) Reported results(1) Adjusted results(1)

1) Please see important information on Key Performance Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures, as applicable, at the beginning and end of this presentation for an explanation of our use of these metrics and non-GAAP financial measures and their reconciliations to GAAP financial measures. “Underlying” results exclude the impact of notable items. Where there is a reference to Underlying results in a paragraph or table, all measures that follow these references are on the same basis, when applicable. 2) Common equity tier 1 ("CET1") capital under Basel III replaced tier 1 common capital under Basel I effective January 1, 2015. 3) Commencement of separation effort from RBS.

Medium-term targets

5

mid-50s% ~10.0 – 10.25%

62% 60% 58% 58% 62% 60% 58% 58% 68% 68% 69% 70% 68% 67% 68% 67% 66% 66% 66% 65% 63% 62% 59% 59%

slide-7
SLIDE 7

258% 75% CFG Peer average 916 bps 407 bps CFG Peer average

  • 10.9%
  • 5.4%

CFG Peer average

Peer average Adjusted CFG Underlying/Adjusted

81.6% 42.8% CFG Peer average 21.5% 10.7% CFG Peer average

Return on tangible common equity

(Return on average tangible common equity change)

  • 5.5%

vs Peers

Efficiency improvement

(Efficiency ratio change)

  • 10.8%

vs Peers

Strong operating leverage

(Positive operating leverage)

EPS Growth

(Earnings per common share diluted)

A strong platform well-positioned to drive value

PPNR

(Pre-provision net revenue) ` 6

Strong execution of turnaround effort has led to outperformance vs peers

3Q18 vs. 3Q13

  • 183%

vs Peers

  • 509 bps

vs Peers

Source: CapIQ and Company filings. Peers include CMA, BBT, FITB, KEY, MTB, PNC, RF, STI and USB. Note: Please see important information on Key Performance Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures at the beginning and end of this presentation for an explanation of our use of these metrics and non-GAAP financial measures and their reconciliation to GAAP financial measures, as applicable. “Adjusted” or “Underlying” results exclude restructuring charges, special items and/or notable items, as applicable. Where disclosed, peer results adjusted for unusual or special revenue, expense and acquisition items.

  • 38.8%

vs Peers

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Total average assets 161.1 $ 139.6 $ 121.4 $ 150.5 $ 156.9 $ Noninterest expense/avg. assets 4.1 % 5.5 % 6.0 % 5.2 % 5.2 % PPNR/avg. assets 4.5 % 2.7 % 2.7 % 3.3 % 3.7 % 2007 2010 2013 2017 3Q18

RBS challenges negatively impacted Citizens balance sheet size and profitability

Citizens was forced to shrink its balance sheet post the Great Recession as it was ineligible for

TARP and RBS had limited capital

As part of IPO plan, balance sheet releveraging was a key to regaining profitability Loan growth for 3Q13 through 3Q18 has been ~55% Commercial, ~45% Consumer, focused on

attractive risk-adjusted return portfolios

Commercial portfolio is highly granular and diversified in terms of geography, industry, company size and rating

Commercial growth driven by larger companies which generally have higher ratings – ~40% of C&I growth has been in Mid Corporate and Industry Verticals

CRE portfolio remains underweight at ~7% of total assets vs ~10% for peers

Consumer growth has focused on high prime and superprime borrowers across mortgage, education and merchant financing

7

1) Amounts as reported in Form FR Y-9C. Noninterest expense and PPNR normalized over 9 quarter CCAR horizon.

(1) (1) (1)

$s in billions

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Substantial progress prudently releveraging the balance sheet

Good loan growth with rising yields(1)

$s in billions

1) Average loan balances. 2) Total loan losses as a percentage of the total loan book based on FRB Severely Adverse Scenario 9-quarter horizon for 2018. 3) 2018 loan growth annualized for calculation. CAGR calculated from 2013 to 2018.

8

$85 $89 $96 $103 $109 $113 3.50% 3.37% 3.32% 3.51% 3.87% 4.32% 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 3Q18 YTD

Loan yields

2018 Stress losses in-line with peer median(2)

6.7% 6.5% 6.4% 6.1% 6.1% 6.1% 5.8% 5.2% 5.2% MTB RF USB FITB KEY CFG BBT PNC STI

Peer median

Citizens continues to have a highly

prudent credit risk appetite

Growth portfolios and non-core rundown

will continue to drive improvement in

  • verall credit quality

Rating methodology inherited from RBS

produces overly conservative results under stress. Under review. 5.9% CAGR(3) 0.0% 0.5% 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 CFG Peer Avg

Net charge-off rates in line with peers over past decade

slide-10
SLIDE 10

35% 37% 29% 29% 19% 18% 10% 9% 7% 7%

3Q17 3Q18

24% 27% 59% 56% 14% 14% 3% 3%

3Q17 3Q18

1) Source: Company data. Portfolio balances loan category, NCO and NPL data, FICO score, LTV ratio, loan term, lien position, risk rating, property type, and industry sector as of September 30, 2018, as applicable. 2) Portfolio balances as of September 30, 2018. Refreshed FICO score, LTV ratio, loan term, lien position, risk rating, property type, industry sector and geographic stratifications current as of September 30, 2018, as applicable. Risk ratings represent rating agency-equivalent ratings of borrowers based on CFG’s internal ratings.

Core commercial portfolio risk ratings improved YoY (2)

Highly disciplined on credit: diversified and granular core loan mix

9

Superprime and prime focused retail portfolio(1)

Core mortgage – FICO ~785; CLTV of ~60% Core home equity – FICO ~765; 53% 1st lien Auto – FICO ~730 Education lending – FICO ~780 Unsecured portfolio - FICO ~755 − $1.9 billion credit card portfolio - FICO ~740 − $1.5 billion personal unsecured - FICO ~765 − $1.5 billion merchant finance portfolio –

FICO ~755, plus benefit of loss-sharing arrangements 800+ 750-799 700-749 650-699 <650 Granular and diversified portfolio

Continue to gain share in Mid-Corporate segment

with generally higher ratings

Remain underweight CRE vs. peers 79% of the CRE portfolio is project-secured

lending

− 56% represented by income-producing projects − 17% Real Estate Investment Trusts, with a

particular focus on mid-caps $58.4 $56.5

Core retail portfolio FICOs improved YoY

$51.5 $54.6

$s in billions

B- and lower B+ to B BB+ to BB- AAA+ to BBB-

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Commercial Capital & Global Markets

Broaden capabilities in DCM, M&A, CRE New FX options/currency swaps platform

and capabilities

2Q17 Western Reserve Partners

acquisition added 30+ M&A professionals(1) Treasury Solutions

Implementing best-in-class cash

management system

Investments in liquidity, payables,

merchant services, trade finance and commercial card

10

Building fee capabilities organically and through targeted acquisitions

1) Includes employees affiliated with WRP Valuations. 2) Fee change from 3Q13 to 3Q18. Normalized for accounting changes and other reclassifications; headcount change 1Q14 to 3Q18.

Consumer Wealth

Investments in personnel plus sales,

technology platforms and products with shift towards managed money

— Advancing HNW/UHNW capabilities

through Clarfeld acquisition

SpeciFi™, robo-advisor product

Business banking

Fundation FinTech partnership to

automate small business underwriting Mortgage

3Q18 Franklin American Mortgage

Company transaction brings mortgage servicing scale Significant opportunity to improve fee income relative to peers (0.8% of assets vs 1.3% for peers) Consumer Banking fees ~7% Financial advisors ~30% Mortgage loan officers ~10% Commercial Banking fees ~44% Client-facing bankers and product specialists ~10%

Adding expertise over 5 years to drive future fee income growth(2)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Rigorous TOP programs drive performance & allow self-funding of investments

Continuously streamlining expense base to self-fund required investments

11

Focus on top-line growth and expense discipline drives positive operating leverage

  • Upgraded talent – headcount relatively stable at

~18k over 5 years; changed out/invested in ~2,500 roles(3)

  • Built Data Intelligence platform in support of

enhanced data analytics

  • Aggressively moving to digital business model
  • Significant investments in customer

segmentation/offerings and customer journeys

  • Development & launch of Citizens Access™

Examples of self-funded investments

  • Currently 10 FinTech relationships, often first

regional bank to market

  • Leading approach for API development
  • Expanded IRP & FX capabilities in Global Markets
  • Re-platforming Treasury Solutions online channel,

AccessOptima™

  • Continued investment & added sales focus in

Commercial Card, Trade Finance & Merchant Services to drive growth

$s in millions

1) Please see important information on Key Performance Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures, as applicable, at the beginning and end of this presentation for an explanation of our use of these metrics and non-GAAP financial measures and their reconciliations to GAAP financial measures. “Adjusted” or “Underlying” results exclude restructuring charges, special items and/or notable items, as applicable. CAGR for 2014 to 2018 estimate. Peer rank based on operating leverage. 2) Bloomberg consensus estimate as of Nov. 27, 2018 adjusted for the estimated 5 month impact of FAMC using midpoint of company outlook. Peer operating leverage based on reported results for 2013, adjusted results for all other periods. 3) Includes ~800 full time equivalent positions added as a result of the 3Q18 Franklin American Mortgage Company (FAMC) acquisition.

TOP program Revenue Expense Tax Total benefit 2014 TOP 1 $

  • $

~200 $

  • $

~200 2015 TOP 2 ~90 ~50

  • ~140

2016 TOP 3 ~10 ~80 ~25 ~115 2017 TOP 4 ~40 ~60 ~5 to 10 ~105 to 110 2018 TOP 5 ~40 ~50 ~0 to 10 ~90 to 100 Cumulative $ ~180 $ ~440 $ ~35 to 45 $ ~650 to 665 Underlying results(1)(2) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018E ex-FAMC CAGR Total revenue 4,691 $ 4,824 $ 5,188 $ 5,701 $ 6,070 $ 7% Noninterest expense 3,223 3,209 3,316 3,419 3,529 2% Operating leverage

  • 0.1%

3.3% 4.2% 6.8% 3.2% Peer rank (out of 10) 6 1 3 2 4

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Rationalizing our capital base

12

Strong CET1 capital position relative to peers offers significant capital flexibility ─ Expect annual normalization of ~40 bps given both strong capital return and loan

growth

─ Expect peers to target CET1 at 9%–9.5% ─ Citizens will approach peer median over time Dividend and repurchase policy ─ Medium-term ~40% dividend payout target; attractive yield ─ Continue to repurchase shares each quarter, while being sensitive to valuation

Rationalizing CET1 toward peer median

1) Amounts may not sum due to rounding.

Basel III basis(1) 2014 2015 2016 2017 3Q18 Common equity tier 1 capital ratio (CET1) 12.4% 11.7% 11.2% 11.2% 10.8% Total capital ratio 15.8% 15.3% 14.0% 13.9% 13.4% Change in CET1

  • 0.7%
  • 0.6%

0.1%

  • 0.4%

Change in CET1, CFG vs peers

  • 0.7%
  • 0.5%
  • 0.1%

0.0%

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Looking forward

13

Success will be driven by what got us here today Continued investments in

  • ur future

Strong and experienced board and leadership team, best-in-class talent Commitment to excellence in every dimension Proven execution ability Focus on our customers Long-term positioning to deliver earnings growth and attractive returns

Confident that we can continue to perform well and drive toward becoming a top performing regional bank that delivers well for its stakeholders

Enterprise-wide initiatives drive improvement in performance

TOP - Rigorous efficiency and revenue growth program to drive performance and

allow self-funding of investments

BSO - Recycle capital into more accretive growth and relationship categories;

grow higher risk-adjusted return asset portfolios, optimize deposits

Growth mindset: innovating to source new customers and revenue streams

(e.g., Student Refinancing, Merchant POS Financing)

Building fee capabilities organically and through targeted acquisitions Relentless focus on our expense base through customer journeys, lean and

agile development and process automation

Significant investments in new technologies, data analytics, seamless

integration of digital and physical distribution, customer experience and broadening capabilities

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Key Messages

  • Five years ago the challenge was to turn Citizens around and improve our performance and capabilities
  • Since the IPO, the challenges have been addressed and we have turned the corner, while closing the

gap to peers. Next phase: Aiming for Excellence

  • Focused on long-term, profitable growth, building a great bank with confidence in our outlook

Strong Board, and talented and seasoned management team

Mindset of continuous improvement will drive continued EPS growth and ROTCE(1) improvement; still positioned for ‘self help’

Benefitting from investments in technology, digital, data, talent and product capabilities

Strong capital position offers flexibility to drive growth and strong capital returns

  • Track record of consistent execution and delivering against goals

Strong operating leverage, net income, EPS growth

Substantial improvement in efficiency ratio, ROTCE(1)

Good expense discipline and consistent, sizable operating leverage(1)

Prudent risk-taking: credit quality remains strong

  • Positioned to continue to deliver well through a full range of macro environments

Outperformed peers in terms of earnings growth and return improvement over headwind and tailwind periods of the past five years

Confident of relative performance outlook through next downturn; prudent credit risk appetite

Believe economic outlook through 2019 remains positive

1) Please see important information on Key Performance Metrics and Non-GAAP Financial Measures at the beginning and end of this presentation for an explanation of our use of these metrics and non-GAAP financial measures and their reconciliation to GAAP financial measures.

14

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Appendix

slide-17
SLIDE 17

16

BSO: Rigorous program to improve returns while driving growth

3Q18 YoY NIM expansion of 15 bps reflects ~5 bps contribution from BSO efforts(1) Assets Liabilities Loan portfolio

Reposition/optimize loan mix Reallocate capital within categories;

  • ptimize credit-only relationships

Investment portfolio

Front-book, back-book rotation

Actions Deposits

Optimize mix with focus on

lower-cost categories

Citizens Access™ diversifies

deposit franchise

Data analytics drives personalized targeting Refine pricing and marketing strategies

Use data analytics & expanded product sets

Consumer

Grow Education & unsecured Strategic reduction in auto Improve promotional deposit gathering Increase investments in digital channels

Commercial

Prudently grow CRE Exit low-return relationships Reposition leasing portfolio Grow operational deposits; upgrade cash

management platform & escrow capabilities

Further enhance product suite

1) Excludes a ~1 bp reduction tied to the August 1, 2018 Franklin American Mortgage Company acquisition.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

5.4% 5.1% 5.0% 4.6% 5.2% 3.5% 3.1% 3.2% 1.9% 2.1% 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3Q18 CFG Peer median

Remain rate sensitive

17

Net interest income positioned to

continue to benefit from rising rates ─ Our asset sensitivity has remained relatively stable at 5.2% Interest rate sensitivity trend Interest rate sensitivity ranking

(200 bps gradual increase)

Note: CFG data as of 3Q18. Peer data from SNL as of 3Q18. Peer banks include BBT, CMA, FITB, KEY, MTB, PNC, RF, STI and USB. Peer estimates based on the public disclosures as

  • f the most recent quarter available and utilizes a 200 basis point gradual increase above 12-month forward curve except PNC, which is based on a 100 basis point gradual increase

and STI, which is based on a 200 basis point shock. PNC and STI excluded from peer median.

8.0% 5.2% 4.6% 3.6% 3.0% 2.1% 1.5% 1.2% 1.0% (0.2%) CMA CFG RF PNC KEY BBT USB MTB STI FITB

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Data & analytics capabilities are key to our success

Improve customer experience

Future of fulfillment – expedited offers and closings Personalize customer interactions across all channels

Using data & analytics strategically across the company

Consumer

Shift to targeted promotional

deposit and lending offers; end ‘mass promotions’

Use data to streamline fulfillment

Deliver operational efficiency and reduced costs

Streamline underwriting &

  • riginations

Streamline servicing with single view of customer data

Enhance sales productivity & accelerate growth

Improve commercial client retention; Single view of client relationship Personalized treatment to acquire, deepen, retain customer relationships Personalized customer targeting

models across all programs and products

Enable optimized marketing spend,

reduce operational costs and

  • rigination timelines

Provide relevant and actionable

intelligence for personalized customer treatment and effective risk decisions

Integrate data mart information

from multiple systems for a single view of customer data

Commercial

Utilize Global Markets platform to

deliver customized daily FX rate/trend data to clients and prospects

Utilize data-driven digital

marketing with personal content to target high-priority industry segments

Invest to enhance client analysis

and product targeting for real-time decision making using AI

18

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Investing in future-oriented digital services and technology platforms

Adaptive security Open architecture Cloud Agile Modernize strategic platforms Data analytics

Convert data into intelligence Deliver access to high quality

data for decision-making

Enhance customer acquisition Deliver personalized

products, services and advice through all channels

Prepare for emerging threats

through trusted, simple and secure capabilities

Deliver a platform that can

adapt to future threats

Adoption of Cloud delivery

model

‘Cloud First’ approach to

deliver agile, scalable, and low-cost solutions to evolving business needs

Continuing to open up

architecture with Middleware & APIs

Develop an App Store-like

‘marketplace’ for secure collaboration

Expedites product delivery and

supports enhanced customer experience

Minimize manual processes;

Partners & FinTechs to contribute new functionality

Seamless integration of

physical and digital distribution

FinTech partnerships to

accelerate path to market and enhance customer experiences

Company-wide Agile delivery

model supports development and delivery of new products and capabilities

Provides early, predictable

delivery, lower cost, better quality

Delivering a customer-focused, adaptable, secure & resilient technology environment

19

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Enhancing customer experience to drive growth and efficiency

Consumer Customer Journeys

Embrace digital and data to improve experience Welcome to the bank Help me resolve problems Help me feel safe from fraud Help me buy a home

  • Data intelligence platform drives targeting and offers

across all channels

  • Digitizing and modernizing the consumer lending

platform

  • Implementing AI and Robotics for automation
  • Transforming physical network to support advice-based

model

Commercial

Origination

Launched customer account

plans, dashboard & performance scorecard Underwriting

Implemented cycle-time

metrics

Streamlined underwriting

templates On-boarding

Launched electronic

document management

Streamlined Treasury

Solutions on-boarding – 50% shorter time Servicing

Client priority service with

dedicated specialist Transactions

AccessAP Card – Online

payables; single use virtual account eliminates paper checks

Investing in modern cash management, derivatives and

customer data platforms

Leveraging product expertise, modern platforms and

data analytics for targeting, insights, pricing and credit analysis

20

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Citizens vs peer group by total CRE loans – 3Q18

21

$s in billions

  • Although Citizens has grown at a faster pace than peers, our CRE

portfolio remains underweight versus peers

Source: SNL and Call report/FR Y-9C as of 9/30/18. CRE loans represent the sum of four types of loans reported on FR Y9-C, Schedule HC-C: 1. Construction and land development loans (“C&D”) (line F159); 2. Multifamily loans (line 1460); 3. Loans secured by non-owner-occupied nonfarm nonresidential properties (line F161); and 4. Loans not secured by real estate that are used to finance CRE or C&D activities (line 2746).

Total assets Total loans and leases Total CRE loans Total CRE/ total assets Total CRE loans/ total loans Total CRE loans/ total risk based capital Total CRE loans/ total commercial loans CFG $159.0 $115.9 $11.8 7.4 % 10.2 % 66.2 % 20.7 MTB 116.8 86.7 28.9 24.7 33.3 213.2 54.0 Key 139.2 92.0 18.5 13.3 20.2 116.2 27.5 BBT 222.9 147.7 23.9 10.7 16.2 95.6 28.7 PNC 380.3 224.1 38.6 10.1 17.2 95.1 25.6 CMA 71.6 49.0 7.2 10.1 14.7 79.2 16.4 USB 464.6 285.6 41.4 8.9 14.5 87.1 28.7 Regions 124.8 82.2 11.0 8.8 13.4 83.8 22.3 STI 211.6 149.2 17.2 8.1 11.5 75.3 21.9 FITB 141.7 94.1 8.7 6.1 9.2 48.5 15.1 $208.2 $134.5 $21.7 11.2 % 16.7 % 99.3 % 26.7 Peer average

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Key performance metrics, Non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations

22

$s in millions, except share, per share and ratio data

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Key performance metrics, Non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations

23

$s in millions, except share, per share and ratio data

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Key performance metrics, Non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations

24

$s in millions, except share, per share and ratio data

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Key performance metrics, Non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations

25

$s in millions, except share, per share and ratio data

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Key performance metrics, Non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations

26

$s in millions, except share, per share and ratio data

slide-28
SLIDE 28