Tuesday, July 9, 2013 Recognizing, Shifting, and Mitigating the Risk - - PDF document

tuesday july 9 2013 recognizing shifting and mitigating
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Tuesday, July 9, 2013 Recognizing, Shifting, and Mitigating the Risk - - PDF document

Tuesday, July 9, 2013 Recognizing, Shifting, and Mitigating the Risk of Subcontractor Default Presenter: Steve Nelson, SureTec Insurance Company. snelson@suretec.com Avoidance/Prequalification/Continuous Qualification Prequalification and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

Tuesday, July 9, 2013

Recognizing, Shifting, and Mitigating the Risk of Subcontractor Default

Presenter: Steve Nelson, SureTec Insurance Company. snelson@suretec.com

Avoidance/Prequalification/Continuous Qualification

  • Prequalification and Continuous Qualification of the subcontractor and the

subcontractor’s capacity and capabilities vis a vis the project

  • Who does it? Are they qualified?
  • Centralizes v. Decentralized?
  • Consistently and systematically applied?
  • Are the prequalifiers empowered to say “No”?
  • Regular and continuous review
  • Surety-style financial analysis a proven indicator of performance and likelihood
  • f failure, with particular attention to
  • Significant swings in profit (or lack thereof) year over year
  • Change in backlog
  • Negative net cash position
  • Increase in A/R aging
  • Under/Over billing
  • A/P aging
  • High utilization or non-renewal of credit facilities
  • Loans to/from shareholders
  • Distributions to shareholders
  • Change in surety
  • Evaluation must be considered in relation to scope, complexity, schedule, and

geography

  • In addition to financial, consider ethics/character, litigation history, public

filings, credit history, reputation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

  • Attention to job cost breakdown, pay items, front end loading, percentage

completion on draws---front end, and as work progresses

Warning Signs

  • Recognize warning signs and act!
  • Delays in providing prequalification information, bonds, or insurance
  • Bid spread
  • Financial stress/availability of working capital/lines of credit
  • Overbilling
  • Increased change order activity
  • Competing creditors
  • Subcontractor/supplier payment notices, pre-lien, stop notices
  • Inquiries/directives from lenders/factoring companies/sureties
  • Labor/Supplier/Subcontractor turnover
  • Project level management/superintendent turnover
  • Death/disability of owner
  • Turnover of key management personnel (who often have a sense of impending

problems and are looking for better opportunities)

  • Fluctuating workforce/change in crew size
  • Low productivity
  • Decline in quality of work
  • Decline in attention to safety issues
  • Difficulty with back office operations – paperwork, submittals, lien releases,

change orders

  • Problems/disputes on other jobs
  • Negative feedback from other subcontractors
  • Understand the financial/operational weakness and tailor the tool to the

problem; i.e., joint checks won’t fix a bid bust or low productivity, increased retainage or withholding payment won’t help a cash flow problem

  • Manage a default to minimize exposure

Credit Enhancements

  • Subcontract performance and payment bonds
  • Subcontractor Default Insurance
  • Letters of Credit
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

  • Personal /Parental/Affiliate Guaranties
  • Third Party Guaranties
  • Major Supplier Guaranties
  • Pledge of Personal Property/Real Estate as collateral security
  • Bonded Sub-subcontractors with dual obligee riders
  • Hybrid risk sharing
  • Shared with owner, surety, or third parties if subcontract award is political,

sole source, or “must hire”

  • shared with owner by negotiated right to charge some or all of subcontract
  • verruns as cost of the work/change order

Control of Subcontract Funding/Cash Flow

  • Dedicated GC employee oversight/mentoring – someone in the GC organization

needs to take “ownership” of the subcontractor’s performance/success

  • Joint Checks
  • Funds Disbursement Control / Escrow
  • GC direct pay of suppliers, equipment, and/or labor
  • Increased Retainage
  • Reduced Retainage
  • Semi-monthly/weekly payroll advance
  • Greater attention to job cost breakdown, draw schedule, line items, front end

loading, stored materials, and percentage completion on draws

  • Paying more than the subcontract amount, even when not justified by contract,

may be better than a default

Manage the Problem

  • Dedicated GC employee oversight/mentoring – someone in the GC organization

needs to take “ownership” of the subcontractor’s performance/success

  • Establish processes to recognize warning signs, report, and react
  • Act quickly
  • Supplement vs. terminate
  • Document actions and preserve rights