trivial cocycles casson invariant and a conjecture of
play

Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron Wolfgang Pitsch Departamento de matem aticas Universidad Aut onoma de Barcelona Topology and Geometry of Low-dimensional Manifolds Nara Womens University, October 25-28, 2016.


  1. Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron Wolfgang Pitsch Departamento de matem´ aticas Universidad Aut´ onoma de Barcelona Topology and Geometry of Low-dimensional Manifolds Nara Womens University, October 25-28, 2016. Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  2. Setting the framework We start by a standard embedding of a genus g ≥ 3 surface Σ g , 1 with a disk embedded into the sphere S 3 . This decomposes S 3 into two handlebodies. Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  3. � � � Mapping class group The diagram Σ g , 1 � � H g � � � � � ι g � S 3 = H g −H g � � ι g −H g is a Heegaard splitting of the 3-sphere and gives rise to a diagram of groups: Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  4. � � � � � � � � Mapping class group M g , 1 A g , 1 � � B g , 1 � � AB g , 1 = A g , 1 ∩ B g , 1 where ◮ M g , 1 = π 0 ( Diff (Σ g ; rel . D 2 )) is the ”mapping class group”. ◮ A g , 1 = subgroup of elements that extend over H g . ◮ B g , 1 = subgroup of elements that extend over −H g . ◮ AB g , 1 is the intersection: mapping classes that extend to the whole sphere. Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  5. Heegaard splittings of closed manifolds With this we can parametrize all manifolds. Definition Let V (3) be the set of oriented diffeomorphism classes of closed oriented 3-manifolds. Theorem (Singer, 1953) The map g →∞ B g , 1 \M g , 1 / A g , 1 lim − → V (3) � S 3 φ �− → φ = H g ι g φ −H g is a bijection. Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  6. The limit is taken along the inclusion maps M g , 1 ֒ → M g +1 , 1 induced by extending a mapping class by the identity: This is why we need to have this fixed disc. Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  7. The Johnson filtration The mapping class group has a very rich combinatorics: Theorem (Nielsen) Let π = π 1 (Σ g , 1 ) . The canonical action of diffeomorphisms on the surface induces an injection: M g , 1 ֒ → Aut ( π ) . Consider the lower central series of π : π ⊃ [ π, π ] ⊃ [ π, [ π, π ]] ⊃ · · · ⊃ Γ k ⊃ . . . Γ 0 = π Γ k +1 = [ π, Γ k ] Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  8. The Johnson filtration The action of M g , 1 on π respects this filtration π ⊃ [ π, π ] ⊃ [ π, [ π, π ]] ⊃ · · · ⊃ Γ k ⊃ . . . hence induces maps ∀ k ≥ 0 τ k � Aut ( π/ Γ k +1 ) M g , 1 For instance τ 0 = H 1 ( − ) Let M g , 1 ( k + 1) = ker τ k Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  9. The Johnson filtration This gives a descending and separated filtration of the mapping class group: ∞ � M g , 1 ⊃ M g , 1 (1) ⊃ M g , 1 (2) . . . M g ( k ) = { Id } k =1 This is the Johnsons filtration, and the quotients M g , 1 / M g , 1 ( k ) have been the object of much study (S. Morita, R. Hain, many others). Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  10. Two questions with partial answers Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  11. Recall Singer’s and Nielsen’s theorem: Theorem (Singer, 1953) The map g →∞ B g , 1 \M g , 1 / A g , 1 lim − → V (3) � S 3 φ �− → φ = H g ι g φ −H g is a bijection. Theorem (Nielsen) Let π = π 1 (Σ g , 1 ) . The canonical action of diffeomorphisms on the surface induces an injection: M g , 1 ֒ → Aut ( π ) . If you know the action of a mapping class on the fundamental group, then you ”know” the manifold it builds. Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  12. � � � First question We have an increasingly accurate series of approximations of the action on the fundamental groups M g , 1 Aut π τ k Aut ( π/ Γ k +1 ) Question What can you say about the manifold S 3 φ if you know the action of φ on π up to k + 1 -commutators? i.e. you only know τ k ( φ ) ? Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  13. Pointing towards an answer? Some easy cases: 1. By Mayer-Viettoris, if you know τ 0 ( φ ) = H 1 ( φ ; Z ) you know the cohomology of S 3 φ as a group. 2. To know the ring structure you only need τ 1 ( φ ) i.e the action on π/ [ π, [ π, π ]] (Stallings). Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  14. Cochran,Gerges, Orr (2001) Definition Two closed 3-manifolds M 0 and M 1 are k -surgery equivalent if there exists a sequence M 0 = X 0 . . . X 2 . . . X m = X 1 such that ◮ X j +1 is obtained from X j by ± 1 q j surgery along a curve γ j ∈ Γ k ( π 1 ( X i )) Theorem (Cochran,Gerges,Orr (2001)) The following are equivalent: 1. M 0 and M 1 are k-equivalent ∼ 2. ∃ φ : π 1 ( M 0 ) / Γ k ( M 0 ) − → π 1 ( M 1 ) / Γ k ( M 1 ) such that φ ([ M 0 ]) = [ M 1 ] where [ M i ] is the image in H 3 ( π 1 ( M i ) / Γ k ( M i ); Z ) of the fundamental class of M along the canonical map f i : M i → K ( π 1 ( M i ) / Γ k ( M i ) , 1) . Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  15. 1. Question: how is k -equvalence related to equality under τ k . ? S 3 φ ∼ k S 3 ⇐ ⇒ τ k ( φ ) = τ k ( ψ ) ψ 2. For k = 2 this is true (Cochran,Gerges,Orr) Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  16. Second Question Question Assume know that φ ∈ M g , 1 ( k ) , i.e. the action on π up to k-commutators is trivial. What is S 3 φ ? By Mayer-Viettoris, S 3 φ is an integral homology sphere. Let S (3) = { M | H ∗ ( M ; Z ) = H ∗ ( S 3 ; Z ) } . and S (3) k = { S 3 φ | φ ∈ lim g M g , 1 ( k ) } Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  17. Known cases 1. For k = 1 S (3) 1 = S (3) (exercise in Mayer-Viettoris) 2. For k = 2 S (3) 2 = S (3) (Prof. Morita) 3. For k = 3 S (3) 3 = S (3) (W. P. and Massuyeau-Meilhan) 4. For k ≥ 4, unknown. Maybe yes? Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  18. Trivial cocycles and Casson invariant Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  19. One of the difficulites in the above question is to understand the restriction of the doble coset relation B g , 1 \M g , 1 / A g , 1 to the groups M g , 1 ( k ) . Denote by ≈ this equivalence relation. Proposition ∀ φ, ψ ∈ M g , 1 (1) � ∃ µ ∈ AB g , 1 such that φ ≈ ψ ⇔ φ = µψµ − 1 ∈ B g , 1 (1) \M g , 1 (1) / A g , 1 (1) where A g , 1 ( k ) = A g , 1 ∩ M g , 1 ( k ) and similarly for B g , 1 ( k ) . ≈ is double class in M g , 1 (1)+ coinvariants under the action of AB g , 1 . Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  20. � � From invariants to trivial cocycles Let F : S (3) → A be an invariant, where A is a group without 2-torsion. This is the same as a familly of functions lim g →∞ M g , 1 (1) / ≈ F � A M g , 1 (1) F g ∀ φ, ψ ∈ M g , 1 (1) let C g ( φ, ψ ) = F g ( φψ ) − F g ( φ ) − F g ( ψ ) This is a trivialized 2-cocycle on M g , 1 Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  21. Properties of C g C g ( φ, ψ ) = F g ( φψ ) − F g ( φ ) − F g ( ψ ) Because F g is constant on the equivalence classes, C g has nice properties. 1. C g +1 restricted to M g , 1 (1) is C g . 2. C g is invariant under conjugation by AB g , 1 C g ( µφµ − 1 , µψµ − 1 ) = C g ( φ, ψ ) 3. C g = 0 on M g , 1 (1) × A g , 1 (1) ∪ B g , 1 (1) × M g , 1 (1) 4. C g � = 0, unless F = 0, equivalently C g is associated to a unique F . Observe that C g measures the defect to be a homomorphism. It can alos be seen as a kind of ”surgery instruction”. Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  22. From cocycles to invariants Theorem (W.P.) Let A be an abelian group wihtout 2 -torsion. Let ( C g ) g ≥ 3 be a familiy of 2 -cocycles on M g , 1 (1) such that 1. C g +1 restricted to M g , 1 (1) is C g . 2. C g is invariant under conjugation by AB g , 1 C g ( µφµ − 1 , µψµ − 1 ) = C g ( φ, ψ ) . 3. C g = 0 on M g , 1 (1) × A g , 1 (1) ∪ B g , 1 (1) × M g , 1 (1) . 4. [ C g ] = 0 in H 2 ( M g , 1 (1); A ) . 5. The associated torsor ρ C g ∈ H 1 ( AB g , 1 ; Hom ( M g , 1 (1) , A )) is 0 . Then C g is the defect of a unique invariant F with values in A, where F g is the unique AB g , 1 -invariant trivialization of C g . Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

  23. Algebraic construction of the cvAsson invariant ◮ The Casson invariant λ : S (3) → Z of M ∈ S (3) essentially counts the number of representations of π 1 ( M ) in SU (2). ◮ The Casson invariant is determined by surgery properties. Wolfgang Pitsch Trivial Cocycles, Casson invariant and a Conjecture of Perron

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend