Holonomic D -Modules, the Dixmie Conjecture and the Jacobian - - PDF document

holonomic d modules the dixmie conjecture and the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Holonomic D -Modules, the Dixmie Conjecture and the Jacobian - - PDF document

Holonomic D -Modules, the Dixmie Conjecture and the Jacobian Conjecture Vladimir Bavula Talks/DOKBONN 1 Plan 1. Holonomic D -Modules and the Inequality of Bernstein. 2. The Jacobian Conjecture, the Dixmier Prob- lem and a Question


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Holonomic D-Modules, the Dixmie Conjecture and the Jacobian Conjecture

Vladimir Bavula

∗Talks/DOKBONN

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Plan

  • 1. Holonomic D-Modules and the Inequality
  • f Bernstein.
  • 2. The Jacobian Conjecture, the Dixmier Prob-

lem and a Question of Rentschler.

  • 3. Main Result: for Somewhat Commutative

Algebras Holonomicity is Preserved under Restriction of Scalars.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. Holonomic D-Modules and the

Inequality of Bernstein Let K be a field of characteristic 0, X be a smooth irreducible algebraic affine variety

  • f dim X = n, O(X) be the alg.
  • f regular

functions on X. The ring of differential operators D(X) on X is a simple Noetherian affine algebra of Gelfand- Kirillov dimension GK D(X) = 2n.

  • Ex. For X = Kn, the ring of diff. operators

with polynomial coefficients, An := D(Kn) = K[x1, . . . , xn, ∂ ∂x1 , . . . , ∂ ∂xn ] is called the Weyl algebra; GK An = 2n and An = A1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ A1, n times.

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Th 1.1. (The Inequality of Bernstein, 1971) Let M ̸= 0 be a finitely generated An-module. Then GK(M) ≥ GK An

2

= n. Th 1.2. Let M ̸= 0 be a finitely generated D(X)-module. Then GK(M) ≥ GK D(X)

2

= n.

  • Def. A finitely generated D(X)-module M is

called holonomic iff GK(M) = n.

  • Ex. O(X) is a holonomic D(X)-module since

GK O(X) = K.dim O(X) = dim X = n. In par- ticular, O(Kn) = K[x1, . . . , xn] is a holonomic An-module. L 1.3. Each holonomic module has finite length. A nonzero sub/factor module of a holonomic module is a holonomic module. If M ̸= 0 is a simple An-module then GK(M) ∈ {GK An 2 = n, n+1, . . . , 2n−1 = GK An−1}.

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Th 1.4. (Bernstein-Lunts, 1988-89) ”Gener- ically” GK(M) = 2n−1 (K is the field of com- plex numbers).

  • 2. The Jacobian Conjecture, the Dixmier

Problem and a Question of Rentschler The Dixmier Problem, 1968: EndK(An) = AutK(An)? Let Pn = K[x1, . . . , xn] be a polynomial ring. For an alg. endomorphism f = (fi) ∈ EndK(Pn), fi := f(xi), the n × n matrix J (f) := ( ∂fi

∂xj) is

called the Jacobian (matrix) of f; ∆(f) := det J (f). For f, g ∈ EndK(Pn), J (g ◦ f) = g(J (f)) J (g) and ∆(g ◦ f) = ∆(g) g(∆(f)). If f ∈ AutK(Pn) and g = f−1, then ∆(f) ∈ K∗ := K\{0}. The Jacobian Conjecture: If, for f ∈ EndK(Pn), ∆(f) ∈ K∗, then f ∈ AutK(Pn).

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Th 2.1. (Bass, Connel and Wright, 1982) The Dixmier Problem ⇒ the Jacobian Conjec- ture. A Question of Rentschler (2 March, 2000): for every simple A1-module M and for every σ ∈ EndK(A1), the twisted A1-module σM has finite lenght? If the Dixmier Problem has a positive solution then σ is an automorphism, hence A1-module

σM is simple.

Th 2.2. Yes to the Question of Rentschler. Th 2.3. Let M be a holonomic An-module and σ ∈ EndK(An). Then σM is a holonomic An-module, hence has finite length. Applications to the Dixmier Problem. The opposite algebra An ≃ Aop

n , xi → xi, ∂ ∂xi →

− ∂

∂xi.

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

An ⊗ Aop

n

≃ An ⊗ An = A2n.

AnAnAn = An⊗Aop

n An = A2nAn, a simple holo-

nomic A2n-module since GK An = 2n = 4n

2 = GK(A2n) 2

. For τ ∈ EndK(An), the twisted An-bimodule (≡ the twisted A2n-module) τAnτ contains the simple An-subbimodule τ(An) since An·τ(An)·An = τ(An)τ(An)τ(An) = τ(AnAnAn) = τ(An), and τ(An) ≃ An.

  • the Dixmier Problem has a Positive So-

lution iff An = τ(An) iff the τAnτ is Sim- ple A2n-module (for all τ).

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Th 2.4. For every τ ∈ EndK(An) the A2n- module τAnτ is holonomic, hence has finite length.

  • Proof. Since An is a holonomic A2n-module,

by Th 2.3, τAnτ is a holonomic A2n-module, hence has finite length.

  • Comments. 1. Th 2.4 is a good argument in

favour of the positive solution of the Dixmier Problem and the Jacobian Conjecture.

  • 2. In case that the Dixmier Problem and the

Jacobian Conjecture have negative solution Th 2.4 explains why it is difficult to give a counter- example (τ(An) is big).

  • 3. Main Result: for Somewhat

Commuattive Algebras Holonomicity is Preserved under Restriction of Scalars

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • Def. An algebra A is called somewhat com-

mutative if there exists a finite dimensional fil- tration, A = ∪i≥0 Fi s.t. the associated graded algebra gr A := ⊕Fi/Fi−1 is commutative and affine.

  • Ex. D(X), An, the universal enveloping alge-

bra U(G) of finite dimensional Lie algebra G. If M is a finitely generated A-module then GK M is a natural number.

  • Def. For a somewhat commutative algebra A

we define the holonomic number, h(A) := min{GK(M) | M ̸= 0 is a fin. gen. A−mod}. A finitely generated A-module M is called a holonomic A-module iff GK(M) = h(A).

  • Ex. h(D(X)) = dim X = n, h(An) = n.

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

L 3.1. Each holonomic module has finite length. A nonzero sub/factor module of a holonomic module is a holonomic module. Th 3.2. (Holonomicity is Preserved under Restriction of Scalars) Let A and B be some- what commutative algebras such that h(A) = h(B). Then, for every algebra endomorphism τ : A → B and for every holonomic B-module M, the A-module τM, obtained by resrtiction

  • f scalars, is a holonomic A-module (hence has

finite length).

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

C 3.3. Let X and Y be smooth irreducible al- gebraic affine varieties of dimension n. Then, for every algebra endomorphism τ : D(X) → D(Y ) and for every holonomic D(Y )-module M, the D(X)-module τM, obtained by resrtic- tion of scalars, is a holonomic D(X)-module (hence has finite length). Proof. Algebras D(X), D(Y ) are somewhat commutative and have the same holonomic number n. Now the result follows from Th 3.2. C 3.4. Let X and Y be smooth irreducible algebraic affine varieties of dimension n and let σ, τ : D(X) → D(Y ) be algebra homomor- phisms. Then the D(X)-bimodule σD(Y )τ is holonomic, and has finite length.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

C 3.5. (Forward-Back) Let X and Y be smooth irreducible algebraic affine varieties of dimen- sion n and let σ : D(X) → D(Y ) be an al- gebra homomorphism. For every holonomic D(Y )-module M and for every nonzero element s ∈ O(Y ), the localization Ms of the module M at the powers of the element s is a holonomic D(X)-module provided Ms ̸= 0. In particular, O(Y )s is a holonomic D(X)-module for every nonzero s ∈ O(Y ). Let f = (fi) ∈ EndK(Pn) be a momomorphism, fi := f(xi).The elements ∆ij of the inverse matrix J (f)−1 = (∆ij) belong to the localiza- tion Pn,∆ := (Pn)∆ of the polynomial ring Pn at the powers of ∆ := det J (f) ̸= 0.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

The derivations of the algebra Pn,∆, δi :=

n

j=1

∆ji∂j, i = 1, . . . , n, satisfy, δi(fj) = δij, i, j = 1, . . . , n. Hence, the subalgebra W(f) of the localization An,∆ := (An)∆ of the Weyla lgebra An, gen- erated by f1, . . . , fn, δ1, . . . , δn, is isomorphic to the Weyl algebra An. C 3.6. (Bass, 1989; van den Essen, 1991) The algebra Pn,∆ is a holonomic W(f)-module.

  • Proof. Pn is a holonomic An-module, now ap-

ply C 3.5.

13