Transplants for MPD and MDS The question is really who to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transplants for mpd and mds
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Transplants for MPD and MDS The question is really who to - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transplants for MPD and MDS The question is really who to transplant, with what and when. Focus on myelofibrosis Jeff Szer Royal Melbourne Hospital Myelodysplasia Little needs to be said Despite new therapies (such as azacitidine


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Transplants for MPD and MDS

The question is really who to transplant, with what and when. Focus on myelofibrosis

Jeff Szer Royal Melbourne Hospital

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Myelodysplasia

  • Little needs to be said
  • Despite new therapies (such as azacitidine

and lenalidomide) MDS is incurable.

  • Most MDS patients are too old to consider

allografting

  • For those that are not, the trick is to time it

right and do it safely.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

MDS Tools

  • IPSS and WPSS

– Karyotype (type), transfusion dependency, MDS category (roughly blast-number related)

  • Timing of transplant is best left to

immediately before progression to high risk disease

Cutler et al Blood 2004;104:579

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Years

2 6 1 3 4 5

Probability of Survival after Allotransplants for MDS, Age ³ 2 0 Years, 1 9 9 8 -2 0 0 6

  • by Disease Status and Donor Type -

Early, HLA-id sib (N= 523)

SUM08_21.ppt

Early, unrelated (N= 418) Advanced, HLA-id sib (N= 1,133) Advanced, unrelated (N= 1,019)

20 40 60 80 100 10 30 50 70 90 20 40 60 80 100 10 30 50 70 90

P  0.0001

Probability of Survival, %

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Years

2 6 1 3 4 5

Probability of Survival after Allotransplants for Early MDS, Age 5 0 Years, 1 9 9 8 -2 0 0 6

  • by Conditioning Regim en and Donor Type -

Myeloablative, HLA-id sib (N= 109)

SUM08_22.ppt

Myeloablative, unrelated (N= 71) Reduced Intensity Conditioning, HLA-id sib (N= 122) Reduced Intensity Conditioning, unrelated (N= 96)

20 40 60 80 100 10 30 50 70 90 20 40 60 80 100 10 30 50 70 90

P  0.6111

Probability of Survival, %

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ABMTRR

slide-7
SLIDE 7

MDS BMT outcome

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MYELOFIBROSIS

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Historical nomenclature

Mesa RA et al Consensus on terminology by the international working group for myelofibrosis research and treatment (IWG-MRT). Leuk Res 2007; 31:737-740

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Proposed nomenclature

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Epidemiology

  • 0.4-1.5 per 100,000
  • Age-related

– 25% > 70 y – 5% < 40

  • M/F 1.2:1.6
  • 15-20% in prior ET/PV by 20 years.
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Structural Map of Janus Kinase 2

Goldman J, N Engl J Med 2005;352:17

Janus Janus Janus

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Involvement of Janus Kinases in Cytokine Signal Transduction

Goldman J, N Engl J Med 2005;352;17

slide-14
SLIDE 14

JAK2V617F

  • STAT3: constitutive activation
  • AKT: increased phosphorylation
  • MPL: decreased expression
  • BCL-xL: increased expression
  • PI-3 kinase: increased expression
slide-15
SLIDE 15

But now for something a lot simpler…

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Dupriez score

Parameter Finding Points Haemoglobin >100 <100 1 WBC >30 1 4-30 <4 1

Dupriez B, et al Prognostic factors in agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a report on 195 cases with a new scoring system. Blood. 1996;88:1013-1018.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Dupriez Score

Score Risk Group Median survival Low 93 months (7.75 yrs) 1 Intermediate 36 months (3 yrs) 2 High 13 months (1 yr)

Dupriez B, et al Prognostic factors in agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a report on 195 cases with a new scoring system. Blood. 1996;88:1013-1018.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Treatment Options

  • Transfusions
  • Androgens and prednisolone (<30% RR

and transient)

  • Erythropoietins
  • Hydroxyurea for increased WBC or Plts
  • Busulphan
  • Melphalan
  • 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Splenectomy

  • N=223
  • Indications for surgery:

– Mechanical discomfort (39%) – Portal HTN (11%) – Severe hypercatabolic symptoms (5%) – Transfusions needed frequently (45%)

Tefferi et al.Splenectomy in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a single-institution experience with 223 patients Blood 2000;95:2226-2233

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Splenectomy

Improvement in symptoms in majority

  • 16% had increase in hepatomegaly
  • 22% had increase in thrombocytosis
  • 16% had blast transformation
  • Median survival 2 years
  • Low platelets and BM without

hypercellularity associated with poor prognosis

Tefferi et al.Splenectomy in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a single-institution experience with 223 patients Blood 2000;95:2226-2233

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Splenic Radiation

  • Radiation in 23 pts
  • 100-500cGy to spleen
  • Transient benefit (6 months) from pain,

spleen size

  • 10% mortality from prolonged cytopenias
  • Median survival 2 years
slide-22
SLIDE 22

JAK2 inhibitors?

  • Giles et al. MK-0457, a Novel Multikinase

Inhibitor, Is Active in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) with the T315I BCR-ABL Resistance Mutation and Patients with Refractory JAK-2 Positive Myeloproliferative Diseases (MPD). Blood 2006; 108: abst 253

  • “Six of 8 currently evaluable patients with JAK-2

positive refractory MPD have achieved an

  • bjective response.”
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Potential new agents

  • Inhibitors

– Are not selective for mutated gene (ATP- binding site inhibitors) – May preferentially inhibit cells with mutation because they depend on always active J AK2V61 7F – Myelosuppression is expected side effect – Elimination of the disease is unlikely.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Current studies

CEP701 J AK2 and FLT3 MF ET/PV phase II XL01 9 (exelixis) J AK2 (stopped) MF TG01 348 J AK2 MF phase I INCB01 8424 J AK1 and J AK2 MF phase III, ET/PV phase II SB1 51 8 J AK2 and FLT3 MF phase I AZD1 480 J AK2 MF phase I

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Allogeneic BMT for MF

Kerbauy et al Hematopoietic cell transplantation as curative therapy for idiopathic myelofibrosis, advanced polycythemia vera, and essential thrombocythemia. Biol Blood Marrow Transplat 2007; 13:355-365

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Patient characteristics

One patient had CIMF that evolved to CML. One patient had a concurrent diagnosis of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and 2 patients showed myelodysplastic changes in addition to the typical morphology of CIMF. One patient had ITP in addition to marrow fibrosis

Kerbauy et al BBMT 2007; 13:355-365

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Donor & Transplant Characteristics

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Causes of death

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Overall Survival

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Mortality: Univariate

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Mortality: multivariate

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Disease parameters

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Survival

No leukaemic transformation And myeloablative regimen Primary diagnosis

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Conclusions

  • HCT offers potentially curative therapy for

patients with myelofibrosis of various aetiologies.

  • Optimum timing for transplantation

remains to be determined, although the data suggest that higher success rates can be expected at earlier disease stages

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Conclusions

  • Optimum conditioning regimen may

depend on patient age and co-morbid conditions

  • Role of JAK2 mutations in therapeutic

decision making?

slide-36
SLIDE 36

CIBMTR

  • CK00-02: Outcome of allogeneic

transplantation for myelofibrosis

  • 289 pts allogeneic HCT for myelofibrosis

between 1989 and 2002

– 162 HLA-identical sibling donor, – 101 URD – 26 alternative related donor

  • Median age 45

Ballen BBMT 2010;16: 358-367

slide-37
SLIDE 37

CIBMTR

Ballen BBMT 2010;16: 358-367

slide-38
SLIDE 38

MDAH: Leuk transformation

Ciurea BBMT 2010; 16: 555-559 N=14 OS EFS

slide-39
SLIDE 39

CIBMTR

  • Conclusions

– allogeneic HCT cures approximately 1/3 of patients with myelofibrosis – young patients with HLA-matched sibling donors have superior survival – results have improved over the last decade.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

ABMTRR

  • Study of 56 patients transplanted for

primary MF 1992-2005

slide-41
SLIDE 41

RMH Data

  • 13 pts with myelofibrosis undergoing BMT

from 9/03-3/07

  • Age: 45 (34-56)
  • Donors: 9 matched sibs, 4 VUD
  • Conditioning: 12 Cy/TBI, 1 Flu/Mel
  • 2 deaths: 1 from progressive disease, 1

from AMI.

  • 1 alive with low grade active MDS
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Drivers for transplant

  • Interval from diagnosis to transplant

– 21 months (5-132).

  • 3 pts transplanted >10 yr after diagnosis of MPD but 8, 9 and

17 months after diagnosis MF

  • Prior splenectomy:

4

  • Reasons

– Transfusion dependency 3 – Falling counts/osteosclerosis 4 – Transformation from ET/PV 2 – MDS/AML 3 – Time 1

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Sequential bone marrows

  • Data on 10 > 1yr

– 6 completely normalised BM

  • 3 months-2yr

– 3 with osteosclerosis have normalised – 4 persistent mild increase reticulin at 2 years

  • 1 with recurrent MPD (JAK2+)
  • 3 pts < 1yr

– All 3 have residual fibrosis at day 100 – All show “improved” fibrosis

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Overall survival

24 48 72 96 120 144 168 20 40 60 80 100

7218% n=13

Months after BMT Survival probability (%)

Relapsed at 2 yr with del 13q AMI Relapsed at 2 yr with del 13q AMI Relapsed at 2 yr with del 13q

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Conclusions

  • HCT offers potentially curative therapy for

patients with myelofibrosis of various aetiologies.

  • Optimum timing for transplantation remains to be

determined, although the data suggest that higher success rates can be expected at earlier disease stages

  • Optimum conditioning regimen may depend on

patient age and co-morbid conditions

  • The role of JAK2 inhibitors or other biological

therapies with BMT remains to be determined

slide-46
SLIDE 46