TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) FINANCING S. SIVAMATHAN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

transit oriented development tod financing
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) FINANCING S. SIVAMATHAN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) FINANCING S. SIVAMATHAN GM/FINANCE Features of Metro Financing Rail Based MRTS projects are: Highly capital intensive, Long Gestation Period, Low Financial IRR since it cannot increase the


slide-1
SLIDE 1

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) FINANCING

  • S. SIVAMATHAN

GM/FINANCE

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Features of Metro Financing

  • Rail Based MRTS projects are:

Highly capital intensive, Long Gestation Period, Low Financial IRR since it cannot increase the fare beyond a point (FIRR of Phase-III: 1.59%), But having High Economic IRR (Social Benefits, EIRR of Phase-III: 17.15%).

  • So far the funding has been made mainly through

Budgetary Support from GOI and State Government as well as loan from multilateral /bilateral agencies.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Features of Metro Financing

  • Experience all over the world reveals that both

construction and operations of a metro are highly subsidised and funded by the Government.

  • Hong Kong:
  • 78% for the first three lines and
  • 66% for the subsequent 2 lines.
  • Singapore Metro:

– Government provides full infrastructure including rolling stock and another agency operates the system. – Difference in replacement costs and historical cost of assets is met by the government.

  • Others run on Governmental support and subsidies.
  • Sao Paulo, New York and Paris metros have access

to tax levies.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

OBJECTIVE OF INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING

  • Main
  • bjectives
  • f

infrastructure funding excluding capex are:

– Long term financial sustainability of the system by:

  • Setting

fares and having fare revision mechanism from time to time will minimise dependence on subsidies

  • Providing

an environment for the MRA to generate alternative sources of revenues i.e., the difference in the EIRR and FIRR is captured.

  • Recovering return from both direct and indirect

beneficiaries

slide-5
SLIDE 5

DMRC’S (O&M) Financial Overview

  • Fare fixed by Regulatory Authority headed by a retired Judge of a High

Court.

  • Fare from Rs. 8/- to Rs.30/- lowest in the world except Kolkata.
  • Last fare revision in Sep-2009.
  • So far, 3 FFC were constituted.
  • GOI is in the process of notifying 4th FFC for revising the fare structure.
  • The system is making Operational Profit from Day One (EBITA).
  • About 25% revenue is from Non-Fare Box Collection.
  • DMRC is able to service and pay back the JICA loans without asking

any subsidy from the Government.

  • Till date DMRC has paid Rs. 2869.50 crore to GOI towards JICA related

payments: -

  • Interest Rs.1837.32 crore & Repayment

Rs.1032.18 crore.

  • Operating Ratio is decorating:
  • FY 2014-15 67.22%.
  • FY 2013-14 60.04%.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT (TOD) For Financing of Infrastructure Projects

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

NEED FOR TOD IN MRTS

  • MRTS projects i.e., Rail and Bus based, are high

capacity MRTS.

  • The

projects are amenable to TOD as well as densification along the MRTS corridor through additional FAR.

  • To improve the financial sustainability of the MRTS

projects, it is important to have:

  • As many MRTS users to live within walking distance of

stations,

  • Because of MRTS projects, there is a huge spurt in

the prices of property (sale as well as rental).

  • The increase in the prices of property go primarily to

the private parties even though the same is caused

  • nly on account of government investment.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

  • Activity centre's established around a

transport/transit node.

  • Medium to high density housing.
  • Mix of retail, employment, commercial

and civic development.

  • Enhanced accessibility via:
  • Walking,
  • Cycling, and
  • Public transport.
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11

NEED FOR TOD IN MRTS

  • Government to encash the increased property

value (sale/rental) in the catchment area of MRTS corridor as well as increased FAR along the MRTS corridor.

  • The fund so generated can be used for the

following:

  • To part fund the project cost,
  • To provide interest subsidy so that loan to the SPV is

available on a very concessional rate.

  • To provide operational subsidies, if any
  • The above will improve the debt service coverage

ratio (DSCR) of the SPV .

slide-12
SLIDE 12

DMRC – PART FUNDING FROM PD

  • DMRC contributed funds towards capex

from IA & PD:

  • Phase-I

Rs.728 crore (7%) of the capex

  • Phase-II

Rs.1050 crore for Phase-II

  • Phase-III

Target is Rs.2505 crore from PD.

  • How it was generated?

– Land leased

  • ut

to private developers against payment of fixed upfront amount and the balance in monthly rentals.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Dedicated Urban Transport Fund

  • For

Phase-III, GNCTD to set up Dedicated urban Transport Fund to create a pool of resources to:

  • Replacement of assets,
  • Providing interest subsidy and
  • Providing operational subsidies.
  • Yet to be set up.
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Innovative Financing Mechanism by BMRCL

  • Govt. of Karnataka, while sanctioning Phase-

II of Bangalore Metro decided to mobilize funds through Cess/TDR:

– Levy of Cess and Surcharge @ 5% of the market value of land or/and building in future developments, to be credited to Metro Infrastructure Fund and to be shared between BMRCL, BWSSB and BDA @ 65%, 20% and 15% respectively. – To extend the benefit of 4 FAR for all properties lying within a distance of 500 meters from the Metro alignment. – Levy cess @ 10% in r/o residential buildings and 20% in r/o commercial buildings on the additional FAR granted and to share the same among BMRCL, BBMP, BWSSB and BDA @ 60%, 20%, 10% and 10% respectively.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

FUNDING OF HYDERABAD METRO

Particulars Amount (Rs./Billion) Total cost 141.32 Less VGF by GoI 14.58 Less VGF by GoAP 0.00 Concessionaire cost 126.74 Concessionaire Debt 99.08 Concessionaire Equity 27.66

slide-16
SLIDE 16

HYDERABAD METRO - PD

  • The concessionaire was allowed to commercially

develop real estate in 18.50 million square feet areas.

  • Revenue form the real estate shall constitute 45%
  • f the total revenue generated from the project.

– Concessionaire would be allowed to undertake real- estate development at and above the first floor level

  • f all depots.

– The total land for depots is 212 acres. – Concessionaire also to have access to 20% of the floor area

  • f

each station for commercial development.

  • In addition, concessionaire can undertake real

estate development

  • ver

the parking and circulation areas at station as well.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

TOD IN DELHI

slide-18
SLIDE 18

WHY TOD

  • DMRC eagerly awaiting for the approval of

Transit Oriented Development (TOD) policy as it has to raise Rs. 2505 Crores from PD for the Phase-lll:

  • TOD Policy gives higher FAR .
  • TOD means Money
  • TOD shall promote use of public transport:
  • Which will reduce congestion and pollution in the

city.

  • Increase the ridership of MRTS system.
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Barriers to equitable and inclusive TOD

  • Achieving FAR 4 is some time not possible,

because of encumbrance like:

  • Height restriction due to air funnel,
  • Structure design of existing or under construction

buildings,

  • Acquiring FAR involves cost.
  • Exemption is available for GOI & GNCTD,
  • DMRC should be included in the list.
  • TOD should be permitted in Monument Regulated

Zone subject to guidelines of NMA.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Barriers to equitable and inclusive TOD

  • DMRC’s few stand alone plots are complying with

TOD conditions:

  • Malviya Nagar, Jantar Mantar,
  • Janakpuri West, Mundka etc.
  • DMRC’s plan to have residential development:
  • GOI directions prohibits DMRC to lease out land for

residential purpose (normally).

  • Some plots are designated under Industrial

Use:

  • DMRC can take up residential development only in

30% area.

  • Some plots (Mundka) are located on existing roads

with a width of less than 18 m ROW.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

RISKS IN FINANCING OF TOD

  • Residential & Commercial may not go together.
  • Bhikaji Cama Palace:
  • A PSU is being approached to have office space on

long term lease basis by paying about 30% of PV of expected rental value over a period of 45 years.

  • The balance rentals shall be paid on month to month

basis.

  • Jantar Mantar & NS Place:
  • In the process of floating tender to assess the

marketability of office space.

  • DMRC don’t have fund for undertaking TOD.
  • Will try to rope in few MNCs, big corporate houses to

pay upfront money and balance through monthly rentals.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Thank You

  • www. delhimetrorail.com