Training materials Mediation in the cross-border succession cases - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

training materials
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Training materials Mediation in the cross-border succession cases - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

FOMENTO Training materials Mediation in the cross-border succession cases Place, Date Trainers This publication has been produced with the financial support of the Justice Programme of the European Union. The contents of this publication are


slide-1
SLIDE 1

FOMENTO Training materials

Mediation in the cross-border succession cases

Place, Date Trainers

This publication has been produced with the financial support of the Justice Programme of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

FOMENTO – goals of the project

  • 2-year project co-funded by the European Commission in the

framework of the Justice Programme 2014-2020.

  • Six European countries: Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Poland and

Sweden.

  • FOMENTO ‘Fostering Mediation in cross-border civil and succession

matters’ - conflicts prevention in cross-border succession matters.

  • Deeper understanding and impulses for a correct implementation
  • f:
  • Directive 2008/52/EC (‘Mediation Directive’)
  • Regulation (EU) No. 650/2012 (‘Succession Regulation’).
slide-3
SLIDE 3

FOMENTO – actions in the project

  • What has happened
  • What happens now
  • What will happend
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Information about partners

  • Information about trainers
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Expectations towards this training

Why am I here? What for? What do I hope to gain?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Program of the workshop

  • Time frame
  • Activities
  • Breaks
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Conflict assesment

What are important aspects?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Case study – conflict assesment

  • Map of the stakeholders
  • Fact description: the story of the conflict
  • Sources of the conflict
  • Each partie’s point of view: their beliefs,

emotions, expectations

  • Partie’s needs/interests
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Map of the stakeholders

Be part of the solution

  • r stay part of the conflict.
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Map of the stakeholders

  • Who is affected by the conflict?
  • Who might be concerned by the course

and its outcomes?

  • Who can potentially influence the

solution?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Genogram

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Genogram

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Map of the stakeholders

  • Genogram of the analysed case- egxample
  • Draw genogram of your chosen case
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conflict history - milestones

Look at the history of this conflict, and think of three turning points that apply to you.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sources of conflict- Circle of conflict by R. Moore

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Law – EU succession regulations

  • Regulation (EU) No. 650/2012

(‘Succession Regulation’).

  • Directive 2008/52/EC (‘Mediation

Directive’)

  • Main rules and consequences
  • Main results from FOMENTO research
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Law – national regulations regarding succession in…

  • Each country separate
  • Main rules and consequences
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Analyse of the case – regarding Regulation (EU) 650/2012

Where will this case be conducted according to the new regulation? What are the main assumptions concerning domestic succession regulations in a country where the case will be conducted?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Analyse of the case – regarding Regulation (EU) 650/2012

  • What is the estimated duration of legal

actions?

  • What actions will have to be undertaken?
  • How many sides/persons will be engaged?
  • Recommendations for sides: what is the best

course of action?

  • Is mediation an option? Analyze chances/

risks and costs.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Cultural differences

Behavior Attitudes Opinions Values

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Sources of the conflict and culture differences

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Culture dimensions

Mutual expectations of the community and the individual

Individualistic cultures Collectivist cultures

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Culture dimensions

Expressing your opinions Low-context cultures High context cultures

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Culture dimensions

Expressing emotions and physical distance

Reserved cultures Expressive cultures

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Culture dimensions

Hierarchy

Low power distance High power distance

(Egalitarianism) (Hierarchical)

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Culture dimensions

Approach to time and punctuality

Monochronic cultures Polichronic cultures

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Mechanism that reinforce cultural conflict

Negative attribution Negative emotions Negative behaviours

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Solving a problem regarding cultural differences

Individualistic approach Collectivistic approach

Goal-oriented Process-oriented Substantive issues oriented Relationship-focused Stress on measurable effects Stress

  • n

unmeasurable and intangible effects Presenting arguments directly Argumentation based upon metaphors Strees on the facts and measurable data,

  • bjective criteria

Stress on the experience and intuition Stress on personal opinions Stress on norms that the group allows Rivalry and restraint are preferred Mutual adjustment and avoiding an open conflict are preferred Stress on effective behaviours Stress on appropriate behaviours Building one’s image Protecting other people’s image

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Mourning

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Mourning

Five stages of mourning by Elisabeth Kübler-Ross

  • Denial and repression
  • Anger
  • Bargaining (negotiations).
  • Depression and melancholy
  • Accepting the loss
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Mourning

Valley of tears

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Mediation Harvard mediation model

  • 1. Introduction to mediation, contract
  • 2. Gathering information.
  • 3. Discovering the needs and parties’

interests, and establishing mutual trust.

  • 4. Negotiating and generating possible

solutions.

  • 5. Formulating and writing the agreement.
slide-33
SLIDE 33

Cross-border mediation

The major factors to be considered :

  • co-mediation
  • language
  • online communication tools
  • location
  • duration and number of sessions
  • external legal experts
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Simulation

  • Preparing
  • Case
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Simulation - Feed back

  • Questions
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Estate planning

  • Who will be the successor and in what fashion?
  • Finding the optimal legal method of estate

transfer

  • difficulties and complications
  • Drawing up of the last will, which involves:
  • collecting and sharing information
  • listening to and explaining to one another (within the family or even

with successors outside the family).

  • One decision maker – an individual or the couple of the parents!
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Estate planning

  • Pre-succession arrangements of the parents regarding their minor children:
  • How shall we divide the estate between our common children?
  • How will the children from the previous relationships be treated?
  • Who should be the children’s legal representative in the case of death of both

parents?

  • Arrangements between divorced parents concerning the division of the estate

between their common children and the children from the new relationships.

  • Pre-succession arrangements with adult children:
  • How will the transfer of the estate including the real property be conducted?
  • How will the transfer of ownership and liability be conducted in a family

business?

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Pre-succession mediation

Specific (!) - The decisions are not taken by all but by the testator alone.

The testator The successors

Greater power – decision maker Less or no power – beneficiary of the decision Decisions based on:

  • knowledge and convictions
  • information obtained during the mediation

An opportunity of:

  • allowing the testator to listen to their

perspective

  • understanding the grounds on which the

eventual decisions have been made.

  • Information to the successors in safe

environment

  • Listening to the successors
  • Verification
  • Decision making
  • Presentation of the decisions - Information to

the successors

  • Listening to the testator’s vision in safe

environment

  • Information to the testator (facts,

interpretations, emotions – about history and the vision)

  • Listening to other successors and building

understanding.

  • Understanding of the succession rules.
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Pre-succession mediation

Preparation of family members to participation in mediation:

  • Explaining the structure of pre-succession mediation and decision-making process.
  • Explaining and defining the role of all parties in the mediation.

Preparation of the mediator:

  • Knowledge of the special characteristics of the area of succession, also in family

companies.

  • Preparation of necessary cooperation with external experts – fields of law or finance.
  • Adjustment of the structure of the mediation to a given family.
  • Taking care of the present and absent mediation parties.
  • Working method well suited to the family (facilitative, transformative, narrative)
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Pre-succession mediation

When preparing for the mediation:

  • Chronology of the events that are relevant for the parties
  • Legal documents
  • Topics that have already been agreed
  • Testator’s emotional, substantive and procedural objectives in order of priority
  • Legal issues to be agreed upon
  • A history of the offers concerning the succession along with the dates
  • Risk analysis if the conflict escalates or is to be sustained - cost of legal counsel and

potential court-related costs

  • An analysis of the situation: cause of the conflict and the degree to which it can

escalate, possible helpful intervention, potential challenges, possible results/solutions.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Summary

  • Summary
  • Feedback session
  • Certificates
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Networking

  • Links
  • Visions
  • Needs
  • How to… application
slide-43
SLIDE 43

Thank you

This publication has been produced with the financial support of the Justice Programme of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the Authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission.