tracking immune cells phenotypic changes in head
play

Tracking immune cells phenotypic changes in Head associated lymphoid - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tracking immune cells phenotypic changes in Head associated lymphoid tissues (HALT), trachea, and spleen of chickens ocularly-infected with Infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) M. Krunkosky 1 , L.G. Beltran Garza 1 , R. M. Gogal Jr. 2 , D.J.


  1. Tracking immune cells phenotypic changes in Head associated lymphoid tissues (HALT), trachea, and spleen of chickens ocularly-infected with Infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) M. Krunkosky 1 , L.G. Beltran Garza 1 , R. M. Gogal Jr. 2 , D.J. Hurley 3 , M. García 1 1 Poultry Diagnostic Research Center, 2 Department of Biosciences and Diagnostic Imaging, 3 Food Animal Health and Management, Department of Population Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

  2. Clinical signs of the disease • conjunctivitis • swelling of the infraorbital sinuses, • nasal discharge • dyspnea and bloody mucus in the trachea

  3. Sites of Lytic - Infection Trachea – Epithelia cells of: • Trachea • Larynx • Nares • Sinus membranes • Conjunctiva Conjunctiva

  4. Mucosal tissues – First mucosal tissues to come in contact with ILTV during natural infection or vaccination are: • HALT (head associated lymphoid tissue) – CALT (conjunctiva associated lymphoid tissue) – NALT (nasal associated lymphoid tissue) – Harderian gland Maxilla cut between nostril and the eyes Nasal cavity and infra-orbital sinus

  5. Immune response induced by ILT infection or vaccination? – Mucosal vaccination with live attenuated vaccines via eye-drop, drinking water or spray induce protective immunity – Resistance (adaptive immune response) is provided by cell mediated immunity – ILTV infections induces strong inflammation responses that influences: • Viral replication • Pathology of disease • Modulates adaptive immune response – Viral chemokine binding protein (gG) favors humoral immunity Therefore early local immune responses against ILTV will dictate adaptive immune responses and outcome of disease

  6. • Objective : To identify changes of immune cells populations in CALT, Harderian gland, and trachea during ILTV lytic infection • Approach : Flow cytometry to quantify (%) – Cells expressing CD4+ or CD8+ (T lymphocytes) Cells expressing MHCI ( All Nucleated cells) – Cells expressing MHCII (Macrophages, Dendritic cells, B cells) – – Cells expressing IgM (B cell first isotype) • Hypothesis: During lytic infection ILTV favorably controls the immune cells of the HALT and trachea to promote viral replication

  7. Experimental Design At 6 weeks of age specific pathogen free (SPF) chickens were inoculated via the ocular route (both eyes) with virulent isolate 63140 at a dose of 3.16 X 10 3 TCID 50 /chicken. A second group of chickens were mock inoculated with media Day 1 Day 3 Day 5 Day 7 Day 9 Post-Infection CALT, Harderian gland, trachea, spleen 60um Tissue disassociation, cells counts adjusted and viability determined Flow cytometry, cytospins, ILTV real time PCR 40 microns 70 microns

  8. Cytospins A B lymphocyte red blood cell lymphocyte C D Glandular epithelial cell Ciliated lymphocyte epithelial cell lymphocyte

  9. Results: Genome Viral Load

  10. Flow Cytometry Procedure: How were cells gated? • Based in peripheral blood lymphocytes: P1: Leukocytes P2: Lymphocytes

  11. Analysis @P2 Gate CALT CD8 CD4 IgM CALT SPLEEN Day 3 mock/MHCII Day 3 mock/MHCII high low high low C Day 3 ILTV- infected/MHCII Day 3 ILTV- infected/MHCII high low high low

  12. CALT % Expression Days Post-Infection Day 1 Day 3 Day 5 Mock + Infected + Mock + Infected + Mock + Infected + 45 ± 2 47 ± 2 47 ± 2 31 ± 3 *** 45 ± 2 31 ± 2 **** P2 gate cells MHCI 69 ± 3 72 ± 2 70 ± 2 59 ± 3** 60 ± 4 58 ± 2 14 ± 1 15 ± 1 17 ± 1 9 ± 1 **** 15 ± 1 12 ± 1 MHCII low MHCII high 40 ± 3 38 ± 2 37 ± 2 52 ± 3 *** 41 ± 2 48 ± 2 CD4 44 ± 2 44 ± 2 45 ± 2 29 ± 2 **** 38 ± 2 35 ± 2 11 ± 4 12 ± 3 13 ± 1 14 ± 2 15 ± 1 14 ± 1 CD8 30 ± 2 30 ± 2 26 ± 2 41 ± (2) **** 34 ± 3 39 ± 3 IgM + Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM *=p- value ≤ 0.05, **=p- value ≤ 0.01, ***=p- value ≤ 0.001, ****0.0001

  13. Harderian Gland % Expression Days Post-Infection Day 1 Day 3 Day 5 Mock + Infected + Mock + Infected + Mock + Infected + P2 gate cells 9 ± 2 7 ± 1 10 ± 2 10 ± 1 9 ± 1 22 ± 3 **** MHCI 82 ± 2 86 ± 2 80 ± 3 82 ± 2 79 ± 1 82 ± 1 MHCII low 8 ± 1 8 ± 1 9 ± 1 6 ± 1*** 7 ± 0 12 ± 2*** MHCII high 20 ± 2 14 ± 1** 16 ± 2 15 ± 2 17 ± 1 18 ± 1 18 ± 1 17 ± 1 15 ± 1 16 ± 1 22 ± 3 27 ± 2 CD4 CD8 36 ± 2 34 ± 2 39 ± 3 38 ± 2 32 ± 3 26 ± 2 36 ± 2 37 ± 2 44 ± 2 33 ± 2 *** 42 ± 3 32 ± 2 ** IgM + Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM *=p- value ≤ 0.05, **=p- value ≤ 0.01, ***=p- value ≤ 0.001, ****0.0001

  14. Trachea % Expression Days Post-Infection Day 1 Day 3 Day 5 Mock + Infected + Mock + Infected + Mock + Infected + P2 gate cells 7 ± 2 5 ± 1 6 ± 1 7 ± 1 11 ± 2 17 ± 3 MHCI 89 ± 1 94 ± 1** 91 ± 1 91 ± 1 88 ± 1 92 ± 1 MHCII low 4 ± 1 3 ± 1 4 ± 2 5 ± 3 5 ± 2 6 ± 4 MHCII high 13 ± 4 8 ± 3** 10 ± 3 10 ± 5 10 ± 1 9 ± 1 28 ± 2 21 ± 2* 31 ± 7 32 ± 17 26 ± 8 32 ± 12 CD4 CD8 13 ± 1 13 ± 1 15 ± 1 18 ± 5 17 ± 1 18 ± 3 IgM 14 ± 1 11 ± 1 16 ± 5 12 ± 1 14 ± 1 11 ± 1 + Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM *=p- value ≤0.05, **=p- value ≤0.01, ***=p- value ≤0.001, ****0.0001

  15. Spleen % Expression Days Post-Inoculation Day 1 Day 3 Day 5 Mock + Infected + Mock + Infected + Mock + Infected + P2 gate cells 48 ± 2 52 ± 2 50 ± 1 46 ± 1** 45 ± 2 42 ± 2 MHCI 76 ± 1 78 ± 1 77 ± 1 79 ± 1 73 ± 2 72 ± 1 MHCII low 27 ± 2 24 ± 2 24 ± 1 25 ± 2 27 ± 2 29 ± 2 MHCII high 30 ± 1 28 ± 2 26 ± 2 27 ± 2 28 ± 2 30 ± 1 CD4 23 ± 1 20 ± 1 22 ± 1 23 ± 1 18 ± 1 24 ± 1*** 40 ± 2 43 ± 2 42 ± 2 43 ± 3 48 ± 2 40 ± 2** CD8 23 ± 1 22 ± 1 21 ± 1 21 ± 2 23 ± 2 24 ± 1 IgM + Values are expressed as Mean ± SEM **=p- value ≤0.01, ***=p- value ≤0.001, ****0.0001

  16. Summary • Immune cells changes or the lack-off that may favor viral replication – CALT: transient decrease of CD4+ and MHCI cells – HG: decrease of IgM+ cells – Trachea: static during lytic replication after ocular inoculation – Overall lack of CD8+ cells increase • Evidence of a developing immune response – CALT: increase of IgM+ cells – CALT & HG: increase in MHCII + cells (maybe APC’s) – Spleen: increase in CD4+ cells

  17. Conclusion • ILTV favorably controls the immune cells of the HALT and trachea to promote viral replication

  18. Objective 2.2.2: Characterization of LOCAL IMMUNE RESPONSES in chickens administered a live attenuated infectious laryngotracheitis virus (ILTV) chicken embryo origin (CEO) vaccine alone or combined with select viral respiratory vaccines Maricarmen García and Robert M. Gogal Jr. (University of Georgia)

  19. • ✔ 1rst Year : Characterization of cell phenotypes in tissues infected with virulent ILTV isolate • 2nd Year : Characterization of cell phenotypes in tissues infected with ILTV CEO vaccine • 3rd Year : Characterization of cell phenotypes in tissues after sequential or co-administration of ILTV (CEO) and IBV vaccines • 4rd and 5 th Year : Characterization of cell phenotypes in tissues post-challenge of ILTV and IBV vaccinated chickens

  20. Questions??

  21. Questions to be Answered • In CALT Is the decrease in CD4+ cells due to apoptosis? • Are MHCI and MHCII high positive cells activated? What type of cells are they?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend