Tourism, Water and the Business
- f Responsible Tourism
12th International Conference on Responsible Tourism in Destinations, Jyväskylä, Finland
- C. Michael Hall
Tourism, Water and the Business of Responsible Tourism 12th - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Tourism, Water and the Business of Responsible Tourism 12th International Conference on Responsible Tourism in Destinations, Jyvskyl, Finland C. Michael Hall michael.hall@canterbury.ac.nz https://canterbury- nz.academia.edu/CMichaelHall
– Sundays and Mondays high water consumption days, Tuesdays and Wednesdays low consumption days (US Study). – Usage reasonably stable, with less than 18% variance from day to day. In contrast, on a monthly basis water usage was at its lowest in December and highest in August. Depending on the location and the type of hotel, water use fluctuated between a minimum of 23% of average daily use and a maximum of 224% of average daily use (US) – The greatest variance for water and hot water consumption (and consequent energy demands) occurs as a result of demand for morning and evening showers and baths in which peak demand may be just under six times the average daily water flow – Peaks in demand vary with the nature of the property and its clientele, i.e. time-constrained business travellers versus vacation tourists. – From a supply perspective, peak demand for water for showers, baths and washing (morning and night) also coincides with demands for hot water for hotel kitchens.
(Gössling et al. 2015: 131)
camping”
as well as in catering to older tourism markets
(picture near Corner Brook, Newfoundland)
ECO-EFFICIENCY More productive use of materials and energy. Increased product life spans Changed consumer behaviour Restructure socio-technical system SLOW / SUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTION Changed consumption patterns leading to reduced throughput of products and services and less energy.
Reduction in personal demand and distance travelled; resuse and
change in demand to emphasise ‘local’ destinations, short supply chains and reduce resource consumption and distance travelled: ‘Reorientation’ / ’Degrowth’ Recessionary if implemented in isolation from other measures. Same or increased personal travel demand. ‘Business as usual’. No fundamental change in destination choice or consumption choices: ‘Green Growth’ / ‘Green Economy’ Continued run down of natural capital if
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT / STEADY-STATE TOURISM
Restructure, Redistribute
Efficiency Sufficiency CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR PRODUCER BEHAVIOUR CONSUMPTION PRODUCTION INTERNAL
Value change; Ethical & social responsibilities
EXTERNAL
Regulation; Cost of energy; System change; Polluter pays
DRIVERS FOR CHANGE
Source: After Hall 2009 Figure Efficiency and sufficiency in sustainable tourism development
(After Hall 2004 in Hall & Lew 2009)
lifecourse
100km 10km 1km 100m 10m 1m 100 years 10 years 1 years 0.1 0.01 0.0001 0.001 month week day
seasonality community socio-cultural change ecological change pedo-geomorphological change Land & water use change demographic change global climate and environmental change daytripping
1000km
annual tourism statistics
Temporal Scale Spatial Scale Structure Agency Socio-technical structures Institutions & governance Individuals ? Individual businesses &
Social practices The “responsible” responses
individuals are important but they are not by themselves sufficient to generate positive change at a global scale
THE ENVIRONMENT / NATURAL CAPITAL
GDP TIME K Natural capital allocated to wildlife / environment Natural capital allocated to human / tourism economy and society. Everything in the previous model of ‘balanced’ sustainable tourism fits in here
Source: Adapted from Hall, 2010
Do efficiency improvements mean that we reduce the level of natural resource consumption and the level of environmental impact? No – not by themselves
Source: Hall, C.M., Gössling, S. & Scott, D. (2015). The evolution of sustainable development and sustainable tourism. In Hall, C.M., Gössling, S. & Scott, D. (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Tourism and Sustainability, Abingdon: Routledge. P.29