Total Knee Arthroplasty Mechanical Alignment Restores the Anatomy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

total knee arthroplasty
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Total Knee Arthroplasty Mechanical Alignment Restores the Anatomy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Total Knee Arthroplasty Mechanical Alignment Restores the Anatomy and Function Giles R. Scuderi, MD Orthopaedic Institute Disclosures Consultant and Society BOD Royalties Op Walk USA Zimmer Biomet Book Royalties


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Orthopaedic Institute

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Mechanical Alignment Restores the Anatomy and Function

Giles R. Scuderi, MD

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclosures

 Consultant and

Royalties

 Zimmer Biomet

 Consultant

 Medtronic  Convatec  Pacira  Merz Pharmaceuticals

 Research Support

 Pacira

  • Society BOD
  • Op Walk USA

 Book Royalties

 Elsevier  Springer  Thieme  World Scientific

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Varus Knee Spectrum of Pathology

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Valgus Knee Spectrum of Pathology

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Successful TKA

  • Long standing surgical principles:
  • Soft tissue balance
  • Bone resection
  • Component alignment
  • Component fixation
slide-6
SLIDE 6

TKA: Surgical Technique

Anatomic Resection Classical Resection

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • Soft tissue technique
  • Bone preparation technique
  • Achieve neutral mechanical axis
  • Conventional instruments
  • Computer Navigation
  • Patient specific instruments (PSI)
  • Goal
  • Lower limb alignment should be within 3° of neutral mechanical

alignment

Berend, et al: CORR 428, 2004 D’Lima, et al: CORR 392, 2001 Fang, et al: J Arthroplasty 24, 2009 Werner, et al: J Biomech 38, 2005 Bellemans: Orthop 34, 2011

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Total Knee Arthroplasty

Restore mechanical axis

  • Center hip-knee-ankle
  • Femur
  • Mechanical – anatomic angle 6° valgus
  • Tibia
  • Mechanical – anatomic angle 0° (neutral)

Appropriate Bone Resection Soft tissue balance

  • Ligament release

Patella tracking

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Classic Method of Bone Resection

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Neutral Mechanical Alignment

  • Better functional outcome at 1 year when coronal

alignment within 3° neutral

  • International Knee Society Score
  • SF 12
  • Knee Society Score

Choong, et al: J Arthroplasty 24, 2009 Longstaff, et al: J Arthoplasty 24, 2009

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Alignment and Failure Rate

Lower failure rate when restore mechanical alignment

Ritter, et al: JBJS 93(A) 17, 2011

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Impact of Mal-Alignment

  • Component mal-alignment in the presence of acceptable

knee alignment

  • Radiographic analysis and retrieval analysis
  • Tibial component varus
  • Medial compartment wear
  • Total wear
  • Tibial tray subsidence
  • Varus mal-alignment as low as 3°
  • associated with accelerated wear,

even if overall limb alignment is ideal Srivastava, et al: Knee 19(5), 2011 Collier, et al: JBJS 89A, 2007

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty

It’s Not Just the Coronal Alignment

  • Effect of sagittal alignment
  • Femur
  • Tibia
  • Axial rotation
  • Femur
  • Tibia
  • Soft Tissue Balance
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Not Just the Coronal Alignment

  • Sagittal Position: Risk factors for failure
  • Flexion of the femoral component >3°
  • Tibial slope > 7° or < 0°

Kim, et al: Int Orthop 38, 2014

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Femoral Component Rotation

  • AP axis to Epicondylar axis: 90.33° ± 2.44°
  • AP axis to Posterior Condyles: 93.08° ± 2.71°
  • Epicondylar axis to Posterior Condyles: 3.6° ± 2.02°

Poilvache et al: CORR 331, 1996

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Correlation Between Condylar Lift-off and Femoral Component Alignment

CT scan with fluoroscopic analysis

  • Supports Epicondylar Axis
  • Lift-off less frequent
  • Lift-off of less magnitude

Insall, Scuderi et al: CORR 403, 2002 Scuderi, Insall: Am. J. Knee 13, 2000 Olcott, Scott: CORR 367, 1999 Poilvache et al: CORR 331, 1996

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Consequence of Internal Rotation

  • f the Femoral Component
  • Patella instability
  • Limited Motion
  • Arthrofibrosis
  • Lateral flexion laxity
  • Instability
  • Less favorable clinical
  • utcomes

Romero et al: J. Arthroplasty 22(2), 2007 Boldt et al: Int. Orthop 30(5), 2006

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Axial Position of Tibia

  • Component Malposition
  • Internal rotation of the tibial

component

  • Causes tibia to externally rotate

during flexion

  • Increases Q-angle
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Tibial Component Rotation

Matsuda et al: Am. J. Knee Surg: 14(3), 2001

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Anatomic Tibial Component

  • No longer need to sacrifice coverage to get the proper

rotation

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Combined Femoral and Tibial Rotation

Internal Rotattion External Rotattion

Berger et al: CORR 356, 1998

Patella Dislocation & Failure Normal Tilt Subluxation

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Balancing the Knee

  • TKA is a soft tissue operation
  • “Every knee has its own soft tissue identity”
  • Understand the infuence of supporting ligaments
  • Anterior fibers influence flexion
  • Posterior fibers influence extension
  • Release of the PCL with preferentially increase the flexion

gap

Baldini, Scuderi, et al: J Knee Surg 2004

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Soft Tissue Balance in TKA

  • Every knee has its own soft tissue identity
  • Deformity may or may not be correctable
  • Gradual soft tissue release
  • Goal: Equal and symmetrical flexion and extension gaps
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Neutral Mechanical Alignment and Classic Bone Resection remain the Gold Standard

  • Sufficient supporting data
  • Clinical and functional outcomes
  • Durability
  • Safe Zone
  • 0° (SD 3°)
  • Best survival

30 years old

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Alignment: Hitting the Target

iASSIST™ Surgical Expertise Conventional Instruments

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Mechanical vs Anatomic Alignment

  • Impact of human error in bone resection
  • Computer navigation outliers
  • 9% tibiofemoral alignment
  • 4.9% femoral components
  • 4% tibial components
  • Compromises
  • Aiming for a “slight degree of varus” requires acceptance of 3° of

intended varus in addition to potential error of 3° - 4° of varus, resulting in unacceptable alignment. Mason, et al: J Arthroplasty 22, 2007 Abdel, et al: JBJS 96B, 2014 Lombardi, Ortho 34, 2011

slide-27
SLIDE 27

“…until additional data can be generated to more accurately determine the ideal post-operative limb alignment in individual patients, a neutral mechanical axis remains a reasonable target and should be considered as the standard for comparison if other alignment targets are introduced…”

Parratte, et al: JBJS 92A, 2010

slide-28
SLIDE 28

TWO FINAL COMMENTS

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Mechanical Alignment

  • Most Recent Supporting Information
  • Tibial component varus increased implant migration with lateral

liftoff

  • RSA analysis of cemented PS TKA at minimum of 10 years
  • In vivo RSA measurement showed greater wear with varus aligned

limbs

  • Despite polyethylene material, retrieval study showed more medial

wear

  • Mechanical alignment still the target
  • 20 year survival and function
  • Alternate alignment strategies must prove safety and efficacy

MacDonald, et al: The Knee Society Members Meeting, Sept 2017 Naudie: The Knee Society Members Meeting, Sept 2017 Wright, et al: The Knee Society Members Meeting, Sept 2017 Abdel, et al: The Knee Society Members Meeting, Sept 2017

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Mechanical Alignment

Revision TKA

slide-31
SLIDE 31

“THOU SHALL NOT VARUS”

slide-32
SLIDE 32