1 KEK理論センター研究会「ハドロン・原子核の最前線2017」 2017年11月20-22日,KEK, つくば市
原田 融
Toru Harada
大阪電気通信大学/KEK理論センターJ-PARC分室
Osaka E.-C. Univ./KEK Theory Center, J-PARC Branch
Toru Harada /KEK - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
KEK 2017 2017 11 20-22 , Toru Harada /KEK J-PARC
1 KEK理論センター研究会「ハドロン・原子核の最前線2017」 2017年11月20-22日,KEK, つくば市
Toru Harada
Osaka E.-C. Univ./KEK Theory Center, J-PARC Branch
2
3
4
5
+30MeV
0(N)
0( )
0( )
0( )
Re. Re. Im. Im. Re. Re.
𝑽𝟏~−30 MeV 𝑽𝑴𝑻~ 2 MeV LLN 3BF ? S mixing Prob.? Strong repulsive, Spin-isospin dep. 𝑽𝟏~+30 MeV 𝑽𝑴𝑻 ?, S width ? 𝑽𝟏~ (−14)(0)MeV ? X width ? LL-XN mixing ? H-particle ? 𝑽𝟏~−51 MeV 𝑽𝑴𝑻~ 22 MeV
6
[F. Weber, PPNP 54(2005)193]
Cassiopeia A nebula NASA/CXC/SAO.
[R. Knorren, M. Prakash, P.J.Ellis, PRC52(1995)3470]
( , , )
iY iY iN
x g g i Coupling constant ratio;
U U
S X
U U
S X
U U
S X
L,S,X,.. K-, ..
(NS:2.01M☉+WD: 0.172M☉) (NS:1.97M☉+WD: 0.50M☉)
シャピロ遅延 (Shapiro delay)
→ Collapse of massive NS !?
With hyperons
8
3B/4B repulsion NNN+YNN 3B/4B repulsion NNN only
ESC MPa w/o hyp
Haidenbauer, et al.
A53(2017) 121. RMF w/multibody coupling Ohnishi, et al., SCHDM2017
NSC97f Julich04 NLO NLO+3BF
9
11
NHC-D/FNSC89NSC97e,fESC04a-d ESC06ESC08a-c [Th.A. Rijken, M. M. Nagels,Y. Yamamoto, PTPS185(2010)14
[I. Arisaka et al., PTP104(2000)995]
RGM-FFSSfss2 [Y. Fujiwara et al, PRC54(1996) 2180; PPNP58 (2007)439]
[H.Polinder, et al., NPA779 (2006) 244;PLB653 (2007) 29] [J.Haidenbauer, et.al., NPA 915(2013)24]
[H. Nemura, et al., PLB 673 (2009) 136; T. Inoue, et al., PTP124 (2010) 591; PRL106 (2011) 162002]
C.B. Dover and H. Feshbach, Ann. Phys. 198(1990)321 NN: 4233 data ( 0<Tlab<350 MeV)
s a
S= 0 S= -1 S= -2 S= -3 S= -4
1S0 3S1
LL
13
Spin-flavor SU(6) symmetry
symmetric antisymmetric L=0 Pauli forbidden state
S = 0 state
[51] [33]
1 LL-XN-SS(I0), H-dibaryon 8S 1 SN(I=1/2,1S0) Pauli forbidden 27 4/9 5/9 NN(1S0) S = 1 state
[51] [33]
8A 5/9 4/9 10 8/9 1/9 SN(I=3/2,3S1) almost Pauli forbidden 10* 4/9 5/9 NN(3S1), LN-SN(I=1/2, 3S1)
Quark Cluster Model
Quark-exchange
(anti-symmetrized)
M.Oka,K.Shimizu,K.Yazaki, PLB130(1983)365; NPA464(1987)700
14
Bound state Cusp state ND NF
NSC97f NSC89
K-d→p-Lp
S+n S(1385)
R.H.Dalitz, Deloff, Czech.J.Phys.B32(1982)1021 T.H.Tan, PRL23(1969)395. O.Braun et al., NPB124(1977)45. D.Eastwood et al.,PRD3(1971)2603.
d(p+, K+)
16
[27] [8s] [1] [10*] [10] [8a]
1S0 3S1-3D1
a s
[8] [8] [27] [8 ] [ [10*] [10 1 ] [ ] ] 8
17
19
20
30.05 MeV UL
0.6 fm a 1.165fm r
2 4 6 8 10 –30 –20 –10
Pb
Λ
208
POTENTIAL (MeV) r (fm)
Woods-Saxon form
0 /(1 exp[(
)/ ]) U U r R a
L L
- +
0(
1) fm R r A
Rev.Mod.Phys. 88 (2016) 035004.
30 MeV
2 3
N
U
( , ) , | ( ) | ,
N
F N N N N
U k g
L L L L L L
+
k
k k k k
L single-particle potential depth ( ) ( )
N YN YN YN YN
Q g v v g QTQ +
Pauli-operator
Effects of the LN-SN coupling in nuclear matter
Y.Nogami, E.Satoh, NPB19(1970)93
as= -1.8fm, at= -1.6fm
(unit in MeV)
Exp. ~-28
LNN NN three-bod body force
, , N N N N N N
Q v v e
L S L S S
LN single channel LN-SN coupled channel
repulsive suppressed
L
N
+
L N N L N
=
Spin-isospin saturated
Overbinding!
L N
L N
+ +
L N S N
L N S
=
Spin-isospin saturated
N‘
1
1.35fm
F
k
kF N N’
21
1
1.35fm
F
k
Th.A.Rijken, V.G.J.Stoks, Y.Yamamoto, PRC59(1999)21; Th.A.Rijken, Y.Yamamoto, PRC73(2006) 044008; Y.Yamamoto, T.Motoba, T.A.Rijken, PTP.Suppl.185(2010)72.
( , )
F
U k
L L
OBEP: Nijmegen YN potential Models
G-matrix calc.
22
Scattering length
as at
Bando- Yamamoto 1985
(unit in MeV)
Exp.
NHC-D
NHC-F
NSC89
1S0 3S1- 3D1
+0.4
Yamamoto et al. 1999 NSC97e
NSC97f
+4.5
+6.9
Rijken- Yamamoto 2009 NSC04a
NSC08a NSC08b
Rijken- Yamamoto 2006
+0.9
NSC08c
Nagels- Rijken- Yamamoto 2016
LY
23
PRC64(2001)044302
G-matrix folding model
PTPS185(2010)72
PTPS185(2010)197
[O. Hashimoto, T. Tamura, PPNP57(2006)564]
SM analysis
30 MeV V L
) A
WS analysis
0.6 fm a
(Exp.) 1.7 MeV 2 MeV
LS
V L
0.2 MeV
LS
V L
( ) A
37.2 MeV V L
24
Microscopic Shell-Model including LN-SN coupling effects
NPA853(2010)3
693 (72) 494 (74) 44 (-8) 267 (56) 504 (61) 153 (61) 92 (42) 507 (65) 23 (-33) 248 (92) xxx (xx)
E(calc) keV E(LS) keV (Millener)
Spin-dependence of the effective LN interaction
[R.H.Dalitz, A.Gal, AnnPhys.116(1978)167]
A = 7,9 A > 9 [D.J.Millener,NPA835(2010)11]
4 LHe, 10 LB, 11 LB, 19 LF
E13@J-PARC
25
Tretyakova, Lanskoy, EPJ.A5(1999) 391.
M.T. Win, K.Hagino et al, PRC83 (2011) 014301 19 L C, 29 L Si, 25 L Mg, (CSHF+BCS) unbound
L
L
6 L He
(a+N+L calc)
21 LNe, 25 L Mg (AMD)
g.s.
26
145-155 L Sm [MR-CDFT+RMF+BCS]
46 LSc, 48 L Sc [AMD+GCM]
27
MPP = multi-Pomeron exchange potential (repulsive) TBA = phenomenological three-body attraction
Full GCM Spherical GCM
Y
K
Incident particle Target Nucleon
Emitting particle
28
E.H. Auerbach et al., Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 148 (1983) 381; C.B. Dover et al.,PRC22 (1980) 2073.
29
(K-,p-)
720 MeV/c
(p+,K+)
1040 MeV/c
qL~280MeV/c qL~400MeV/c qL ~60-100MeV/c
1 max
[ ]
N J J
j j
L 1
[( ) ( ) ]
N J
n j n j
“Spin-Stretched’’ “Substitutional”
H.Bando, T.Motoba, J.Zofka, Int.J.Mod.Phys. A5(1990)4021
(K-,p-)
Stooped K-
p+ K+
neutron Lambda
1s 1p 1d 2s 1f d f7/2
3/2 n
L
by R.Hausmann and W.Weise
(p+,K+) reaction
Theoretical calculations
56Fe target
Momentum transfer
30
Morimatsu, Yazaki, NPA483 (1988) 493.
Completeness relation
bound states, quasibound states Continuum states, resonance states
Double-differential Lab Cross Sections Strength functions
Green’s function
31
ImE ReE
Sheet I Sheet II Bound state Anti-bound state Decay resonance Capture resonance
2 2 2
1 2 2
R I R I
k k ik k m
(pole) 2
( ) 2 2 k E B i m -
Rek
Bound state Anti-bound ( virtual state) Decay resonance Capture resonance state
complex k
[+] top (Im k >0) [-] bottom (Im k < 0) Complex momentum Complex energy
32
12C
Harada, Hirabayashi, NPA744 (2004) 323.
Sensitivity of the spectrum to the L–nucleus potential parameters
−40 MeV r0 =1.155 fm
r0 = 1.155 fm U0=−29.39 MeV
−20 MeV U0=−29.39 MeV 1.10 fm 1.27 fm
33
The Underbinding Problem
3H L 4He L 5He L
[Exp.]
1+ -1.24 MeV 0+ -2.39 MeV 0.0 0+ 1+
Akaishi et al., PRL 84 (2000) 3539. g-matrix calc. with LN-SN(D2)
Underbound
The Overbinding Problem
Dalitz et al., NP B47 (1972) 109.
3H L 4He L 5He L
[Exp.]
1+ -1.24 MeV 0+ -2.39 MeV 0.0 Overbound spin-spin
N
( ) L
LN single-channel calc.
suppressed
ΛN,ΣN ΣN,ΛN
Q V V e
by Y. Akaishi
“The 0+-1+ difference is not a measure of LN spin-spin interaction.” by B.F. Gibson
L p p n
S
L p p n
S
L p p n
S
+ +
LNN three-body force
4He L
PRL84(2000)3539
Coherent coupling
1+
1+
0+
0+
D2
coh.Σ
9% 1. P
1+
1+
0+
0+
SC97e(S)
coh.Σ
7% 0. P 1+
1+
0+
0+
SC97f(S)
coh.Σ
9% 0. P
1+
1+
0+
0+
SC89(S)
coh.Σ
0% 2. P
Coherent coupling Coherent coupling Coherent coupling
Breuckner-Hartree-Fock
NPA684(2001)586c
(unit in MeV)
0.0
1+
0+
Exp.
1+
0+
VMC
4
( H)
L
6.20 V 0.38 0.86 spin-spin
LNN force
ΛN ΛNN
V +V phenomenological
37
YN: NSC97e-f(e) 𝑄
𝛵 0+ ≅ 2 %
𝑄
𝛵 1+ ≅ 1 %
S mixing prob.
38
YN: NSC97e-f(e) LNN TBF
39
Nogga, Kamada, Glockle, PRL88(2002)172501
LH, 4 LH(0+), 4 LH(1+) hypernuclei 3 LH 4 LH
40
5He with full realistic interactions
H.Nemura et al., PRL89(2002)142504
Better understanding of the L-S coupling and Tensor force
C
T L 1
C
T S
a
*
a
~ 1.5 % admixture
“Incoherent L-S coupling”
~1.5 % appears in 5
LHe.
a rigid core. The incoherent S admixture is also important.
Hyperon-mixing
~72 MeV
NS NL
~28 MeV
LS LL SS NX
~300 MeV
N NN
41
N N N N L N S L L N X Nuclei
Fujita-Miyazawa 3BF
Hypernuclei
Strong LNN 3BF ?
XN-LL coupling LN-SN coupling
~1-2 % very large ?
KEK-PS-E521
9Li+L 9Li+L
2.5 MeV FWHM
g.s. g.s.
L
d d
~1/1000 17.5±0.6 mb/sr
(1.2 GeV/c)
12 12
C( , ) C K p
+ + L
L
d d
5.8±2.2 nb/sr
10 10
+ L
42
11.3±1.9 nb/sr
0 p
+
+
+
K+
p p p L n
p-
p n L
K0
K p K n
+
p K p
L K+
p p p p S- L n
p-
n L
Doorway
p K p
S
43
via S- doorways caused by LN-SN coupling Hyperon-mixing
11 MeV
X
U
is fixed. PS-=0.57%
Spreading potential dep.
9Li+L
44
Two-step mechanism Harada, Umeya,Hirabayashi, PRC79(2009)014603
10B
UX =
45
ΛH hypernucleus
0+ 0+ 0+
5802.87 MeV
Gal, Millener, PLB725(2013)445
Dalitz, Levi Setti, Nuovo Cimento 30(1963)498 Khin Swe Myint, Akaishi, PTP Suppl.146(2002)599
BHF + Coherent L-S coupling SM SM+L-S coupling t+n+n+L 4-body calc. FINUDA Exp.
6 ΛH Agnello et al., PRL108(2012)042501
6 ΛH
6 6
(252MeV/c)
Li H
Stop
K p
L
+ +
6 6
(130MeV/c)
H He p -
L
+ LN-SN mixing
1.4 MeV
L glue effects
4.4 MeV
46 H.Sugimura et al.,(J-PARC E10 Collaboration) PLB 724 (2014)39.
ΛH hypernucleus by 6Li(p-, K+) reactions
Green’s function method
47
0,0 0,1 0, 1,0 1,1 ,0 ,
N N N N
U U U U U U U
( ) ( )
f f f f
1
(0) (0) (0) (0)
ˆ ( )
N
f
G G E G
L L L
G
for example, 2 x 2
48
LH production in the 6Li(p-,K+) reaction
SN LN couplings
s1/2 p3/2 p1/2
L p n
5H(g.s.)
s1/2 p3/2 p1/2
S- p n
5He*
s1/2 p3/2 p1/2
S- p n
5He(g.s.)
6 LH(1+ exc.)
S- doorways
6 LH(0+ g.s.) forbidden
p-p K+S- reactions
s1/2 p3/2 p1/2
p n
p- K+
6Li(1+ g.s.)
Non-spinflip Δ𝑇 = 0 dominant
…..
49
BL 3.10 MeV PS= 1.54 % BL 2.33 MeV PS= 0.79 % BL 1.84 MeV PS= 0.32 % BL 1.58 MeV PS= 0.07 %
6 LH(1+)
Data: H.Sugimura et al.,(J-PARC E10 Collaboration) PLB 724 (2014)39.
50
The shape and magnitude of the spectrum are sensitive to the strengths of (VS, WS).
WS potential
3.0 MeV FWHM
VS dependence
WS= -26 MeV is fixed VS= +30 MeV is fixed
WS dependence
The c2-value distribution in VΣ, WΣ
c2/N = 1.28 with fs (N=66) Data: R. Honda, et al., (J-PARC E10 Collaboration), PRC96 (2017) 014005
Yamamoto, et al., PRL. 115 (2015) 222501.
52
Yamamoto, et al., PRL. 115 (2015) 222501.
2.12±0.10
53
R.H. Dalitz, F. Von Hippel, Phys. Lett. 10 (1964) 153.
54
A.Gal, PLB 744 (2015) 352.
55
Ab initio no-core shell model (NCSM) calculations Bonn-Jülich LO chiral EFT hyperon-nucleon potentials plus a CSB Λ-Σ0 mixing vertex
Since 1969, ANL
37.8 MeV p p - L + + 41.1 MeV n p L + +
(64.2%) (35.8%)
(free) 10
/ 2.63 10 s
L
57
LH hypernucleus in Heavy-Ion Collisions 3 LH “puzzle”
ALICE Collaboration, PLB754(2006)360 STAR Collaboration, Science 328(2010)50
3 LH
181 ps
BL(3
LH) = 0.13 MeV
XH
7 XH5 LLH+2n; Decay pion spectroscopy
NAGARA
10 *
Be
LL
DEMACHI- YANAGI
11 12
Be or Be
LL LL
HIDA
“weak attractive”
1
( ) ( ) 2 ( )
A A A
B Z B Z B Z
LL LL LL L L
2M B M
L LL
H-dibaryon
Jaffe, PRL38(1977)195
LL bound energy
6He LL
12 6 4
C He He t
+X + +
5He
p p
+ +
H.Takahashi et al.,PRL87(2001)212502 K.Nakazawa , NPA 835 (2010)207 K.Nakazawa , H.Takahashi,NPA 835 (2010)207
4.7 1.01 0.67
6
( He) BLL
LL
Prowse, 1966 Nagara,2001 X mass update
Hiyama et al.
PRL104(2010)212502
CM[MeV]
BLL (6.91) 11.88 18.23 14.74 (g.s.)
60
SM[MeV]
BLL (6.91) 18.40 20.27 23.21 14.97 (g.s.)
Gal-Millener,
PLB701(2011)342
61
#13-11-14
4 LH 9 LBe*
#10-9-6
4 LH 9 LBe
Aoki, et al., NPA 828 (2009) 191–232
𝚶− + 𝟐𝟑𝐃 → 𝚳
𝟓𝐈 + 𝚳 𝟘𝐂𝐟
𝚶− + 𝟐𝟑𝐃 → 𝚳
𝟓𝐈 + 𝚳 𝟘𝐂𝐟
∗
2p 0.82 MeV
・・・・ 理論的予想
a
VNN
d a L
VLN
d a L L
VLL NAGARA event High resolution g spectroscopy
10 *
Be
LL
Demachi-Yanagi event
12.28 12.33(exp.)
6He LL
determined from YNG kF=0.84fm-1
OCM+LN potential+LL potential
YNG NF HN, KKNN
62
Danysz et al.
11Be
n a a
LL
+ + + L+ L
OCM + 3BF + LN pot. + LL pot.
YNG NF HN, KKNN Pheno. Gaussian
6He
a
LL
L L + +
10Be
a a
LL
L L + + +
exp. + ΛΛ gs
(0 ) 6.91 MeV B
exp. ΛΛ 1
(2 ) 11.88 MeV B
+
The subsystems are reproduced:
0.9 MeV
bond
vLL 0.5 MeV
LL bound energy
63
64
65
S=-2 dibaryon (uuddss) “H” 2 σ bump at EΛΛ ~ 15 MeV
C.J.Yoon et al., (KEK-E522),PRC75(2007)022201(R)
correlation
fm-1, reff > 3 fm.
Data: N.Shah, et al. (STAR Collab.)
P42@J-PARC
Search for H-Dibaryon with a Large Acceptance Hyperon Spectrometer (J.K. Ahn, K. Imai)
NHC-D NSC97f NSC97e NSC89 NSC03 NHC-F 66
PRL94(2005)202502
Ab initio calculations by SVM
X-LL coupled-channel calculations aXN-aLL coupled-channel calculations LL-XN s-wave: P(X) < 1 % 1sL
2: P(X) < 1 %, 1sL1pL: P(X) ~10 %
1.01 0.67
6
( He) BLL
LL
Nagara,2001 X mass update
2keV?
Hyperon-mixing
~72 MeV
NS NL
~28 MeV
LS LL SS NX
~300 MeV
N NN
67
N N N N L N S L L N X Nuclei
Fujita-Miyazawa 3BF
Hypernuclei
Strong LNN 3BF ?
XN-LL coupling LN-SN coupling
~1-2 % very large ?
68
(1959) (1969) (1979) (1968) (1968) (1968) (1968)
Woods-Saxon potential: Binding energies (exp.)
attractive potential for X- !? Dover, Gal, Ann. Phys. 146 (1983) 348.
[C.B. Dover, A.Gal, Ann. Phys. 146 (1989) 309.]
X-hypernuclei via (K-,K+) reactions
28Si
24 4 MeV for 1.1 fm V r
X -
BNL-E885
( 1 MeV) WX
DWIA analysis of 12C(K-,K+) data at 1.8GeV/c
Tadokoro et al.,PRC51(1995)2656
16 MeV VX
VX
T.Iijima et al.,NPA546(1992)588.
Semi-Classical Distorted Wave Model Analysis
20, 10, 0, 10, 20MeV VX -
+
12C 12C
70
G-matrix+local density approximation
12C 12C 90Zr 90Zr
71 T.Motoba, S.Sugimoto, NPA835(2010)223.
( , )
F
U k
X X
1
1.35 fm
F
k
G-matrix calc. Yamamoto 2006 Yamamoto et al. 2006
(unit in MeV)
+20 +10 +40 +30 Rijken-Yamamoto 2009
ESC04d
+6.4
+6.4
+6.3
+7.2 ESC04d*
+6.0
+8.5 ESC08a
+5.6
+8.4 ESC08a*
+2.4 +1.9 +9.1 ESC08b
NHC-D
1,1S0
+0.7
1, 3S1- 3D1 3,1S0 3, 3S1- 3D1
Ehime
15N+X-
14 MeV
3 MeV W E
X
VX -
Woods-Saxon 1.1 fm, 0.6 fm r a
1.5MeV FWHM
16O
72
ds/d[15N(1/2-)⊗sX ](1-) = 6 nb/sr, ds/d [15N(1/2-)⊗pX](2+) = 9 nb/sr for VX=-14 MeV.
73
Doorway
One-step mechanism Two-step mechanism K p p
L
0p
K p
+
L K p K
X p
LL
XN-LL coupling
[T. Harada, Y. Hirabayashi, A. Umeya, PLB690(2010)363]
15N+X-
X- LL Hyperon-mixing
16O
w/o XN-LL coupling with XN-LL coupling
7 nb/sr (5.2 %) 12 nb/sr (8.8 %)
16O
1.5MeV FWHM 14 MeV VX -
74
The large momentum transfer qΞ− ≃ 400 MeV/c leads to the spin-stretched Ξ− doorways states followed by [15N(1/2−, 3/2−) ⊗ sΞ−]1− → [14C(0+, 2+) ⊗ sΛpΛ]1−
75
Motoba, Sugimoto, NPA
Core-excitation
NHCD
NHCD Ehime ESC04d ESC08c
76
Isospin dependence
77
5 LHe 10 LBe
KISO Nakazawa, et al., PTEP,2015, 033D02
78
Nakazawa, et al., PTEP,2015, 033D02
X- 2p absorption Scenario?
79
Nagae, et al., PoS(INPC2016)038
12 XBe
80
DD tρ NHC-D Ehime ESC08c ESC04d
DD tρ NHC-D Ehime ESC08c ESC04d
81
LH hypernucleus in Heavy-Ion Collisions
LH bound state in 6Li(p-,K+) reactions
82
Keywords Hyperon mixing + Coupled-channels
83
from http://j-parc.jp/ J-PARC (Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex)
84