Theories of Fission Topical Program: FRIB and the GW170817 Kilonova - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

theories of fission
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Theories of Fission Topical Program: FRIB and the GW170817 Kilonova - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Theories of Fission Topical Program: FRIB and the GW170817 Kilonova July, 19 th 2018 Nicolas Schunck LLNL-PRES-737743 LLNL-PRES-XXXXXX This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National


slide-1
SLIDE 1

LLNL-PRES-XXXXXX

This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC

Theories of Fission

Topical Program: FRIB and the GW170817 Kilonova Nicolas Schunck

July, 19th 2018

LLNL-PRES-737743

slide-2
SLIDE 2

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

2

Characteristjcs of Fission

Multj-scale Quantum Dynamical Process

LLNL-PRES-737743

Entrance channel

slide-3
SLIDE 3

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

3

Outline

  • Introductjon
  • Statjc Nuclear Propertjes

Macroscopic-Microscopic Approach

Nuclear Density Functjonal Theory

  • Fission Dynamics

Classical Dynamics (Stochastjc Langevin Equatjons)

Quantum Dynamics (“Collectjve”)

Quantum Dynamics (“Non-collectjve”)

  • Fission Spectrum
  • Concluding Remarks

LLNL-PRES-737743

slide-4
SLIDE 4

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

4

Macroscopic-microscopic Models (1/4)

A phenomenological approach to nuclear structure

  • Start with deformed liquid

drop(let)

  • Take into account nucleon

degrees of freedom

Shell correctjon coming from the distributjon of single-partjcle levels

Pairing correctjon to mock up efgects of residual interactjons

  • Extensions to fjnite

angular momentum or temperature

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • M. Bolsterli, E. O. Fiset, J. R. Nix, and J. L. Norton,

PRC 5, 1050 (1972); M. Brack, J. Damgaard, A. S. Jensen, H. C. Pauli, V. M. Strutinsky, and C. Y. Wong, RMP 44, 320 (1972); J. Dudek, B. Herskind, W. Nazarewicz, Z. Zymanski, T.R. Werner, PRC 38 940 (1988)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

5

Macroscopic-microscopic Models (2/4)

The total binding energy is a sum of several components

  • Total energy is writuen
  • Macroscopic liquid drop energy
  • Shell correctjon
  • Pairing correctjon
  • Shell and pairing correctjons require a set of single-partjcle energies

en: need to solve the Schrödinger equatjon

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • J. Dudek, T. Werner, ADNDT 50, 179 (1992)J. Dudek, T. Werner, ADNDT 59, 1 (1995); N. Schunck, J. Dudek, B. Herskind, PRC 75 054304 (2007);
  • P. Möller, A. Sierk, T. Ichigawa, H. sagawa, ADNDT 109, 1 (2012)
slide-6
SLIDE 6

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

6

Macroscopic-microscopic Models (3/4)

Deformatjons are collectjve d.o.f, single partjcles intrinsic d.o.f

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • (One-body) Schrödinger equatjon
  • Nuclear mean-fjeld potentjal can be

Nilsson, Woods-Saxon, Folded-Yukawa, etc.

  • Solve BCS equatjon to compute occupatjon
  • f s.p. states and extract pairing energy
  • How does that apply to fjssion?

Deformatjon of the nuclear shape drive the fjssion process (=collectjve variables)

Compute energy for difgerent deformatjons → potentjal energy surfaces

slide-7
SLIDE 7

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

7

Macroscopic-microscopic Models (4/4)

Examples

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • P. Möller, et al, ADNDT 109, 1 (2012)
  • M. Kowal, et al, PRC 82, 014303 (2010)
  • Global theory: many propertjes of all nuclei in the nuclear chart
  • Fast: many calculatjons need only a laptop
  • Inconsistent framework

Each theoretjcal piece (macro, micro, pairing, RPA, etc.) is treated independently of the others

Predictjve power has not really changed since the 1970ies

slide-8
SLIDE 8

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

8

Nuclear Density Functjonal Theory (1/3)

DFT is a remapping of the quantum many-body problem

  • Quantum mechanics rules: Start

with best estjmate of a realistjc nuclear Hamiltonian

  • Replace the exact wave functjon by

a simpler form, the reference state: a product state

  • Replace exact Hamiltonian with

efgectjve one such that

  • Energy is a functjonal of density of

partjcles and pairing tensor

  • Spontaneous symmetry breaking

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, PR 136, B864 (1964); W.

Kohn and L. J. Sham, PR 140, A1133 (1965); J. Engel, PRC 75, 014306 (2007); M Bender, P.H. Heenen, P.-G. Reinhard, RMP 75, 121 (2003); J. Messud, M. Bender, and E. Suraud, PRC 80, 054314 (2009).

slide-9
SLIDE 9

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

9

Nuclear Density Functjonal Theory (2/3)

The densitjes contain all degrees of freedom of the system

  • Form of the energy functjonal chosen by physicists, ofuen guided by

characteristjcs of nuclear forces (central force, spin-orbit, tensor, etc.): Skyrme, Gogny, etc.

  • Variatjonal principle: determine the actual densitjes of the nucleus

by requiring the energy is minimal with respect to their variatjons

Resultjng equatjon is called HFB equatjon (Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov)

Solving the equatjon gives densitjes and characteristjcs of the reference state

  • Any observable can be computed when we know the density
  • One can compute potentjal energy surfaces by solving the HFB

equatjon with constraints on the value of the collectjve variables

LLNL-PRES-737743

slide-10
SLIDE 10

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

10

Nuclear Density Functjonal Theory (3/3)

Examples

LLNL-PRES-737743

Quadrupole deformation β20 Octupole deformation β30

β-decay half-lives

  • J. Zhao, et al, PRC 91, 024321 (2015)
  • S. Goriely, R. Capote, PRC 89, 054318 (2014)
  • M. Mustonen, J. Engel, PRC 93, 014304 (2016)
  • Global theory: many propertjes of all nuclei in the nuclear chart
  • Consistent framework: a single energy functjonal and quantum

many-body methods

  • Computatjonally expensive

Mass-table-scale calculatjons require supercomputers

Computjng potentjal energy surfaces is an art

slide-11
SLIDE 11

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

11

Fission Observables

Statjc approaches can be used to compute some fjssion observables

  • Fission barriers inputs to compute fjssion cross-sectjons (=rates)
  • Reductjon multj-dimensional → 1-dimensional (arbitrary)
  • Assume parabolic shape (not justjfjed)
  • Neglect collectjve inertja
  • Statjstjcal theory gives (rather poor) estjmates of primary fjssion

yields

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • S. Goriely, et al, PRL 111, 242502 (2013)
  • M. Chadwick, et al, Nucl. Data Sheets 112, 2887

(2011)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

12

Classical Dynamics (1/3)

Fission is a stochastjc difgusion process in the collectjve space

  • How to extract fjssion product yields from the knowledge of the po-

tentjal energy surface?

Analogy with classical theory of difgusion

Collectjve variable = generalized coordinate

Defjne related momentum

  • Langevin equatjons

Frictjon tensor Random force Fluctuatjon-dissipatjon theorem

LLNL-PRES-737743

slide-13
SLIDE 13

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

13

Classical Dynamics (2/3)

Practjcal examples

  • Start beyond the saddle point (or close enough)
  • Build trajectories through the collectjve space by generatjng at

each step the needed random variable

  • Enough trajectories (in the thousands) allow reconstructjng FPY

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • P. Nadtochy and G. Adeev, PRC 72, 054608 (2005); P. N. Nadtochy, A. Kelić, and K.-H. Schmidt, PRC 75, 064614 (2007); J. Randrup and P. Möller, PRL

106, 132503 (2011); J. Randrup, P. Möller, and A. J. Sierk, PRC 84, 034613 (2011); P. Möller, J. Randrup, and A. J. Sierk, PRC 85, 024306 (2012); J. Randrup and P. Möller, PRC 88, 064606 (2013); J. Sadhukhan, W. Nazarewicz and N. Schunck, PRC 93, 011304 (2016), J. Sadhukhan, W. Nazarewicz and

  • N. Schunck, PRC 96, 061361 (2017).
slide-14
SLIDE 14

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

14

Classical Dynamics (3/3)

Langevin classical dynamics is ideal tool for spontaneous fjssion

  • SF mass distributjons can be obtained by combining quantum tunneling tech-

niques (half-lives) and classical dynamics

Collectjve inertja plays critjcal role in determining tunneling probability (=τSF)

Evolutjon from saddle to scission done with Langevin dynamics (=classical_ with microscopic inputs (energy, inertja)

Dissipatjon tensor stjll cause of signifjcant uncertainty

  • J. Sadhukhan, W. Nazarewicz and N. Schunck, Phys. Rev. C 93, 011304 (2016); J. Sadhukhan, W. Nazarewicz, C. Zhang and N. Schunck, Phys. Rev. C

(R) 96, 061301 (2017)

LLNL-PRES-746697

slide-15
SLIDE 15

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

15

  • Ansatz for the tjme-dependent many-body wave functjon
  • Minimizatjon of the tjme-dependent quantum mechanical actjon +

ansatz + Gaussian overlap approximatjon + some patjence

  • Interpretatjon

– is probability amplitude to be at point q at tjme t – Related probability current – Flux of probability current through scission line gives yields

Quantum Dynamics - TDGCM (1/3)

Computjng the fmow of probability in the collectjve space

LLNL-PRES-737743

J.-F. Berger, M. Girod, D. Gogny, CPC 63, 365 (1991); H. Goutte, J.-F. Berger, P. Casoli, D. Gogny, PRC 71 024316 (2005); D. Regnier, N. Dubray, N. Schunck, and M. Verrière, PRC 93, 054611 (2016); D. Regnier, M. Verriere, N. Dubray, and N. Schunck, CPC 200, 350 (2016)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

16

Quantum Dynamics - TDGCM (2/3)

Example: TDGCM Evolutjon

LLNL-PRES-737743

slide-17
SLIDE 17

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

17

Quantum Dynamics – TDGCM (3/3)

Examples: Fission Product Yield Calculatjons

LLNL-PRES-737743

slide-18
SLIDE 18

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

18

Quantum Dynamics – TDDFT (1/3)

TDDFT simulates a single fjssion even in real tjme

  • Main limitatjon of Langevin and TDGCM: adiabatjcity is built-in

Need to precompute potentjal energy surfaces (costly)

Invoke arbitrary criteria for scission

Phenomenological models of dissipatjon = exchange between intrinsic (=single-partjcle) and collectjve degrees of freedom

  • Solutjon: Generalize DFT to tjme-dependent processes

No adiabatjcity: excited fragments, dynamical excitatjons at scission, clear defjnitjon of TKE, etc.

Enormous computatjonal cost

  • Scope

Best for fjssion fragment propertjes (E*, TKE, angular momentum)

Needs extensions for FPY to include dissipatjon mechanisms

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • C. Simenel, PRL 105 192701 (2010); C. Simenel, A. Umar, PRC(R) 89 031601 (2014); C. Scamps, C. Simenel, D. Lacroix, PRC 92 011602 (2015);
  • A. Bulgac, P. Magierksi, K. Roche, I. Stetcu, PRL 116 122504 (2016); Y. Tanimura, D. Lacroix, S. Ayik, PRL 118 152501 (2017)
slide-19
SLIDE 19

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

19

Quantum Dynamics – TDDFT (2/3)

Examples

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • A. Bulgac, P. Magierksi, K. Roche, I. Stetcu,

PRL 116 122504 (2016)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

20

Quantum Dynamics – TDDFT (3/3)

Early results in 240Pu show we can estjmate energy sharing

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • Total energy conserved in TDDFT

⇒ Total kinetjc energy can be computed explicitly

  • Total energy of fragment give

their excitatjon energy ⇒ TDDFT gives prescriptjon to determine sharing of excitatjon energy at scission

slide-21
SLIDE 21

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

21

Fission Spectrum

Computjng neutrons and gammas from fragment deexcitatjon

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • Fission spectrum models rely on

inputs such as FPY (primary), TKE, excitatjon energy of fragments, level densitjes, etc.

  • Most codes (CGMF, FREYA) tuned to

specifjc isotopes

  • R. Vogt, et al. PRC 85 024608 (2012)
  • B. Becker, et al. PRC 87 014617 (2013)

Figure courtesy of E. Ormand

slide-22
SLIDE 22

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

22

Conclusions

Fission models are predictjve but expensive to use

  • Two main approaches to compute global nuclear propertjes

Macroscopic-microscopic approaches

Nuclear density functjonal theory

  • Realistjc simulatjons of fjssion dynamics can predict

Spontaneous fjssion half-lives

Primary (independent) fjssion yields

Fission spectra

  • Three major challenges

Interfacing all these models and scale up to mass-table types of calculatjons

Understanding and modeling uncertaintjes

Maintaining and expanding in-house know-how: a workforce issue

LLNL-PRES-737743

slide-23
SLIDE 23

LLNL-PRES-xxxxxx

23

The FIRE Topical Collaboratjon

Bringing together experts in fjssion theory, nuclear data and nuclear astrophysics

LLNL-PRES-737743

  • Project team

LLNL: N.Schunck (PI), R. Vogt

LANL: T. Kawano, P. Talou, A. Hayes

BNL: A. Sonzogni, L. McCutchan

Notre Dame: R. Surman

North Carolina State: G. McLaughlin

  • Additjonal partjcipants

1 postdoc at LANL

1 postdoc at Notre Dame

1 graduate student at NCSU

1 summer student at LLNL

  • Jointly funded by DOE/NP, DOE/USNDP

and NA221 (Non-proliferatjon)

slide-24
SLIDE 24