The Village of Alsips 2015 Property Tax Year Levy Presentation T - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the village of alsip s 2015 property tax year levy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Village of Alsips 2015 Property Tax Year Levy Presentation T - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Village of Alsips 2015 Property Tax Year Levy Presentation T opics The Villages Total Equalized Assessed Value (EAV) Where Property Taxes Go Across All Taxing Bodies Key FY15 Audit Results FY16 Budget Highlights Bond


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Village of Alsip’s 2015 Property Tax Year Levy

 The

Village’s Total Equalized Assessed Value (EAV)

 Where Property Taxes Go Across All Taxing Bodies  Key FY15 Audit Results  FY16 Budget Highlights  Bond and Interest Levy  FY15 Actuary Results for the Police and Fire Pension Funds  Where Property Taxes Have Gone And Will Go (Within

Village)

 The Board Determined 5.00% Increase In The

Village’s Tax Levy

Presentation T

  • pics
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Equalized Assessed Valuation

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

$802,041,333 $749,936,394 $722,163,750 $598,824,867 $548,725,983 $510,949,666 $491,782,726

Since tax year 2008, the Village’s total EAV dropped 38.7% Since the tax rate varies inversely with the EAV, and because the Village levies by dollar amounts, the EAV usually does not influence the amount of property tax receipt brought into the

  • Village. The exception is in TIF districts. Because of this large drop in EAV, all

but the old TIF #1 (123rd St. to 127th St.) have brought in little or no monies for in recent years for potential economic development. Residential 38.0%; Commercial 18.1%; Industrial 43.8%; Other 0.1%

Per 2013 Debt Disclosure based on 2012 EAV per Cook County

Tax Year 2014: 96.1% of taxes extended were distributed to the Village Tax Year 2013: 99.3% of taxes extended were distributed to the Village

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Where Property Taxes Go

Elementary School District Consolidated High School Village of Other (Cook, Libr., (Avg. of Districts 125,126, & 130) District 218 Alsip Park D, MWRD, etc.)

39.7¢ 29.7¢ 13.4¢ 17.1¢

slide-4
SLIDE 4

FY15 Audit Results

 General Fund actual revenues were $746,597 or 3.9% higher than

budgeted.

 General Fund actual expenditures were $736,112 or 3.7% lower

than originally budgeted.

 The General Fund had a positive net change of $1,258,101, leading

to a strong $12,357,238 fund balance. The unassigned fund balance

  • f $10,119,323 is 54% of operating expenditures. (A large portion of

this unassigned fund balance will go into an OPEB trust fund.)

 Road and Bridge had a positive net change in fund balance of

$278,661. Without loan proceeds of $940,000, the change in fund balance was a negative $661,339. The fund balance is $1,262,983.

 Water and Sewer had a negative change in net position of

($1,822,125), and is down to an unrestricted fund balance of $953,967.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Governmental Activities Revenue $25.6 million

Other Taxes include sales taxes, state income tax (LGDF), fuel, and real estate transfer taxes Property taxes totaled $9.87 million, a 5.9% increase from the prior year.

Charges for Service 15.0% Operating & Capital Grants 0.3% Property Taxes 38.5% Other Taxes 43.4% Other 2.8%

Governmental Activities - Revenue FY15

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Governmental Activities Expenses $25.3 million

General Government 14.9% Public Safety 62.2% Road & Bridge 13.1% Building 1.9% Health & Welfare 5.2% Interest 1.4% Capital projects 1.4%

Governmental Activities-Expenses FY15

slide-7
SLIDE 7

FY16 (Current) Budget Highlights

General Fund Road & Bridge Motor Fuel Tax Water & Sewer Heritage I Heritage II

  • Est. Revenue

17,433,210 2,165,750 545,203 10,123,500 1,430,100 3,258,600 Appropriation

  • 18,171,023 -3,510,110
  • 1,138,786 -10,513,993 -1,693,821 -3,396,183

Gain/(Loss) $ (737,813) $ (1,344,360) $ (593,583) $ (390,493) $ (263,721) $ (137,583)

 Almost all major operating funds showed deficit budgets in at

least the last four fiscal years’ appropriation ordinances passed

 Factors that contributed to these deficits are:

 Revenues are usually projected conservatively  Authorized expenditures are not all made in a fiscal year  Sometimes fund balances are spent down for planned capital projects,

such as FY16 Mather Ave. & the Heritage I & II resurfacing projects

 Property taxes for the General Fund (Corporate levy) and the R&B

Fund have not keep up with costs (as seen on subsequent slides)

 Stagnant vehicle sticker prices have not kept up with R&B Fund costs

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Bond and Interest Levy

Bond Series Original Par Amount Due FY16 Levy Amount FY16 Funding Source 2005B Bond (Refi 1999 & 2000) $2,425,000.00 $273,752.50 $150,564.00 Water Fund 45% Tax Levy 55% 2007 Bond (Partially Defeased) $6,825,000.00 (Original Amt) $253,685.00 $0.00 Water Fund 100% 2009A Bond $7,815,000.00 $704,015.00 $0.00 Road & Bridge 50% Heritage II 50% 2010 Bond (Refi 2001 & 2001A) $3,550,000.00 $594,850.00 $594,850.00 Tax Levy 100% 2015 Bond (Refi 2003 & Partially Adv. Refi 2007) $6,685,000.00 $458,823.90 $48,307.00 Heritage I 41.8% Heritage II 10.6% Water Fund 37.0% Tax Levy 10.5% TOTAL $2,285,126.40 $793,721.00

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Actuarial Assumptions

 Actuarially Recommended Tax Levy

 Reflects required practice for accounting standards  Reflects Entry Age Normal funding; 19-year amortization (100% by

2033); Smoothed market (5-year avg. market value); a custom mortality table combining IDOI data and the RP 2000 blue collar tables (new); 7.0% Investment returns; Individual payroll increases of 4-11% (a declining service based payroll scale) and a total payroll increase of 3.50% (new). Changes in these assumptions this year increased the unfunded liabilities and the recommended levy.

 Department of Insurance

 Projected Unit Cost (PUC) is a minimum funding method required

per Illinois statute that does not reflect audit standards. The Village continues to exceed these requirements.

 PUC funding method; 90% funded by FY 2040; Smoothed market; RP

2000 Mortality table; Interest Rate 6.75%; Payroll increase 4.5%

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Actuary Police & Fire Pension Funds

 Highlights from Actuary on Pension Funds:

POLICE PENSION FIRE PENSION Approximate Rate of Investment Returns Ending 4/30/2015

6.9%

(LY 9.1%)

7.6%

(LY 9.3%)

Percent Funded for Period Ending 4/30/2015

35.7%

(LY 36.7%)

54.8%

(LY 58.1%)

Actuarial Report’s Levy Requirement (w/o reserve)

$2,990,818

(28.2% More Than LY’s $2,333,349)

$1,964,649

(27.7% Larger Than LY’s $1,538,355)

Actual Amount of 2015 Tax Year Levy (w/o reserve)

$2,450,000 (5.0% More Than LY’s $2,333,349) $1,615,200 (5.0% Larger Than LY’s $1,538,355)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Pension Levies: Tax Years 2011-2015

Fund (Includes Reserves) Tax Year 2015 Increase Tax Years 2011- 2015 Overall Increase Tax Year 2015 Actuarially Determined Contribution Increase Tax Years 2011-2014 Actuarially Determined Contribution Increase Police Pension 5.0% 41.6% 28.2% 72.8% Fire Pension 5.0% 32.0% 27.7% 60.6%

 Due to the rapid increase in the public safety funds’ actuarially determined

Annual Required Contributions (ARCs), for the first time in many years the Village will not bring in enough property taxes to make the ARCs. The above table shows what will be levied and what should have been levied for the

  • ARC. The combined unfunded liability now stands at $51.8 million.

 A similar levy cannot not exist for the

Village’s retirees’ healthcare liability. That $43.7 million unfunded healthcare liability is growing by around $1.65 million per year. Continued unchecked, it will likely see growth rates larger than the pension levies’ growth rates shown above, putting even more financial pressure on the General Fund, the Road & Bridge Fund, and the Water & Sewer Fund.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Pension Levies’ Effect On Other Funds

 The increasing police and fire pension levies have

consumed the other levies putting significant financial pressure on Village operations. OPEB debt payments will follow this trend.

 In the preceding three levies, the Corporate levy had

increased a total (not annual) of less than 3%, the Road & Bridge levy had actually declined by almost 3%, and the Bonds & Interest levy had increased by 0.7%.

 More recently, last year’s Corporate levy decreased 0.78%

while the Road & Bridge levy was flat.

 These increases are significantly lower than wage &

benefit increases during that period.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Property Tax Year 2015 Levy Summary

 The Village’s 2015 property tax levy was discussed at the

publically open Finance Committee meetings on November 24, 2015 and November 30, 2015.

 The Village Board voted unanimously to determine an

aggregate levy 5.00% more than the Village’s 2014 levy at a special Village Board meeting on November 30, 2015.

 A 5.00% increase will bring in approximately $450,000.  Example: For an Alsip homeowner paying $5,000 a year

in property taxes, the increase would be $2.80 per month. $2.80/mo. = ($5,000/yr. )(yr./12 mo.)(13.42% of bill)(5.00%)

 The levy must be voted on by the Board and submitted to

Cook County by the last Tuesday every December.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Board Determined 5.0% 2015 Tax Levy

The 2014 levy shows the Board intention of having a 3% loss amount in the police and fire pension fund levies, although this was actually levied by the Board in the corporate levy and moved to “top off” the pension levies. Levy Tax Year 2015 Tax Year 2014 Tax Year 2013 Tax Year 2012 Corporate $ 3,791,290.00 $ 3,655,000.00 $ 3,683,868.00 $ 3,625,000.00 3% Loss Amount $ 113,738.00 $ - $ - $ - Road & Bridge $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 $ 500,000.00 3% Loss Amount $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 Fire Pension $ 1,615,200.00 $ 1,538,355.00 $ 1,480,436.00 $ 1,319,515.00 3% Loss Amount $ 48,456.00 $ 46,150.64 $ - $ - Police Pension $ 2,450,000.00 $ 2,333,349.00 $ 2,148,485.00 $ 1,955,290.00 3% Loss Amount $ 73,500.00 $ 70,000.47 $ - $ - Bonds & Interest (B&I) $ 793,721.00 $ 793,546.00 $ 861,101.00 $ 859,027.00 5 % Loss Amount $ 39,686.00 $ 39,677.30 $ 43,055.00 $ 42,951.00 Aggregate Levy (no B&I) $ 8,607,184.00 $ 8,157,855.11 $ 7,827,789.00 $ 7,414,805.00 Levy w/o Loss Amount $ 9,150,211.00 $ 8,820,250.00 $ 8,673,890.00 $ 8,258,832.00 Total Extended Levy $ 9,440,591.00 $ 8,991,078.41 $ 8,731,945.00 $ 8,316,783.00 % Increase 5.00% 2.97% 4.99% 4.59%