the u s oil gas renaissance alaska s role
play

The U.S. Oil & Gas Renaissance Alaskas Role Resource - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The U.S. Oil & Gas Renaissance Alaskas Role Resource Development Council Remarks by Ryan Lance June 24, 2014 Cautionary Statement The following presentation includes forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future


  1. The U.S. Oil & Gas Renaissance – Alaska’s Role Resource Development Council Remarks by Ryan Lance June 24, 2014

  2. Cautionary Statement The following presentation includes forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events, such as anticipated revenues, earnings, business strategies, competitive position or other aspects of our operations, operating results or the industries or markets in which we operate or participate in general. Actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecast in such forward- looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that may prove to be incorrect and are difficult to predict such as oil and gas prices; operational hazards and drilling risks; potential failure to achieve, and potential delays in achieving expected reserves or production levels from existing and future oil and gas development projects; unsuccessful exploratory activities; unexpected cost increases or technical difficulties in constructing, maintaining or modifying company facilities; international monetary conditions and exchange controls; potential liability for remedial actions under existing or future environmental regulations or from pending or future litigation; limited access to capital or significantly higher cost of capital related to illiquidity or uncertainty in the domestic or international financial markets; general domestic and international economic and political conditions, as well as changes in tax, environmental and other laws applicable to ConocoPhillips’ business and other economic, business, competitive and/or regulatory factors affecting ConocoPhillips’ business generally as set forth in ConocoPhillips’ filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We caution you not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which are only as of the date of this presentation or as otherwise indicated, and we expressly disclaim any responsibility for updating such information. Use of non-GAAP financial information – This presentation may include non-GAAP financial measures, which help facilitate comparison of company operating performance across periods and with peer companies. Any non-GAAP measures included herein will be accompanied by a reconciliation to the nearest corresponding GAAP measure on our website at www.conocophillips.com/nongaap . Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors – The SEC permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved, probable and possible reserves. We use the term "resource" in this presentation that the SEC’s guidelines prohibit us from including in filings with the SEC. U.S. investors are urged to consider closely the oil and gas disclosures in our Form 10-K and other reports and filings with the SEC. Copies are available from the SEC and from the ConocoPhillips website.

  3. North American Shale Plays Source: U.S. Department of Energy, EIA 3

  4. North America Has New Abundance of Low-Cost Natural Gas North America Production versus Demand 120 U.S. & Canada Demand 100 Billion Cubic Feet per Day 80 Shale Production 60 40 Non-Shale Production 20 0 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 Shale % of 54% 2.5% 20% 43% 52% Production Rising shale gas production will soon enable LNG exports Source: Wood Mackenzie Source: U.S. Department of Energy, EIA, Annual Energy Outlooks 4

  5. U.S. LNG Import / (Export) Projections Historical U.S. Department of Energy Projections 20 2005 15 2007 Net Importer 10 BCFd 2008 5 2010 0 2013 Net Exporter (5) 2014 (10) 2010 2015 2020 2025 U.S. is poised to become a net LNG exporter Source: U.S. Dept. of Energy, Energy Information Administration 5

  6. Global Natural Gas Prices 20 Japan LNG 18 16 14 Nominal $/MMbtu 12 10 U.K. Spot 8 6 4 U.S. 2 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Wide divergence between pricing in major markets Source: Bloomberg 6

  7. Global LNG Supply/Demand 800 102 Tighter Market More Competition  Rising pipe and LNG supply competition beyond 2018 with some constraints Announced 76 600 Projects  Significant base decline Lacking Market  Slippage of projects under way MTPA BCFd 51 400 Expected  Announced LNG projects have Projects substantial execution risks: Committed  Reservoir and technical 25 200  Partner and government alignment  Experience and alignment of participants Existing  Sales  Substantial cost inflation 0 0  Other above-ground factors 2012 2016 2020 2024 LNG demand grows rapidly, enabled by increasing supply. High project risks act as barrier to entry and keep market relatively balanced. Source: ConocoPhillips 7

  8. Proposed Natural Gas Liquefaction & Export Projects  ~40 export terminals have filed with authorities* in North America  In the U.S., DOE has permitted 6 projects or ~9 BCFD for non-Free Trade Agreement exports to date  Sabine Pass is the only project under construction  Global LNG demand and competing supplies will restrict the number of projects built >400 MTPA (52 BCFD) of potential exports filed with authorities 8 *Filed with U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or Canada National Energy Board 8

  9. The Shale Revolution Has Spread to Liquids U.S. Crude, Condensate and Natural Gas Liquids Production Department of Energy Forecast High Side 14 Expert Range 12 "Peak Oil" Million Barrels per Day 10 U.S. Tight Oil 8 D.O.E. Forecast 6 Conventional Production 4 Alaska Crude 2 NGLs 0 Liquids production is increasing toward a new record Source: U.S. Department of Energy, EIA, Annual Energy Review 2013, Table 5.1b. Forecast from EIA Annual Energy Outlook 2014 9

  10. U.S. Oil Production: Texas and North Dakota Lead the Way Top 5 U.S. Oil Producing States (million barrels per day) 3.0 2.5 Texas (Eagle Ford NGL & Permian 2.0 Basin) 1.5 Oil 1.0 California (crude & condensate) Alaska 0.5 North Dakota (Bakken) Oklahoma 0.0 1981 1989 1997 2005 2013 Source: U.S. Department of Energy EIA, as of 4/1/2014 11

  11. The North Slope Story  Legacy fields (Prudhoe and Alaska Fraction of Total US Oil Production Kuparuk) made Alaska a major 30% crude oil producer 25% 20%  Enhanced oil recovery & other 15% cutting-edge technologies help 10% maximize rate & recovery 5%  As legacy fields declined, space 0% 1973 1978 1983 1988 1993 1998 2003 2008 2013 became available for developing new fields Kuparuk – Improving Base Production  Investment in new production minimal during ACES  Improved investment climate now leading to renewed North Slope investment Source: U.S. Department of Energy EIA and ConocoPhillips 12

  12. “ELF” Tax Period Encouraged Significant New Production New Field Production Under ELF New Field Production Under ELF 300,000 250,000 18 new fields developed, adding over 250,000 BOD 200,000 Barrels per Day to TAPS 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Alaska Production Total Alaska Production 2.5 2.0 Million Barrels per Day 1.5 1.0 Led to several-year flattening of 0.5 production despite low oil prices 0.0 1981 1989 1997 2005 2013 Sources: Alaska Department of Natural Resources and U.S. Department of Energy EIA 13

  13. Can Alaska’s North Slope Rebound? CD5 Construction Activities  Best opportunities are in legacy fields  28 BBls of light & viscous oil resources remain  32 TCF of natural gas resources  Technology will play a role  SB 21, the More Alaska Production Act, is working  Encouraging new investment  Setting the stage for a world-class LNG project 14

  14. Since SB 21 Passed, ConocoPhillips Has Taken Action  Increased Capital Spending  2014 Alaska capital budget is $1.7 billion, up 50% from 2013  That’s double our average from 2008- 2012  Added two rigs to Kuparuk rig fleet  Announced ~$2 Billion in New Projects  Drill site at Kuparuk (DS 2S) – Targeting approval late 2014  Development in NPRA (GMT 1) – Targeting approval late 2014  Viscous oil development in Kuparuk (1H NEWS) – Targeting approval late 2014  Hundreds of direct & indirect jobs during construction  Potential to add 40,000+ BOPD of new oil in 2018  AKLNG Project moving forward – State & industry working together Alaska is Moving in the Right Direction 15

  15. The U.S. Oil & Gas Renaissance – Alaska’s Role Resource Development Council Remarks by Ryan Lance June 24, 2014

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend