INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
The Subtree Polynomial Lucas Mol Joint work with Jason Brown - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
The Subtree Polynomial Lucas Mol Joint work with Jason Brown - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
I NTRODUCTION C OUNTING S UBTREES C OMPLEX S UBTREE R OOTS R EAL S UBTREE R OOTS O PEN P ROBLEMS The Subtree Polynomial Lucas Mol Joint work with Jason Brown (Dalhousie University) CanaDAM 2019 Graph Polynomials Minisymposium I NTRODUCTION C
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
PLAN
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
PLAN
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
THE SUBTREE POLYNOMIAL
Let T be a tree (or forest), and let S be the collection of all subtrees (connected subgraphs) of T.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
THE SUBTREE POLYNOMIAL
Let T be a tree (or forest), and let S be the collection of all subtrees (connected subgraphs) of T. ◮ Define the subtree polynomial of T by ΦT(x) =
n
- S∈S
x|V(S)|.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
THE SUBTREE POLYNOMIAL
Let T be a tree (or forest), and let S be the collection of all subtrees (connected subgraphs) of T. ◮ Define the subtree polynomial of T by ΦT(x) =
n
- S∈S
x|V(S)|. ◮ Alternatively, ΦT(x) =
n
- k=1
sk(T)xk, where sk(T) is the number of subtrees of T of order k.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T: ΦT(x) =
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T: ΦT(x) = 5x
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T: ΦT(x) = 5x + 4x2
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T: ΦT(x) = 5x + 4x2 + 4x3
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T: ΦT(x) = 5x + 4x2 + 4x3 + 3x4
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T: ΦT(x) = 5x + 4x2 + 4x3 + 3x4 + x5
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
GRAPH PARAMETERS ENCODED
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
GRAPH PARAMETERS ENCODED
◮ ΦT(1) is the number of subtrees of T.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
GRAPH PARAMETERS ENCODED
◮ ΦT(1) is the number of subtrees of T.
◮ An important topological index, inversely correlated to the Wiener index.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
GRAPH PARAMETERS ENCODED
◮ ΦT(1) is the number of subtrees of T.
◮ An important topological index, inversely correlated to the Wiener index.
◮ The quantity MT = Φ′
T(1)
ΦT(1) is the mean subtree order of T.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
GRAPH PARAMETERS ENCODED
◮ ΦT(1) is the number of subtrees of T.
◮ An important topological index, inversely correlated to the Wiener index.
◮ The quantity MT = Φ′
T(1)
ΦT(1) is the mean subtree order of T.
◮ First studied by Jamison.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
GRAPH PARAMETERS ENCODED
◮ ΦT(1) is the number of subtrees of T.
◮ An important topological index, inversely correlated to the Wiener index.
◮ The quantity MT = Φ′
T(1)
ΦT(1) is the mean subtree order of T.
◮ First studied by Jamison.
◮ Less obvious: −ΦT(−1) is the independence number of T (Jamsion, 1987).
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
THE LOCAL SUBTREE POLYNOMIAL
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
THE LOCAL SUBTREE POLYNOMIAL
Let T be a tree with vertex v, and let Sv be the collection of subtrees of T containing v.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
THE LOCAL SUBTREE POLYNOMIAL
Let T be a tree with vertex v, and let Sv be the collection of subtrees of T containing v. ◮ The local subtree polynomial of T at v is given by ΦT,v(x) =
- S∈Sv
x|V(S)|.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
THE LOCAL SUBTREE POLYNOMIAL
Let T be a tree with vertex v, and let Sv be the collection of subtrees of T containing v. ◮ The local subtree polynomial of T at v is given by ΦT,v(x) =
- S∈Sv
x|V(S)|. Evidently, we have: ΦT(x) = ΦT,v(x) + ΦT−v(x).
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T with vertex v: v ΦT,v(x) =
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T with vertex v: v ΦT,v(x) = x
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T with vertex v: v ΦT,v(x) = x + x2
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T with vertex v: v ΦT,v(x) = x + x2 + 2x3
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T with vertex v: v ΦT,v(x) = x + x2 + 2x3 + 2x4
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T with vertex v: v ΦT,v(x) = x + x2 + 2x3 + 2x4 + x5
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T with vertex v: v ΦT,v(x) = x + x2 + 2x3 + 2x4 + x5 ΦT−v(x) = 4x + 3x2 + 2x3 + x4
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
AN EXAMPLE
Consider the following tree T with vertex v: v ΦT,v(x) = x + x2 + 2x3 + 2x4 + x5 ΦT−v(x) = 4x + 3x2 + 2x3 + x4 Notice: Many of the “large” subtrees of T contain v, while many
- f the “small” subtrees of T do not contain v.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
PLAN
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
COUNTING SUBTREES
◮ Let sk(T) denote the number of subtrees of T of order k, i.e., ΦT(x) =
n
- k=1
sk(T)xk.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
COUNTING SUBTREES
◮ Let sk(T) denote the number of subtrees of T of order k, i.e., ΦT(x) =
n
- k=1
sk(T)xk. ◮ Among all trees of order n, the star has the largest number
- f subtrees, while the path has the smallest number of
subtrees.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
COUNTING SUBTREES
◮ Let sk(T) denote the number of subtrees of T of order k, i.e., ΦT(x) =
n
- k=1
sk(T)xk. ◮ Among all trees of order n, the star has the largest number
- f subtrees, while the path has the smallest number of
subtrees. ◮ In fact, Jamison demonstrated that for any tree T of order n ≥ 5 not isomorphic to Pn or K1,n−1, sk (Pn) < sk(T) < sk
- K1,n−1
- for all 3 ≤ k ≤ n − 1.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
COUNTING SUBTREES
◮ Let sk(T) denote the number of subtrees of T of order k, i.e., ΦT(x) =
n
- k=1
sk(T)xk. ◮ Among all trees of order n, the star has the largest number
- f subtrees, while the path has the smallest number of
subtrees. ◮ In fact, Jamison demonstrated that for any tree T of order n ≥ 5 not isomorphic to Pn or K1,n−1, sk (Pn) < sk(T) < sk
- K1,n−1
- for all 3 ≤ k ≤ n − 1.
◮ We give a short proof of this result.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
CSIKV´
ARI’S GENERALIZED TREE SHIFT
Let T be a tree, and let v1 and v2 be non-leaf vertices of T connected by a path whose internal vertices all have degree 2.
T1 T2 q v1 v2
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
CSIKV´
ARI’S GENERALIZED TREE SHIFT
Let T be a tree, and let v1 and v2 be non-leaf vertices of T connected by a path whose internal vertices all have degree 2.
T1 T2 q v1 v2
The following tree T ′ is said to be obtained from T by a generalized tree shift:
T1 T2 q + 1
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A POSET
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A POSET
◮ Let Tn be the set of trees
- f order n.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A POSET
◮ Let Tn be the set of trees
- f order n.
◮ Say T T ′ if T ′ can be
- btained from T by a
sequence of generalized tree shifts.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A POSET
◮ Let Tn be the set of trees
- f order n.
◮ Say T T ′ if T ′ can be
- btained from T by a
sequence of generalized tree shifts. ◮ is a partial order on Tn.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A POSET
◮ Let Tn be the set of trees
- f order n.
◮ Say T T ′ if T ′ can be
- btained from T by a
sequence of generalized tree shifts. ◮ is a partial order on Tn. ◮ The path Pn is the minimum element, and the star K1,n−1 is the maximum element.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A POSET
◮ Let Tn be the set of trees
- f order n.
◮ Say T T ′ if T ′ can be
- btained from T by a
sequence of generalized tree shifts. ◮ is a partial order on Tn. ◮ The path Pn is the minimum element, and the star K1,n−1 is the maximum element.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
Theorem: Let T be a tree of order n ≥ 4, and let T ′ be a tree
- btained from T by a generalized tree shift. For every
k ∈ {3, . . . , n − 1}, sk(T) < sk(T ′).
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
Theorem: Let T be a tree of order n ≥ 4, and let T ′ be a tree
- btained from T by a generalized tree shift. For every
k ∈ {3, . . . , n − 1}, sk(T) < sk(T ′).
T1 T2 q v1 v2
T :
T1 T2
T ′ :
q + 1
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
Theorem: Let T be a tree of order n ≥ 4, and let T ′ be a tree
- btained from T by a generalized tree shift. For every
k ∈ {3, . . . , n − 1}, sk(T) < sk(T ′).
T1 T2 q v1 v2
T :
T1 T2
T ′ :
q + 1
Sketch of Proof: Show that ΦT ′(x) − ΦT(x) = 1 x · q
- i=0
xi
- ·
- ΦT1,v1(x) − x
- ·
- ΦT2,v2(x) − x
- .
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
PLAN
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
SUBTREE ROOTS
If ΦT(z) = 0, then z ∈ C is called a subtree root of T.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
SUBTREE ROOTS
If ΦT(z) = 0, then z ∈ C is called a subtree root of T.
Re(z) Im(z)
The subtree roots of all trees of order at most 14.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
BOUNDING THE MODULUS
Theorem: Let T be a tree. If ΦT(z) = 0, then |z| ≤ 1 +
3
√ 3.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
BOUNDING THE MODULUS
Theorem: Let T be a tree. If ΦT(z) = 0, then |z| ≤ 1 +
3
√ 3. ◮ This bound is tight! The only tree with a subtree root of modulus 1 +
3
√ 3 is the star K1,3.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
Theorem: Let T be a tree. If ΦT(z) = 0, then |z| ≤ 1 +
3
√ 3.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
Theorem: Let T be a tree. If ΦT(z) = 0, then |z| ≤ 1 +
3
√ 3. Proof idea: Use the fact that ΦT(z) = ΦT,v(z) + ΦT−v(z).
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
Theorem: Let T be a tree. If ΦT(z) = 0, then |z| ≤ 1 +
3
√ 3. Proof idea: Use the fact that ΦT(z) = ΦT,v(z) + ΦT−v(z). By the reverse triangle inequality, |ΦT(z)| ≥ |ΦT,v(z)| − |ΦT−v(z)|.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
Theorem: Let T be a tree. If ΦT(z) = 0, then |z| ≤ 1 +
3
√ 3. Proof idea: Use the fact that ΦT(z) = ΦT,v(z) + ΦT−v(z). By the reverse triangle inequality, |ΦT(z)| ≥ |ΦT,v(z)| − |ΦT−v(z)|. So it suffices to show that if |z| > 1 +
3
√ 3, then |ΦT,v(z)| > |ΦT−v(z)|.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
Theorem: Let T be a tree. If ΦT(z) = 0, then |z| ≤ 1 +
3
√ 3. Proof idea: Use the fact that ΦT(z) = ΦT,v(z) + ΦT−v(z). By the reverse triangle inequality, |ΦT(z)| ≥ |ΦT,v(z)| − |ΦT−v(z)|. So it suffices to show that if |z| > 1 +
3
√ 3, then |ΦT,v(z)| > |ΦT−v(z)|. This is proven using a rather technical strong induction. The key is a good lower bound on |ΦT,v(z)|.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
Lemma: Let T be a tree of order n with vertex v. If |z| ≥ 2, then |ΦT,v(z)| ≥ |z| · (|z| − 1)n−1 .
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
Lemma: Let T be a tree of order n with vertex v. If |z| ≥ 2, then |ΦT,v(z)| ≥ |z| · (|z| − 1)n−1 . Key ingredient of proof:
v v1 v2 vk
T2 T1 Tk . . .
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
Lemma: Let T be a tree of order n with vertex v. If |z| ≥ 2, then |ΦT,v(z)| ≥ |z| · (|z| − 1)n−1 . Key ingredient of proof:
v v1 v2 vk
T2 T1 Tk . . . ΦT,v(z) = z ·
k
- i=1
- 1 + ΦTi,vi(z)
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
PLAN
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
REAL SUBTREE ROOTS
◮ The subtree polynomial has positive coefficients
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
REAL SUBTREE ROOTS
◮ The subtree polynomial has positive coefficients
◮ ⇒ no subtree roots in (0, ∞)
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
REAL SUBTREE ROOTS
◮ The subtree polynomial has positive coefficients
◮ ⇒ no subtree roots in (0, ∞)
◮ The subtree polynomial has no complex roots of modulus greater than 1 +
3
√ 3
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
REAL SUBTREE ROOTS
◮ The subtree polynomial has positive coefficients
◮ ⇒ no subtree roots in (0, ∞)
◮ The subtree polynomial has no complex roots of modulus greater than 1 +
3
√ 3
◮ ⇒ no subtree roots in
- −∞, −1 −
3
√ 3
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
REAL SUBTREE ROOTS
◮ The subtree polynomial has positive coefficients
◮ ⇒ no subtree roots in (0, ∞)
◮ The subtree polynomial has no complex roots of modulus greater than 1 +
3
√ 3
◮ ⇒ no subtree roots in
- −∞, −1 −
3
√ 3
- ◮ Question: What about the interval (−1 −
3
√ 3, 0)?
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A ROOT-FREE SUBINTERVAL
Theorem: No tree has a subtree root in the interval [−1, 0).
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A ROOT-FREE SUBINTERVAL
Theorem: No tree has a subtree root in the interval [−1, 0). Sketch of Proof:
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A ROOT-FREE SUBINTERVAL
Theorem: No tree has a subtree root in the interval [−1, 0). Sketch of Proof: Let T be a tree.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A ROOT-FREE SUBINTERVAL
Theorem: No tree has a subtree root in the interval [−1, 0). Sketch of Proof: Let T be a tree. ◮ Claim: Φ′
T(x) > 0 for all x ∈ (−1, 0).
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A ROOT-FREE SUBINTERVAL
Theorem: No tree has a subtree root in the interval [−1, 0). Sketch of Proof: Let T be a tree. ◮ Claim: Φ′
T(x) > 0 for all x ∈ (−1, 0).
◮ Since ΦT(0) = 0, the fact that ΦT(x) < 0 for x ∈ [−1, 0) follows by MVT.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A ROOT-FREE SUBINTERVAL
Theorem: No tree has a subtree root in the interval [−1, 0). Sketch of Proof: Let T be a tree. ◮ Claim: Φ′
T(x) > 0 for all x ∈ (−1, 0).
◮ Since ΦT(0) = 0, the fact that ΦT(x) < 0 for x ∈ [−1, 0) follows by MVT. ◮ Useful identity: xΦ′
T(x) =
- v∈V(T)
ΦT,v(x)
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A ROOT-FREE SUBINTERVAL
Theorem: No tree has a subtree root in the interval [−1, 0). Sketch of Proof: Let T be a tree. ◮ Claim: Φ′
T(x) > 0 for all x ∈ (−1, 0).
◮ Since ΦT(0) = 0, the fact that ΦT(x) < 0 for x ∈ [−1, 0) follows by MVT. ◮ Useful identity: xΦ′
T(x) =
- v∈V(T)
ΦT,v(x) ◮ Claim: ∀v ∈ V(T), x ∈ (−1, 0) ⇒ ΦT,v(x) ∈ (−1, 0).
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A ROOT-FREE SUBINTERVAL
Theorem: No tree has a subtree root in the interval [−1, 0). Sketch of Proof: Let T be a tree. ◮ Claim: Φ′
T(x) > 0 for all x ∈ (−1, 0).
◮ Since ΦT(0) = 0, the fact that ΦT(x) < 0 for x ∈ [−1, 0) follows by MVT. ◮ Useful identity: xΦ′
T(x) =
- v∈V(T)
ΦT,v(x) ◮ Claim: ∀v ∈ V(T), x ∈ (−1, 0) ⇒ ΦT,v(x) ∈ (−1, 0). ◮ Claim is proved using induction and the nice recursive formula for ΦT,v(x): ΦT,v(x) = x ·
k
- i=1
- 1 + ΦTi,vi(x)
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A ROOT-DENSE SUBINTERVAL
Theorem: The closure of the collection of all real subtree roots contains the interval [−2, −1].
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
A ROOT-DENSE SUBINTERVAL
Theorem: The closure of the collection of all real subtree roots contains the interval [−2, −1]. Proof technique: We show that the collection of real subtree roots of the following family of trees is dense in [−2, −1]:
a b
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
PLAN
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
OPEN PROBLEMS
Find a tighter bound on the subtree roots of all trees of order n.
Re(z) Im(z)
Our bound: 1 +
3
√ 3
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
OPEN PROBLEMS
Find a tighter bound on the subtree roots of all trees of order n.
Re(z) Im(z)
Our bound: 1 +
3
√ 3 Conjectured bound: 1 +
n−1
√ n − 1
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
OPEN PROBLEMS
Find a tighter bound on the subtree roots of all trees of order n.
Re(z) Im(z)
Our bound: 1 +
3
√ 3 Conjectured bound: 1 +
n−1
√ n − 1 A stronger conjecture
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
CLOSURE
Does the closure of the collection of subtree roots contain the entire annulus 1
2 ≤
- z + 1
2
- ≤ 3
2?
Re(z) Im(z)
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
OPEN PROBLEMS
◮ Consider “subtrees” of graphs.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
OPEN PROBLEMS
◮ Consider “subtrees” of graphs.
◮ Roots of the subtree polynomial still appear to be bounded in modulus by 1 +
3
√ 3.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
OPEN PROBLEMS
◮ Consider “subtrees” of graphs.
◮ Roots of the subtree polynomial still appear to be bounded in modulus by 1 +
3
√ 3.
Re(z) Im(z)
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
OPEN PROBLEMS
A question of Jamison:
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
OPEN PROBLEMS
A question of Jamison: ◮ For which trees is the sequence of coefficients s2(T), s3(T), . . . , sn(T) unimodal?
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
OPEN PROBLEMS
A question of Jamison: ◮ For which trees is the sequence of coefficients s2(T), s3(T), . . . , sn(T) unimodal? ◮ In particular, is this sequence unimodal when T has no vertices of degree 2?
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS
OPEN PROBLEMS
A question of Jamison: ◮ For which trees is the sequence of coefficients s2(T), s3(T), . . . , sn(T) unimodal? ◮ In particular, is this sequence unimodal when T has no vertices of degree 2?
◮ Fact: This sequence is NOT log-concave for all such trees.
INTRODUCTION COUNTING SUBTREES COMPLEX SUBTREE ROOTS REAL SUBTREE ROOTS OPEN PROBLEMS