The Subprime Crisis: Lessons about Market Discipline Mark J. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Subprime Crisis: Lessons about Market Discipline

Mark J. Flannery

University of Florida

Eleventh International Banking Conference, “The Credit Market Turmoil of 2007–08: Implications for Public Policy”, sponsored by the European Central Bank and the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. September 25-26, 2008.

Outline

• 1. What happened?
• 2. Market Discipline defined
• 3. Lessons
• a. For market “monitoring”
• b. For market “influence”
• 4. Reforms
• 5. Is the concept of market discipline dead?

2

What happened?

Growing volume of subprime loans Many securitized and tranched:

–“better than Aaa returns” –little recourse to underwriters

Default risks highly correlated with housing prices

3

Were these underwriting and securitization arrangements fundamentally flawed?

“An economist sees something work in practice and wonders if it can work in theory.”

To assess market discipline, we need to decide:

• 1. Were these loans reasonable investments,

ex ante? Or should “influence” have prevented them?

• 2. Why did investors purchase securitizations

when arrangers had so little skin in the game?

• 3. Did market prices reflect risks? Value?
• 4. How did the rating agencies affect other

market participants’ actions?

5

Market Discipline Defined

What is it? Use market information and investor pressure to help control risk-taking in financial firms.

• 1. Monitoring

a) prices of stock, bonds b) quantities of debt available

• 2. Influence

a) Direct b) Indirect

6

Pros and Cons of Market Discipline

Market monitoring reflects firm condition

– own money – forward looking, use more creating methods

Market influence can occur quickly

– Legal/administrative restrictions

But, is transparency enhanced by supervisors’ private information?

Use market information to induce speedier problem resolutions. (E.g. Bliss (2001)).

7

An Ideal Market Discipline Scorecard

Monitoring Influence Loan

• riginations

Loan sales to

• ther investors

Ratings Reaction to losses

8

“Monitoring”: did market prices provide advance warning? Represent financial sector equity with four Fidelity “sector funds”

– Brokers – Financial Services – Insurance – Banking

Not a true return series …

9

Monthly Sub-Index Values, rel. to Apr. 1988

5 10 15 20 25 Apr-88 Apr-90 Apr-92 Apr-94 Apr-96 Apr-98 Apr-00 Apr-02 Apr-04 Apr-06 Apr-08 Brokers Fin Svcs Insurance Banks

10

Financial Index, SP500, rel. to Apr. 1988

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 Jan-03 Jan-04 Jan-05 Jan-06 Jan-07 Jan-08 Fin Index SP500

11

Financial Index, SP500, rel. to Apr. 1988

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Jan-05 Apr-05 Jul-05 Oct-05 Jan-06 Apr-06 Jul-06 Oct-06 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Fin Index SP500

12

CDM3 - TBM3 (% points)

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 1/3/1997 1/3/1998 1/3/1999 1/3/2000 1/3/2001 1/3/2002 1/3/2003 1/3/2004 1/3/2005 1/3/2006 1/3/2007 1/3/2008

13

14

Market Discipline Scorecard

Monitoring Influence Loan

• riginations

Loan sales to

• ther investors

Ratings Reaction to losses

15

What went wrong with security prices?

Unusual(!) opaqueness Before the crisis started Since Prominent role of asymmetric information and risk aversion Akerlof doesn’t talk about the people who don’t buy/sell a used car.

16

“Influencing” Originations and Sales

Effective “free markets” require that

– Employees can be induced to function for the good of the firm. – Firms earn reputations that affect future business.

But these things did not always occur in subprime

– Poor incentives for underwriters – Bonuses based on getting deals done – Investment managers bought pools without sufficient due diligence

17

Market Discipline Scorecard

Monitoring Influence Loan

• riginations

Loan sales to

• ther investors

Ratings Reaction to losses

18

Rating Agencies (NRSROs) (#1

• f 3)

Acting as monitors: report quality to investors. Acting as influencers: change nature of the security (or bank’s asset portfolio risk) to attain the issuer’s desired rating. SEC Report (7/8/08): “issuer pays” conflict “may be exacerbated” for RMBS, CDOs The volume of new business may have trampled the PV of reputational rents.

19

Rating Agencies (#2 of 3)

Did the rating agencies make An honest mistake in their models? A self-serving attempt to maximize market share? failure of market influence. Slow revisions to their models, as new data arrived? failure of market influence.

20

Rating Agencies (#3 of 3)

Moody’s EVP and director of Corporate Department: by using securities ratings as a tool of regulation, governments fundamentally change the nature of the product agencies

• sell. Issuers pay ratings fees to purchase . .

. a license from the government . . if present trends of regulatory use of ratings are not arrested, the credibility and integrity

• f the ratings system itself will inevitably be
• eroded. (McGuire (1995), italics added for

emphasis).

21

Market Discipline Scorecard

Monitoring Influence Loan

• riginations

Loan sales to

• ther investors

Ratings Reaction to losses

22

Re-Capitalization

This week: $8 billion to Morgan Stanley, $5 billion to Goldman Sachs. $ 138 bill. $ 162 bill. US: $ 266 bill. $ 381 bill. World: New Capital Losses Through May 2008

Next Steps

• 1. Remove some of the opacity from OTC

settlements

• 2. Set the rules: Federal Reserve revisions

to Reg Z (July 2008)

• 3. Strengthen Pillar II

24

The verdict on market discipline seems pretty negative

But who did better? “Good information” perfect foresight Different expectations: in the midst of a bubble, who’s expectations should influence prices? The arguments for market information remain – but the moral hazard will reduce bond info. Rely more on stockprices.

25

A statesman addressing the House of Commons in 1947 said: No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed, it has been said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.

26

“No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-

• wise. Indeed, it has been

said that democracy is the worst form of government except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.”

27